Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. Limitations on Government Debt and Deficits in the United States

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Federal debt and deficit issues are of grave concern in the United States. Congress enforces US debt limitations pursuant to its constitutional authority to control spending and borrowing. Since 2001 Congress has modified the debt limit 14 times. State and local debt and deficit issues are equally serious. The debate is ongoing as to what reforms will effectively address these pressing concerns. On the federal level the proposed solutions include a balanced budget amendment, elimination of the debt limit altogether, and consideration of failure to pay the US debt a constitutional violation based on the “Public Debt Clause,” which, it is argued, allows violations to be justiciable, on the one hand, and focusing on growth rather than debt and deficit on the other. On the State and municipal level proposals range from relying on market mechanisms, imposing constitutional limits on debt, tying the debt threshold to annual revenue, and submitting issuance of bonds or other indebtedness to the electorate for approval. The debate continues.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Cohen, Botelho and Yan (2013); Buchanan and Dorf (2012).
 
2
Reuters (2013).
 
3
Department of the Treasury (2013).
 
4
Weisman (2013).
 
5
Davidson (2011).
 
6
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV, § 4.
 
7
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
8
31 U.S.C. §§ 1104, 1105 (2013). See also Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
9
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
10
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
11
Budget Contents and Submission to Congress, 31 U.S.C. § 1105(a) (2011).
 
12
Tollestrup (2014).
 
13
Tollestrup (2014).
 
14
2 U.S.C. § 601–645 (2011); Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
15
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, 2 U.S.C. §§ 601–603, 623, 631–644, 651–656, 658(a)-(g), 661(a)-(f), 665(a)-(e).
 
16
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
17
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
18
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
19
Tollestrup (2014).
 
20
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
21
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
22
Tollestrup (2014).
 
23
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
24
Tollestrup (2014).
 
25
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
26
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
27
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
28
Allen (2013).
 
29
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (2014).
 
30
Heniff (2012).
 
31
Allen (2013).
 
32
U.S. Constitution, Art. I, § 9.
 
33
1921 Budget and Accounting Act, 42 Stat. §§ 20–27 (1921).
 
34
Office of Management and Budget.
 
35
Joyce & Reischauer (1992).
 
36
Koch (2013).
 
37
Austin and Levit (2013).
 
38
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
39
Office of Management and Budget.
 
40
Austin (2011).
 
41
Austin (2011).
 
42
Levit, Bass, Nicola and Nuschler (2013); Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
43
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 1: “The Congress shall have Power . . . to pay the Debts . . . of the United States”; U.S. Const. art I, § 8, cl. 2: “The Congress shall have Power . . . [t]o borrow money on the credit of the United States”; U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time”; U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 18: “The Congress shall have Power . . . [t]o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.”
 
44
Austin and Levit (2013).
 
45
31 U.S.C. § 3101 (2013).
 
46
Noll (2008); Bayley (1970).
 
47
Austin and Levit (2013).
 
48
Austin and Levit (2013).
 
49
Austin and Levit (2013).
 
50
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
51
Office of Management and Budget (2009); Austin and Levit (2013).
 
52
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
53
Austin and Levit (2013).
 
54
Austin and Levit (2013); Levit, Bass, Nicola, and Nuschler (2013).
 
55
Austin and Levit (2013).
 
56
Austin and Levit (2013).
 
57
Id.; 31 U.S.C. § 3101(b) (raising limit to $14,294,000,000,000); Austin and Levit (2013).
 
58
Levit, Bass, Nicola, and Nuschler (2013).
 
59
Tollestrup (2014).
 
60
Dwyer and Miller (2011).
 
62
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014, PL 113-46, 31 USC 3101 Note 1002, (c)(1), http://​www.​gpo.​gov/​fdsys/​pkg/​BILLS-113hr2775enr/​pdf/​BILLS-113hr2775enr.​pdf.
 
63
Austin and Levit (2014).
 
64
2 U.S.C. § 901 (as amended Jan. 2, 2013).
 
65
Austin (2011).
 
66
2 U.S.C. § 900(7).
 
67
2 U.S.C. § 900(8).
 
68
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
69
2 U.S.C. § 900(4)(B).
 
70
2 U.S.C. § 900(4)(A).
 
71
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
72
2 U.S.C. § 901a(1)(A)-(B); 2 U.S.C. § 901a(2)(A)-(I).
 
73
2 U.S.C. § 901a(1)(A); OMB Fiscal Year 2014, supra note 8, at 120.
 
74
2 U.S.C. § 901a(1)(B).
 
75
2 U.S.C. 901a(3)-(4), (8), (11).
 
76
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
77
2 U.S.C. § 906(7)(A)-(C) (exempting low-income subsidies, catastrophe subsidies, and qualified individual premiums, such as payments to the states for coverage of Medicare); 2 U.S.C. § 906(b), (d) (providing special rules for student loans and Medicare).
 
78
Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
79
Op. cit, n. 78: Office of Management and Budget (2013).
 
80
2 U.S.C. § 931.
 
81
31 U.S.C. § 3101A (2013).
 
82
Pub. L. 113-3, 127 Stat. 51 (Feb. 4, 2013).
 
83
Pub. L. 113-67, (127 Stt.1165 (December 26, 2013).
 
84
Tollestrup (2014).
 
85
Inman and Fitts (1990).
 
86
Inman and Fitts (1990).
 
87
Viser (2013).
 
88
McCubbins (1990).
 
89
McCubbins (1990).
 
90
McCubbins (1990).
 
92
Schragger (2012).
 
93
Schragger (2012).
 
94
Congressional Budget Office (1995).
 
95
Abramowicz (2011). See, U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 4: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”
 
96
Abramowicz (2011).
 
97
Wessel (2013).
 
98
Economist (2013); Bomey, Snavely, and Priddle (2013).
 
99
Schragger (2012); Nolan (2011).
 
100
Schragger (2012); Monkkonen (1995).
 
101
Schragger (2012); Briffault (2003); Super (2005).
 
102
The Commerce Clause, U.S. Const., art. I, § 8, cl. 3.
 
103
New York v. U.S., 505 U.S. 144, 167 (1992).
 
104
Coniglio (2013).
 
105
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority v. Foster, 795 So. 2d 288, 2001-0009 (La. 2001); California Assn. of Retail Tobacconists v. State of California, 109 Cal. App. 4th 792, 135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 224 (4th Dist. 2003).
 
106
Coniglio (2013); Oklahoma Educ. Ass’n v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Legislature, 2007 OK 30, 158 P.3d 1058 (Okla. 2007).
 
107
Oklahoma Educ. Ass’n v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Legislature, 2007 OK 30, 158 P.3d 1058, 1066 (Okla. 2007), quoting Calvey v. Saxon, 2000 OK 17, 21, 997 P.2d 164, 171 (Okla. 2000).
 
108
Rubin (1993).
 
109
Rubin (1993).
 
110
Briffault (2003).
 
111
Sharpless v. Mayor of Philadelphia, 21 Pa. 147, 169 (1853).
 
112
Briffault (2003).
 
113
Ind. Const. art. X, § 5.
 
114
Coniglio (2013).
 
115
Jones v. City of Portland, 245 U.S. 217, 221 (1917).
 
116
Colo. Const. art. XI, § 3.
 
117
Ga. Const. art. 7, § 4, ¶ 1(b).
 
118
Briffault (2003).
 
119
Cal. Const. art. XVI, §1(a).
 
120
Coniglio (2013).
 
121
Ind. Const. art. XIII, § 1.
 
122
Idaho Const. art. VIII, § 3.
 
123
Rubin (1993).
 
124
Coniglio (2013).
 
125
Andrello v. Dulan, 49 Misc. 2d 17, 22, 266 N.Y.S.2d 738, 744 (Sup. 1966).
 
126
Andrello v. Dulan, 49 Misc. 2d 17, 22, 266 N.Y.S.2d 738, 744 (Sup. 1966).
 
127
Coniglio (2013).
 
128
Coniglio (2013).
 
129
Montano v. Gabaldon, 108 N.M. 94, 96, 766 P.2d 1328, 1330 (1989); Coniglio (2013).
 
130
Coniglio (2013).
 
131
Mercantile Bank of Illinois, N.A. v. School Dist. of Osceola, 834 S.W. 2d 737, 738 (Mo. 1992).
 
132
National Conference of State Legislatures (2010).
 
133
National Conference of State Legislatures (2010).
 
134
National Conference of State Legislatures (2010).
 
135
Schragger (2012).
 
136
Schragger (2012).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abramowicz, Michael. Train Wrecks, Budget Deficits, and the Entitlements Explosion: Exploring the Implications of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Public Debt Clause. Social Science Research Network. 2011. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1874746. Accessed 6 April 2015. Abramowicz, Michael. Train Wrecks, Budget Deficits, and the Entitlements Explosion: Exploring the Implications of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Public Debt Clause. Social Science Research Network. 2011. http://​papers.​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​1874746. Accessed 6 April 2015.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen, Kenneth J. Federal Grant Practice. § 1.6 Mandatory and Discretionary Spending. Thomson Reuters, 2013. Allen, Kenneth J. Federal Grant Practice. § 1.6 Mandatory and Discretionary Spending. Thomson Reuters, 2013.
Zurück zum Zitat Bayley, Rafael A. 1970. The National Loans of the United States from July 4, 1776, to June 30, 1880 (2d ed. facsimile reprint). Bayley, Rafael A. 1970. The National Loans of the United States from July 4, 1776, to June 30, 1880 (2d ed. facsimile reprint).
Zurück zum Zitat Briffault, Richard. Foreword: The Disfavored Constitution: State Fiscal Limits and State Constitutional Law. Rutgers Law Journal. 2003;34:907–957. Briffault, Richard. Foreword: The Disfavored Constitution: State Fiscal Limits and State Constitutional Law. Rutgers Law Journal. 2003;34:907–957.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, Neil H. and Michael C. Dorf. How to Choose the Least Unconstitutional Option: Lessons for the President (and Others) from the Debt Ceiling Standoff. Columbia Law Review 2012;112:1175–1243. Buchanan, Neil H. and Michael C. Dorf. How to Choose the Least Unconstitutional Option: Lessons for the President (and Others) from the Debt Ceiling Standoff. Columbia Law Review 2012;112:1175–1243.
Zurück zum Zitat Congressional Budget Office. The Economic and Budget Outlook: An Update. 1995. U.S. Government Printing Office. Congressional Budget Office. The Economic and Budget Outlook: An Update. 1995. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Zurück zum Zitat Coniglio, James A. State and Local Government Debt Financing, Constitutional Considerations. In: Gelfand, M., ed. State and Local Government Debt Financing, vol. 1 (2d ed) Wilmette: Callaghan, 2013. Coniglio, James A. State and Local Government Debt Financing, Constitutional Considerations. In: Gelfand, M., ed. State and Local Government Debt Financing, vol. 1 (2d ed) Wilmette: Callaghan, 2013.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson, Paul. 2011. A Primer on the Debt-Ceiling Debate. USA Today, July 29. Davidson, Paul. 2011. A Primer on the Debt-Ceiling Debate. USA Today, July 29.
Zurück zum Zitat Inman, Robert P. and Michael A. Fitts. Political Institutions and Fiscal Policy: Evidence from the U.S. Historical Record. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 1990;6:79–132.CrossRef Inman, Robert P. and Michael A. Fitts. Political Institutions and Fiscal Policy: Evidence from the U.S. Historical Record. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 1990;6:79–132.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joyce, Phillip G. and Robert D. Reischauer. Deficit Budgeting: the Federal Budget Process and Budget Reform. Harvard Journal on Legislation. 1992;29:429–453. Joyce, Phillip G. and Robert D. Reischauer. Deficit Budgeting: the Federal Budget Process and Budget Reform. Harvard Journal on Legislation. 1992;29:429–453.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch, Charles H. Administrative Law and Practice. Thomson Reuters, 2013. Koch, Charles H. Administrative Law and Practice. Thomson Reuters, 2013.
Zurück zum Zitat McCubbins, Matthew D. Budget Policy-Making and the Appearance of Power. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 1990;6:133–153.CrossRef McCubbins, Matthew D. Budget Policy-Making and the Appearance of Power. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 1990;6:133–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Monkkonen, Eric H. The Local State: Public Money and American Cities. Redwood City, Calif.: Stanford, 1995. Monkkonen, Eric H. The Local State: Public Money and American Cities. Redwood City, Calif.: Stanford, 1995.
Zurück zum Zitat Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Year 2014: Analytical Perspectives. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013. Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Year 2014: Analytical Perspectives. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013.
Zurück zum Zitat Office of Management and Budget. Historical Tables: Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2010. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2009. Office of Management and Budget. Historical Tables: Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2010. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2009.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin, Dale F. Constitutional Aid Limitation Provisions and the Public Purpose Doctrine. Saint Louis University Public Law Review. 1993;12:143–167. Rubin, Dale F. Constitutional Aid Limitation Provisions and the Public Purpose Doctrine. Saint Louis University Public Law Review. 1993;12:143–167.
Zurück zum Zitat Schragger, Richard C. Democracy and Debt. Yale Law Journal 2012;121:860–886. Schragger, Richard C. Democracy and Debt. Yale Law Journal 2012;121:860–886.
Zurück zum Zitat Super, David A. 2005. Rethinking Fiscal Federalism. Harvard Law Review 118:2544–2652. Super, David A. 2005. Rethinking Fiscal Federalism. Harvard Law Review 118:2544–2652.
Zurück zum Zitat Viser, Matt. Shutdown Fight Reveals Deeper Splits within GOP. 2013. Boston Globe, September 30. Viser, Matt. Shutdown Fight Reveals Deeper Splits within GOP. 2013. Boston Globe, September 30.
Zurück zum Zitat Weisman, Jonathan. House G.O.P. Raises Stakes in Debt-Ceiling Fight. New York Times, September 26, 2013. Weisman, Jonathan. House G.O.P. Raises Stakes in Debt-Ceiling Fight. New York Times, September 26, 2013.
Metadaten
Titel
Limitations on Government Debt and Deficits in the United States
verfasst von
Ved P. Nanda
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41205-4_12