nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. The Content of Fundamental Rights

verfasst von : Antonio Balsamo

Erschienen in: Handbook of European Criminal Procedure

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this chapter, the content of fundamental rights is analysed in the light both of the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights, as interpreted by the Strasbourg Court, and of the law of the European Union, which in the last few years has adopted a number of directives aimed at strengthening the procedural rights of suspected or accused persons, as well as the rights and protection of victims in criminal proceedings.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Protection of Fundamental Rights

Nächstes Kapitel History of the Cooperation

Addo MK, Grief N (1998) Does Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights enshrine absolute rights? Eur J Int Law, pp 510 ff

Aguado Correa T (2015) La Directiva 2014/42/UE sobre embargo y decomiso en la Unión Europea: una solución de compromiso a medio camino. Revista General de Derecho Europeo, no. 35

Allegrezza S, Covolo V (2016) The Directive 2012/13/Eu on the right to information in criminal proceedings: status quo or step forward? In: Durdevic Z, Ivicevic Karas E (eds) European criminal procedure law in service of protection if the Union financial interests: state of play and challenges. Croatian Association of European Criminal Law, Zagreb, pp 41 ff

Androulakis IN (2014) European perspectives on rights for victims of crime. Eucrim, pp 111 ff

Arangüena Fanego C (2014) El derecho a la asistencia letrada en la directiva 2013/48/UE. Revista General de Derecho Europeo, pp 1 ff

Ashworth A (2008) Self-Incrimination in European Human Rights Law. A pregnant pragmatism. Cardozo Law Rev, pp 751 ff

Bachmaier Winter L (2015) The EU Directive on the right to access to a lawyer: a critical assessment. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Human Rights in European Criminal Law. New developments in European legislation and case law after the lisbon Treaty. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 111 ff

Balsamo A, Kostoris RE (eds) (2008) Giurisprudenza europea e processo penale italiano. Giappichelli, Torino

Becerril J, Lopez R (2011) The European Protection Order. Eucrim, pp 76 ff

Berger M (2007) Self-Incrimination and the European Court of Human Rights: procedural issues in the enforcement of the right to silence. Eur Human Rights Law Rev, pp 514 ff

Biral M (2014) The right to examine or have examined witnesses as a minimum right for a fair trial: pitfalls and trends. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice, pp 331 ff

Cape E, Hodgson J (2014) The right to access to a lawyer at police station: making the European Union Directive work in practice. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 450 ff

Chenal R, Gambini F, Tamietti A (2012) Commento all'art. 6. In: Bartole S, De Sena P, Zagrebelsky V (eds) Commentario breve alla Convenzione europea per la salvaguardia dei diritti dell'uomo e delle libertà fondamentali. Cedam, Padova, pp 172 ff

Chiavario M (2001) Commento all'art. 6. In: Bartole S, Conforti B, Raimondi G (eds) Commentario alla Convenzione europea per la salvaguardia dei diritti dell'uomo e delle libertà fondamentali. Cedam, Padova, pp 153 ff

Cocq CC (2016) EU data protection rules applying to law enforcement activities: towards an harmonised legal framework? New J Eur Crim Law, pp 263 ff

Costa Ramos V (2016) The rights of the defence according to the ECtHR: an illustration in the light of A.T. v. Luxembourg and the right to legal assistance. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 397 ff

Coventry T (2017) Pretrial detention. Assessing European Union competence under Article 82(2) TFEU. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 43 ff

Cras S, De Matteis L (2010) The Directive on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings. Eucrim, pp 153 ff

Cras S (2014) The Directive on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings. Eucrim, pp 32 ff

Cras S (2016) The Directive on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings genesis and descriptive comments relating to selected articles. Eucrim, pp 109 ff

Cras S, Erbežnik A (2016) The Directive on the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at trial. Eucrim, pp 25 ff

Cras S (2017) The Directive on the right to legal aid in criminal and EAW proceedings. Genesis and description of the sixth instrument of the 2009 Roadmap. Eucrim, pp 34 ff

Daniele M (2014) Testimony through a live link in the perspective of the right to confront witnesses. Crim Law Rev, pp 189 ff

de Hert P, Papakonstantinou V (2016) The new police and criminal justice data protection Directive: a first analysis. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 7 ff

de Jong F, van Lent L (2016) The presumption of innocence as a counterfactual principle. Utrecht Law Rev, pp 32 ff

Dennis I (2011) The human rights act and the law of criminal evidence: ten years on. Sydney Law Rev, pp 333 ff

De Valkeneer C (2009) La provocation policière à la lumière de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme, pp 211 ff

De Wet E (2004) The prohibition of torture as an international norm of jus cogens and its implications for national and customary law. Eur J Int Law, pp 97 ff

Di Chiara G (2013) The protection of the right of freedom on the European Union Level: the European arrest warrant and non-custodial pre trial measures. The guideline of the principle of proportionality: an interpretive perspective. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational inquiries and the protection of fundamental rights in criminal proceedings. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 241 ff

Esen R (2012) Intercepting communications ‘In Accordance with the Law’. J Crim Law, pp 164 ff

François L (2007) La procédure italienne par contumace confrontée aux exigences européennes du procès équitable. Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme, pp 521 ff

Gambini R, Salvadori M (eds) (2009) Convenzione europea sui diritti dell'uomo: processo penale e garanzie. ESI, Napoli

Gialuz M, Spagnolo P (2012) Commento all'art. 5. In: Bartole S, De Sena P, Zagrebelsky V (eds) Commentario breve alla Convenzione europea per la salvaguardia dei diritti dell'uomo e delle libertà fondamentali. Cedam, Padova, pp 107 ff

Gillespie A, Bettinson V (2007) Preventing secondary victimisation through anonymity. Mod Law Rev, pp 114 ff

González Monje A (2016) La presunción de inocencia en la Unión Europea: Directiva 2016/343 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 9 de marzo de 2016 por la que se refuerzan en el proceso penal determinados aspectos de la presunción de inocencia y el derecho a estar presente en el juicio. Revista General de Derecho Europeo, no. 39

Grasso G, Sicurella R (eds) (2007) Lezioni di diritto penale europeo. Giuffrè, Milano

Groenhuijsen MS, Pemberton A (2009) The EU framework decision for victims of crime: does hard law make a difference? Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice, pp 43 ff

Harris D, O’Boyle M, Warbrick C (2014) Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Henzelin M, Rordorf H (2014) When does the length of criminal proceedings become unreasonable according to the European Court of Human Rights? New J Eur Crim Law, pp 78 ff

Hoyano LCH (2001) Striking a balance between the rights of defendants and vulnerable witnesses: will special measures directions contravene guarantees of a fair trial? Crim Law Rev, pp 968 ff

Jacobs FG, White RCA, Ovey C (2010) The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Jackson JD (2005) The effect of Human Rights on criminal evidentiary processes: towards convergence, divergence or realignment? Mod Law Rev, pp 737 ff

Jackson JD, Summers SJ (2012) The internationalisation of criminal evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Jebens SE (2007) The scope of the presumption of innocence in article 6 paragraph 2 of the Convention: especially on its reputation-related aspect. Liber amicorum Luzius Wildhaber – Human Rights – Strasbourg Views/Droits de l'homme – Regards de Strasbourg. Engel Verlag, Kehl, pp 207 ff

Jimeno-Bulnes M (2017) The use of intelligence information in criminal procedure. A challenge to defence rights in the European and the Spanish panorama. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 171 ff

Klip A (2015) On victim’s rights and its impact on the rights of the accused. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 23(3):177 ff

Kloth M (2010) Immunities and the right of access to court under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

Kostoris RE (ed) (2005) La ragionevole durata del processo. Garanzie ed efficienza della giustizia penale. Giappichelli, Torino

Kostoris RE (2016) Equità, processo penale, diritto europeo. Riflessioni di un giurista di civil law. Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, pp 1653 ff

Kuty F (2006) Justice pénale et procès équitable. Larcier, Bruxelles

Lamberigts S (2016) The Directive on the presumption of innocence. A missed opportunit for legal person? Eucrim, pp 36 ff

Lamberigts S (2016) The privilege against self-incrimination: A chameleon of criminal procedure. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 418 ff

Lonati S (2017) Fair trial and the interpretation approach adopted by the Strasbourg Court. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice, pp 52 ff

Lupària L (ed) (2015) Victim: and criminal Justice. European standards and national good practices. Wolters Kluver, Assago

Manes V, Zagrebelky V (eds) (2011) La Convenzione europea dei diritti dell'uomo nell'ordinamento penale italiano. Giuffrè, Milano

Mcbride J (2009) Human rights and criminal procedure. The case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

Mcdonagh M (2013) The right to information in international human rights law. Human Rights Law Rev, pp 25 ff

Muraszkiewicz J (2016) Article 12 of the EU human trafficking directive: fulfilling aspirations for victim participation in criminal trials? New J Eur Crim Law 7:331 ff

Murdoch JL (2002) Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The protection of liberty and security of person. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

Novokmet A (2016) The right of a victim to a review of a decision not to prosecute as set out in Article 11 of Directive 2012/29/EU and an assessment of its pransposition in Germany, Italy, France and Croatia. Utrecht Law Rev, pp 86 ff

O’Keefe R (2011) State immunity and human rights: heads and walls, hearts and minds. Vanderbilt J Transnl Law, pp 999 ff

Pettigrew M (2017) Retreating from vinter in Europe: sacrificing whole life prisoners to save the Strasbourg Court?. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice, pp 260 ff

Pettigrew M, Vinter A (2017) Retreat in Europe. returning to the issue of whole life sentences in Strasbourg. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 128 ff

Pinto de Albuquerque P (2015) Life Imprisonment and the European Right to Hope. AIC, no. 2

Pradel J (1996) La notion de procès equitable en droit pénal européen. Revue général de droit, pp 514 ff

Quattrocolo S (2015) The right to information in EU legislation. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Human Rights in European criminal law. New developments in European legislation and case law after the lisbon treaty. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 81 ff

Rafaraci T (ed) (2011) La cooperazione di polizia e giudiziaria in materia penale nell'Unione europea dopo il Trattato di Lisbona. Giuffrè, Milano

Renucci JF (2017) Droit européen des droits de l'homme. L.G.D.J, Paris

Repik B (1995) Réflexions sur la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de la personne concernant la présomption d'innocence. In: Liber Amicorum Marc-André Eisen. L.G.D.J., pp 331 ff

Requa M (2010) Absent witnesses and the UK Supreme Court: judicial deference as judicial dialogue? Int J Evid Proof, pp 208 ff

Roberts P (2011) Does Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights require reasoned verdicts in criminal trials? Human Rights Law Rev, pp 213 ff

Roberts P, Zuckerman A (2010) Criminal evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Ruggeri S (2016) Inaudito reo proceedings, defence rights, and harmonisation goals in the EU responses of the European Courts and new perspectives of EU law. Eucrim, pp 42 ff

Sieber U, Brüner FH, Satzger H, Von Heintschel-Heinegg B (eds) (2011) Europaieshes Strafrecht. Nomos, Baden-Baden

Soo A (2016) Potential remedies for violation of the right to counsel in criminal proceedings: Article 12 of the Directive 2013/48/EU (22 October2013) and its output in national legislation. Eur Crim Law Rev, pp 284 ff

Soo A (2017) Article 12 of the Directive 2013/48/EU: A starting point for discussion on a common understanding of the criteria for effective remedies of violation of the right to counsel. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice, pp 31 ff

Soo A (2017) How are the member states progressing on transposition of Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer? An inquiry conducted among the member states with the special focus on how Article 12 is transposed. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 64 ff

Spencer JR (2014) Hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings. Hart, Oxford

Stavros S (1993) The guarantees for accused persons under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

Sudre F (2015) Droit européen et international des droits de l'homme. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

Summers SJ (2007) Fair Trials. The European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights. Hart, Oxford

Symeonidou-Kastanidou E (2013) The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings: the transposition of Directive 2013/48/EU of 22 October 2013 on national legislation. Eur Crim Law Rev, pp 68 ff

Symeonidou-Kastanidou E (2016) Directive 2011/36/EU on combating trafficking in human beings. Fundamental choices and problems of implementation. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 465 ff

Thörnich D (2017) Art. 6 Abs. 3 lit. d EMRK und der unerreichbare (Auslands-)Zeuge: Appell zur Stärkung des Konfrontationsrechts bei präjudizierender Zeugenvernehmung im Ermittlungsverfahren. Zugleich Besprechung von EGMR, Urt. v. 15.12.2015 – 9154/10 (Schatschaschwili v. Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, pp 39 ff

Trechsel S (2006) Human rights in criminal proceedings. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Tulkens F, Lotarski J (2004) Le tribunal indépendant et impartial à la lumière de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. In: Mélanges Jacques van Compernolle. Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 741 ff

Ubertis G, Viganò F (eds) (2016) Corte di Strasburgo e giustizia penale. Giappichelli, Torino

Van Bockel B (2010) The Ne Bis in Idem Principle in EU law. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn

van der Aa S (2014) Post-trial victims’ rights in the EU: do law enforcement motives still reign supreme? Eur Law J, pp 239 ff

van der Aa S (2016) Variable vulnerabilities? Comparing the rights of adult vulnerable suspects and vulnerable victims under EU law. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 39 ff

Vanderpuye K (2010) Traditions in conflict: the internationalization of confrontation. Cornell Int Law J, pp 513 ff

Vervaele JAE (2014) Extraordinary rendition and the security paradigm. In: Haeck Y, McGonigle Leyh B, Burbano-Herrera C, Contreras-Garduño D (eds) The realisation of Human Rights: when theory meets practice. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 371 ff

Vogel B (2017) “In camera”- Verfahren als Gewährung effektiven Rechtsschutzes? Neue Entwicklungen im europäischen Sicherheitsrecht. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, pp 28 ff

VV AA (2009) The right to trial within a reasonable time and short-term reform of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

Wieczorek I (2012) A needed balance between security, liberty and justice. Positive signals arrive from the field of victims’ rights. Eur Crim Law Rev, pp 141 ff.

Titel: The Content of Fundamental Rights
verfasst von: Antonio Balsamo
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Handbook of European Criminal Procedure
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72461-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-72462-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72462-1_3