nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

15. Lessons from the Study

verfasst von : Poul Erik Mouritzen, Niels Opstrup

Erschienen in: Performance Management at Universities

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The practical and theoretical lessons from the study are summarized in this chapter. What can policymakers learn from the Danish case? The paradoxes and contradictory goals that may arise when a performance-based research funding system such as the BRI is introduced are discussed. The second set of lessons is those relevant for university management, in particular related to the problems of using systems like the Bibliometric Research Indicator vis-à-vis individuals. The chapter concludes with a short discussion of lessons for future research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Havoc or Heaven?

Aagaard, Kaare 2018. “Performance-Based Research Funding in Denmark: The Adoption and Translation of the Norwegian Model”. Journal of Data and Information Science 3(4): 19–29.CrossRef

Emmeche, Claus. 2009. “Mareridt, damage control eller forskningsrelevante kvalitetskriterier?” Notat om faggruppernes forbehold overfor den bibliometriske forskningsindikator efter niveaudelingsprocessen og indtastning af tidskriftlisterne pr. 15/9-2009. https://static-curis.ku.dk/portal/files/198723628/Faggruppernes_forbehold_v3.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2019.

Esarey, Justin. 2017. “Does Peer Review Identify the Best Papers? A Simulation Study of Editors, Reviewers, and the Scientific Publication Process”. PS: Political Science & Politics 50(4): 963–969.

Gläser, Jochen, and Grit Laudel. 2016. “Governing Science. How Science Policy Shapes Research Content”. European Journal of Sociology 57(1): 117–168.CrossRef

Gläser, Jochen, Thomas H. Spurling, and Linda Butler. 2004. “Intraorganisational Evaluation: Are There ‘Least Evaluable Units’?” Research Evaluation 13(1): 19–32.CrossRef

Mouritzen, Poul Erik, Niels Opstrup, and Pernille Bak Pedersen. 2018. En fremmed kommer til byen. Ti år med den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.

Osterloh, Margit. 2010. “Governance by Numbers. Does It Really Work in Research?” Analyse & Kritik 2: 267–283.

Osterloh, Margit, and Alfred Kieser. 2015. “Double-Blind Peer Review: How to Slaughter a Sacred Cow”, pp. 307–325 in Isabel Welpe, Jutta Wollersheim, Stefanie Ringelhan, and Margit Osterloh (Eds.) Incentives and Performance—Governance of Research Organizations. New York: Springer.

O’Toole, Laurence J. 2012. “Interorganizational Relations and Policy Implementation”, pp. 292–304 in B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.

Retningslinjer. 2017. Retningslinjer for forskningsregistrering til Den Bibliometriske Forskningsindikator. https://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator/BFIs-regler/retningslinjer_for_forskningsregistrering_til_bfi.pdf. Accessed November 21, 2017.

Sauder, Michael, and Wendy Nelson Espeland. 2009. “The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change”. American Sociological Review 74(1): 63–82.CrossRef

Sivertsen, Gunnar, and Jesper Schneider. 2012. Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. NIFU Rapport 17, 2012.

Stern, Nicholas. 2016. Building on Success and Learning from Experience. An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, London, UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-excellence-framework-review. Accessed February 1, 2019.

Weaver, R. Kent. 2015. “Getting People to Behave: Research Lessons for Policy Makers”. Public Administration Review 75(6): 806–816.CrossRef

Wouters, Paul, et al. 2015. The Metric Tide: Literature Review (Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management). HEFCE. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.5066.3520.

Titel: Lessons from the Study
verfasst von: Poul Erik Mouritzen
Niels Opstrup
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Performance Management at Universities
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21324-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-21325-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21325-1_15