Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 1/2018

18.11.2017 | Original Paper

Life cycle energy and carbon footprint analysis of photovoltaic battery microgrid system in India

verfasst von: Jani Das, Ajit Paul Abraham, Prakash C. Ghosh, Rangan Banerjee

Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Electricity supply in India is from a centralized grid. Many parts of the country experience grid interruptions. Life cycle energy and environmental analysis has been done for a 27 kWp photovoltaic system which acts as grid backup for 3 h outage in an Indian urban residential scenario. This paper discusses energy requirements and carbon emission for a PV storage system for five different battery technologies in Indian context. This can be used as a metric for comparative analysis for new batteries, with an undeveloped market. The energy requirements for the components are quantified and are compared in terms of energy payback time (EPBT) and Net Energy Ratio (NER). All the calculations are done for Indian context. EPBT is found to be in the range of 2–4.5 years for all the systems, while NER is in the range of 6.6–2.52. NaS has the highest emission factor of 0.67 kgCO2/kWh and the least for NiCd (0.091 kgCO2/kWh). These factors can be used to select a PV battery option and to target selection of materials and systems based on the reported values.
Vorheriger Artikel Financing resource efficiency and cleaner production in Central America
Nächster Artikel Valorisation of mango seed via extraction of starch: preliminary techno-economic analysis

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Abraham AP, Ghosh PC, Banerjee R (2016) A framework for incorporating load profiles for sizing and designing of microgrid, 21st century energy needs-materials, systems and applications (ICTFCEN), Kharagpur, pp 1–6
Akinyele DO (2017) Environmental performance evaluation of a grid-independent solar photovoltaic power generation (SPPG) plant. Energy 130:515–529CrossRef
Akinyele DO, Rayudu RK (2016) Techno-economic and life cycle environmental performance analyses of a solar photovoltaic microgrid system for developing countries. Energy 109:160–179CrossRef
Alsema E (1996) Environmental aspects of solar cell modules. Summary Report Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University
Alsema E (1998) Energy requirements and CO2 mitigation potential of PV systems. In: Presented at the BNL/NREL workshop “PV and the environment 1998”, Keystone, CO, USA
Alsema E (2000a) Energy payback time and CO2 emissions of PV systems. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 8(1):17–25CrossRef
Alsema E (2000b) Environmental life cycle assessment of solar home systems Tech. Rep. NWS-E-2000-15. Department of Science, Technology and Society Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Alsema E, de Wild-Scholten M (2005) The real environmental impacts of crystalline silicon PV modules: An analysis based on up-to-date manufacturers data. In: Presented at the 20th European photovoltaic solar energy conference
Battke B, Schmidt TS, Grosspietsch D, Hoffmann VH (2013) A review and probabilistic model of life cycle costs of stationary batteries in multiple applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:240–250CrossRef
Baumann M, Peters JF, Weil M, Grunwald A (2017) CO2 footprint and life cycle costs of electrochemical energy storage for stationary grid applications. Energy Technol 5:1071CrossRef
Das J, Ghosh PC, Banerjee R(2016)Life cycle analysis of battery technologies for photovoltaic application in India. 21st century energy needs-materials, systems and applications (ICTFCEN), Kharagpur, India, pp 1–5
De Wild-Scholten MJ, Alsema EA (2006) Environmental life cycle inventory of crystalline silicon photovoltaic module production. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Materials Research Society Symposium, Materials Research Society, Warren-dale, PA
Deng Y, Li J, Li T, Gao X, Yuan C (2017) Life cycle assessment of lithium sulfur battery for electric vehicles. J Power Sources 343:284–295CrossRef
Denholm P, Kulcinski GL (2004) Life cycle energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions from large scale energy storage systems. Energy Convers Manage 45:2153–2172CrossRef
Ehnberg J, Liu Y, Grahn M (2014) Grid and storage-system perspectives on renewable power. ISBN:978-91-980974-0-5
Gaines L, Singh M (1995) Energy and environmental impacts of electric vehicle battery production and recycling. SAE Paper 951865
Gaines L, Sullivan JL, Burnham A, Belharouak I (2011) Life cycle analysis of lithium ion battery production and recycling. 90th Annual meeting of transportation research board, Washington, D.C.
Germani M, Landi D, Rossi M (2015) Efficiency and environmental analysis of a system for renewable electricity generation and electrochemical storage of residential buildings. Proc CIRP 29:839–844CrossRef
Hawkins TR, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, Strømman AH (2013) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17(1):53–64CrossRef
Hiremath M, Derendorf K, Vogt T (2015) Comparative life cycle assessment of battery storage systems for stationary applications. Environ Sci Technol 49(8):4825–4833CrossRef
Hitmann Associates (1980) Life cycle energy analysis of electric vehicle storage batteries, H-1008/001-80-964. submitted to the US Department of Energy, Contract Number DE-AC02-79ET25420.A000
IEEE (2007) IEEE Std 1562 IEEE guide for array and battery sizing in stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) systems
Ishihara K, Nishimura K, Uchiyama Y (1999) Life cycle analysis of electric vehicles with advanced battery in Japan. Proc Electric Veh Symp Beijing China 16:7–10
ISO (1997) ISO International Standard, ISO/FDIS 14040, Environmental management: life cycle assessment—principles and framework
ISO (1998) ISO International Standard, ISO 14041, Environmental management: life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis
ISO (2000) ISO International Standard, ISO 14042, Environmental management: life cycle assessment—life cycle impact assessment
Jacob AS, Das J, Abraham AP, Banerjee R, Ghosh PC (2017) Cost and energy analysis of PV battery grid backup system for a residential load in urban India. Energy Procedia 118:88–94CrossRef
Jungbluth N (2005) Life cycle assessment of crystalline photovoltaics in the Swiss ecoinvent database. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 13(5):429–446CrossRef
Jungbluth N, Stucki M, Flury K, Frischknecht R, Büsser S (2012) Life cycle inventories of photovoltaics. ESU-services Ltd., Uster
Kato K, Murata A, Sakuta K (1998) Energy pay back time and life-cycle CO2 emission of residential PV power system with silicon PV module. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 6(2):105–115CrossRef
Kertes A (1996) Life cycle assessment of three available battery technologies for electric vehicles in a Swedish perspective. Master Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden
Knapp K, Jester T (2001) Empirical Investigation of the energy pay back time for photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy 71(3):165–172CrossRef
Krauter S, Ruther R (2004) Considerations for the calculations of greenhouse gas reduction by photovoltaic solar energy. Renew Energy 29(3):345–355CrossRef
Majeau-Bettez G, Hawkins TR, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 45(10):4548–4554CrossRef
Matheys J, Autenboer W, Timmermans JM, Mierlo J, Bossche P, Maggetto G (2007) Influence of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of traction batteries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:191–196CrossRef
McKenna E, McManus M, Cooper S, Thomson M (2013) Economic and environmental impact of lead-acid batteries in grid-connected domestic PV systems. Appl Energy 104:239–249CrossRef
Nawaz I, Tiwari GN (2006) Embodied energy analysis of photovoltaic (PV) system based on macro- and micro-level. Energy Policy 34(17):3144–3152CrossRef
Newnham RH, Baldsing WGA (1997) Performance of flooded- and gelled-electrolyte lead/acid batteries under remote-area power-supply duty. J Power Sources 66(1):127–139
Notter DA, Gauch M, Widmer R, Wager P, Stamp A, Zah R, Althaus HJ (2010) Contribution of Li-Ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 44:6550–6556CrossRef
Rydh CJ (1999) Environmental assessment of vanadium redox and lead-acid batteries for stationary energy storage. J Power Sources 80(1):21–29CrossRef
Rydh CJ, Sanden BA (2005a) Energy Analysis of batteries in photovoltaic systems-Part I: performance and energy requirements. Energy Convers Manag 46:1957–1979CrossRef
Rydh CJ, Sanden BA (2005b) Energy analysis of batteries in photovoltaic systems. Part II: energy return factors and overall battery efficiencies. Energy Convers Manag 46:1957–1979CrossRef
Spanos C, Turney DE, Fthenakis V (2015) Life-cycle analysis of flow-assisted nickel zinc, manganese dioxide, and valve-regulated lead-acid batteries designed for demand-charge reduction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:478–494CrossRef
Sullivan JL, Gaines L (2010) A review of battery life cycle analysis, State of knowledge and critical needs. Energy Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory
Sullivan JL, Gaines L (2012) Status of life cycle inventories for batteries. Energy Convers Manage 58:34–148CrossRef
Van den Bossche P, Vergels F, Van Mierlo J, Matheys J, Van Autenboer W (2006) SUBAT An assessment of sustainable battery technology. J Power Sources 162(2):913–919CrossRef
Yu Y, Wang X, Wang D, Huang K, Wang L, Bao L, Wu F (2012) Environmental characteristics comparison of Li-ion batteries and Ni–MH batteries under the uncertainty of cycle performance. J Hazard Mater 229:455–460CrossRef
Yue D, You F, Darling SB (2014) Domestic and overseas manufacturing scenarios of silicon-based photovoltaics: life cycle energy and environmental comparative analysis. Sol Energy 105:669–678CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Life cycle energy and carbon footprint analysis of photovoltaic battery microgrid system in India
verfasst von
Jani Das
Ajit Paul Abraham
Prakash C. Ghosh
Rangan Banerjee
Publikationsdatum
18.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1456-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Anammox bacteria with attached-growth media for nitrogen removal in wastewater

Editorial

Artificial intelligence, its impact on innovation, and the Google effect

Original Paper

Valorisation of mango seed via extraction of starch: preliminary techno-economic analysis

Original Paper

Biomass ash-based mineral admixture prepared from municipal sewage sludge and its application in cement composites

Original Paper

Comparative LCA of technology improvement opportunities for a 1.5-MW wind turbine in the context of an onshore wind farm

Original Paper

Model fuel desulfurization and denitrogenation using copper and cerium modified mesoporous material (MSU-S) through adsorption process