Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Actuarial Journal 1/2018

21.12.2017 | Original Research Paper

On Pareto-optimal reinsurance with constraints under distortion risk measures

verfasst von: Wenjun Jiang, Hanping Hong, Jiandong Ren

Erschienen in: European Actuarial Journal | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper studies the Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies, where both the insurer’s and the reinsurer’s risks and returns are considered. We assume that the risks of the insurer and the reinsurer, as well as the reinsurance premium, are determined by some distortion risk measures with different distortion operators. Under the constraint that a reinsurance policy is feasible only if the resulting risk of each party is below some pre-determined values, we derive explicit expressions for the optimal reinsurance polices. Methodologically, we show that the generalized Neyman-Pearson method, the Lagrange multiplier method, and the dynamic control methods can be utilized to solve our problem. Special cases when both parties’ risks are measured by Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Tail Value-at-Risk (TVaR) are studied in great details. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate practical implications of the results.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 53(5):941–973 Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 53(5):941–973
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernard C, Tian W (2009) Optimal reinsurance arrangements under tail risk measures. J Risk Insur 76(3):709–725CrossRef Bernard C, Tian W (2009) Optimal reinsurance arrangements under tail risk measures. J Risk Insur 76(3):709–725CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Borch K (1960a) An attempt to determine the optimum amount of stop loss reinsurance. In: Transactions of the 16th International Congress of Actuaries pp 597–610 Borch K (1960a) An attempt to determine the optimum amount of stop loss reinsurance. In: Transactions of the 16th International Congress of Actuaries pp 597–610
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Borch K (1960b) Reciprocal reinsurance treaties. ASTIN Bull J IAA 1(4):170–191CrossRef Borch K (1960b) Reciprocal reinsurance treaties. ASTIN Bull J IAA 1(4):170–191CrossRef
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai J, Tan KS (2007) Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measures. ASTIN Bull 37(1):93–112MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Cai J, Tan KS (2007) Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measures. ASTIN Bull 37(1):93–112MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai J, Lemieux C, Liu F (2016) Optimal reinsurance from the perspectives of both an insurer and a reinsurer. ASTIN Bull: J IAA 46(3):815–849MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Cai J, Lemieux C, Liu F (2016) Optimal reinsurance from the perspectives of both an insurer and a reinsurer. ASTIN Bull: J IAA 46(3):815–849MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
14.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung KC, Lo A (2017) Characterizations of optimal reinsurance treaties: a cost-benefit approach. Scand Actuar J 1:1–28MathSciNetCrossRef Cheung KC, Lo A (2017) Characterizations of optimal reinsurance treaties: a cost-benefit approach. Scand Actuar J 1:1–28MathSciNetCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chi Y (2012) Reinsurance arrangements minimizing the risk-adjusted value of an insurer’s liability. ASTIN Bull 42(2):529–557MathSciNetMATH Chi Y (2012) Reinsurance arrangements minimizing the risk-adjusted value of an insurer’s liability. ASTIN Bull 42(2):529–557MathSciNetMATH
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chi Y, Tan KS (2011) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CVaR risk measures: a simplified approach. ASTIN Bull 41(2):487–509MathSciNetMATH Chi Y, Tan KS (2011) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CVaR risk measures: a simplified approach. ASTIN Bull 41(2):487–509MathSciNetMATH
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cont R, Deguest R, Scandolo G (2010) Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures. Quant Finan 10(6):593–606MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Cont R, Deguest R, Scandolo G (2010) Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures. Quant Finan 10(6):593–606MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Denuit M, Dhaene J, Goovaerts M, Kaas R (2006) Actuarial theory for dependent risks: measures, orders and models. Wiley, Chichester Denuit M, Dhaene J, Goovaerts M, Kaas R (2006) Actuarial theory for dependent risks: measures, orders and models. Wiley, Chichester
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dhaene J, Denuit M, Goovaerts MJ, Kaas R, Vyncke D (2002a) The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications. Insur Math Econ 31(2):133–161MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dhaene J, Denuit M, Goovaerts MJ, Kaas R, Vyncke D (2002a) The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications. Insur Math Econ 31(2):133–161MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dhaene J, Denuit M, Goovaerts MJ, Kaas R, Vyncke D (2002b) The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory. Insur Math Econ 31(1):3–33MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dhaene J, Denuit M, Goovaerts MJ, Kaas R, Vyncke D (2002b) The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory. Insur Math Econ 31(1):3–33MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber HU (1979) An introduction to mathematical risk theory. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, PhiladelphiaMATH Gerber HU (1979) An introduction to mathematical risk theory. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, PhiladelphiaMATH
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Golubin A (2006) Pareto-optimal insurance policies in the models with a premium based on the actuarial value. J Risk Insur 73(3):469–487MathSciNetCrossRef Golubin A (2006) Pareto-optimal insurance policies in the models with a premium based on the actuarial value. J Risk Insur 73(3):469–487MathSciNetCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hürlimann W (2011) Optimal reinsurance revisited-point of view of cedent and reinsurer. ASTIN Bull 41(02):547–574MathSciNetMATH Hürlimann W (2011) Optimal reinsurance revisited-point of view of cedent and reinsurer. ASTIN Bull 41(02):547–574MathSciNetMATH
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ignatov ZG, Kaishev VK, Krachunov RS (2004) Optimal retention levels, given the joint survival of cedent and reinsurer. Scand Actuar J 2004(6):401–430MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Ignatov ZG, Kaishev VK, Krachunov RS (2004) Optimal retention levels, given the joint survival of cedent and reinsurer. Scand Actuar J 2004(6):401–430MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (2012) Dynamic optimization: the calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management. Courier Corporation, New YorkMATH Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (2012) Dynamic optimization: the calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management. Courier Corporation, New YorkMATH
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann EL, Romano JP (2006) Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkMATH Lehmann EL, Romano JP (2006) Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkMATH
29.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Luenberger DG (1969) Optimization by vector space methods. Wiley, New YorkMATH Luenberger DG (1969) Optimization by vector space methods. Wiley, New YorkMATH
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Meeks HD, Francis R (1973) Duality relationships for a nonlinear version of the generalized neyman-pearson problem. J Optim Theory Appl 11(4):360–378MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Meeks HD, Francis R (1973) Duality relationships for a nonlinear version of the generalized neyman-pearson problem. J Optim Theory Appl 11(4):360–378MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Raviv A (1979) The design of an optimal insurance policy. Am Econ Rev 69(1):84–96 Raviv A (1979) The design of an optimal insurance policy. Am Econ Rev 69(1):84–96
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rustagi JS (2014) Optimization techniques in statistics. Elsevier, AmsterdamMATH Rustagi JS (2014) Optimization techniques in statistics. Elsevier, AmsterdamMATH
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Weng C, Zhuang SC (2017) CDF formulation for solving an optimal reinsurance problem. Scand Actuar J 2017(5):395–418MathSciNetCrossRef Weng C, Zhuang SC (2017) CDF formulation for solving an optimal reinsurance problem. Scand Actuar J 2017(5):395–418MathSciNetCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng Y, Cui W, Yang J (2015) Optimal reinsurance under distortion risk measures and expected value premium principle for reinsurer. J Syst Sci Complex 28(1):122–143CrossRefMATH Zheng Y, Cui W, Yang J (2015) Optimal reinsurance under distortion risk measures and expected value premium principle for reinsurer. J Syst Sci Complex 28(1):122–143CrossRefMATH
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhuang SC, Weng C, Tan KS, Assa H (2016) Marginal indemnification function formulation for optimal reinsurance. Insur Math Econ 67:65–76MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Zhuang SC, Weng C, Tan KS, Assa H (2016) Marginal indemnification function formulation for optimal reinsurance. Insur Math Econ 67:65–76MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Metadaten
Titel
On Pareto-optimal reinsurance with constraints under distortion risk measures
verfasst von
Wenjun Jiang
Hanping Hong
Jiandong Ren
Publikationsdatum
21.12.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Actuarial Journal / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2190-9733
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-9741
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-017-0163-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

European Actuarial Journal 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe