Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Review of Multicriteria Methodologies and Tools for the Evaluation of the Provision of Ecosystem Services

verfasst von : Parthena Chatzinikolaou, Davide Viaggi, Meri Raggi

Erschienen in: Multicriteria Analysis in Agriculture

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

An ecosystem is defined as an area, place or environment where organisms interact with the physical and chemical environment. Ecosystems provide a variety of benefits to people that are divided into market and non-market ecosystem goods or ecosystem services (ES) and classified in multiple ways. A wide range of methodologies is available to value changes in ES. The type of valuation technique chosen depends on the type of ES to be valued, as well as the quantity and quality of data available. Since ES provide multiple benefits, they are valued for a range of reasons and researchers must employ valuation methods that better match this diversity. How to compare objects with multiple characteristics has been the focus of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). In this paper, a literature review has been performed that covers an overview of various methodologies that seek to improve the knowledge base of existing tools and methodologies in ES evaluation. The focus will be on studies that used MCDA for an ES assessment; attempting to cover a representative sample of case studies of ES assessments through MCDA. We also discuss advantages and disadvantages of different methodological choices in ecosystem service evaluation. We conclude that the ES concept is currently used in a range of studies with widely differing aims creating difficulties for policy makers as well as researchers since it makes it difficult to assess the credibility of assessment results. MCDA techniques can indeed help structuring the problem and supporting a more transparent decision-making.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abildtrup, J., Audsley, E., Fekete-Farkas, M., Giupponi, C., Gylling, M., Rosato, P., & Rounsevell, M. (2006). Socio-economic scenario development for the assessment of climate change impacts on agricultural land use: A pairwise comparison approach. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 101–115.CrossRef Abildtrup, J., Audsley, E., Fekete-Farkas, M., Giupponi, C., Gylling, M., Rosato, P., & Rounsevell, M. (2006). Socio-economic scenario development for the assessment of climate change impacts on agricultural land use: A pairwise comparison approach. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 101–115.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Abu-Taleb, M. F., & Mareschal, B. (1995). Water resources planning in the Middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. European Journal of Operational Research, 81, 500–511.CrossRef Abu-Taleb, M. F., & Mareschal, B. (1995). Water resources planning in the Middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. European Journal of Operational Research, 81, 500–511.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Armsworth, P. R., Chan, K. M. A., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Kremen, C., Ricketts, T. H., & Sanjayan, M. A. (2007). Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 1383–1384.CrossRef Armsworth, P. R., Chan, K. M. A., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Kremen, C., Ricketts, T. H., & Sanjayan, M. A. (2007). Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 1383–1384.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bodini, A., & Giavelli, G. (1992). Multicriteria analysis as a tool to investigate compatibility between conservation and development on Salina Island, Aeolian Archipelago, Italy. Environmental Management, 16, 633–652.CrossRef Bodini, A., & Giavelli, G. (1992). Multicriteria analysis as a tool to investigate compatibility between conservation and development on Salina Island, Aeolian Archipelago, Italy. Environmental Management, 16, 633–652.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–626.CrossRef Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–626.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, M., & Vivas, M. B. (2005). Landscape Development Intensity Index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101, 289–309.CrossRef Brown, M., & Vivas, M. B. (2005). Landscape Development Intensity Index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101, 289–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhard, F., Kroll, F., Müller, F., & Windhorst, W. (2009). Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services – A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 15, 1–22. Burkhard, F., Kroll, F., Müller, F., & Windhorst, W. (2009). Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services – A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 15, 1–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29.CrossRef Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhard, B., Petrosillo, I., & Costanza, R. (2010). Ecosystem services – Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecological Complexity, 7, 257–259.CrossRef Burkhard, B., Petrosillo, I., & Costanza, R. (2010). Ecosystem services – Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecological Complexity, 7, 257–259.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carnus, J. M., Parrotta, J., Brockerhoff, E., Arbez, M., Jactel, H., Kremer, A., Lamb, D., OHara, K., & Walters, B. (2006). Planted forests and biodiversity. Journal of Forestry, 104, 65–77. Carnus, J. M., Parrotta, J., Brockerhoff, E., Arbez, M., Jactel, H., Kremer, A., Lamb, D., OHara, K., & Walters, B. (2006). Planted forests and biodiversity. Journal of Forestry, 104, 65–77.
Zurück zum Zitat Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R. S., Diaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., et al. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1305–1312.CrossRef Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R. S., Diaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., et al. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1305–1312.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carreño, L., Frank, F. C., & Viglizzo, E. F. (2012). Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 154, 68–77.CrossRef Carreño, L., Frank, F. C., & Viglizzo, E. F. (2012). Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 154, 68–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Castella, J.-C., Trung, T. N., & Boissau, S. (2005). Participatory simulation of land-use changes in the Northern Mountains of Vietnam: The combined use of an agent-based model, a role-playing game, and a geographic information system. Ecology and Society, 10, 27.CrossRef Castella, J.-C., Trung, T. N., & Boissau, S. (2005). Participatory simulation of land-use changes in the Northern Mountains of Vietnam: The combined use of an agent-based model, a role-playing game, and a geographic information system. Ecology and Society, 10, 27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18.CrossRef Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chatzinikolaou, P., Viaggi, D., & Raggi, M. (2015). The evaluation of ecosystem services production: An application in the Province of Ferrara. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 4(3), 235–259. Chatzinikolaou, P., Viaggi, D., & Raggi, M. (2015). The evaluation of ecosystem services production: An application in the Province of Ferrara. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 4(3), 235–259.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung, W. W. L., Lam, V. W. Y., Sarmiento, J. L., Kearney, K., Watson, R., & Pauly, D. (2009). Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios. Fish and Fisheries, 10, 235–251.CrossRef Cheung, W. W. L., Lam, V. W. Y., Sarmiento, J. L., Kearney, K., Watson, R., & Pauly, D. (2009). Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios. Fish and Fisheries, 10, 235–251.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat CICES. (2013). The common international classification of ecosystem services. Report to the European Environment Agency. CICES. (2013). The common international classification of ecosystem services. Report to the European Environment Agency.
Zurück zum Zitat Comino, E., Bottero, M., Pomarico, S., & Rosso, M. (2014). Exploring the environmental value of ecosystem services for a river basin through a spatial multicriteria analysis. Land Use Policy, 36, 381–395.CrossRef Comino, E., Bottero, M., Pomarico, S., & Rosso, M. (2014). Exploring the environmental value of ecosystem services for a river basin through a spatial multicriteria analysis. Land Use Policy, 36, 381–395.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., & de Groot, R. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.CrossRef Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., & de Groot, R. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.CrossRef Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowling, R. M., Egoh, B., Knight, A. T., O’Farrell, P. J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Roux, D. J., Welz, A., & Wilhelm-Rechman, A. (2008). An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9483–9488.CrossRef Cowling, R. M., Egoh, B., Knight, A. T., O’Farrell, P. J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Roux, D. J., Welz, A., & Wilhelm-Rechman, A. (2008). An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9483–9488.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Daily, G. (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press. Daily, G. (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J., & Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 21–28.CrossRef Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J., & Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 21–28.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot, R. (1987). Environmental functions as a unifying concept for ecology and economics. Environmentalist, 7, 105–109.CrossRef de Groot, R. (1987). Environmental functions as a unifying concept for ecology and economics. Environmentalist, 7, 105–109.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot, R. (1992). Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff. 315 pp. de Groot, R. (1992). Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff. 315 pp.
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot, R. (2006). Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 175–186.CrossRef de Groot, R. (2006). Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 175–186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272.CrossRef de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408.CrossRef de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diehl, K., Burkhard, B., & Jacob, K. (2016). Should the ecosystem services concept be used in European Commission impact assessment? Ecological Indicators, 61(Part 1), 6–17.CrossRef Diehl, K., Burkhard, B., & Jacob, K. (2016). Should the ecosystem services concept be used in European Commission impact assessment? Ecological Indicators, 61(Part 1), 6–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donner, S. D., Skirving, W. J., Little, C. M., Oppenheimer, M., & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2005). Global assessment of coral bleaching and required rates of adaptation under climate change. Global Change Biology, 11, 2251–2265.CrossRef Donner, S. D., Skirving, W. J., Little, C. M., Oppenheimer, M., & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2005). Global assessment of coral bleaching and required rates of adaptation under climate change. Global Change Biology, 11, 2251–2265.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duinker, P. N., & Greig, L. A. (2007). Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 206–219.CrossRef Duinker, P. N., & Greig, L. A. (2007). Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 206–219.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat EC. (2009). Consultation on the future “EU 2020” strategy. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. EC. (2009). Consultation on the future “EU 2020” strategy. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Zurück zum Zitat EC. (2010). European Commission: Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020, Brussels. EC. (2010). European Commission: Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020, Brussels.
Zurück zum Zitat EC. (2011). European Commission: Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244, Brussels. EC. (2011). European Commission: Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244, Brussels.
Zurück zum Zitat Egoh, B., Drakou, E.G., Dunbar, M., Maes, J., & Willemen, L. (2012). Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: A review. Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Egoh, B., Drakou, E.G., Dunbar, M., Maes, J., & Willemen, L. (2012). Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: A review. Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Zurück zum Zitat Egoh, B., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., & van Jaarsveld, A. S. (2008). Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 127, 135–140.CrossRef Egoh, B., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., & van Jaarsveld, A. S. (2008). Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 127, 135–140.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feld, C., Sousa, J., da Silva, P., & Dawson, T. (2010). Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: Towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2895–2919.CrossRef Feld, C., Sousa, J., da Silva, P., & Dawson, T. (2010). Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: Towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2895–2919.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher, B., & Kerry Turner, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 141, 1167–1169.CrossRef Fisher, B., & Kerry Turner, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 141, 1167–1169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643–653.CrossRef Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643–653.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fontana, V., Radtke, A., Bossi Fedrigotti, V., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Zerbe, S., & Buchholz, T. (2013). Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Economics, 93, 128–136.CrossRef Fontana, V., Radtke, A., Bossi Fedrigotti, V., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Zerbe, S., & Buchholz, T. (2013). Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Economics, 93, 128–136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Galimberti, G., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2014). Landscape perception and ecosystem service uses: Some results from surveys and latent variable models. Deliverable 4.20 “Summary Report on Case Study Activity”. Galimberti, G., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2014). Landscape perception and ecosystem service uses: Some results from surveys and latent variable models. Deliverable 4.20 “Summary Report on Case Study Activity”.
Zurück zum Zitat Girardin, P., Bockstaller, C., & Van der Werf, H. (2000). Assessment of potential impacts of agricultural practices on the environment: The AGRO*ECO method. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 227–239.CrossRef Girardin, P., Bockstaller, C., & Van der Werf, H. (2000). Assessment of potential impacts of agricultural practices on the environment: The AGRO*ECO method. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 227–239.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser, M., & Diele, K. (2004). Asymmetric outcomes: Assessing central aspects of the biological, economic and social sustainability of a mangrove crab fishery, Ucides cordatus (Ocypodidae), in North Brazil. Ecological Economics, 49, 361–373.CrossRef Glaser, M., & Diele, K. (2004). Asymmetric outcomes: Assessing central aspects of the biological, economic and social sustainability of a mangrove crab fishery, Ucides cordatus (Ocypodidae), in North Brazil. Ecological Economics, 49, 361–373.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69, 1209–1218.CrossRef Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69, 1209–1218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez-Limon, J. A., & Sanchez-Fernandez, G. (2010). Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 69, 1062–1075.CrossRef Gomez-Limon, J. A., & Sanchez-Fernandez, G. (2010). Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 69, 1062–1075.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gorshkov, V. G., Gorshkov, V. V., & Makarieva, A. M. (2000). Biotic regulation of the environment. London: Springer, Published in association with Praxis Publishing. Gorshkov, V. G., Gorshkov, V. V., & Makarieva, A. M. (2000). Biotic regulation of the environment. London: Springer, Published in association with Praxis Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo, M., Richter, G. M., Holland, R. A., Eigenbrod, F., Taylor, G., & Shah, N. (2016). Implementing land-use and ecosystem service effects into an integrated bioenergy value chain optimisation framework. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 91, 392–406.CrossRef Guo, M., Richter, G. M., Holland, R. A., Eigenbrod, F., Taylor, G., & Shah, N. (2016). Implementing land-use and ecosystem service effects into an integrated bioenergy value chain optimisation framework. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 91, 392–406.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haas, G., Wetterich, F., & Geier, U. (2000). Life cycle assessment framework in agriculture on the farm level. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5, 345–348.CrossRef Haas, G., Wetterich, F., & Geier, U. (2000). Life cycle assessment framework in agriculture on the farm level. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5, 345–348.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haas, G., Wetterich, F., & Köpke, U. (2001). Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 83, 43–53.CrossRef Haas, G., Wetterich, F., & Köpke, U. (2001). Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 83, 43–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Halberg, N., Verschuur, G., & Goodlass, G. (2005). Farm level environmental indicators; are they useful? An overview of green accounting systems for European farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105, 195–212.CrossRef Halberg, N., Verschuur, G., & Goodlass, G. (2005). Farm level environmental indicators; are they useful? An overview of green accounting systems for European farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105, 195–212.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 209–228.CrossRef Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 209–228.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Helliwell, D. R. (1969). Valuation of wildlife resources. Regional Studies, 3, 41–49.CrossRef Helliwell, D. R. (1969). Valuation of wildlife resources. Regional Studies, 3, 41–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1997). Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 19–36.CrossRef Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1997). Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 19–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35.CrossRef Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes, J. B., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1997). Population diversity: Its extent and extinction. Science, 278, 689–692.CrossRef Hughes, J. B., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1997). Population diversity: Its extent and extinction. Science, 278, 689–692.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jetz, W., Wilcove, D. S., & Dobson, A. P. (2007). Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biology, 5, e157.CrossRef Jetz, W., Wilcove, D. S., & Dobson, A. P. (2007). Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biology, 5, e157.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jopke, C., Kreyling, J., Maes, J., & Koellner, T. (2015). Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecological Indicators, 49, 46–52.CrossRef Jopke, C., Kreyling, J., Maes, J., & Koellner, T. (2015). Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecological Indicators, 49, 46–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kienast, F., Bolliger, J., Potschin, M., de Groot, R., Verburg, P., Heller, I., Wascher, D., & Haines-Young, R. (2009). Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: Insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environmental Management, 44, 1099–1120.CrossRef Kienast, F., Bolliger, J., Potschin, M., de Groot, R., Verburg, P., Heller, I., Wascher, D., & Haines-Young, R. (2009). Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: Insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environmental Management, 44, 1099–1120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1, 95–108.CrossRef Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1, 95–108.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirchner, M., Schmidt, J., Kindermann, G., Kulmer, V., Mitter, H., Prettenthaler, F., Rüdisser, J., Schauppenlehner, T., Schönhart, M., Strauss, F., et al. (2015). Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes — The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies. Ecological Economics, 109, 161–174.CrossRef Kirchner, M., Schmidt, J., Kindermann, G., Kulmer, V., Mitter, H., Prettenthaler, F., Rüdisser, J., Schauppenlehner, T., Schönhart, M., Strauss, F., et al. (2015). Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes — The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies. Ecological Economics, 109, 161–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirchner, M., Schönhart, M., & Schmid, E. (2016). Spatial impacts of the CAP post-2013 and climate change scenarios on agricultural intensification and environment in Austria. Ecological Economics, 123, 35–56.CrossRef Kirchner, M., Schönhart, M., & Schmid, E. (2016). Spatial impacts of the CAP post-2013 and climate change scenarios on agricultural intensification and environment in Austria. Ecological Economics, 123, 35–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54–66.CrossRef Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lautenbach, S., Kugel, C., Lausch, A., & Seppelt, R. (2011). Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecological Indicators, 11, 676–687.CrossRef Lautenbach, S., Kugel, C., Lausch, A., & Seppelt, R. (2011). Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecological Indicators, 11, 676–687.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Layke, C., Mapendembe, A., Brown, C., Walpole, M., & Winn, J. (2012). Indicators from the global and sub-global millennium ecosystem assessments: An analysis and next steps. Ecological Indicators, 17, 77–87.CrossRef Layke, C., Mapendembe, A., Brown, C., Walpole, M., & Winn, J. (2012). Indicators from the global and sub-global millennium ecosystem assessments: An analysis and next steps. Ecological Indicators, 17, 77–87.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luck, G. W., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2003). Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 331–336.CrossRef Luck, G. W., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2003). Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 331–336.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lundin, M., & Morrison, G. M. (2002). A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems. Urban Water, 4, 145–152.CrossRef Lundin, M., & Morrison, G. M. (2002). A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems. Urban Water, 4, 145–152.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lupp, G., Steinhäußer, R., Bastian, O., & Syrbe, R.-U. (2015). Impacts of increasing bioenergy use on ecosystem services on nature and society exemplified in the German district of Görlitz. Biomass and Bioenergy, 83, 131–140.CrossRef Lupp, G., Steinhäußer, R., Bastian, O., & Syrbe, R.-U. (2015). Impacts of increasing bioenergy use on ecosystem services on nature and society exemplified in the German district of Görlitz. Biomass and Bioenergy, 83, 131–140.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 19–26.CrossRef Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 19–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J. P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E. G., Notte, A. L., Zulian, G., et al. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1, 31–39.CrossRef Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J. P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E. G., Notte, A. L., Zulian, G., et al. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1, 31–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Sastre, R., Ravera, F., González, J. A., López Santiago, C., Bidegain, I., & Munda, G. (2017). Mediterranean landscapes under change: Combining social multicriteria evaluation and the ecosystem services framework for land use planning. Land Use Policy, 67, 472–486.CrossRef Martínez-Sastre, R., Ravera, F., González, J. A., López Santiago, C., Bidegain, I., & Munda, G. (2017). Mediterranean landscapes under change: Combining social multicriteria evaluation and the ecosystem services framework for land use planning. Land Use Policy, 67, 472–486.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mendoza, G. A., & Prabhu, R. (2003). Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 329–343.CrossRef Mendoza, G. A., & Prabhu, R. (2003). Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 329–343.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being. In A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being. In A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis report. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis report. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Zurück zum Zitat Moberg, F., & Folke, C. (1999). Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 29, 215–233.CrossRef Moberg, F., & Folke, C. (1999). Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 29, 215–233.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moffett, A., Garson, J., & Sarkar, S. (2005). MultCSync: A software package for incorporating multiple criteria in conservation planning. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20, 1315–1322.CrossRef Moffett, A., Garson, J., & Sarkar, S. (2005). MultCSync: A software package for incorporating multiple criteria in conservation planning. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20, 1315–1322.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, J. P., & Kennedy, P. E. (2009). The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: An assessment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42, 345–377.CrossRef Nelson, J. P., & Kennedy, P. E. (2009). The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: An assessment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42, 345–377.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Newton, A. C., Hodder, K., Cantarello, E., Perrella, L., Birch, J. C., Robins, J., Douglas, S., Moody, C., & Cordingley, J. (2012). Cost–benefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 571–580.CrossRef Newton, A. C., Hodder, K., Cantarello, E., Perrella, L., Birch, J. C., Robins, J., Douglas, S., Moody, C., & Cordingley, J. (2012). Cost–benefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 571–580.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Norberg, J. (1999). Linking Nature’s services to ecosystems: Some general ecological concepts. Ecological Economics, 29, 183–202.CrossRef Norberg, J. (1999). Linking Nature’s services to ecosystems: Some general ecological concepts. Ecological Economics, 29, 183–202.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Odum, E. P., & Odum, H. T. (1972). Natural areas as necessary components of man’s total environment (Vol. 37, pp. 178–189). In Transactions of the 37th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC. Odum, E. P., & Odum, H. T. (1972). Natural areas as necessary components of man’s total environment (Vol. 37, pp. 178–189). In Transactions of the 37th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC.
Zurück zum Zitat Oikonomou, V., Dimitrakopoulos, P., & Troumbis, A. (2011). Incorporating ecosystem function concept in environmental planning and decision making by means of multi-criteria evaluation: The case-study of Kalloni, Lesbos, Greece. Environmental Management, 47, 77–92.CrossRef Oikonomou, V., Dimitrakopoulos, P., & Troumbis, A. (2011). Incorporating ecosystem function concept in environmental planning and decision making by means of multi-criteria evaluation: The case-study of Kalloni, Lesbos, Greece. Environmental Management, 47, 77–92.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Onate, J., Andersen, E., Peco, B., & Primdahl, J. (2000). Agri-environmental schemes and the European agricultural landscapes: The role of indicators as valuing tools for evaluation. Landscape Ecology, 15, 271–280.CrossRef Onate, J., Andersen, E., Peco, B., & Primdahl, J. (2000). Agri-environmental schemes and the European agricultural landscapes: The role of indicators as valuing tools for evaluation. Landscape Ecology, 15, 271–280.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pannell, D. J., & Glenn, N. A. (2000). A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecological Economics, 33, 135–149.CrossRef Pannell, D. J., & Glenn, N. A. (2000). A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecological Economics, 33, 135–149.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paracchini, M. L., & Capitani, C. (2011). Implementation of a EU wide indicator for the rural-agrarian landscape. In support of COM(2006)508 “Development of agri-environmental indicators for monitoring the integration of environmental concerns into the Common Agricultural Policy”. Paracchini, M. L., & Capitani, C. (2011). Implementation of a EU wide indicator for the rural-agrarian landscape. In support of COM(2006)508 “Development of agri-environmental indicators for monitoring the integration of environmental concerns into the Common Agricultural Policy”.
Zurück zum Zitat Paracchini, M. L., Pacini, C., Jones, M. L. M., & Pérez-Soba, M. (2011). An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options. Ecological Indicators, 11, 71–80.CrossRef Paracchini, M. L., Pacini, C., Jones, M. L. M., & Pérez-Soba, M. (2011). An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options. Ecological Indicators, 11, 71–80.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patil, G. P., Brooks, R. P., Myers, W. L., Rapport, D. J., & Taillie, C. (2001). Ecosystem health and its measurement at landscape scale: Toward the next generation of quantitative assessments. Ecosystem Health, 7, 307–316.CrossRef Patil, G. P., Brooks, R. P., Myers, W. L., Rapport, D. J., & Taillie, C. (2001). Ecosystem health and its measurement at landscape scale: Toward the next generation of quantitative assessments. Ecosystem Health, 7, 307–316.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce, D. W. (1993). Economic values and the natural world. London: Earthscan. Pearce, D. W. (1993). Economic values and the natural world. London: Earthscan.
Zurück zum Zitat Perrings, C., Folke, C., & Maler, K.-G. (1992). The ecology and economics of biodiversity loss: The research agenda. Ambio, 21, 201–211. Perrings, C., Folke, C., & Maler, K.-G. (1992). The ecology and economics of biodiversity loss: The research agenda. Ambio, 21, 201–211.
Zurück zum Zitat Perrings, C., Naeem, S., Ahrestani, F. S., Bunker, D. E., Burkill, P., Canziani, G., Elmqvist, T., Fuhrman, J. A., Jaksic, F. M., Kawabata, Z., et al. (2011). Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 512–520.CrossRef Perrings, C., Naeem, S., Ahrestani, F. S., Bunker, D. E., Burkill, P., Canziani, G., Elmqvist, T., Fuhrman, J. A., Jaksic, F. M., Kawabata, Z., et al. (2011). Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 512–520.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Polasky, S. (2008). What’s nature done for you lately: Measuring the value of ecosystem services. Choices, 23, 42–46. Polasky, S. (2008). What’s nature done for you lately: Measuring the value of ecosystem services. Choices, 23, 42–46.
Zurück zum Zitat Posthumus, H., Rouquette, J. R., Morris, J., Gowing, D. J. G., & Hess, T. M. (2010). A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecological Economics, 69, 1510–1523.CrossRef Posthumus, H., Rouquette, J. R., Morris, J., Gowing, D. J. G., & Hess, T. M. (2010). A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecological Economics, 69, 1510–1523.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rasul, G., & Thapa, G. B. (2004). Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: An assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives. Agricultural Systems, 79, 327–351.CrossRef Rasul, G., & Thapa, G. B. (2004). Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: An assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives. Agricultural Systems, 79, 327–351.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Regan, H. M., Davis, F. W., Andelman, S. J., Widyanata, A., & Freese, M. (2006). Comprehensive criteria for biodiversity evaluation in conservation planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 2715–2728.CrossRef Regan, H. M., Davis, F. W., Andelman, S. J., Widyanata, A., & Freese, M. (2006). Comprehensive criteria for biodiversity evaluation in conservation planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 2715–2728.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez, J. P., Beard, J., Douglas, T., Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S. J., Agard, J., Dobson, A. P., & Peterson, G. D. (2006). Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11, 28.CrossRef Rodriguez, J. P., Beard, J., Douglas, T., Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S. J., Agard, J., Dobson, A. P., & Peterson, G. D. (2006). Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11, 28.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., Cullen, R., & Case, B. (2008). The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach. Ecological Economics, 64, 835–848.CrossRef Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., Cullen, R., & Case, B. (2008). The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach. Ecological Economics, 64, 835–848.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schneiders, A., Van Daele, T., Van Landuyt, W., & Van Reeth, W. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: Complementary approaches for ecosystem management? Ecological Indicators, 21, 123–133.CrossRef Schneiders, A., Van Daele, T., Van Landuyt, W., & Van Reeth, W. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: Complementary approaches for ecosystem management? Ecological Indicators, 21, 123–133.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Segura, M., Maroto, C., Belton, V., & Ginestar, C. (2015). A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services. Forests, 6, 1696.CrossRef Segura, M., Maroto, C., Belton, V., & Ginestar, C. (2015). A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services. Forests, 6, 1696.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seppelt, R., Dormann, C. F., Eppink, F. V., Lautenbach, S., & Schmidt, S. (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 630–636.CrossRef Seppelt, R., Dormann, C. F., Eppink, F. V., Lautenbach, S., & Schmidt, S. (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 630–636.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seppelt, R., Fath, B., Burkhard, B., Fisher, J. L., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lautenbach, S., Pert, P., Hotes, S., Spangenberg, J., Verburg, P. H., et al. (2012). Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecological Indicators, 21, 145–154.CrossRef Seppelt, R., Fath, B., Burkhard, B., Fisher, J. L., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lautenbach, S., Pert, P., Hotes, S., Spangenberg, J., Verburg, P. H., et al. (2012). Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecological Indicators, 21, 145–154.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Silvert, W. (2000). Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecological Modelling, 130, 111–119.CrossRef Silvert, W. (2000). Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecological Modelling, 130, 111–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sitch, S., Huntingford, C., Gedney, N., Levy, P. E., Lomas, M., Piao, S. L., Betts, R., Ciais, P., Cox, P., Friedlingstein, P., et al. (2008). Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs). Global Change Biology, 14, 2015–2039.CrossRef Sitch, S., Huntingford, C., Gedney, N., Levy, P. E., Lomas, M., Piao, S. L., Betts, R., Ciais, P., Cox, P., Friedlingstein, P., et al. (2008). Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs). Global Change Biology, 14, 2015–2039.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart, T. J., & Scott, L. (1995). A scenario-based framework for multicriteria decision analysis in water resources planning. Water Resources Research, 31, 2835–2843.CrossRef Stewart, T. J., & Scott, L. (1995). A scenario-based framework for multicriteria decision analysis in water resources planning. Water Resources Research, 31, 2835–2843.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swetnam, R. D., Fisher, B., Mbilinyi, B. P., Munishi, P. K. T., Willcock, S., Ricketts, T., Mwakalila, S., Balmford, A., Burgess, N. D., Marshall, A. R., et al. (2011). Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: A GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 563–574.CrossRef Swetnam, R. D., Fisher, B., Mbilinyi, B. P., Munishi, P. K. T., Willcock, S., Ricketts, T., Mwakalila, S., Balmford, A., Burgess, N. D., Marshall, A. R., et al. (2011). Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: A GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 563–574.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat TEEB. (2010a). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. London: Earthscan. TEEB. (2010a). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. London: Earthscan.
Zurück zum Zitat TEEB. (2010b). A quick guide to the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for local and regional policy makers. www.teebweb.org. TEEB. (2010b). A quick guide to the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for local and regional policy makers. www.​teebweb.​org.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., Collingham, Y. C., Erasmus, B. F. N., de Siqueira, M. F., Grainger, A., Hannah, L., et al. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427, 145–148.CrossRef Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., Collingham, Y. C., Erasmus, B. F. N., de Siqueira, M. F., Grainger, A., Hannah, L., et al. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427, 145–148.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, R. K., & Daily, G. C. (2008). The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 25–35.CrossRef Turner, R. K., & Daily, G. C. (2008). The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 25–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cauwenbergh, N., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Franchois, L., Garcia Cidad, V., Hermy, M., Mathijs, E., Muys, B., Reijnders, J., et al. (2007). SAFE—A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 120, 229–242.CrossRef Van Cauwenbergh, N., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Franchois, L., Garcia Cidad, V., Hermy, M., Mathijs, E., Muys, B., Reijnders, J., et al. (2007). SAFE—A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 120, 229–242.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Zanten, B., Verburg, P., Espinosa, M., Gomez-y-Paloma, S., Galimberti, G., Kantelhardt, J., Kapfer, M., Lefebvre, M., Manrique, R., Piorr, A., et al. (2014). European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 309–325.CrossRef van Zanten, B., Verburg, P., Espinosa, M., Gomez-y-Paloma, S., Galimberti, G., Kantelhardt, J., Kapfer, M., Lefebvre, M., Manrique, R., Piorr, A., et al. (2014). European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 309–325.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Zanten, B. T., Zasada, I., Koetse, M. J., Ungaro, F., Häfner, K., & Verburg, P. H. (2016). A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 17, 87–98.CrossRef van Zanten, B. T., Zasada, I., Koetse, M. J., Ungaro, F., Häfner, K., & Verburg, P. H. (2016). A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 17, 87–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Verburg, P. H., Schulp, C. J. E., Witte, N., & Veldkamp, A. (2006). Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114, 39–56.CrossRef Verburg, P. H., Schulp, C. J. E., Witte, N., & Veldkamp, A. (2006). Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114, 39–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Viaggi, D. (2015). Special section: Exploring the contribution of landscape management to the rural economy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 2082–2087.CrossRef Viaggi, D. (2015). Special section: Exploring the contribution of landscape management to the rural economy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 2082–2087.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vira, B., & Adams, W. M. (2009). Ecosystem services and conservation strategy: Beware the silver bullet. Conservation Letters, 2, 158–162.CrossRef Vira, B., & Adams, W. M. (2009). Ecosystem services and conservation strategy: Beware the silver bullet. Conservation Letters, 2, 158–162.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wallace, K. J. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139, 235–246.CrossRef Wallace, K. J. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139, 235–246.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weber, J.-L. (2007). Implementation of land and ecosystem accounts at the European Environment Agency. Ecological Economics, 61, 695–707.CrossRef Weber, J.-L. (2007). Implementation of land and ecosystem accounts at the European Environment Agency. Ecological Economics, 61, 695–707.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wegner, G., & Pascual, U. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change, 21, 492–504.CrossRef Wegner, G., & Pascual, U. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change, 21, 492–504.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wiggering, H., Dalchow, C., Glemnitz, M., Helming, K., Müller, K., Schultz, A., Stachow, U., & Zander, P. (2006). Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators, 6, 238–249.CrossRef Wiggering, H., Dalchow, C., Glemnitz, M., Helming, K., Müller, K., Schultz, A., Stachow, U., & Zander, P. (2006). Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators, 6, 238–249.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Willemen, L., Hein, L., van Mensvoort, M. E. F., & Verburg, P. H. (2010). Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators, 10, 62–73.CrossRef Willemen, L., Hein, L., van Mensvoort, M. E. F., & Verburg, P. H. (2010). Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators, 10, 62–73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, M. A., & Carpenter, S. R. (1999). Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecological Applications, 9, 772–783. Wilson, M. A., & Carpenter, S. R. (1999). Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecological Applications, 9, 772–783.
Zurück zum Zitat WRI. (2005). Managing ecosystems to fight poverty. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. WRI. (2005). Managing ecosystems to fight poverty. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Zurück zum Zitat Xenopoulos, M. A., Lodge, D. M., Alcamo, J., Märker, M., Schulze, K., & Van Vuuren, D. P. (2005). Scenarios of freshwater fish extinctions from climate change and water withdrawal. Global Change Biology, 11, 1557–1564.CrossRef Xenopoulos, M. A., Lodge, D. M., Alcamo, J., Märker, M., Schulze, K., & Van Vuuren, D. P. (2005). Scenarios of freshwater fish extinctions from climate change and water withdrawal. Global Change Biology, 11, 1557–1564.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xiang, W.-N., & Clarke, K. C. (2003). The use of scenarios in land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 885–909.CrossRef Xiang, W.-N., & Clarke, K. C. (2003). The use of scenarios in land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 885–909.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zahm, F., Viaux, P., Vilain, L., Girardin, P., & Mouchet, C. (2008). Assessing farm sustainability with the IDEA method – from the concept of agriculture sustainability to case studies on farms. Sustainable Development, 16, 271–281.CrossRef Zahm, F., Viaux, P., Vilain, L., Girardin, P., & Mouchet, C. (2008). Assessing farm sustainability with the IDEA method – from the concept of agriculture sustainability to case studies on farms. Sustainable Development, 16, 271–281.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zerger, A., Warren, G., Hill, P., Robertson, D., Weidemann, A., & Lawton, K. (2011). Multi-criteria assessment for linking regional conservation planning and farm-scale actions. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26, 103–110.CrossRef Zerger, A., Warren, G., Hill, P., Robertson, D., Weidemann, A., & Lawton, K. (2011). Multi-criteria assessment for linking regional conservation planning and farm-scale actions. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26, 103–110.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Review of Multicriteria Methodologies and Tools for the Evaluation of the Provision of Ecosystem Services
verfasst von
Parthena Chatzinikolaou
Davide Viaggi
Meri Raggi
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76929-5_2