Skip to main content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

16.11.2022 | Original Article

Liberal Vestiges in an Illiberal Regime: The Case of Singapore

verfasst von: Stephan Ortmann

Erschienen in: Society

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Abstract

Singapore has been called a state that has “disavowed” liberalism. However, a number of liberals have emerged who see political freedoms as essential to achieve accountable government that acts in the general interest. They draw on an institutional foundation that has been deeply shaped by liberalism while the rejection of liberalism is not based on an ideological alternative. Instead, it is portrayed as a necessity because citizens are told they need to sacrifice freedoms in exchange for economic growth and political stability due to the many vulnerabilities of a small, multi-ethnic country. Over the years, as the city-state became more developed and more secure, the government has liberalized some aspects, although often followed by greater restrictions. Two types of liberals have emerged, one seeking to change the system from the outside, the other advocating for political reform from within. However, both have been unsuccessful as the ruling party has sidelined liberal voices within the party and increasingly insists on the need for illiberal authoritarian rule.
Fußnoten
1
The “Shared Values” were (1) Nation before community and society above self, (2) Family as the basic unit of society, (3) Community support and respect for the individual, (4) Consensus, not conflict, and (5) Racial and religious harmony. (Singapore Government 1991).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Afoaku, O. G. (2000). US foreign policy and authoritarian regimes: Change and continuity in international clientelism. Journal of Third World Studies, 17(2), 13-40. Afoaku, O. G. (2000). US foreign policy and authoritarian regimes: Change and continuity in international clientelism. Journal of Third World Studies, 17(2), 13-40.
Zurück zum Zitat Barr, M. D. (2000). Lee Kuan Yew and the “Asian values” debate. Asian Studies Review, 24(3), 309-334. CrossRef Barr, M. D. (2000). Lee Kuan Yew and the “Asian values” debate. Asian Studies Review, 24(3), 309-334. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, D. (2014). What is liberalism? Political theory, 42(6), 682-715. CrossRef Bell, D. (2014). What is liberalism? Political theory, 42(6), 682-715. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, D. (2018). Stop those who speak up a ‘vocal minority’ The Straits Times, 19 May, p. A34. Chan, D. (2018). Stop those who speak up a ‘vocal minority’ The Straits Times, 19 May, p. A34.
Zurück zum Zitat Chee S.J. (1994). Dare to Change: An Alternative Vision for Singapore. Singapore: Singapore Democratic Party. Chee S.J. (1994). Dare to Change: An Alternative Vision for Singapore. Singapore: Singapore Democratic Party.
Zurück zum Zitat Chee S.J. (2001). Your Future, My Faith, Our Freedom. Singapore: Open Singapore Centre. Chee S.J. (2001). Your Future, My Faith, Our Freedom. Singapore: Open Singapore Centre.
Zurück zum Zitat Chee S.J. (2012). Democratically Speaking. Singapore: New Brick House. Chee S.J. (2012). Democratically Speaking. Singapore: New Brick House.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheong KH (2018). Anticipating our urban future: Trends, threats, and transformation. IPS-Nathan Lecture Series, 10 April. Cheong KH (2018). Anticipating our urban future: Trends, threats, and transformation. IPS-Nathan Lecture Series, 10 April.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong, J. I. (2017). Liberalisation in the Face of Existential Threat: Contemplating Political Change in Singapore from Taiwan and South Korea. In L. K. Seng, Thum P. T., & J. M.-T. Chia (Eds.). Living with Myths in Singapore (pp. 147-158). Singapore: ethos books. Chong, J. I. (2017). Liberalisation in the Face of Existential Threat: Contemplating Political Change in Singapore from Taiwan and South Korea. In L. K. Seng, Thum P. T., & J. M.-T. Chia (Eds.). Living with Myths in Singapore (pp. 147-158). Singapore: ethos books.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua BH. (2005). Liberalization without democratization: Singapore in the next decade. In FKL Wah and J Öjendal (eds) Southeast Asian responses to globalization: restructuring governance and deepening democracy (pp. 57-82) . Copenhagen: NIAS. Chua BH. (2005). Liberalization without democratization: Singapore in the next decade. In FKL Wah and J Öjendal (eds) Southeast Asian responses to globalization: restructuring governance and deepening democracy (pp. 57-82) . Copenhagen: NIAS.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua BH. (2017). Liberalism Disavowed: Communitarianism and State Capitalism in Singapore. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. CrossRef Chua BH. (2017). Liberalism Disavowed: Communitarianism and State Capitalism in Singapore. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez, M. & Loh, K. S. (2008). The Left-Wing Trade Unions in Singapore, 1945-1970. In M. Barr & C.A. Trocki (Eds.). Paths Not Taken: Political Pluralism in Post-War Singapore (pp. 206-227). Singapore: NUS Press. Fernandez, M. & Loh, K. S. (2008). The Left-Wing Trade Unions in Singapore, 1945-1970. In M. Barr & C.A. Trocki (Eds.). Paths Not Taken: Political Pluralism in Post-War Singapore (pp. 206-227). Singapore: NUS Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeden, M. & Stears M. (2013). Liberalism. In M. Freeden, L. T. Sargent, & M. Stears (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (pp. 329-347). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef Freeden, M. & Stears M. (2013). Liberalism. In M. Freeden, L. T. Sargent, & M. Stears (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (pp. 329-347). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat George, C. (2007). Consolidating authoritarian rule: Calibrated coercion in Singapore. The Pacific Review, 20(2), 127-145. CrossRef George, C. (2007). Consolidating authoritarian rule: Calibrated coercion in Singapore. The Pacific Review, 20(2), 127-145. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat George, C. (2017). Singapore, Incomplete: Reflections on a First World nation’s arrested political development. Singapore: Woodsville News. George, C. (2017). Singapore, Incomplete: Reflections on a First World nation’s arrested political development. Singapore: Woodsville News.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez, James. 2000. Self-censorship: Singapore’s shame. Singapore: Think Centre. Gomez, James. 2000. Self-censorship: Singapore’s shame. Singapore: Think Centre.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, T. (2002). The politics of civil society in Singapore. Asian Studies Review, 26(1), 97-117. CrossRef Lee, T. (2002). The politics of civil society in Singapore. Asian Studies Review, 26(1), 97-117. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lent, J. A. (1975). Protecting the people. Index on Censorship, 4(3), 7-16. CrossRef Lent, J. A. (1975). Protecting the people. Index on Censorship, 4(3), 7-16. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liow, E. D. (2012). The neoliberal-developmental state: Singapore as case study. Critical Sociology, 38(2), 241-264. CrossRef Liow, E. D. (2012). The neoliberal-developmental state: Singapore as case study. Critical Sociology, 38(2), 241-264. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Low, D. & Vadaketh, S. T. (2014). Hard Choices: Challenging the Singapore Consensus. Singapore: NUS Press. CrossRef Low, D. & Vadaketh, S. T. (2014). Hard Choices: Challenging the Singapore Consensus. Singapore: NUS Press. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta, U. S. (2018). Liberalism and empire: A study in nineteenth-century British liberal thought. University of Chicago Press. Mehta, U. S. (2018). Liberalism and empire: A study in nineteenth-century British liberal thought. University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ministry of Communications and Information and the Ministry of Law. (2018). Deliberate Online Falsehoods: Challenges and Implications. Singapore: Government Printer. https://​bit.​ly/​2ZUOEBr Ministry of Communications and Information and the Ministry of Law. (2018). Deliberate Online Falsehoods: Challenges and Implications. Singapore: Government Printer. https://​bit.​ly/​2ZUOEBr
Zurück zum Zitat Ministry of Manpower (MOM) (2019). Comprehensive Labour Force Survey. Singapore: Government Printer. Ministry of Manpower (MOM) (2019). Comprehensive Labour Force Survey. Singapore: Government Printer.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortmann, S. (2009). Managed crisis: Legitimacy and the national threat in Singapore. Saarbrücken: VDM Publishing. Ortmann, S. (2009). Managed crisis: Legitimacy and the national threat in Singapore. Saarbrücken: VDM Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortmann, S. (2011). Singapore: Authoritarian but newly competitive. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 153-164. CrossRef Ortmann, S. (2011). Singapore: Authoritarian but newly competitive. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 153-164. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, A. N., Stockwell, A. J., Pasieka, A., & Ho, W. S. (1987). British Imperial Policy And Decolonization 1938-64: Vol 1. 1938-1951. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef Porter, A. N., Stockwell, A. J., Pasieka, A., & Ho, W. S. (1987). British Imperial Policy And Decolonization 1938-64: Vol 1. 1938-1951. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Progress Singapore Party. (2020). You Deserve Better: A GE2020 Manifesto by Progress Singapore Party. Singapore: Progress Singapore Party. Progress Singapore Party. (2020). You Deserve Better: A GE2020 Manifesto by Progress Singapore Party. Singapore: Progress Singapore Party.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodan, G. (1992). Singapore: Emerging tensions in the ‘dictatorship of the middle class’. The Pacific Review, 5(4), 370-381. CrossRef Rodan, G. (1992). Singapore: Emerging tensions in the ‘dictatorship of the middle class’. The Pacific Review, 5(4), 370-381. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenfeld, B. (2020). The autocratic middle class: how state dependency reduces the demand for democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef Rosenfeld, B. (2020). The autocratic middle class: how state dependency reduces the demand for democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, D. (1994). Singapore, China, and the “soft authoritarian” challenge. Asian Survey, 34(3), 231-242. CrossRef Roy, D. (1994). Singapore, China, and the “soft authoritarian” challenge. Asian Survey, 34(3), 231-242. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Singapore Democratic Party (2010). The Singapore Democrats. 30 Years of Democratic Service. Singapore: Singapore Democratic Party. Singapore Democratic Party (2010). The Singapore Democrats. 30 Years of Democratic Service. Singapore: Singapore Democratic Party.
Zurück zum Zitat Singapore Government (1991). Shared Values. White Paper, 2 January. Singapore Government (1991). Shared Values. White Paper, 2 January.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan, K. P. (2012). The ideology of pragmatism: Neo-liberal globalisation and political authoritarianism in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(1), 67-92. CrossRef Tan, K. P. (2012). The ideology of pragmatism: Neo-liberal globalisation and political authoritarianism in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(1), 67-92. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tan, N. (2014). Democratization and embracing uncertainty in post-2011 Singapore. In E. S. K. Fung, & S. Drakeley (eds.). Democracy in Eastern Asia: Issues, Problems and Challenges in a Region of Diversity (pp. 181-201). London: Routledge. Tan, N. (2014). Democratization and embracing uncertainty in post-2011 Singapore. In E. S. K. Fung, & S. Drakeley (eds.). Democracy in Eastern Asia: Issues, Problems and Challenges in a Region of Diversity (pp. 181-201). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Tay, S. S. C. (2004). Imagining freedom. In K. C. Ban, A. Pakir, & C. K. Tong (eds.). Imagining Singapore. 2 nd ed. (pp. 84-105). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press. Tay, S. S. C. (2004). Imagining freedom. In K. C. Ban, A. Pakir, & C. K. Tong (eds.). Imagining Singapore. 2 nd ed. (pp. 84-105). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tey, T. H. (2008). Excluding religion from politics and enforcing religious harmony – Singapore-style. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 118–142. Tey, T. H. (2008). Excluding religion from politics and enforcing religious harmony – Singapore-style. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 118–142.
Zurück zum Zitat Tham, D. (2022). Judge dismisses SDP’s POFMA challenge over ‘10 million population’ article. Today, 10 May. Tham, D. (2022). Judge dismisses SDP’s POFMA challenge over ‘10 million population’ article. Today, 10 May.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, M. R. (2019). Authoritarian Modernism in East Asia. London: Palgrave. CrossRef Thompson, M. R. (2019). Authoritarian Modernism in East Asia. London: Palgrave. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Verweij, M., & Pelizzo, R. (2009). Singapore: Does authoritarianism pay? Journal of Democracy, 20(2), 18-32. CrossRef Verweij, M., & Pelizzo, R. (2009). Singapore: Does authoritarianism pay? Journal of Democracy, 20(2), 18-32. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wee, C. L. (2001). Mediating ‘Progress’: The National Narrative of Economic Development and Liberalism in Singapore. Communal/Plural: Journal of Transnational & Cross-Cultural Studies, 9(2), 223-242. CrossRef Wee, C. L. (2001). Mediating ‘Progress’: The National Narrative of Economic Development and Liberalism in Singapore. Communal/Plural: Journal of Transnational & Cross-Cultural Studies, 9(2), 223-242. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Workers’ Party (2020). Make Your Vote Count: The Workers’ Party Manifesto 2020. Singapore: Workers’ Party. Workers’ Party (2020). Make Your Vote Count: The Workers’ Party Manifesto 2020. Singapore: Workers’ Party.
Metadaten
Titel
Liberal Vestiges in an Illiberal Regime: The Case of Singapore
verfasst von
Stephan Ortmann
Publikationsdatum
16.11.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Society
Print ISSN: 0147-2011
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-4725
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-022-00790-0