Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Development of an Android System Integrated with Sensor Networks Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

16. Do Robot Appearance and Speech Affect People’s Attitude? Evaluation Through the Ultimatum Game

verfasst von : Shuichi Nishio, Kohei Ogawa, Yasuhiro Kanakogi, Shoji Itakura, Hiroshi Ishiguro

Erschienen in: Geminoid Studies

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this study, we examined the factors that influence humans recognition of robots as social beings. Participants took part in sessions of the Ultimatum Game, a procedure frequently used in the fields of both economics and social psychology for examining peoples’ attitudes toward others. In the experiment, several agents having different appearances were used, and speech stimuli, which were expected to induce a mentalizing effect on the participants’ attitude toward the agents, were utilized. The results show that, while appearance per se did not elicit a significant difference in the participants attitudes, the mentalizing stimuli affected their attitudes in different fashions, depending on the robots’ appearance. These results showed that elements such as a simple conversation with an agent and the agents’ appearance are important factors that cause people to treat robots in a more humanlike fashion and as social beings.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Attitude Change Induced by Different Appearances of Interaction Agents
Nächstes Kapitel Isolation of Physical Traits and Conversational Content for Personality Design
Literatur
1.
Nishio, S., K. Ogawa, Y. Kanakogi, S. Itakura, and H. Ishiguro. 2012. Do robot appearance and speech affect people’s attitude? Evaluation through the ultimatum game. In 21st IEEE International symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2012), 809–814.
2.
DiSalvo, C.F., F. Gemperle, J. Forlizzi, and S. Kiesler. 2002. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, DIS ’02, 321–326.
3.
Yee, N., J.N. Bailenson, and K. Rickertsen. 2007. A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI, 1–10.
4.
Kilner, J.M., Y. Paulignan, and S.J. Blakemore. 2003. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology 13 (6): 522–525.CrossRef
5.
Komatsu, T., and S. Yamada. 2007. How do robotic agents’ appearances affect people’s interpretations of the agents’ attitudes? In Proceedings of the CHI, 2519–2524.
6.
Frith, U., and C.D. Frith. 2003. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 358 (1431): 459–473.CrossRef
7.
Reeves, Byron, and Clifford Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Gallagher, H.L., A.I. Jack, A. Roepstorff, and C.D. Frith. 2002. Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. NeuroImage, 16 (3, Part A): 814–821.CrossRef
9.
Itakura, S. 2008. Development of mentalizing and communication: From viewpoint of developmental cybernetics and developmental cognitive neuroscience. IEICE Transactions on Communications 91 (7): 2109–2117CrossRef
10.
Güth, Werner, Rolf Schmittberger, and Bernd Schwarze. 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3 (4): 367–388.CrossRef
11.
Falk, Armin, Ernst Fehr, and Urs Fischbacher. 2003. On the nature of fair behavior. Economic Inquiry 41 (1): 20–26.CrossRef
12.
Yamagishi, T., Y. Horita, H. Takagishi, M. Shinada, S. Tanida, and K.S. Cook. 2009. The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 106 (28): 11520–11523.CrossRef
13.
Ohmura, Y., and T. Yamagishi. 2005. Why do people reject unintended inequity? Responders’ rejection in a truncated ultimatum game. Psychological Reports 96 (2): 533–541.CrossRef
14.
Güth, Werner. 1995. On ultimatum bargaining experiments—A personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 27 (3): 329–344.CrossRef
15.
Roth, E. 1989. An experimental study of sequential bargaining. American Economic Review 79 (3): 355–84.
16.
Slembeck, T. 1999. Reputations and fairness in bargaining - experimental evidence from a repeated ultimatum game with fixed opponents. Technical report 9904, Department of Economics, University of St.Gallen, May 1999.
17.
Nishio, S., H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita. June 2007. Geminoid: Teleoperated android of an existing person. In Humanoid Robots: New Developments, Armando Carlos de Pina Filho ed, 343–352. Vienna, Austria: I-Tech Education and Publishing.
Metadaten
Titel
Do Robot Appearance and Speech Affect People’s Attitude? Evaluation Through the Ultimatum Game
verfasst von
Shuichi Nishio
Kohei Ogawa
Yasuhiro Kanakogi
Shoji Itakura
Hiroshi Ishiguro
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Geminoid Studies

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8701-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-8702-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8702-8_16

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise