Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Pasinetti on Post-Keynesian Income Distribution and Growth Theory: The Basic Issues

verfasst von : Mauro L. Baranzini, Amalia Mirante

Erschienen in: Luigi L. Pasinetti: An Intellectual Biography

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Baranzini and Mirante consider here the basic issues of the second ‘Two-Cambridges controversy’ on income distribution and profit determination. It was sparked by Pasinetti in 1962; and the controversy saw him, Nicky Kaldor, Richard Kahn and Joan Robinson on the Cambridge UK side, and Samuelson, Modigliani, Stiglitz, Meade and even Frank Hahn on the Cambridge US side. This controversy has generated at least 400 papers in scholarly journals, numerous books and a ‘must’ reference in a large number of textbooks. Pasinetti’s paper has about 350 quotations in the Social Science Citation index. This chapter expounds the origins and the implications of the so-called Pasinetti’s Theorem (‘Cambridge equation’), as well as of the Anti-Pasinetti, or Dual, Theorem formulated by Samuelson and Modigliani in 1966.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
One might say that it is not necessarily the most original and groundbreaking contribution of Pasinetti; but some of the most recent literature, especially in connection with Piketty’s (2014) analysis, has positively reassessed the relevance of the Kaldor-Pasinetti theorem of income and wealth distribution.
 
2
On this point, see Pasinetti (1974a, p. 121).
 
3
Geoff Harcourt has pointed out to us that ‘RCOM i.e. Robin Matthews is hardly a marginalist’. This may certainly be true, but Hahn’s and Matthews’ long and renowned survey on economic growth published in the Economic Journal in 1964, as well as their 1971 post-scriptum to the theory of economic growth, has a distinct marginalist blend. During his lectures given in Michaelmas Term 1971 at the Oxford Institute of Economics and Statistics, St. Cross Building, Robin Matthews gave indeed a marginal relevance to the post-Keynesian models of income distribution and capital accumulation that had been elaborated in Cambridge few years earlier. In fact, from 1949 to 1965 Matthews was a Cambridge lecturer in economics and fellow of St. John’s College. In 1965, he returned to Oxford to take up the Drummond Chair of Political Economy at All Souls College, before returning to Cambridge in 1975 as Master of Clare College (1975–93) and as Professor of Political Economy (1980–91).
 
4
Joan V. Robinson wrote to Richard F. Kahn, who was in Geneva at that time, an account of this particular meeting on Wednesday, November 2, 1955. She wrote: ‘We had Nicky at Tuesday. His aim was to get his own theory clear before reading mine. It was quite a good evening, but he was a bit disappointed that he has not got any further. He set out to find a theory of the constant relative shares and after going over Ricardo, Walras etc. (this was quite fun) came down for the Widow’s Cruse theory that given p-to-consume [propensity to consume] out of wages and profits each separately the shares are determined by the rate of investment. But when about 11.15 I asked him how he got the share of investment constant he did not seem to have any views. I fear it will be a long time year before he has ‘figured out’ enough for it to be possible to argue about the fine points. Meanwhile I amuse myself explaining it to the research students’ (Letter from Joan V. Robinson to Richard F. Kahn, October 31, 1955, RKP 13/90/211-7; quoted in King 1998, p. 418).
 
5
See Mari (2010, pp. 112–3). We provide a passage of Mari’s Ph.D. thesis:
Kaldor presented his Keynesian theory of income distribution at a meeting of the Secret Seminar that took place in Ruth Cohen’s rooms in Newham College on Monday the 31st of October 1955. [Footnote: The Secret Seminar, though it was also known as Tuesday Group, met on Mondays (Marris 1991, p. 203 and Pasinetti 2007, p. 74). Joan V. Robinson wrote to Kahn an account (see footnote 5 above) of this particular meeting on Wednesday, the 2nd of November 1955. Therefore, this seminar should have taken place the previous Monday, the 31st of October 1955.] To reconstruct what happened that evening of autumn of over fifty years ago, we found four accounts of it, those of Joan V. Robinson [1955, see her letter to R. F. Kahn quoted above], Anthony P. Thirlwall (1987) and Robin Marris (1991, 2003). They all, with the exception of Joan Robinson’s letter, rely on human memory, looking back many years. And we have to take into account that human memory can be fallible. At this meeting of the Secret Seminar were certainly present Nicholas Kaldor himself, Joan V. Robinson, Robin L. Marris, Harry G. Johnson and Ruth L. Cohen. Richard F. Kahn, who worked on several occasions for international organisations, was absent because he spent the year 1955 in Geneva as a member of the Research and Planning Division of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
Mari then adds that in those years Robin Marris and Harry Johnson ‘were two of the most interesting exponents of the younger generation of Cambridge economists, both associated with King’s College. At that time, Marris was Assistant director of research, whereas Johnson was Lecturer and taught courses on ‘Money and Banking’ and ‘International Monetary Theory’ for the preliminary examination in economics and on ‘Advanced Theory of International trade’ and ‘Classes on Monetary Theory’ (with Joan Robinson) for the Economics Tripos Part II’. To this we may add that according to Thirlwall (1987, p. 165), quoted by Mari (2010, p. 114), ‘Harry Johnson, then Fellow of King’s, who was a Keynesian at the time, attended the seminar. Johnson saw immediately that if investment determines saving, and the propensity to save out of profits is different from (higher than) the propensity to save out of wages, the investment ratio must be associated with a unique distribution of income between wages and profits. Kaldor wrote up his paper in less than a week and submitted it to the Review of Economic Studies at the end of December [1955]’. This is why in 2003 the first author of this volume wrote to the then still living Robin Marris (1924–2012) asking if the role of himself and Harry Johnson had been crucial for the formulation of Kaldor’s equation. Marris replied in the following way: ‘The answer is yes and no. Date late fifties I think. Nicky produced his Great Rabbit, inverting the Keynesian income-determining theory into a distribution theory, at the SS [Secret Seminar], but said he needed another equation to close it. He didn’t. He was already there. Harry [Johnson] and I sent him notes to that effect and I sent a note on the first-order stability conditions. Nicky phoned me and said he couldn’t quite follow my note. I volunteered to come down to his rooms. But that was no good. He was on his way to a lecture.’
 
6
In other words, the behaviour of the working class, as it is represented by their propensity to consume and to save, as well by their pattern of accumulation, does not interfere with the distribution of income between profits and wages, or with the determination of the profit rate (as well as the wage rate). In a certain sense, we find again the classical proposition: the capitalist class provides most of the savings held within the system and determines the path of capital accumulation of the whole society; through their behaviour, they heavily influence the distribution of income among factors of production. Of course, the non-entrepreneurial classes may, through their saving, consumption and accumulation behaviour, influence (as it seems logical) the distribution of income among classes and their accumulation of savings path. The decisions relative to investment and growth of the productive system then come to be taken by a sort of ‘entrepreneurial élite’. The case of our modern and post-industrial societies is quite illuminating: public authorities, via their fiscal and monetary policies, try to reach a predetermined ‘required’ rate of growth for the system that will allow them both to check public expenditure and to reach other economic policy goals.
 
7
The staying at the MIT was arranged by Jim Mirrlees who had been there as visiting professor in the spring of 1976, and Cary Brown, then Chairman of the Department of Economics, kindly gave his consent. James S. Duesenberry, then Chairman of the Department of Economics, sponsored the staying at Harvard.
 
8
The title of the article was initially suggested to the author by Walter A. Eltis, then Editor of the Oxford Economic Papers and Fellow of Exeter College.
 
9
This version of the controversy has been confirmed by Paul Samuelson to the first author of this volume in a letter dated March 29, 2004.
 
10
We exclude the case s w ˃ s c (P/Y) = I/Y for which the economy cannot be in a steady state, which is outside the scope of this type of analysis. In such a case, in post-Keynesian terms, the economic system would be in a situation in which there is a lack of effective demand and therefore continuing unemployment, which is inconsistent with the assumption of full employment that underlies this kind of analysis.
 
11
As pointed out in Part I, Frank Hahn was most probably invited to join the discussion by Nicky Kaldor, but eventually did not send a paper. With James E. Meade (and to a lesser extent Robin Matthews), he would have been a sort of ‘fifth column’ of Cambridge US working in Cambridge UK.
 
12
Apart from the already-quoted Meade (1963, 1966a), Hahn (1964), Meade and Hahn (1965) and Samuelson and Modigliani (1966a, b), we find, for instance, in chronological order, Sato (1966), Stiglitz (1967), Britto (1969, 1972, 1973), W. W. Chang (1969), Ferguson (1969, 1972), Ramser (1969, 1972), Uzawa (1969), Furono (1970), Mückl (1970), Balestra and Baranzini (1971), Hahn and Matthews (1971), Vaughan (1971, 1979, 1988), Guha (1972), Hu (1973), Bevan (1974), Folkers (1974a, b), Ng (1974), Campa (1975), Rau (1975), Schlicht (1975), Blattner (1976), Ramanathan (1976), Brems (1979), Woodfield and McDonald (1979, 1981, 1982), Bombach (1981), Domenghino (1982), Kano (1985), Fleck and Domenghino (1987, 1990), Miyazaki (1987a,b, 1988, 1991), Samuelson (1991).
 
13
Nicholas Kaldor to Mauro Baranzini, February 15, 1982.
 
14
Ibid.
 
15
But see also Pasinetti (2000).
 
16
In a different setting (which includes life-cycle saving and a tax system aiming at drastically reducing the inequality of wealth distribution), Mattauch, Klenert, Stiglitz and Edenhofer (2017), Taylor (2014) and Zamparelli (2015), inspired by Piketty (2014), consider also what they define the ‘Anti-Anti-Pasinetti case’, where workers do disappear from the economic system, since ‘there are more diverse uses and forms of capital and more possibilities to substitute capital for labor (e.g. replacing delivery workers by drones or self-driving trucks)’ as Piketty and Saez (2014) maintain, quoted in Mattauch, Klenert, Stiglitz and Edenhofer (2017, p. 4). The latter scholars (2017, p. 3) set themselves to prove that ‘depending on the value of the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor σ and on the level of the capital tax τ, three cases can occur. Either both classes co-exist (‘Pasinetti-state’), or the capitalists (“Anti-Pasinetti-state”) or the workers (“Anti-Anti-Pasinetti-state”) disappear’. It is, however, a complete different setting of analysis; but it shows how relevant is still Pasinetti’s Theorem after 56 years of its original formulation (1962–2018). On this issue see also Pasinetti (2000).
 
17
The term ‘differentiated interest rate’ was first formulated by Balestra and Baranzini (1971). Later on, in Trinity Term of 1975, during his tutorials with the first author of this volume, James Mirrlees was puzzled with the term, and suggested that ‘different interest rate’ might do better.
 
18
We came across Kahn’s contribution by reading the ‘Introduction’ of Panico and Salvadori (1993, p. xv). In fact, they write: ‘Besides, like Kaldor, Kahn recognised the importance of the questions related to the role of the State and of financial markets in the maintenance of steady growth conditions, and claimed that steady growth analysis should assume that the rate of interest is lower than the rate of profit, an assumption that will become crucial in the development of post Keynesian theory.’ Then Panico and Salvadori go on quoting Kahn as follows:
The fact that in a Golden Age capitalists’ expectations are realised in the broad does not exclude the risks involved in the vagaries of technical processes and of consumers’ behaviour. For these reasons, the risk-free rate of interest would even in a Golden Age lie below the rate of profit, with which yields on ordinary shares are more comparable since they involve the same kind of risks as physical investment. (Kahn 1959, p. 150)
Kahn’s article, published (in the Oxford Economic Papers) three years before Pasinetti’s 1962 paper (in The Review of Economic Studies), must have been familiar to the latter. In fact, it was Kahn who was behind the appointment of Pasinetti as a Fellow of King’s College in 1960. But strangely Pasinetti does not refer to the quoted passage of Kahn in his original work, and develops his model, leading to the Cambridge equation, by assuming, as we have already pointed out, that ‘in a long-run equilibrium model, the obvious hypothesis to make is that of a rate of interest equal to the rate of profit’ (Pasinetti 1962, pp. 271–2). Asked explicitly about this episode, Pasinetti replied that at that time he was well aware of Kahn’s article ‘Exercises in the Analysis of Growth’ when he drafted and redrafted his ‘Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth’, but he didn’t recall the above passage when he discussed the relationship between the rate of profit and the rate of interest. Not even Kahn, who read the draft of the article leading to the Cambridge equation, as far as Pasinetti remembers, raised any specific question. Pasinetti recalls, however, that Kahn insisted that the paper (although freshly published in The Review of Economic Studies) should be added as an Appendix to his (Pasinetti’s) Cambridge Ph.D. thesis.
 
19
See, for instance, Baranzini and Mirante (2016).
 
20
Panico and Salvadori start their review of the Cambridge post-Keynesian theory on the ‘public sector and international trade’ by writing:
Some other extensions of the Post Keynesian theory of growth and distribution have examined the influence of government activity and international trade. An article published in 1972 by Steedman introduced government activity into a model of growth and distribution which used Pasinetti’s institutional distinction between workers and capitalists. Steedman moved from Meade’s analysis of the ‘Pasinetti’ and ‘dual theorem’ to argue that in the presence of government activity a ‘Pasinetti equilibrium’ is still possible but, in general, an equilibrium in which the capital/output ratio is independent of the methods of production is not. Steedman characterized government activity in terms of fiscal policy interventions, introducing into the analysis different forms of taxation, government consumption and transfer payments to the workers. He assumed that the government budget is always balanced, so that no problem arises related to monetary policy and to the existence of financial assets issued by the government. (Panico and Salvadori 1993, p. xxii)
 
21
‘It is surprising that the various authors, while trying so many extensions, should have paid so little attention to the role of Government taxation and expenditure, a topic on which Kaldor worked so much in his life’ (Pasinetti 1989a, p. 26).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Araujo, J.T. 1992. The Government Sector in Kaldor-Pasinetti Models of Growth and Income Distribution. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15 (2): 211–228.CrossRef Araujo, J.T. 1992. The Government Sector in Kaldor-Pasinetti Models of Growth and Income Distribution. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15 (2): 211–228.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1994. Four Essays in the Cambridge Theory of Distribution and Growth. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge. ———. 1994. Four Essays in the Cambridge Theory of Distribution and Growth. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1995. Kaldor’s Neo-Pasinetti Theorem and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution. Manchester School of Social and Economic Studies 63 (3): 311–317.CrossRef ———. 1995. Kaldor’s Neo-Pasinetti Theorem and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution. Manchester School of Social and Economic Studies 63 (3): 311–317.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Araujo, R.S.A., and J.R. Teixeira. 2002. Structural Change and Decisions on Investment Allocation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 13 (2): 249–258.CrossRef Araujo, R.S.A., and J.R. Teixeira. 2002. Structural Change and Decisions on Investment Allocation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 13 (2): 249–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Balestra, P., and M. Baranzini. 1971. Some Optimal Aspects in a Two-Class Growth Model with a Differentiated Interest Rate. Kyklos 24 (2): 240–256.CrossRef Balestra, P., and M. Baranzini. 1971. Some Optimal Aspects in a Two-Class Growth Model with a Differentiated Interest Rate. Kyklos 24 (2): 240–256.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M. 1975a. The Pasinetti and the Anti-Pasinetti Theorems: A Reconciliation. Oxford Economic Papers 27 (3): 470–473.CrossRef Baranzini, M. 1975a. The Pasinetti and the Anti-Pasinetti Theorems: A Reconciliation. Oxford Economic Papers 27 (3): 470–473.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1975b. A Two-Class Monetary Growth Model. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 111 (2): 177–189. ———. 1975b. A Two-Class Monetary Growth Model. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 111 (2): 177–189.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1976. On the Distribution of Income in Two-Class Growth Models. D. Phil. Thesis, The Queen’s College, Oxford. ———. 1976. On the Distribution of Income in Two-Class Growth Models. D. Phil. Thesis, The Queen’s College, Oxford.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1991a. A Theory of Wealth Distribution and Accumulation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ———. 1991a. A Theory of Wealth Distribution and Accumulation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1991b. The Pasinetti and Anti-Pasinetti Theorems’: A Reply to K. Miyazaki and P. A. Samuelson. Oxford Economic Papers 43 (2): 195–198.CrossRef ———. 1991b. The Pasinetti and Anti-Pasinetti Theorems’: A Reply to K. Miyazaki and P. A. Samuelson. Oxford Economic Papers 43 (2): 195–198.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1992. The Debate on Kaldor’s Theory of Distribution. In Nicholas Kaldor: The Economics and Politics of Capitalism as a Dynamic System, ed. F. Targetti, 143–159. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ———. 1992. The Debate on Kaldor’s Theory of Distribution. In Nicholas Kaldor: The Economics and Politics of Capitalism as a Dynamic System, ed. F. Targetti, 143–159. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1995. Distribution, Accumulation and Institutions. In The Makers of Modern Economics, ed. A. Heertje, vol. II, 1–28. Aldershot/Brookfield: E. Elgar. ———. 1995. Distribution, Accumulation and Institutions. In The Makers of Modern Economics, ed. A. Heertje, vol. II, 1–28. Aldershot/Brookfield: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2001. The Foundations of the Cambridge School of Income Distribution and Structural Change. In Growth Redistribution and Structural Change, ed. J.R. Teixeira and F.G. Carneiro, 11–45. Brasilia: Universa Editora. ———. 2001. The Foundations of the Cambridge School of Income Distribution and Structural Change. In Growth Redistribution and Structural Change, ed. J.R. Teixeira and F.G. Carneiro, 11–45. Brasilia: Universa Editora.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2005. Modigliani’s Life-Cycle Theory of Savings Fifty Years Later. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 58 (233–4): 109–172. ———. 2005. Modigliani’s Life-Cycle Theory of Savings Fifty Years Later. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 58 (233–4): 109–172.
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M., and C. Mari. 2010. The Cantabrigensis-Italian School of Income and Wealth Distribution. Paper presented at the Conference ‘Gli economisti postkeynesiani di Cambridge e l’Italia’, Atti dei Convegni Lincei, Rome: Scienze e Lettere, 235–340. Baranzini, M., and C. Mari. 2010. The Cantabrigensis-Italian School of Income and Wealth Distribution. Paper presented at the Conference ‘Gli economisti postkeynesiani di Cambridge e l’Italia’, Atti dei Convegni Lincei, Rome: Scienze e Lettere, 235–340.
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M., and A. Mirante. 2016. A Compendium of Italian Economists at Oxbridge: Contributions to the Evolution of Economic Thinking. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Baranzini, M., and A. Mirante. 2016. A Compendium of Italian Economists at Oxbridge: Contributions to the Evolution of Economic Thinking. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M., and R. Scazzieri. 1997. Profit and Rent in a Model of Capital Accumulation and Structural Dynamics. In Essays in Honour of Geoffrey C. Harcourt, ed. P. Arestis, G. Palma, and M. Sawyer, 121–132. London/New York: Routledge. Baranzini, M., and R. Scazzieri. 1997. Profit and Rent in a Model of Capital Accumulation and Structural Dynamics. In Essays in Honour of Geoffrey C. Harcourt, ed. P. Arestis, G. Palma, and M. Sawyer, 121–132. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Baranzini, M., S.O. Benjuino, and J.R. Teixeira. 2003. Taxation on Intergenerational Bequest and Redistribution of Wealth in a Class-Setting, Discussion Paper n. 279. Brasilia: Department of Economics, University of Brasilia. Baranzini, M., S.O. Benjuino, and J.R. Teixeira. 2003. Taxation on Intergenerational Bequest and Redistribution of Wealth in a Class-Setting, Discussion Paper n. 279. Brasilia: Department of Economics, University of Brasilia.
Zurück zum Zitat Bevan, D.L. 1974. Savings, Inheritance and Economic Growth in the Presence of Earning Inequality, mimeo. Oxford: St. John’s College. Bevan, D.L. 1974. Savings, Inheritance and Economic Growth in the Presence of Earning Inequality, mimeo. Oxford: St. John’s College.
Zurück zum Zitat Blattner, N. 1976. Corporate Finance and Income Distribution in a Growing Economy. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 86 (2): 223–238. Blattner, N. 1976. Corporate Finance and Income Distribution in a Growing Economy. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 86 (2): 223–238.
Zurück zum Zitat Bombach, G. 1981. Ein Modell und sein Echo. Kyklos 34 (4): 517–539.CrossRef Bombach, G. 1981. Ein Modell und sein Echo. Kyklos 34 (4): 517–539.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bortis, H. 1993. Notes on the Cambridge Equation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 16 (1): 105–126.CrossRef Bortis, H. 1993. Notes on the Cambridge Equation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 16 (1): 105–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brems, H. 1979. Alternative Theories of Pricing, Distribution, Saving and Investment. American Economic Review 69 (1): 161–165. Brems, H. 1979. Alternative Theories of Pricing, Distribution, Saving and Investment. American Economic Review 69 (1): 161–165.
Zurück zum Zitat Britto, R. 1969. The Life-Cycle Savings in a Two-Class Growth Model. Paper presented at the December Meeting of the Econometric Society, New York. Britto, R. 1969. The Life-Cycle Savings in a Two-Class Growth Model. Paper presented at the December Meeting of the Econometric Society, New York.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1972. On Differential Savings Propensities in Two-Class Growth Models. The Review of Economic Studies 39 (4): 491–494.CrossRef ———. 1972. On Differential Savings Propensities in Two-Class Growth Models. The Review of Economic Studies 39 (4): 491–494.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1973. Some Recent Developments in the Theory of Economic Growth: An Interpretation. Journal of Economic Literature 11 (4): 1343–1366. ———. 1973. Some Recent Developments in the Theory of Economic Growth: An Interpretation. Journal of Economic Literature 11 (4): 1343–1366.
Zurück zum Zitat Campa, G. 1975. Indeterminatezza del saggio di profitto e rilevanza della propensione a risparmiare dei lavoratori e della tecnologia nel paradosso di Pasinetti. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 34 (1/2): 16–55. Campa, G. 1975. Indeterminatezza del saggio di profitto e rilevanza della propensione a risparmiare dei lavoratori e della tecnologia nel paradosso di Pasinetti. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 34 (1/2): 16–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang, P.P. 1964. Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth: A Comment. The Review of Economic Studies 31 (2): 103–105.CrossRef Chang, P.P. 1964. Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth: A Comment. The Review of Economic Studies 31 (2): 103–105.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chang, W.W. 1969. The Theory of Saving and the Stability of Growth Equilibrium. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 83 (3): 491–503.CrossRef Chang, W.W. 1969. The Theory of Saving and the Stability of Growth Equilibrium. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 83 (3): 491–503.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ciccarone, G. 2004. Finance and the Cambridge Equation. Review of Political Economy 16 (2): 163–177.CrossRef Ciccarone, G. 2004. Finance and the Cambridge Equation. Review of Political Economy 16 (2): 163–177.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2008. Finance and the Cambridge Equation: Again on the Rate of Profits of Financial Intermediaries. Review of Political Economy 20 (3): 433–441.CrossRef ———. 2008. Finance and the Cambridge Equation: Again on the Rate of Profits of Financial Intermediaries. Review of Political Economy 20 (3): 433–441.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Commendatore, P. 1993. Sull’esistenza di un’economia a due classi in un modello post Keynesiano di crescita e di distribuzione con settore pubblico ed attività finanziarie. Studi Economici 51 (3): 5–38. Commendatore, P. 1993. Sull’esistenza di un’economia a due classi in un modello post Keynesiano di crescita e di distribuzione con settore pubblico ed attività finanziarie. Studi Economici 51 (3): 5–38.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1997. Existence of Two Classes in Post Keynesian Theories of Growth and Institutional Distribution, Discussion Paper No. 9703. Manchester: School of Economic Studies, University of Manchester. ———. 1997. Existence of Two Classes in Post Keynesian Theories of Growth and Institutional Distribution, Discussion Paper No. 9703. Manchester: School of Economic Studies, University of Manchester.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1999a. Government Deficits (and Financial Activities) in Post Keynesian Theories of Growth and Distribution. Ph.D. Dissertation, University Federico II at Naples. ———. 1999a. Government Deficits (and Financial Activities) in Post Keynesian Theories of Growth and Distribution. Ph.D. Dissertation, University Federico II at Naples.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1999b. Pasinetti and Dual Equilibria in a Post Keynesian Model of Growth and Institutional Distribution. Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1): 223–236.CrossRef ———. 1999b. Pasinetti and Dual Equilibria in a Post Keynesian Model of Growth and Institutional Distribution. Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1): 223–236.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2001. Reformulating the Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and “Institutional” Distribution, Quaderni di dipartimento n. 6. Dipartimento di Teoria Economica e Applicazioni, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’. ———. 2001. Reformulating the Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and “Institutional” Distribution, Quaderni di dipartimento n. 6. Dipartimento di Teoria Economica e Applicazioni, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2002. Inside Debt, Aggregate Demand and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution: A Note. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (2): 269–274.CrossRef ———. 2002. Inside Debt, Aggregate Demand and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution: A Note. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (2): 269–274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2003. On the Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and “Institutional” Distribution. Review of Political Economy 15 (2): 193–209.CrossRef ———. 2003. On the Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and “Institutional” Distribution. Review of Political Economy 15 (2): 193–209.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2008. Complex Dynamics in a Pasinetti-Solow Model of Growth and Distribution. Economics & Complexity 3 (1): 33–55. ———. 2008. Complex Dynamics in a Pasinetti-Solow Model of Growth and Distribution. Economics & Complexity 3 (1): 33–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Commendatore, P., S. D’Acunto, N. Pinto, and C. Panico. 2003. Keynesian theories of growth. In The Theory of Economic Growth: A Classical Perspective, ed. N. Salvadori, 103–138. Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Commendatore, P., S. D’Acunto, N. Pinto, and C. Panico. 2003. Keynesian theories of growth. In The Theory of Economic Growth: A Classical Perspective, ed. N. Salvadori, 103–138. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Commendatore, P., C. Panico, and A. Pinto. 2005. Government Debt, Growth and Distribution in a Postkeynesian Approach. In Innovation, Unemployment and Policy in the Theories of Growth and Distribution, ed. R. Balducci and N. Salvadori, 215–229. Aldershot: E. Elgar. Commendatore, P., C. Panico, and A. Pinto. 2005. Government Debt, Growth and Distribution in a Postkeynesian Approach. In Innovation, Unemployment and Policy in the Theories of Growth and Distribution, ed. R. Balducci and N. Salvadori, 215–229. Aldershot: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Craven, J. 1977. On the Marginal Product of Capital. Oxford Economic Papers 29 (3): 472–478. Craven, J. 1977. On the Marginal Product of Capital. Oxford Economic Papers 29 (3): 472–478.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1979. The Distribution of the Product. London: Allen & Unwin. ———. 1979. The Distribution of the Product. London: Allen & Unwin.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalziel, P.C. 1989. Comment on Cambridge (U.K.) vs Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of “Pasinetti’s Paradox”: Comment. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 11 (4): 648–653.CrossRef Dalziel, P.C. 1989. Comment on Cambridge (U.K.) vs Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of “Pasinetti’s Paradox”: Comment. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 11 (4): 648–653.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1991b. A Note on Dalziel’s Model of Long-Run Distributive Equilibrium: Reply. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 14 (1): 121–124.CrossRef ———. 1991b. A Note on Dalziel’s Model of Long-Run Distributive Equilibrium: Reply. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 14 (1): 121–124.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1991c. A Generalization and Simplification of the Cambridge Theorem with Budget Deficits. Cambridge Journal of Economics 15 (3): 287–300. ———. 1991c. A Generalization and Simplification of the Cambridge Theorem with Budget Deficits. Cambridge Journal of Economics 15 (3): 287–300.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalziel, P.C. 1991–2. Does Government Activity Invalidate the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit? A Reconciliation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 14(2): 225–232. Dalziel, P.C. 1991–2. Does Government Activity Invalidate the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit? A Reconciliation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 14(2): 225–232.
Zurück zum Zitat Darity, W.A. 1981. The Simple Analytics of Neo-Ricardian Growth and Distribution. The American Economic Review 71 (5): 978–993. Darity, W.A. 1981. The Simple Analytics of Neo-Ricardian Growth and Distribution. The American Economic Review 71 (5): 978–993.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson, P. 1968. The Demand and Supply of Securities and Economic Growth and Its Implication for the Kaldor-Pasinetti Versus Samuelson-Modigliani Controversy. The American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 58 (2): 252–269. Davidson, P. 1968. The Demand and Supply of Securities and Economic Growth and Its Implication for the Kaldor-Pasinetti Versus Samuelson-Modigliani Controversy. The American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 58 (2): 252–269.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vivo, G. 1987. David Ricardo. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, op. cit., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 4, 183–198. London: Macmillan. De Vivo, G. 1987. David Ricardo. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, op. cit., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 4, 183–198. London: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Delli Gatti, D. 1987. Il pensiero di Keynes (1923–1936) e l’interpretazione dei post-Keynesiani “soggettivisti”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Catholic University, Milan. Delli Gatti, D. 1987. Il pensiero di Keynes (1923–1936) e l’interpretazione dei post-Keynesiani “soggettivisti”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Catholic University, Milan.
Zurück zum Zitat Delli Gatti, D., and M. Gallegati. 1990. Financial Instability, Income Distribution and the Stock Market. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12 (3): 356–374.CrossRef Delli Gatti, D., and M. Gallegati. 1990. Financial Instability, Income Distribution and the Stock Market. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12 (3): 356–374.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Denicolò, V., and M. Matteuzzi. 1990. Public Debt and the Pasinetti Paradox. Cambridge Journal of Economics 14 (3): 339–344. Denicolò, V., and M. Matteuzzi. 1990. Public Debt and the Pasinetti Paradox. Cambridge Journal of Economics 14 (3): 339–344.
Zurück zum Zitat Domenghino, C.-M. 1982. Die Weiterentwicklung der postkeynesianischen Verteilungstheorie. Bern/Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Domenghino, C.-M. 1982. Die Weiterentwicklung der postkeynesianischen Verteilungstheorie. Bern/Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Zurück zum Zitat Dougherty, C.R.S. 1972. On the Rate of Return and the Rate of Profit. The Economic Journal 82 (328): 1324–1350.CrossRef Dougherty, C.R.S. 1972. On the Rate of Return and the Rate of Profit. The Economic Journal 82 (328): 1324–1350.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1980. Interest and Profit. London/New York: Methuen/Columbia University Press. ———. 1980. Interest and Profit. London/New York: Methuen/Columbia University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Dutt, A.K., and E.J. Amadeo 1993. A Post-Keynesian Theory of Growth, Interest and Money. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 181–205. London/New York: Macmillan. Dutt, A.K., and E.J. Amadeo 1993. A Post-Keynesian Theory of Growth, Interest and Money. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, ed. M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt, 181–205. London/New York: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Eichner, A.S., and J.A. Kregel. 1975. An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 13 (4): 1293–1314. Eichner, A.S., and J.A. Kregel. 1975. An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 13 (4): 1293–1314.
Zurück zum Zitat Ewijk, C. van. 1989. Dynamics of Growth and Debt: A Post-Keynesian Analysis. Alblasserdam: Kanters. Ewijk, C. van. 1989. Dynamics of Growth and Debt: A Post-Keynesian Analysis. Alblasserdam: Kanters.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1991. On the Dynamics of Growth and Debt. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ———. 1991. On the Dynamics of Growth and Debt. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Faria, J.R. 2000. A Two-Class Fiscal and Monetary Growth Model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11 (3): 355–364.CrossRef Faria, J.R. 2000. A Two-Class Fiscal and Monetary Growth Model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11 (3): 355–364.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2001. The Pasinetti Paradox in an Intertemporal Dynamic Model, Political Economy Working Paper 13/01. Dallas: University of Texas. ———. 2001. The Pasinetti Paradox in an Intertemporal Dynamic Model, Political Economy Working Paper 13/01. Dallas: University of Texas.
Zurück zum Zitat Faria, J.R., and R.A. Araujo. 2004. A Intertemporal Pasinettian Model with Government Sector. International Journal of Business and Economics 3 (3): 257–268. Faria, J.R., and R.A. Araujo. 2004. A Intertemporal Pasinettian Model with Government Sector. International Journal of Business and Economics 3 (3): 257–268.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazi, E., and N. Salvadori. 1981. The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor Model of Growth and Distribution. Kyklos 34 (4): 582–592.CrossRef Fazi, E., and N. Salvadori. 1981. The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor Model of Growth and Distribution. Kyklos 34 (4): 582–592.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson, C.E. 1969. The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Ferguson, C.E. 1969. The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1972. The Current State of Capital Theory: A Tale of Two Paradigms. Southern Economic Journal 39 (2): 160–176.CrossRef ———. 1972. The Current State of Capital Theory: A Tale of Two Paradigms. Southern Economic Journal 39 (2): 160–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fleck, F.H., and C.-M. Domenghino. 1987. Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of “Pasinetti’s Paradox”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 10 (1): 22–36.CrossRef Fleck, F.H., and C.-M. Domenghino. 1987. Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of “Pasinetti’s Paradox”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 10 (1): 22–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1990. Government Activity Does Invalidate the “Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12 (3): 487–497.CrossRef ———. 1990. Government Activity Does Invalidate the “Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12 (3): 487–497.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Folkers, C. 1974a. Die Wirkungen einer verstärkten Beteiligung der Arbeitnehmer am Vermögenszuwachs auf die Verteilung des Vermögensbestandes. Finanzarchiv 32 (2): 194–217. Folkers, C. 1974a. Die Wirkungen einer verstärkten Beteiligung der Arbeitnehmer am Vermögenszuwachs auf die Verteilung des Vermögensbestandes. Finanzarchiv 32 (2): 194–217.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1974b. Vermögensverteilung und Profitrate im gleichgewichtigen Wirtschaftswachstum. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatwissenschaft 130 (3): 373–393. ———. 1974b. Vermögensverteilung und Profitrate im gleichgewichtigen Wirtschaftswachstum. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatwissenschaft 130 (3): 373–393.
Zurück zum Zitat Furono, Y. 1970. Convergence Time in the Samuelson-Modigliani Model. The Review of Economic Studies 37 (2): 221–232.CrossRef Furono, Y. 1970. Convergence Time in the Samuelson-Modigliani Model. The Review of Economic Studies 37 (2): 221–232.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guha, A. 1972. The Global Stability of Two-Class Neoclassical Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 86 (4): 687–690.CrossRef Guha, A. 1972. The Global Stability of Two-Class Neoclassical Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 86 (4): 687–690.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta, K.L. 1976. Differentiated Interest Rate and Kaldor-Pasinetti Paradoxes. Kyklos 29 (2): 310–314.CrossRef Gupta, K.L. 1976. Differentiated Interest Rate and Kaldor-Pasinetti Paradoxes. Kyklos 29 (2): 310–314.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1996. Cambridge Theorem, Ricardian Equivalence and Government Activity. Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik 192 (1): 344–351. ———. 1996. Cambridge Theorem, Ricardian Equivalence and Government Activity. Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik 192 (1): 344–351.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, F.H. 1964. A letter to Nicholas Kaldor, 30th July 1964, Luigi L. Pasinetti’s archives. Hahn, F.H. 1964. A letter to Nicholas Kaldor, 30th July 1964, Luigi L. Pasinetti’s archives.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, F.H., and R.C.O. Matthews. 1964. The Theory of Economic Growth: A Survey. The Economic Journal 74 (296): 779–902.CrossRef Hahn, F.H., and R.C.O. Matthews. 1964. The Theory of Economic Growth: A Survey. The Economic Journal 74 (296): 779–902.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1971. Post-scriptum to the Theory of Economic Growth. Oxford: All Souls College, mimeo. ———. 1971. Post-scriptum to the Theory of Economic Growth. Oxford: All Souls College, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat Harcourt, G.C. 1969. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Journal of Economic Literature 7 (2): 369–405. Harcourt, G.C. 1969. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Journal of Economic Literature 7 (2): 369–405.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef ———. 1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1976. The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons – Or Dead End? Oxford Economic Papers, 25–65. ———. 1976. The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons – Or Dead End? Oxford Economic Papers, 25–65.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2006. The Structure of the Post-Keynesian Economics: The Core Contributions of the Pioneers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef ———. 2006. The Structure of the Post-Keynesian Economics: The Core Contributions of the Pioneers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hill, G. 2001. The Immiseration of the Landlords: Rent in a Kaldorian Theory of Income Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25 (4): 481–492.CrossRef Hill, G. 2001. The Immiseration of the Landlords: Rent in a Kaldorian Theory of Income Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25 (4): 481–492.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hu, S.C. 1973. On Optimal Capital Accumulation in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth. Metroeconomica 25 (3): 155–163.CrossRef Hu, S.C. 1973. On Optimal Capital Accumulation in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth. Metroeconomica 25 (3): 155–163.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jong-Il, Y., and A.K. Dutt. 1996. Government Debt, Income Distribution and Growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics 20 (3): 335–351.CrossRef Jong-Il, Y., and A.K. Dutt. 1996. Government Debt, Income Distribution and Growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics 20 (3): 335–351.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahn, R.F. 1959. Exercises in the Analysis of Growth. Oxford Economic Papers 11 (2): 143–156.CrossRef Kahn, R.F. 1959. Exercises in the Analysis of Growth. Oxford Economic Papers 11 (2): 143–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaldor, M. 1982. Letter to Mauro Baranzini. Kaldor, M. 1982. Letter to Mauro Baranzini.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaldor, N. 1956. Alternative Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 23 (2): 83–100.CrossRef Kaldor, N. 1956. Alternative Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 23 (2): 83–100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1966. Marginal Productivity and the Macro-Economic Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4): 309–319.CrossRef ———. 1966. Marginal Productivity and the Macro-Economic Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4): 309–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kano, M. 1985. Money, Financial Assets and Pasinetti’s Theory of Profit. Economic Studies Quarterly 36 (2): 169–177. Kano, M. 1985. Money, Financial Assets and Pasinetti’s Theory of Profit. Economic Studies Quarterly 36 (2): 169–177.
Zurück zum Zitat Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan. Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat King, J.E. 1998. Your Position Is Thoroughly Orthodox and Entirely Wrong: Nicholas Kaldor and Joan Robinson, 1933–1983. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (4): 411–432.CrossRef King, J.E. 1998. Your Position Is Thoroughly Orthodox and Entirely Wrong: Nicholas Kaldor and Joan Robinson, 1933–1983. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (4): 411–432.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kregel, J.A. 1977. Some Post-Keynesian Distribution Theory. In Modern Economic Thought, ed. S. Weintraub, 421–438. Oxford: B. Blackwell. Kregel, J.A. 1977. Some Post-Keynesian Distribution Theory. In Modern Economic Thought, ed. S. Weintraub, 421–438. Oxford: B. Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1985. Hamlet Without the Prince: Cambridge Macroeconomics Without Money. The American Economic Review 75 (2): 133–139. ———. 1985. Hamlet Without the Prince: Cambridge Macroeconomics Without Money. The American Economic Review 75 (2): 133–139.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurose, K. 2004. Rate of Profit and Interest in a Growth Theory with Endogenous Money. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (1): 889–901.CrossRef Kurose, K. 2004. Rate of Profit and Interest in a Growth Theory with Endogenous Money. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (1): 889–901.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat La Marca, M. 2005. The Public Sector in a Model of Growth and Distribution à la Pasinetti: Existence of One- or Two-Class Economies. Metroeconomica 56 (2): 157–181.CrossRef La Marca, M. 2005. The Public Sector in a Model of Growth and Distribution à la Pasinetti: Existence of One- or Two-Class Economies. Metroeconomica 56 (2): 157–181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laing, N.F. 1969. Two Notes on Pasinetti’s Theorem. The Economic Record 45 (111): 373–385.CrossRef Laing, N.F. 1969. Two Notes on Pasinetti’s Theorem. The Economic Record 45 (111): 373–385.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lavoie, M., and M. Seccareccia. 1988. Money, Interest and Rentiers: The Twilight of Rentier Capitalism in Keynes’s General Theory. In Keynes and Public Policy After Fifty Years, ed. O. Hamouda and J.N. Smithin, 145–158. Aldershot: E. Elgar. Lavoie, M., and M. Seccareccia. 1988. Money, Interest and Rentiers: The Twilight of Rentier Capitalism in Keynes’s General Theory. In Keynes and Public Policy After Fifty Years, ed. O. Hamouda and J.N. Smithin, 145–158. Aldershot: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1999. Fair Interest Rates. In Encyclopedia of Political Economy, ed. P.A. O’Hara, vol. 1, 543–545. London/New York: Routledge. ———. 1999. Fair Interest Rates. In Encyclopedia of Political Economy, ed. P.A. O’Hara, vol. 1, 543–545. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Maneschi, A. 1974. The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor and Pasinetti Models of Growth and Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 41 (1): 149–150.CrossRef Maneschi, A. 1974. The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor and Pasinetti Models of Growth and Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 41 (1): 149–150.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marglin, S.A. 1984. Growth, Distribution and Prices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Marglin, S.A. 1984. Growth, Distribution and Prices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Mari, C. 2010. Kaldor, Cambridge and the Keynesian Theory of Income Distribution. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lugano, Switzerland. Mari, C. 2010. Kaldor, Cambridge and the Keynesian Theory of Income Distribution. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lugano, Switzerland.
Zurück zum Zitat Marris, R.L. 1991. Reconstructing Keynesian Economics with Imperfect Competition: A Desk-Top Simulation. Aldershot/Brookfield: E. Elgar. Marris, R.L. 1991. Reconstructing Keynesian Economics with Imperfect Competition: A Desk-Top Simulation. Aldershot/Brookfield: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2003. Letter to Mauro Baranzini, 7th October. ———. 2003. Letter to Mauro Baranzini, 7th October.
Zurück zum Zitat Masamichi, K. 1987. The Effect of Public Education in Two-Class Models, mimeo. Masamichi, K. 1987. The Effect of Public Education in Two-Class Models, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastromatteo, G. 1989a. Self-Financing by Companies and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process: A Note. Milan: Catholic University, mimeo. Mastromatteo, G. 1989a. Self-Financing by Companies and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process: A Note. Milan: Catholic University, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1989b. Government Intervention, Self-Financing by Private Companies and the Pasinetti Process: A Few Reflections. Milan: Catholic University, mimeo. ———. 1989b. Government Intervention, Self-Financing by Private Companies and the Pasinetti Process: A Few Reflections. Milan: Catholic University, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1994. Tassazione e distribuzione del reddito in un modello post-Keynesiano. Economia Internazionale 47 (4): 383–391. ———. 1994. Tassazione e distribuzione del reddito in un modello post-Keynesiano. Economia Internazionale 47 (4): 383–391.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1996. Economia monetaria post-Keynesiana e rigidità dei tassi bancari. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 104 (4): 555–569. ———. 1996. Economia monetaria post-Keynesiana e rigidità dei tassi bancari. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 104 (4): 555–569.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2000. Microfoundations of the Post-Keynesian Monetary Theory. Studi Economici 55 (71): 47–64. ———. 2000. Microfoundations of the Post-Keynesian Monetary Theory. Studi Economici 55 (71): 47–64.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattauch, L., D. Klenert, J.E. Stiglitz, and O. Edenhofer. 2017. Piketty Meets Pasinetti: on Public Investment and Intelligent Machinery. Oxford: Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School. Mattauch, L., D. Klenert, J.E. Stiglitz, and O. Edenhofer. 2017. Piketty Meets Pasinetti: on Public Investment and Intelligent Machinery. Oxford: Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School.
Zurück zum Zitat Meade, J.E. 1963. The Rate of Profits in a Growing Economy. The Economic Journal 73 (292): 665–674.CrossRef Meade, J.E. 1963. The Rate of Profits in a Growing Economy. The Economic Journal 73 (292): 665–674.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1966. The Outcome of the Pasinetti Process: A Note. The Economic Journal 76 (301): 161–165.CrossRef ———. 1966. The Outcome of the Pasinetti Process: A Note. The Economic Journal 76 (301): 161–165.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meade, J.E., and F.H. Hahn. 1965. The Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy. The Economic Journal 75 (298): 445–448.CrossRef Meade, J.E., and F.H. Hahn. 1965. The Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy. The Economic Journal 75 (298): 445–448.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miyazaki, K. 1986. The Differentiated Rate of Interest and Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Model of Growth and Income Distribution. Tokyo: Hosei University, mimeo. Miyazaki, K. 1986. The Differentiated Rate of Interest and Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Model of Growth and Income Distribution. Tokyo: Hosei University, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1987a. A Note on Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Growth Model. Tokyo: Hosei University, mimeo. ———. 1987a. A Note on Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Growth Model. Tokyo: Hosei University, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1987b. Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Model: The Case of Two Types of Workers with Different Propensities to Save. Tokyo: Hosei University, mimeo. ———. 1987b. Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Model: The Case of Two Types of Workers with Different Propensities to Save. Tokyo: Hosei University, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1988. The Post-Keynesian View About the Neoclassical Anti-Pasinetti Theory. Tokyo, mimeo: Hosei University. ———. 1988. The Post-Keynesian View About the Neoclassical Anti-Pasinetti Theory. Tokyo, mimeo: Hosei University.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1991. On the Neo-Keynesian Interpretation of the Anti-Pasinetti Theory. Oxford Economic Papers 43 (2): 187–194.CrossRef ———. 1991. On the Neo-Keynesian Interpretation of the Anti-Pasinetti Theory. Oxford Economic Papers 43 (2): 187–194.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, B.J. 1974. The Pasinetti Paradox Revisited. The Review of Economic Studies 41 (2): 297–299.CrossRef Moore, B.J. 1974. The Pasinetti Paradox Revisited. The Review of Economic Studies 41 (2): 297–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mückl, W.J. 1970. Public Sector, Growth, Distribution of Income and Wealth in a Neo-Classical Model. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 184 (3): 193–225.CrossRef Mückl, W.J. 1970. Public Sector, Growth, Distribution of Income and Wealth in a Neo-Classical Model. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 184 (3): 193–225.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1978. On the Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Cambridge Models of Growth and Distribution. Jahrbücher für National Ökonomie und Statistik 193 (6): 508–517. ———. 1978. On the Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Cambridge Models of Growth and Distribution. Jahrbücher für National Ökonomie und Statistik 193 (6): 508–517.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng, Y.K. 1974. The Neoclassical and Neo-Marxist-Keynesian Theories of Income Distribution: A Non-Cambridge Contribution to the Cambridge Controversy in Capital Theory. Australian Economic Papers 12 (22): 124–132. Ng, Y.K. 1974. The Neoclassical and Neo-Marxist-Keynesian Theories of Income Distribution: A Non-Cambridge Contribution to the Cambridge Controversy in Capital Theory. Australian Economic Papers 12 (22): 124–132.
Zurück zum Zitat Noda, T. 1987. The Pasinetti Theorem in a Mixed Economy. University of Tokyo, mimeo. Noda, T. 1987. The Pasinetti Theorem in a Mixed Economy. University of Tokyo, mimeo.
Zurück zum Zitat Nuti, D.M. 1974. On the Rates of Return on Investment. Kyklos 27 (2): 345–366.CrossRef Nuti, D.M. 1974. On the Rates of Return on Investment. Kyklos 27 (2): 345–366.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connell, J. 1995. Indirect Taxes and the Cambridge Model. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 18 (1): 141–151.CrossRef O’Connell, J. 1995. Indirect Taxes and the Cambridge Model. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 18 (1): 141–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palley, T.I. 1996a. Inside Debt, Aggregate Demand, and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 20 (4): 465–474.CrossRef Palley, T.I. 1996a. Inside Debt, Aggregate Demand, and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 20 (4): 465–474.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1996b. Post Keynesian Economics: Debt, Distribution, and the Macro Economy. London/New York: Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press.CrossRef ———. 1996b. Post Keynesian Economics: Debt, Distribution, and the Macro Economy. London/New York: Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1997. Money, Fiscal Policy and the Cambridge Theorem. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21 (5): 633–639.CrossRef ———. 1997. Money, Fiscal Policy and the Cambridge Theorem. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21 (5): 633–639.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2002. Financial Institutions and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (2): 275–277.CrossRef ———. 2002. Financial Institutions and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (2): 275–277.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Panico, C. 1985. Market Forces and the Relationship Between the Rate of Interest and the Rate of Profits. Contributions to Political Economy 4 (1): 37–60.CrossRef Panico, C. 1985. Market Forces and the Relationship Between the Rate of Interest and the Rate of Profits. Contributions to Political Economy 4 (1): 37–60.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1987. Interest and Profit. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, vol. II, 877–879, op. cit. ———. 1987. Interest and Profit. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, vol. II, 877–879, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1988. Interest and Profit in the Theories of Value and Distribution. Basingstoke/New York: Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press.CrossRef ———. 1988. Interest and Profit in the Theories of Value and Distribution. Basingstoke/New York: Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1992. Un confronto tra i modelli macroeconomici finanziari di Tobin e quelli di derivazione Kaldoriana. In Lezioni di Macroeconomia, ed. B. Jossa and A. Nardi, 329–380. Bologna: Il Mulino. ———. 1992. Un confronto tra i modelli macroeconomici finanziari di Tobin e quelli di derivazione Kaldoriana. In Lezioni di Macroeconomia, ed. B. Jossa and A. Nardi, 329–380. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1997. Government Deficits in Post Keynesian Theories of Growth and Distribution. Contribution to Political Economy 16 (1): 61–86.CrossRef ———. 1997. Government Deficits in Post Keynesian Theories of Growth and Distribution. Contribution to Political Economy 16 (1): 61–86.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1998. Interest and Profit. In The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics, ed. H.D. Kurz and N. Salvadori, vol. I, 425–430, op. cit. ———. 1998. Interest and Profit. In The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics, ed. H.D. Kurz and N. Salvadori, vol. I, 425–430, op. cit.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1999. The Government Sector in the Post-Keynesian Theory of Growth and Personal Distribution. In Value, Distribution and Capital. Essays in Honour of P. Garegnani, ed. G. Mongiovi and F. Petri, 339–353. London/New York: Routledge. ———. 1999. The Government Sector in the Post-Keynesian Theory of Growth and Personal Distribution. In Value, Distribution and Capital. Essays in Honour of P. Garegnani, ed. G. Mongiovi and F. Petri, 339–353. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Panico, C., and N. Salvadori 1993. Introduction. In Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and Distribution, ed. C. Panico and N. Salvadori, xiii–xxxi. Aldershot: E. Elgar. Panico, C., and N. Salvadori 1993. Introduction. In Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and Distribution, ed. C. Panico and N. Salvadori, xiii–xxxi. Aldershot: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Park, M.-S. 2002. Growth and Income Distribution in a Credit Money Economy: Introducing the Banking Sector into the Linear Production Model. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (5): 585–612.CrossRef Park, M.-S. 2002. Growth and Income Distribution in a Credit Money Economy: Introducing the Banking Sector into the Linear Production Model. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (5): 585–612.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2004. Credit Money and Kaldor’s “Institutional” Theory of Income Distribution. Review of Political Economy 16 (1): 79–99.CrossRef ———. 2004. Credit Money and Kaldor’s “Institutional” Theory of Income Distribution. Review of Political Economy 16 (1): 79–99.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2006. The Financial System and the Pasinetti Theorem. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (2): 201–217.CrossRef ———. 2006. The Financial System and the Pasinetti Theorem. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (2): 201–217.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2008. Finance and the Cambridge Equation: A Comment. Review of Political Economy 20 (3): 421–432.CrossRef ———. 2008. Finance and the Cambridge Equation: A Comment. Review of Political Economy 20 (3): 421–432.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pasinetti, L.L. 1962. Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies 29 (4): 267–279.CrossRef Pasinetti, L.L. 1962. Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies 29 (4): 267–279.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1974. Growth and Income Distribution: Essays in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1974. Growth and Income Distribution: Essays in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1975. Determinatezza del saggio di profitto nella teoria Post-Keynesiana: Risposta al Professor Campa. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 34 (9/10): 639–647. ———. 1975. Determinatezza del saggio di profitto nella teoria Post-Keynesiana: Risposta al Professor Campa. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 34 (9/10): 639–647.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1977. On “Non-Substitution” in Production Models. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1 (4): 389–394.CrossRef ———. 1977. On “Non-Substitution” in Production Models. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1 (4): 389–394.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1983. Conditions of Existence of a Two Class Economy in the Kaldor and More General Models of Growth and Income Distribution. Kyklos 36 (1): 91–102.CrossRef ———. 1983. Conditions of Existence of a Two Class Economy in the Kaldor and More General Models of Growth and Income Distribution. Kyklos 36 (1): 91–102.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1989a. Ricardian Debt/Taxation Equivalence in the Kaldor Theory of Profits and Income Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 13 (1): 25–36. ———. 1989a. Ricardian Debt/Taxation Equivalence in the Kaldor Theory of Profits and Income Distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 13 (1): 25–36.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1989b. Government Deficit Spending is Not Incompatible with the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit: A Reply to Fleck and Domenghino. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 11 (4): 641–647.CrossRef ———. 1989b. Government Deficit Spending is Not Incompatible with the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit: A Reply to Fleck and Domenghino. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 11 (4): 641–647.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1989c. ‘Address’ at King’s College Chapel, Memorial Service of Richard Ferdinand Kahn. Cambridge: King’s College. ———. 1989c. ‘Address’ at King’s College Chapel, Memorial Service of Richard Ferdinand Kahn. Cambridge: King’s College.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2000. Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53 (215): 383–433. ———. 2000. Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53 (215): 383–433.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2007. Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians: A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to Be Accomplished. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 2007. Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians: A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to Be Accomplished. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettenati, P. 1974. The Rate of Interest and the Rate of Profits in a Capitalist Society: A Neo-Keynesian Model of Money, Distribution and Growth. Economic Notes 3 (1): 97–128. Pettenati, P. 1974. The Rate of Interest and the Rate of Profits in a Capitalist Society: A Neo-Keynesian Model of Money, Distribution and Growth. Economic Notes 3 (1): 97–128.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1975. Keynes’ Monetary Theory and the Neo-Keynesian Theory of Distribution. Oxford Economic Papers 27 (1): 1–9.CrossRef ———. 1975. Keynes’ Monetary Theory and the Neo-Keynesian Theory of Distribution. Oxford Economic Papers 27 (1): 1–9.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1993. Pasinetti’s Theorem in a Modern Institutional Framework. In Post-Keynesian Theory of Growth and Distribution, ed. C. Panico and N. Salvadori, 229–237, op. cit. First published in Studi Economici, 1967. ———. 1993. Pasinetti’s Theorem in a Modern Institutional Framework. In Post-Keynesian Theory of Growth and Distribution, ed. C. Panico and N. Salvadori, 229–237, op. cit. First published in Studi Economici, 1967.
Zurück zum Zitat Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA/London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRef Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA/London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Piketty, T., and E. Saez. 2014. Inequality in the Long Run. Science 344 (6186): 838–843.CrossRef Piketty, T., and E. Saez. 2014. Inequality in the Long Run. Science 344 (6186): 838–843.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ramanathan, R. 1976. The Pasinetti Paradox in a Two-Class Monetary Growth Model. Journal of Monetary Economics 2 (3): 389–397.CrossRef Ramanathan, R. 1976. The Pasinetti Paradox in a Two-Class Monetary Growth Model. Journal of Monetary Economics 2 (3): 389–397.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ramser, H.J. 1969. Zur verteilungstheoretischen Relevanz der Kaldor-Formel. Kyklos 22 (3): 585–588.CrossRef Ramser, H.J. 1969. Zur verteilungstheoretischen Relevanz der Kaldor-Formel. Kyklos 22 (3): 585–588.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1972. Keynessche Inflations- und Kaldorsche Verteilungstheorie. Kyklos 32 (1-2): 205–218.CrossRef ———. 1972. Keynessche Inflations- und Kaldorsche Verteilungstheorie. Kyklos 32 (1-2): 205–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rau, N. 1975. Two-Class Neoclassical Growth: A Conjecture Proved. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 (2): 344–345.CrossRef Rau, N. 1975. Two-Class Neoclassical Growth: A Conjecture Proved. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 (2): 344–345.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Riese, H. 1981. Theorie der Produktion und Einkommensverteilung. Kyklos 34 (4): 540–562.CrossRef Riese, H. 1981. Theorie der Produktion und Einkommensverteilung. Kyklos 34 (4): 540–562.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson, J.V. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan. Robinson, J.V. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, P.A. 1991. Extirpating Error Contamination Concerning the Post-Keynesian Anti-Pasinetti Equilibrium. Oxford Economic Papers 43 (2): 177–186.CrossRef Samuelson, P.A. 1991. Extirpating Error Contamination Concerning the Post-Keynesian Anti-Pasinetti Equilibrium. Oxford Economic Papers 43 (2): 177–186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, P.A., and F. Modigliani. 1966a. The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models. The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4): 269–301.CrossRef Samuelson, P.A., and F. Modigliani. 1966a. The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models. The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4): 269–301.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1966b. Reply to Pasinetti and Robinson. The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4): 321–330.CrossRef ———. 1966b. Reply to Pasinetti and Robinson. The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4): 321–330.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sato, K. 1966. The Neoclassical Theorem and Distribution of Income and Wealth. The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4): 331–335.CrossRef Sato, K. 1966. The Neoclassical Theorem and Distribution of Income and Wealth. The Review of Economic Studies 33 (4): 331–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schianchi, A. 1978. Crescita e distribuzione in un modello a tre classi: una nota. Ricerche Economiche 42 (1): 103–106. Schianchi, A. 1978. Crescita e distribuzione in un modello a tre classi: una nota. Ricerche Economiche 42 (1): 103–106.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlicht, E. 1975. A Neoclassical Theory of Wealth Distribution. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie 189 (1–2): 78–96. Schlicht, E. 1975. A Neoclassical Theory of Wealth Distribution. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie 189 (1–2): 78–96.
Zurück zum Zitat Seccareccia, M. 1996. Post Keynesian Fundism and Monetary Circulation. In Money in Motion: The Post Keynesian and Circulation Approaches, ed. G. Delaplace and E.J. Nell, 400–416. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Seccareccia, M. 1996. Post Keynesian Fundism and Monetary Circulation. In Money in Motion: The Post Keynesian and Circulation Approaches, ed. G. Delaplace and E.J. Nell, 400–416. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seccareccia, M., and M. Lavoie. 1989. Les idées révolutionnaires de Keynes en politique économique et le déclin du capitalisme rentier. Economie appliquée 42 (1): 47–70. Seccareccia, M., and M. Lavoie. 1989. Les idées révolutionnaires de Keynes en politique économique et le déclin du capitalisme rentier. Economie appliquée 42 (1): 47–70.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2016. Income Distribution, Rentiers and their Role in a Capitalist Economy. Journal of Political Economy 45 (3): 200–223.CrossRef ———. 2016. Income Distribution, Rentiers and their Role in a Capitalist Economy. Journal of Political Economy 45 (3): 200–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sepehri, A. 1989. Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of “Pasinetti’s Paradox” – A Critical Evaluation, mimeo: University of Manitoba. Sepehri, A. 1989. Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of “Pasinetti’s Paradox” – A Critical Evaluation, mimeo: University of Manitoba.
Zurück zum Zitat Skott, P. 1981. On the Kaldorian Saving Funktion. Kyklos 34 (4): 563–581.CrossRef Skott, P. 1981. On the Kaldorian Saving Funktion. Kyklos 34 (4): 563–581.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1988. Finance, Saving and Accumulation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 12 (3): 339–354. ———. 1988. Finance, Saving and Accumulation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 12 (3): 339–354.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1989a. Kaldor’s Theory of Growth and Distribution. Frankfurt am Main/Bern: Peter Lang. ———. 1989a. Kaldor’s Theory of Growth and Distribution. Frankfurt am Main/Bern: Peter Lang.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1989b. Effective Demand, Class Struggle, and Economic Growth. International Economic Review 30 (1): 231–247.CrossRef ———. 1989b. Effective Demand, Class Struggle, and Economic Growth. International Economic Review 30 (1): 231–247.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1993a. Class Conflict and Accumulation. In Macroeconomic Theory: Diversity and Convergence, ed. G. Mongiovi and C. Rühl, 208–221. Aldershot: E. Elgar. ———. 1993a. Class Conflict and Accumulation. In Macroeconomic Theory: Diversity and Convergence, ed. G. Mongiovi and C. Rühl, 208–221. Aldershot: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1993b. Effective Demand, Class Struggle and Cyclical Growth. In Non Linear Dynamics in Economic Theory, ed. M. Jarsulic, 452–468. Aldershot: E. Elgar. ———. 1993b. Effective Demand, Class Struggle and Cyclical Growth. In Non Linear Dynamics in Economic Theory, ed. M. Jarsulic, 452–468. Aldershot: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1999. Kaldor’s Growth Laws and the Principle of Cumulative Causation. In Growth, Employment and Inflation; Essays in Honour of John Cornwall, ed. M. Setterfield, 166–179. New York/London: St. Martin’s/Macmillan.CrossRef ———. 1999. Kaldor’s Growth Laws and the Principle of Cumulative Causation. In Growth, Employment and Inflation; Essays in Honour of John Cornwall, ed. M. Setterfield, 166–179. New York/London: St. Martin’s/Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Solow, R.M. 2000. The Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53 (215): 349–381. Solow, R.M. 2000. The Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53 (215): 349–381.
Zurück zum Zitat Steedman, I. 1972. The State and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process. The Economic Journal 82 (328): 1387–1395.CrossRef Steedman, I. 1972. The State and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process. The Economic Journal 82 (328): 1387–1395.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stiglitz, J.E. 1967. A Two-Sector Two Class Model of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies 34 (2): 227–238.CrossRef Stiglitz, J.E. 1967. A Two-Sector Two Class Model of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies 34 (2): 227–238.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1975. Review of Pasinetti’s Growth and Income Distribution. Journal of Economic Literature 13 (4): 1327–1328. ———. 1975. Review of Pasinetti’s Growth and Income Distribution. Journal of Economic Literature 13 (4): 1327–1328.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, L. 2014. The Triumph of the Rentier? Thomas Piketty vs. Luigi Pasinetti and John Maynard Keynes. International Journal of Political Economy 43 (3): 4–17.CrossRef Taylor, L. 2014. The Triumph of the Rentier? Thomas Piketty vs. Luigi Pasinetti and John Maynard Keynes. International Journal of Political Economy 43 (3): 4–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Teixeira, J.R. 1991. The Kaldor-Pasinetti Process Reconsidered. Metroeconomica 42 (3): 257–267.CrossRef Teixeira, J.R. 1991. The Kaldor-Pasinetti Process Reconsidered. Metroeconomica 42 (3): 257–267.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1998. Luigi L. Pasinetti. In Italian Economists of the Twentieth Century, ed. F. Meacci, 272–294, Cheltenham UK/Northampton MA: E. Elgar. ———. 1998. Luigi L. Pasinetti. In Italian Economists of the Twentieth Century, ed. F. Meacci, 272–294, Cheltenham UK/Northampton MA: E. Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1999. Growth and Stability in Kaldor-Pasinetti Models with Taxation and Public Expenditure. Revista de Economia Comptemporânea 5: 71–91. ———. 1999. Growth and Stability in Kaldor-Pasinetti Models with Taxation and Public Expenditure. Revista de Economia Comptemporânea 5: 71–91.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2009. Growth, Distribution, Stability and Government Budget Surplus: The Extended Cambridge Equation Revisited. Economia 10 (2): 239–251. ———. 2009. Growth, Distribution, Stability and Government Budget Surplus: The Extended Cambridge Equation Revisited. Economia 10 (2): 239–251.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2017. A Revised Post-Keynesian Model of Growth and Distributional Improvements for Economic Policy. Brasilia: University of Brasilia: Department of Economics. ———. 2017. A Revised Post-Keynesian Model of Growth and Distributional Improvements for Economic Policy. Brasilia: University of Brasilia: Department of Economics.
Zurück zum Zitat Teixeira, J.R., and J.T. Araujo. 1991. A Note on Dalziel’s Model of Long-Run Distributive Equilibrium. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 14 (1): 117–120.CrossRef Teixeira, J.R., and J.T. Araujo. 1991. A Note on Dalziel’s Model of Long-Run Distributive Equilibrium. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 14 (1): 117–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1996. A Post-Keynesian Model of Growth with Distributional Improvements. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 30 (1): 67–76.CrossRef ———. 1996. A Post-Keynesian Model of Growth with Distributional Improvements. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 30 (1): 67–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1997a. A Pasinettian Amend to Growth and Distribution in an Open Economy. Metroeconomica 48 (2): 205–209.CrossRef ———. 1997a. A Pasinettian Amend to Growth and Distribution in an Open Economy. Metroeconomica 48 (2): 205–209.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1997b. Policy Intervention and the Trade-Off Between Growth and Functional Distribution of Income. Analise Economica 22: 148–158. ———. 1997b. Policy Intervention and the Trade-Off Between Growth and Functional Distribution of Income. Analise Economica 22: 148–158.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2004. A Pasinettian Approach to International Economic Relations. Review of Political Economy 16 (1): 117–129.CrossRef ———. 2004. A Pasinettian Approach to International Economic Relations. Review of Political Economy 16 (1): 117–129.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Teixeira, J.R., R. Sugahara, and M. Baranzini. 1998. On Micro-Foundations for the Kaldor-Pasinetti Growth Model with Taxation and Bequest. Anais do XXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia 1: 505–518; reprinted in (2002) in the Brasilian Journal of Business Economics 2 (1): 9–23. Teixeira, J.R., R. Sugahara, and M. Baranzini. 1998. On Micro-Foundations for the Kaldor-Pasinetti Growth Model with Taxation and Bequest. Anais do XXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia 1: 505–518; reprinted in (2002) in the Brasilian Journal of Business Economics 2 (1): 9–23.
Zurück zum Zitat Thirlwall, A.P. 1987. Nicholas Kaldor. Brighton/New York: Wheatsheaf/New York University Press. Thirlwall, A.P. 1987. Nicholas Kaldor. Brighton/New York: Wheatsheaf/New York University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobin, J. 1960. Towards a General Kaldorian Theory of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 27 (2): 119–120.CrossRef Tobin, J. 1960. Towards a General Kaldorian Theory of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 27 (2): 119–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Uthman, U.A. 2006. Profit-Sharing Versus Interest-Taking in the Kaldor-Pasinetti Theory of Income and Profit Distribution. Review of Political Economy 18 (2): 209–222.CrossRef Uthman, U.A. 2006. Profit-Sharing Versus Interest-Taking in the Kaldor-Pasinetti Theory of Income and Profit Distribution. Review of Political Economy 18 (2): 209–222.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Uzawa, B. 1969. Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 77 (4): 628–652.CrossRef Uzawa, B. 1969. Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 77 (4): 628–652.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vaughan, R.N. 1971. The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models: A Correction. The Review of Economic Studies 38 (2): 271.CrossRef Vaughan, R.N. 1971. The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models: A Correction. The Review of Economic Studies 38 (2): 271.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1979. Class Behaviour and the Distribution of Wealth. The Review of Economic Studies 46 (3): 447–465.CrossRef ———. 1979. Class Behaviour and the Distribution of Wealth. The Review of Economic Studies 46 (3): 447–465.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1988. Distributional Aspects of the Life-Cycle Theory of Saving. In Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, ed. D. Kessler and A. Masson, 193–235, Oxford: Clarendon Press. ———. 1988. Distributional Aspects of the Life-Cycle Theory of Saving. In Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, ed. D. Kessler and A. Masson, 193–235, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood, A. 1975. A Theory of Profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wood, A. 1975. A Theory of Profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodfield, A., and J. McDonald. 1979. On Relative Income Shares in the Pasinetti and Samuelson-Modigliani Systems. The Economic Journal 89 (354): 329–335.CrossRef Woodfield, A., and J. McDonald. 1979. On Relative Income Shares in the Pasinetti and Samuelson-Modigliani Systems. The Economic Journal 89 (354): 329–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1981. Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Model: An Extension. Australian Economic Papers 20 (36): 104–114.CrossRef ———. 1981. Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Model: An Extension. Australian Economic Papers 20 (36): 104–114.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1982. Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Model: Reply to Baranzini. Australian Economic Papers 21 (38): 207–213.CrossRef ———. 1982. Income Distribution in the Pasinetti Model: Reply to Baranzini. Australian Economic Papers 21 (38): 207–213.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zamparelli, L. 2015. Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution, and Piketty: An Anti-Dual Pasinetti Economy, Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali e Economiche. Rome: Università La Sapienza. Zamparelli, L. 2015. Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution, and Piketty: An Anti-Dual Pasinetti Economy, Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali e Economiche. Rome: Università La Sapienza.
Metadaten
Titel
Pasinetti on Post-Keynesian Income Distribution and Growth Theory: The Basic Issues
verfasst von
Mauro L. Baranzini
Amalia Mirante
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71072-3_6