Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2/2018

08.09.2016

Line by line, part by part: collaborative sketching for designing

verfasst von: Tellervo Härkki, Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Kai Hakkarainen

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

While sketching has an established role in professional design, its benefits and role in design education are subjects that invite research and opinions. We investigated how undergraduates studying to become design educators and textile teachers used sketching to generate and develop design solutions in a collaborative setting. The students were given an authentic design assignment involving three detailed tasks, one of which was 2D visualisation by sketching. Adopting a micro-analytical approach, we analysed the video-recorded visualisation session to understand how teams used sketching to collaborate and to generate and develop design solutions. To that end, we set three research questions: (1) What ways of collaborative working are reflected in actions of sketching? (2) In what ways do sequences of collaborative sketching contribute to designing? (3) What kinds of collaborative sequences of sketching advance designing? Our analysis identified three collaborative ways of sketching (co-ordinated, collective and disclosed) and confirmed that sketching is an important facilitator of mutual appropriation, adaption and adoption. Next, we identified three ways of contributing to designing, as well as three functions and six capacities for advancing designing. Our analysis shows that sketching can lead to invaluable advances in designing, although each team had its own way of using and benefiting from sketching. We further consider that the teams’ diverse sketching processes and rich content owed, at least in part, to the task structure and imposed constraints. We continue to see sketching as an important design tool, one among many.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. M. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 1–11.CrossRef Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. M. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 1–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bilda, Z., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies, 27, 587–613.CrossRef Bilda, Z., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies, 27, 587–613.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boucharenc, C. G. (2006). Research on basic design education: An international survey. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 1–30.CrossRef Boucharenc, C. G. (2006). Research on basic design education: An international survey. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 1–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bucciarelli, L. L. (1996). Designing engineers. Cambridge: MIT Press. Bucciarelli, L. L. (1996). Designing engineers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardella, M. E., Altman, C. J., & Adams, R. S. (2006). Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers. Design Studies, 27, 5–24.CrossRef Cardella, M. E., Altman, C. J., & Adams, R. S. (2006). Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers. Design Studies, 27, 5–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3, 221–227.CrossRef Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3, 221–227.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Saussure, F. (1960). Course in general linguistics. London: Peter Owen. de Saussure, F. (1960). Course in general linguistics. London: Peter Owen.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisentraut, R., & Günther, J. (1997). Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process. Design Studies, 18, 369–383.CrossRef Eisentraut, R., & Günther, J. (1997). Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process. Design Studies, 18, 369–383.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge: MIT Press. Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. (1990). Sketching and the mind’s visual eye. Leonardo, 23(1), 117–126.CrossRef Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. (1990). Sketching and the mind’s visual eye. Leonardo, 23(1), 117–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garner, S. (2001). Comparing graphic actions between remote and proximal design teams. Design Studies, 22(4), 365–376.CrossRef Garner, S. (2001). Comparing graphic actions between remote and proximal design teams. Design Studies, 22(4), 365–376.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge: MIT Press. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 395–429.CrossRef Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 395–429.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66, 133–136.CrossRef Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66, 133–136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 123–143.CrossRef Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 123–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9, 1–36.CrossRef Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9, 1–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hope, G. (2005). The types of drawing that young children produce in response to design task. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 10, 43–53. Hope, G. (2005). The types of drawing that young children produce in response to design task. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 10, 43–53.
Zurück zum Zitat Hope, G. (2008). Thinking and learning through drawing in primary classrooms. Los Angeles: Sage. Hope, G. (2008). Thinking and learning through drawing in primary classrooms. Los Angeles: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers. Educational Psychologist, 48, 25–39.CrossRef Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers. Educational Psychologist, 48, 25–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis. The Journal of Modern Craft, 4, 39–103. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis. The Journal of Modern Craft, 4, 39–103.
Zurück zum Zitat Kavakli, M., & Gero, J. S. (2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22, 347–364.CrossRef Kavakli, M., & Gero, J. S. (2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22, 347–364.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kavakli, M., Scrivener, S. A., & Ball, L. J. (1998). Structure in idea sketching behaviour. Design Studies, 19, 485–517.CrossRef Kavakli, M., Scrivener, S. A., & Ball, L. J. (1998). Structure in idea sketching behaviour. Design Studies, 19, 485–517.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laamanen, T-K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2008). Sources of inspiration and mental image in textile design process. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 7, 105–119.CrossRef Laamanen, T-K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2008). Sources of inspiration and mental image in textile design process. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 7, 105–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laamanen, T-K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2014). Constraining an open-ended design task by interpreting sources of inspiration. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 13, 135–156.CrossRef Laamanen, T-K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2014). Constraining an open-ended design task by interpreting sources of inspiration. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 13, 135–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Kangas, K., Härkki, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2016a). Textile teacher students’ collaborative design processes in a design studio setting. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 16, 35–54.CrossRef Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Kangas, K., Härkki, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2016a). Textile teacher students’ collaborative design processes in a design studio setting. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 16, 35–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lahti, H., Kangas, K., Koponen, V., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2016b). Material mediation and embodied actions in collaborative design process. Techne Series A, 23, 15–29. Lahti, H., Kangas, K., Koponen, V., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2016b). Material mediation and embodied actions in collaborative design process. Techne Series A, 23, 15–29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think. Oxford: Architectural Press. Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDonald, D., Gustafson, B. J., & Gentilini, S. (2007). Enhancing children’s drawing in design technology planning and making. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25, 59–75.CrossRef MacDonald, D., Gustafson, B. J., & Gentilini, S. (2007). Enhancing children’s drawing in design technology planning and making. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25, 59–75.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Menezes, A., & Lawson, B. (2006). How designers perceive sketches. Design Studies, 27, 571–585.CrossRef Menezes, A., & Lawson, B. (2006). How designers perceive sketches. Design Studies, 27, 571–585.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perry, M., & Sanderson, D. (1998). Coordinating joint design work. Design Studies, 19, 273–288.CrossRef Perry, M., & Sanderson, D. (1998). Coordinating joint design work. Design Studies, 19, 273–288.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process. Design Studies, 19, 389–430.CrossRef Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process. Design Studies, 19, 389–430.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Römer, A., Leinart, S., & Sachse, P. (2000). External support of problem analysis in design problem solving. Research in Engineering Design, 12, 144–151.CrossRef Römer, A., Leinart, S., & Sachse, P. (2000). External support of problem analysis in design problem solving. Research in Engineering Design, 12, 144–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions. Review of Educational Research, 68, 35–59.CrossRef Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions. Review of Educational Research, 68, 35–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rowell, P. (2002). Peer interaction in shared technological activity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 1–22.CrossRef Rowell, P. (2002). Peer interaction in shared technological activity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 1–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 4, 696–735.CrossRef Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 4, 696–735.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sawyer, K. (2013). Zig zag. San Francisco: Wiley. Sawyer, K. (2013). Zig zag. San Francisco: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Creativity and Innovation Management, 1, 68–74.CrossRef Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Creativity and Innovation Management, 1, 68–74.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schott, G. D. (2011). Doodling and the default network of the brain. The Lancet, 378, 1133–1134.CrossRef Schott, G. D. (2011). Doodling and the default network of the brain. The Lancet, 378, 1133–1134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., et al. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654.CrossRef Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., et al. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Composition and construction in experts’ and novices’ weaving design. Design Studies, 22, 47–66.CrossRef Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Composition and construction in experts’ and novices’ weaving design. Design Studies, 22, 47–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385–403.CrossRef Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385–403.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Syrjäläinen, E., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2014). The quality of design in 9th grade pupils’ design-and-make assignments in craft education. Design and Technology Education: an international Journal, 19, 30–39. Syrjäläinen, E., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2014). The quality of design in 9th grade pupils’ design-and-make assignments in craft education. Design and Technology Education: an international Journal, 19, 30–39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang, J. C. (1991). Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 143–160.CrossRef Tang, J. C. (1991). Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 143–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trojano, L., Grossi, D., & Flash, T. (2008). Cognitive neuroscience of drawing. Cortex, 45, 269–277.CrossRef Trojano, L., Grossi, D., & Flash, T. (2008). Cognitive neuroscience of drawing. Cortex, 45, 269–277.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Valkenburg, R., & Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19, 249–271.CrossRef Valkenburg, R., & Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19, 249–271.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van der Lugt, R. (2005). How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies, 26, 101–122.CrossRef van der Lugt, R. (2005). How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies, 26, 101–122.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Welch, M. (1998). Students’ use of three-dimensional modelling while designing and making a solution to a technological problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 241–260.CrossRef Welch, M. (1998). Students’ use of three-dimensional modelling while designing and making a solution to a technological problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 241–260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, M. C. (2008). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 20, 1–11.CrossRef Yang, M. C. (2008). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 20, 1–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, M. C., & Cham, J. G. (2007). An analysis of sketching skill and its role in early stage engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 476–482.CrossRef Yang, M. C., & Cham, J. G. (2007). An analysis of sketching skill and its role in early stage engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 476–482.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zeisel, J. (1984). Inquiry by design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zeisel, J. (1984). Inquiry by design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.CrossRef Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Line by line, part by part: collaborative sketching for designing
verfasst von
Tellervo Härkki
Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen
Kai Hakkarainen
Publikationsdatum
08.09.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9379-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

    Premium Partner