Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Pasinetti’s Main Research Lines. On Productivity Changes and on Ricardo

verfasst von : Mauro L. Baranzini, Amalia Mirante

Erschienen in: Luigi L. Pasinetti: An Intellectual Biography

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Baranzini and Mirante maintain that by taking into account the whole of his activity, Pasinetti’s scientific contribution may be divided into nine, strongly inter-related, strands. They are on: (1) the measurement of technical progress; (2) Ricardo; (3) income distribution and profit determination; (4) capital theory; (5) structural economic dynamics and vertical integration; (6) pure labour theory of value; (7) natural versus institutional relations; (8) stylized facts and resource scarcity; (9) the roots of the recent financial crises and the Modigliani-Miller Theorem. In this chapter Baranzini and Mirante expound in detail the first ‘Two-Cambridges controversy’ on the measurement of productivity changes (which saw Pasinetti fiercely debating with Bob Solow back in 1959), and the seminal contribution by Pasinetti on ‘Ricardo and classical political economy’.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
This is how Nicholas Kaldor did sketch Pasinetti’s scientific contribution in one of his letters of reference dated 1982:
1.
The ‘Pasinetti Theorem’ concerning the independence of the rate of profits of the saving propensity of workers (in (2));
 
2.
The refutation of the Samuelson-Levhari, non-switching theorem (in (4));
 
3.
The formulation of the concept of vertically integrated (and ‘hyper-integrated’) sectors and their relation to Sraffa’s sub-systems (in (3));
 
4.
The measurement of productivity changes (in (6));
 
5.
A multi-sector model of economic growth with different rates of technical progress in different sectors (in (5));
 
6.
Important new theorems concerning linear models of production (in (1)).
 
Kaldor gave the following references: (1) Lectures on the Theory of Production, Columbia University Press, New York, and Macmillan, London, 1977, pp. 285+xiv. (2) Growth and Income Distribution–Essays in Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1974, pp. 151+x. (3) ‘The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis’, in Metroeconomica, 1973, vol. xxv. (4) ‘Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Technique’, in Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 1966, Vol. lxxx. (5) ‘A New Theoretical Approach to the Problems of Economic Growth’, in the Economic Approach to Development Planning, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia No. 28, 1965. (6) ‘On Concepts and Measures of Changes in Productivity’, in The Review of Economics and Statistics, no. 3, August 1959.
 
2
See Sect. 2.​4, Footnote 52.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arena, R. 1982. Réflexions sur la compatibilité des approches ricardiennes et keynésiennes du fonctionnement de l’activité économique. Économie Appliquée 35 (3): 405–448. Arena, R. 1982. Réflexions sur la compatibilité des approches ricardiennes et keynésiennes du fonctionnement de l’activité économique. Économie Appliquée 35 (3): 405–448.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1992. Une synthèse entre post-keynésiens et néo-ricardiens est-elle encore possible? L’actualité Économique 68 (4): 587–606.CrossRef ———. 1992. Une synthèse entre post-keynésiens et néo-ricardiens est-elle encore possible? L’actualité Économique 68 (4): 587–606.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M. 1982, ed. Advances in Economic Theory. Oxford: B. Blackwell. Baranzini, M. 1982, ed. Advances in Economic Theory. Oxford: B. Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M., and G.C. Harcourt, eds. 1993. The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti. Basingstoke and London/New York: Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press. Baranzini, M., and G.C. Harcourt, eds. 1993. The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti. Basingstoke and London/New York: Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M., and P.L. Porta. 2017. Luigi Lodovico Pasinetti. In The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics, ed. R.A. Cord, 979–1001. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Baranzini, M., and P.L. Porta. 2017. Luigi Lodovico Pasinetti. In The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics, ed. R.A. Cord, 979–1001. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M., and R. Scazzieri, eds. 1986. Foundations of Economics: Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell. Baranzini, M., and R. Scazzieri, eds. 1986. Foundations of Economics: Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellino, E. 2014. Pasinetti on Ricardo. In The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, ed. H.D. Kurz and N. Salvadori, 396–404. Cheltenham/Northampton: E. Elgar. Bellino, E. 2014. Pasinetti on Ricardo. In The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, ed. H.D. Kurz and N. Salvadori, 396–404. Cheltenham/Northampton: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Bliss, C.J. 1986. Progress and Anti-progress in Economic Science. InFoundations of Economics, ed. M. Baranzini and R. Scazzieri, 363–376. Oxford/New York: B. Blackwell. Bliss, C.J. 1986. Progress and Anti-progress in Economic Science. InFoundations of Economics, ed. M. Baranzini and R. Scazzieri, 363–376. Oxford/New York: B. Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Caravale, G.A., ed. 1976. The Cambridge Debate on the Theory of Capital and Distribution. Perugia: Università degli Studi, mimeo. Caravale, G.A., ed. 1976. The Cambridge Debate on the Theory of Capital and Distribution. Perugia: Università degli Studi, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat Caravale, G.A., and D.A. Tosato, eds. 1980. Ricardo and the Theory of Value, Distribution and Growth. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Caravale, G.A., and D.A. Tosato, eds. 1980. Ricardo and the Theory of Value, Distribution and Growth. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Zurück zum Zitat Casarosa, C. 1978. A New Formulation of the Ricardian System. Oxford Economic Papers 30 (1): 38–63.CrossRef Casarosa, C. 1978. A New Formulation of the Ricardian System. Oxford Economic Papers 30 (1): 38–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1982. The New View of the Ricardian Theory of Distribution and Economic Growth. In Advances in Economic Theory, ed. M. Baranzini, 227–239. Op. cit. ———. 1982. The New View of the Ricardian Theory of Distribution and Economic Growth. In Advances in Economic Theory, ed. M. Baranzini, 227–239. Op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat Costabile, L., and R. Scazzieri. 2012. Il pensiero economico nei decenni successivi al secondo dopoguerra. In Il contributo italiano alla storia del pensiero. Economia, ed. V. Negri Zamagni, P.L. Porta, L. Costabile, R. Faucci, C. Perrotta, R. Scazzieri, and G. Todeschini, 739–765. Rome: Enciclopedia Italiana di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Costabile, L., and R. Scazzieri. 2012. Il pensiero economico nei decenni successivi al secondo dopoguerra. In Il contributo italiano alla storia del pensiero. Economia, ed. V. Negri Zamagni, P.L. Porta, L. Costabile, R. Faucci, C. Perrotta, R. Scazzieri, and G. Todeschini, 739–765. Rome: Enciclopedia Italiana di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti.
Zurück zum Zitat Darity, W.A. 1981. The Simple Analytics of Neo-Ricardian Growth and Distribution. The American Economic Review 71 (5): 978–993. Darity, W.A. 1981. The Simple Analytics of Neo-Ricardian Growth and Distribution. The American Economic Review 71 (5): 978–993.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vivo, G. 1987. David Ricardo. In The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman, vol. IV, 183–198. London/New York: Macmillan. De Vivo, G. 1987. David Ricardo. In The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman, vol. IV, 183–198. London/New York: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorfman, R. 1965. Discussion. Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia 28: 691–692. Dorfman, R. 1965. Discussion. Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia 28: 691–692.
Zurück zum Zitat Eygelshoven, P.J., and S.K. Kuipers. 1981. A Note on Pasinetti’s “Ricardian System”. The Review of Economic Studies 48 (1): 185–186.CrossRef Eygelshoven, P.J., and S.K. Kuipers. 1981. A Note on Pasinetti’s “Ricardian System”. The Review of Economic Studies 48 (1): 185–186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Groenewegen, P.D. 1993. Marshall on Ricardo. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 45–70, op. cit. Groenewegen, P.D. 1993. Marshall on Ricardo. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 45–70, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat Halevi, J. 2016. Luigi Pasinetti and the Political Economy of Growth and Distribution, Working Paper No. 40. New York: Institute for Economic Thinking; reprinted in Halevi, J., et al., eds. 2016. Post Keynesian Essays from Down Under, vol. IV, 310–326. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Halevi, J. 2016. Luigi Pasinetti and the Political Economy of Growth and Distribution, Working Paper No. 40. New York: Institute for Economic Thinking; reprinted in Halevi, J., et al., eds. 2016. Post Keynesian Essays from Down Under, vol. IV, 310–326. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Harcourt, G.C. 1976. The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons – or Dead End? Oxford Economic Papers: 25–65. Harcourt, G.C. 1976. The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons – or Dead End? Oxford Economic Papers: 25–65.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1982. Post Keynesianism: Quite Wrong and/or Nothing New? In Thames Papers in Political Economy; reprinted in Arestis, P., and Skouras, T., eds. 1985. Post Keynesian Economic Theory, 125–145. Brighton/Armonk: M. E. Sharpe/Wheatsheaf. ———. 1982. Post Keynesianism: Quite Wrong and/or Nothing New? In Thames Papers in Political Economy; reprinted in Arestis, P., and Skouras, T., eds. 1985. Post Keynesian Economic Theory, 125–145. Brighton/Armonk: M. E. Sharpe/Wheatsheaf.
Zurück zum Zitat Harcourt, G.C., and P. Kriesler. 2016. On Ricardo and Cambridge. In Reclaiming Pluralism in Economics. Essays in Honour of John E. King, ed. J. Courvisanos, J. Doughney, and A. Millmow, 150–167. Oxford/New York: Routledge. Harcourt, G.C., and P. Kriesler. 2016. On Ricardo and Cambridge. In Reclaiming Pluralism in Economics. Essays in Honour of John E. King, ed. J. Courvisanos, J. Doughney, and A. Millmow, 150–167. Oxford/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Hicks, J.R. 1979. The Ricardian System: A Comment. Oxford Economic Papers 31 (1): 133–134.CrossRef Hicks, J.R. 1979. The Ricardian System: A Comment. Oxford Economic Papers 31 (1): 133–134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hicks, J.R., and S. Hollander. 1977. Mr. Ricardo and the Modern. Quarterly Journal of Economics 91 (3): 351–369.CrossRef Hicks, J.R., and S. Hollander. 1977. Mr. Ricardo and the Modern. Quarterly Journal of Economics 91 (3): 351–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hishiyama, I. 1993. Physiocratic Dichotomy in Price Determination and Its Ricardian Resolution. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 71–94, op. cit. Hishiyama, I. 1993. Physiocratic Dichotomy in Price Determination and Its Ricardian Resolution. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 71–94, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurz, H.D., and N. Salvadori. 1993. The “Standard Commodity” and Ricardo’s Search for an “Invariable Measure of Value”. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 95–123, op. cit. Kurz, H.D., and N. Salvadori. 1993. The “Standard Commodity” and Ricardo’s Search for an “Invariable Measure of Value”. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 95–123, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat Maneschi, A. 1993. Ricardian Comparative Advantage and the Perils of the Stationary State. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 124–146, op. cit. Maneschi, A. 1993. Ricardian Comparative Advantage and the Perils of the Stationary State. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 124–146, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattauch, L., D. Klenert, J.E. Stiglitz, and O. Edenhofer. 2017. Piketty Meets Pasinetti: On Public Investment and Intelligent Machinery. Oxford: Institute for the New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School. Mattauch, L., D. Klenert, J.E. Stiglitz, and O. Edenhofer. 2017. Piketty Meets Pasinetti: On Public Investment and Intelligent Machinery. Oxford: Institute for the New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasinetti, L.L. 1959. ‘On Concepts and Measures of Changes in Productivity’ and ‘Reply to Robert M. Solow’. The Review of Economics and Statistics 41 (3): 270–282 and 285–286. Pasinetti, L.L. 1959. ‘On Concepts and Measures of Changes in Productivity’ and ‘Reply to Robert M. Solow’. The Review of Economics and Statistics 41 (3): 270–282 and 285–286.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1960. A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System. The Review of Economic Studies 27 (2): 78–98.CrossRef ———. 1960. A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System. The Review of Economic Studies 27 (2): 78–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1962. Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies 29 (4): 267–279.CrossRef ———. 1962. Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies 29 (4): 267–279.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1964/5. Causalità e interdipendenza nell’analisi econometrica e nella teoria economica. In Annuario dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Anno Accademico 1964–65, 233–250. Milan: Vita e Pensiero. ———. 1964/5. Causalità e interdipendenza nell’analisi econometrica e nella teoria economica. In Annuario dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Anno Accademico 1964–65, 233–250. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1965. A New Theoretical Approach to the Problems of Economic Growth. Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia 28: 572–687 and 692–693. ———. 1965. A New Theoretical Approach to the Problems of Economic Growth. Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia 28: 572–687 and 692–693.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1966. Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (4): 503–517 (Leading Paper of the Symposium on Capital Theory, ed. Paul A. Samuelson). ———. 1966. Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (4): 503–517 (Leading Paper of the Symposium on Capital Theory, ed. Paul A. Samuelson).
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1969. Switches of Techniques and the “Rate of Return” in Capital Theory. The Economic Journal 79 (315): 508–531.CrossRef ———. 1969. Switches of Techniques and the “Rate of Return” in Capital Theory. The Economic Journal 79 (315): 508–531.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1972. Reply to Mr Dougherty. The Economic Journal 82 (328): 1351–1352.CrossRef ———. 1972. Reply to Mr Dougherty. The Economic Journal 82 (328): 1351–1352.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1973. The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis. Metroeconomica 25 (1): 1–29; reprinted in Pasinetti, L.L., ed. 1980. Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, 16–43, op. cit. ———. 1973. The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis. Metroeconomica 25 (1): 1–29; reprinted in Pasinetti, L.L., ed. 1980. Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, 16–43, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1974. Growth and Income Distribution: Essays in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1974. Growth and Income Distribution: Essays in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1981. On the Ricardian Theory of Value: A Note. The Review of Economic Studies 48 (4): 673–675.CrossRef ———. 1981. On the Ricardian Theory of Value: A Note. The Review of Economic Studies 48 (4): 673–675.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1982. A Comment on the “New View” of the Ricardian Theory. In Advances in Economic Theory, ed. M. Baranzini, 240–242, op. cit. ———. 1982. A Comment on the “New View” of the Ricardian Theory. In Advances in Economic Theory, ed. M. Baranzini, 240–242, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1986. Theory of Value – A Source of Alternative Paradigms in Economic Analysis. In Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, ed. M. Baranzini and R. Scazzieri, 409–431, op. cit. ———. 1986. Theory of Value – A Source of Alternative Paradigms in Economic Analysis. In Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, ed. M. Baranzini and R. Scazzieri, 409–431, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1989. Ricardian Debt/Taxation Equivalence in the Kaldor Theory of Profits and Income Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 13 (1): 25–36. ———. 1989. Ricardian Debt/Taxation Equivalence in the Kaldor Theory of Profits and Income Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 13 (1): 25–36.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1993. Structural Economic Dynamics: A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef ———. 1993. Structural Economic Dynamics: A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2000. Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53 (215): 383–431. ———. 2000. Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53 (215): 383–431.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2003. ‘Letter to the Editor’, in ‘Comments – Cambridge Capital Controversies’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (4): 227–228. (A Comment on Avi J. Cohen, and Geoffrey C. Harcourt’s Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies, same Journal 17 (1): 199–214.)CrossRef ———. 2003. ‘Letter to the Editor’, in ‘Comments – Cambridge Capital Controversies’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (4): 227–228. (A Comment on Avi J. Cohen, and Geoffrey C. Harcourt’s Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies, same Journal 17 (1): 199–214.)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2007. Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians: A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to Be Accomplished. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 2007. Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians: A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to Be Accomplished. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2015. On the Origin of the Theory of Rent in Economics. In Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics, ed. M. Baranzini, C. Rotondi, and R. Scazzieri, 35–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 2015. On the Origin of the Theory of Rent in Economics. In Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics, ed. M. Baranzini, C. Rotondi, and R. Scazzieri, 35–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Porta, P.L. 1990. David Ricardo. La sistemazione teorica della concorrenza e del mercato. In Il pensiero economico: temi, problemi, correnti, scuole, ed. G. Becattini, 101–147. Torino: UTET. Porta, P.L. 1990. David Ricardo. La sistemazione teorica della concorrenza e del mercato. In Il pensiero economico: temi, problemi, correnti, scuole, ed. G. Becattini, 101–147. Torino: UTET.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1992. David Ricardo: Notes on Malthus’s ‘Measure of Value’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef ———. 1992. David Ricardo: Notes on Malthus’s ‘Measure of Value’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2001. Sraffa’s Ricardo After Fifty Years: A Preliminary Estimate. In Reflexions on the Classical Canon in Economics. Essays in Honor of Samuel Hollander, ed. E.L. Forget and S. Peart, 241–269. London/New York: Routledge. ———. 2001. Sraffa’s Ricardo After Fifty Years: A Preliminary Estimate. In Reflexions on the Classical Canon in Economics. Essays in Honor of Samuel Hollander, ed. E.L. Forget and S. Peart, 241–269. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson, J.V. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan. Robinson, J.V. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Roncaglia, A. 1988. The Neo-Ricardian Approach and the Distribution of Income. In Theories of Income Distribution, ed. A. Asimakopulos, 159–180. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef Roncaglia, A. 1988. The Neo-Ricardian Approach and the Distribution of Income. In Theories of Income Distribution, ed. A. Asimakopulos, 159–180. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rossi, A.A. 1966. La dinamica Ricardiana. Lugano: La Buona Stampa. Rossi, A.A. 1966. La dinamica Ricardiana. Lugano: La Buona Stampa.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvadori, N., and R. Signorino. 2016. From Stationary State to Endogenous Growth: International Trade in the Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System. Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (3): 895–912.CrossRef Salvadori, N., and R. Signorino. 2016. From Stationary State to Endogenous Growth: International Trade in the Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System. Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (3): 895–912.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, P.A. 1959a,b. A Modern Treatment of the Ricardian Economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 73 (1–2): 1–35 & 217–31. Samuelson, P.A. 1959a,b. A Modern Treatment of the Ricardian Economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 73 (1–2): 1–35 & 217–31.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1966. A Summing Up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (4): 568–583.CrossRef ———. 1966. A Summing Up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (4): 568–583.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Say, J.B. 1817. Traité d’économie politique (1st ed., 1803). 3rd ed. Paris: Déterville. Say, J.B. 1817. Traité d’économie politique (1st ed., 1803). 3rd ed. Paris: Déterville.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaikh, A. 1980. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: Humbug II. In Growth, Profits and Property, ed. E.J. Nell, 80–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Shaikh, A. 1980. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: Humbug II. In Growth, Profits and Property, ed. E.J. Nell, 80–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1987. Humbug Production Function. In The New Palgrave, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, vol. 2, 690–691, op. cit. ———. 1987. Humbug Production Function. In The New Palgrave, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, vol. 2, 690–691, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat Solow, R.M. 1959. Comment on Pasinetti. Review of Economics and Statistics 41 (3): 282–285. Solow, R.M. 1959. Comment on Pasinetti. Review of Economics and Statistics 41 (3): 282–285.
Zurück zum Zitat Zamagni, S. 1984. On Ricardo and Hayek Effects in a Fixwage Model of Traverse. In Economic Theory and Hicksian Themes, ed. D.A. Collard et al., 135–151. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Zamagni, S. 1984. On Ricardo and Hayek Effects in a Fixwage Model of Traverse. In Economic Theory and Hicksian Themes, ed. D.A. Collard et al., 135–151. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Pasinetti’s Main Research Lines. On Productivity Changes and on Ricardo
verfasst von
Mauro L. Baranzini
Amalia Mirante
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71072-3_5