nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | Supplement | Buchkapitel

25. Extinguishment of Obligations

verfasst von : İlhan Helvacı

Erschienen in: Turkish Contract Law

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

There are several causes of extinguishment of obligations. The normal manner of extinguishment of an obligation is its performance as required. The other causes are set out in the Turkish Code of Obligations in the following order: discharge by agreement, constitution of a new obligation (novation), merger, impossibility of performance and set-off.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Effects of the Obligation on Third Parties

Nächstes Kapitel Limitation Period

Aybay (2011), pp. 152–162; Becker (1941), Vorbemerkung zu art. 114–142, art. 114–126; Berger (2012), pp. 450–472; Engel (1997), pp. 669–681, 761–784; Eren (2015), pp. 1257–1281, 1299–1307; Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 409–517; Gauch et al. (2008), pp. 187–216; Honsell et al. (2003), Vorbemerkungen zu art. 114–142, art. 114–126; Kılıçoğlu (2013), pp. 835–866; Nomer (2015), pp. 381–391; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), Vorbemerkungen zum dritten Titel (art. 114–142), art. 114–126; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 531–579; Reisoğlu (2014), pp. 404–423; Schwenzer (2009), pp. 506–518; Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 984–1030; Tercier (2004), pp. 257–279; Tercier et al. (2016), pp. 444–479; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 114–126, and von Tuhr and Escher (1974), pp. 161–211.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 74, I, p. 161; Tercier (2004), p. 259.

Eren (2015), p. 1185; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 459; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 535–536.

Although the principal obligation is extinguished, the liability for interest connected to any coupons that are independent of the principal deed is not extinguished. Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 535.

For further explanations Helvacı (2008), pp. 402–404; Steinauer (2003), p. 177.

Remise conventionnelle, Aufhebung durch Übereinkunft.

For further explanations see Turanboy (1998), Gümüş (2015).

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 75, I, p. 173; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 405; Nomer (2015), p. 382; Eren (2015), p. 1270; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 536.

Tercier (2004), p. 266; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 115, N. 2; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 538–539; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 986; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 426.

Engel (1997), p. 765; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 115, N. 2; Berger (2012), p. 452.

Acte de disposition, Verfügungsgeschäft. See Chap. 14, fn. 5–6.

Tercier (2004), p. 266; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 115, N. 11; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 987.

Pouvoir de disposer, Verfügungsmacht.

Tercier (2004), p. 266; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 115, N. 11; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 538–539; Eren (2015), p. 1271.

Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 115, N. 7; Tercier (2004), p. 266; Gauch et al. (2008), p. 194; von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 75, IV, pp. 177–178; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 540; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 427.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 540.

Berger (2012), pp. 452–453; Becker (1941), art. 115, N. 3.

Déclaration de volonté, Willenserklärung.

Reisoğlu (2014), p. 405; Tercier et al. (2016), p. 456; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 537.

Engel (1997), p. 765; Tercier (2004), p. 267.

Novation, Neuerung.

For further explanations see Koyuncuoğlu (1972), Önay (2016).

Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 116, N. 2; Gauch et al. (2008), p. 195; Tercier (2004), p. 261; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 116, N. 1; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 989; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 540.

Nomer (2015), p. 389.

Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 116, N. 9; Engel (1997), p. 769; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 407; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 542.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 542; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 992, cf. Eren (2015), p. 1265.

Engel (1997), p. 769; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 437; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 407; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 542.

Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 434; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 541.

Pouvoir de disposer, Verfügungsmacht.

Tercier (2004), p. 261; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 116, N. 1.

Eren (2015), p. 1265; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 542; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 408.

Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 451; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 996; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 544.

Reisoğlu (2014), p. 409.

For further explanations see Toksal (1956).

Confusion, Vereinigung.

Engel (1997), p. 778.

Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 118, N. 2; von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 77, I, p. 187.

Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 997; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 547.

Tercier (2004), p. 262.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 548; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 409; Eren (2015), p. 1269.

Helvacı (2008), pp. 402–404. On the contrary Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 549.

The Turkish Commercial Code sets certain specific rules relating to the transfer of negotiable instruments. For example, any bill of exchange may be transferred by endorsement and the delivery of possession of it even if it is not expressly made out to order (TComC art. 681 par. 1, compare to SCO art. 1001). The endorsement may be made out to the drawee, regardless of whether he has accepted the bill or not, to the drawer or to any other person liable for it. These persons may re-endorse the bill (TComC art. 681 par. 3); Pursuant to the TComC art. 778 par. 1, subcl. a, these rules, unless they are contrary to its nature, also apply to promissory notes. Moreover, a cheque made payable to a specific person with or without the explicit comment ‘to order’ may be transferred by endorsement and the delivery of possession of it (TComC art. 788 par. 1; compare to SCO art. 1108). The endorsement may be made out to the drawer or to any other person liable for it. These persons may re-endorse the cheque (TComC art. 788 par. 3).

For further explanations see Dural (1976), Kurt (2016).

See Sect. 5.2.5.

See Sect. 22.2.3.2.2.

See Sect. 22.5.

Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 20, N. 4; Tercier (2004), p. 269; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 411; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 999.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 549; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 411.

Tercier (2004), p. 269; Eren (2015), p. 1300; Dural (1976), p. 89, 114.

Eren (2015), p. 1300; Dural (1976), p. 89.

Tercier (2004), p. 269; Honsell et al. (2003), art. 19/20, N. 46.

See Sect. 15.5.

Serozan (2014), p. 84; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 551; Eren (2015), p. 1301.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 551, compare to Eren (2015), pp. 1300–1301.

Engel (1997), p. 783; Tercier (2004), p. 272; Tandoğan (1990), pp. 104–118; Nomer and Engin (2017), art. 208, N. 23.

Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 119, N. 20.

Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 119, N. 20; Eren (2015), pp. 1304–1305; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 556–557.

For further explanations see Ercoşkun Şenol (2016).

See Chap. 10.

Termination of the contract takes effect retroactively (résolution, Rücktritt).

Termination of the contract takes effect prospectively (résiliation, Kündigung).

Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 742–743.

Cf. Öz (1990), pp. 108–111.

Compensation, Verrechnung.

For further explanations see Aral (1994), Develioğlu (2012).

Tercier et al. (2016), p. 469; Nomer (2015), p. 385; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 564.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 565; Eren (2015), p. 1274; Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 482–483.

Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 1012; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 565.

Déclaration de volonté, Willenserklärung.

Engel (1997), p. 670; Tercier et al. (2016), p. 470; Eren (2015), p. 1275; Nomer (2015), p. 385; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 565.

von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 79, III, pp. 208–209; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 566; Eren (2015), p. 1275.

Tercier et al. (2016), p. 472; Eren (2015), p. 1275; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 566; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 120, N. 2; Tercier (2004), p. 275; Gauch et al. (2008), p. 206.

Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 496–497; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 567; Eren (2015), p. 1277.

See Sect. 32.2.3.3.

Tercier (2004), p. 276; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 120, N. 11; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 568; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 494; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 120, N. 7; Gauch et al. (2008), p. 207.

Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 494; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 568.

Engel (1997), pp. 672–673; Eren (2015), p. 1276, cf. Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 569.

Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 120, N. 8; Tercier (2004), p. 277; Eren (2015), p. 1278; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 1017; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 570; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 120, N. 8; Gauch et al. (2008), pp. 208–209.

See Sect. 18.3.5.

Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 496; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 571–572.

Engel (1997), p. 680; Tercier (2004), p. 278; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 573; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 422; Gauch et al. (2008), pp. 209–210.

A waiver is an agreement between the debtor and creditor (pactum de non compensando), and not a unilateral legal transaction by either party. Gauch et al. (2008), p. 210; Tercier (2004), pp. 278–279, on the contrary see Engel (1997), p. 680.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 573.

Tercier (2004), p. 274; Engel (1997), p. 675; Nomer (2015), p. 385; Tercier et al. (2016), p. 471; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 573.

Tercier et al. (2016), p. 471; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 574.

Pouvoir de disposer, Verfügungsmacht.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 574.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 575.

Engel (1997), p. 679; Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 510–511; Eren (2015), p. 1279; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 576.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 577–578.

Eren (2015), p. 1281; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 423; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 578.

Aral F (1994) Türk borçlar hukukunda takas. Savaş, Ankara

Aybay A (2011) Borçlar hukuku dersleri genel bölüm. Filiz, İstanbul

Becker H (1941) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, vol VI, Obligationenrecht, 1. Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Art. 1-183. Stämpfli, Bern

Berger B (2012) Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Stämpfli, Bern

Develioğlu HM (2012) Takas. Vedat, İstanbul

Dural M (1976) Borçlunun sorumlu olmadığı sonraki imkânsızlık (bk. 117). İstanbul

Engel P (1997) Traité des obligations en droit Suisse. Stämpfli, Bern

Ercoşkun Şenol HK (2016) Borçlar hukukunda kısmi imkânsızlık. On iki levha, İstanbul

Eren F (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Yetkin, Ankara

Feyzioğlu FN (1977) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 2. Fakülteler, İstanbul

Gauch P, Schluep WR, Emmenegger S (2008) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, vol 2. Schulthess, Zürich

Gümüş MA (2015) Türk-İsviçre borçlar hukukunda ibra sözleşmesi. Vedat, İstanbul

Helvacı İ (2008) Eski medenî kanunumuzla karşılaştırmalı olarak Türk medenî kanununa göre sözleşmeden doğan ipotek hakkı. On iki levha, İstanbul

Honsell H, Vogt NP, Wiegand W (eds) (2003) Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, Obligationenrecht 1: Art. 1-529 OR. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Basel

Kılıçoğlu AM (2013) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Turhan, İstanbul

Koyuncuoğlu T (1972) Türk ve İsviçre hukukunda borcun yenilenmesi (novatio). İstanbul

Kurt LM (2016) Borçlunun sorumlu olmadığı sonraki imkânsızlık. Yetkin, Ankara

Nomer HN (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

Nomer HN, Engin Bİ (2017) Türk borçlar kanunu şerhi, özel borç ilişkileri, Volume 1: satış sözleşmesi. Seçkin, Ankara

Oğuzman K, Öz T (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Vedat, İstanbul

Oser H, Schönenberger W (1929) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume V: Das Obligationenrecht, Erster Halbband: Art. 1-183. Schulthess, Zürich

Önay I (2016) Yenileme. On iki levha, İstanbul

Öz T (1990) Sebepsiz zenginleşme. Kazancı, İstanbul

Reisoğlu S (2014) Türk borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

Schwenzer I (2009) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil. Schulthess, Bern

Serozan R (2014) Borçlar hukuku genel bölüm, vol 3 (Kocayusufpaşaoğlu/Hatemi/Serozan/Arpacı). Filiz, İstanbul

Steinauer PH (2003) Les droits réels, vol 3. Stämpfli, Bern

Tandoğan H (1990) Özel borç ilişkileri, vol I/1. Evrim, İstanbul

Tekinay SS, Akman S, Burcuoğlu H, Altop A (1993) Tekinay borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Filiz, İstanbul

Tercier P (2004) Le droit des obligations. Schulthess, Zurich

Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu HM (2016) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. On iki levha, İstanbul

Thévenoz L, Werro F (éd) (2012) Commentaire romand code des obligations 1: art. 1-529 CO. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Bâle

Toksal BM (1956) Hukuki cephesiyle hesabı cari. İstanbul

Turanboy KN (1998) İbra sözleşmesi. Ankara

von Tuhr A, Escher A (1974) Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrecht, vol 2. Schulthess, Zürich

Titel: Extinguishment of Obligations
verfasst von: İlhan Helvacı
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Turkish Contract Law
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60060-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60061-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60061-1_25

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"