nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Concepts, Methodologies and Tools of Gamification and Design Thinking

verfasst von : João Leitão

Erschienen in: Open Innovation Business Modeling

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

First of all, this item revisits a selection of the main theoretical concepts being taught (see Fig. 3.1), in an introductory way, in the scope of a course on technological entrepreneurship designing, namely: entrepreneur; challenge; entrepreneurial opportunity; team; creativity, resilience and leadership; and technological entrepreneurship (entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial route); considering the set of modular lists proposed by Byers et al. (2015) in the fourth edition of the book entitled: Technology Ventures: From Idea to Enterprise; which serves as a basic reference in terms of the course’s design, planning, structuring and functioning. The reason for this lies in the need to present a coherent sequence of concepts considered basic in this course, proceeding later to presentation of the tools used to identify, explore and work on the business idea tending towards the creation of a technology-based firm (entrepreneurial route) or implementation of an entrepreneurial and innovative project (intrapreneurial route), using a new methodology named: Pentagon of opportunity exploitation, which uses an approach crossing gamification and design thinking.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Methodological Design and Empirical Findings

For further information consult: http://dschool.stanford.edu/

For an example of empirical application of the open innovation bridge tool—Tangram model, consult Part II—Empirical application of open innovation business models in this book.

A module is understood to be a unit of learning which is autonomous and with its own identity, but part of a cohesive and coherent whole supported by structuring pedagogical principles.

For more information, consult: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/library/publications/2015/ects-users-guide_en.pdf.

Amabile, T., & Khaire, M. (2008). Creativity and the role of the leader. Harvard Business Review, 86(10), 100–109.

Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship capital—Determinants and impact (CEPR Working Papers, Working Paper No. 4905). London, UK.

Baeck, A., & Gremett, P. (2011). Design thinking. In H. Degen & X. Yuan (Eds.), UX best practices—How to achieve more impact with user experience. New York: McGraw-Hill Osborne Media.

Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102–1119.CrossRef

Barringer, B., & Ireland, R. (2006). Entrepreneurship: Successfully launching new ventures. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Baumol, W. (2002). The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the capitalist growth miracle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Bernarda, G., Smith, A., & Papadakos, T. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want. New York: Wiley. 978-1-118-96805-5.

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.CrossRef

Byers, T., Dorf, R., & Nelson, A. (2015). Technology ventures: From idea to enterprise (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Chatterji, A. (2009). Spawned with a silver spoon?: Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 185–206.CrossRef

Drucker, P. (2002). Managing in the Next Society. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Duarte, C., & Esperança, J. (2014). Empreendedorismo e Planeamento Financeiro. 2.ª Edição: edições Sílabo.

Eesley, C., & Roberts, E. (2012). Are you experienced or are you talented?: When does innate talent versus experience explain entrepreneurial performance? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 207–219.CrossRef

Folta, T., Delmar, F., & Wennberg, K. (2010). Hybrid entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(2), 253–269.CrossRef

Foss, N., & Saebi, T. (2015). Business models and business model innovation: Bringing organization into the field. In N. Foss & T. Saebi (Eds.), Business model innovation: The organizational dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Graham, C. (2005). Insights on development from the economics of happiness. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(2), 201–231.CrossRef

Hansen, M., & Nohria, N. (2004). How to build collaborative advantage. Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 22–30.

Hayton, J., & Zahra, S. (2004). Technological entrepreneurship: Key themes and emerging research directions. In Crossroads of Entrepreneurship (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer.

Hienerth, C., Keinz, P., & Lettl, C. (2011). Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Planning, 44(5-6), 344–374.CrossRef

Hmieleski, K., & Baron, R. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 473–488.CrossRef

Ibarra, H. (2002). How to stay stuck in the wrong career. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 40–48.

Jenkins, A., & Unwin, D. (2001). How to write learning outcomes. Accessed in December 2016 at: https://www.ubalt.edu/cas/faculty/faculty-matters/How%20to%20write%20student%20learning%20outcomes.pdf

Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2001). The art of innovation. London: Profile Books Ltd.

Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: A pratical guide. In Implementing Bologna in your institution C 3.4-1. Accessed December 2016, from http://www.tcd.ie/teaching-learining/academic-developement/asses/pdf/Kennedy-Writing-and-Using-learning-Outcomes.pdf

Kuemmerle, W. (2002). Home base and knowledge management in international ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 99–122.CrossRef

Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J., & Halilem, N. (2013). Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33, 431–449.CrossRef

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.CrossRef

Leitão, J., & Gomes, D. (Coord.) (2014). Manual para Jovens Empreendedores: Comportamentos e Competências, Associação Coração DELTA. isbn: 978-989-20-5150-5.

Markman, G., Balkin, D., & Baron, R. (2002). Inventors and new venture formation: The effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 149–165.CrossRef

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2009). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaires, game changers and challengers, Self Published.

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Pedro, E., Leitão, J., & Alves, H. (2018). Intellectual capital and performance: Taxonomy of components and multidimensional analysis axes. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 407–452.CrossRef

Pereira, D., & Leitão, J. (2016). Absorptive capacity, coopetition and product innovation: Contrasting Italian and Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 71(1/2), 10–37.CrossRef

Petroni, G., Venturini, K., & Verbano, C. (2011). Open innovation and new issues in R&D organization and personnel management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(1), 147–173.CrossRef

Sarasvathy, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: Open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113–135.CrossRef

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sexton, D., & Upton, N. (1987). Evaluation of an innovative approach to teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 25(1), 35–43.

Siegel, R., Siegel, E., & Macmillan, I. (1993). Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), 169–180.CrossRef

Simon, H. (1969). Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Storbacka, K., Frow, P., Nenonen, S., & Payne, A. (2012). Designing business models for value creation. Review of Marketing Research, 9, 51–78.

Ulijn, J., Nagel, A., & Tan Wee, L. (2001). The impact of national, corporate and professional cultures on innovation: German and dutch firms compared. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 9(1), 21–51.CrossRef

van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006). Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Management, 36(3), 347–363.CrossRef

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship. In J. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship: Firm emergence and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Winter, S., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743.CrossRef

Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.CrossRef

Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.CrossRef

Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 216–226.CrossRef

Titel: Concepts, Methodologies and Tools of Gamification and Design Thinking
verfasst von: João Leitão
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Open Innovation Business Modeling
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91281-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91282-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91282-0_3