Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 2/2019

04.09.2018 | Original Research

Banks’ deferred tax assets during the financial crisis

verfasst von: J. Douglas Hanna, Zining Li, Wayne Shaw

Erschienen in: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated that the net deferred tax liabilities of industrial firms are valued by market participants in a manner consistent with an expected net present value. In this study, using a sample of bank holding companies, we address several issues not directly addressed in the prior studies. First, do market participants value a firm’s net deferred assets similarly to how they value net deferred tax liabilities? Second, can a regulatory environment that provides incentives to defer recognition of deferred tax assets impact the valuation of net deferred tax assets? Third, does the valuation of net deferred assets change during an economic downturn? Fourth, can explicit or implicit government guarantees impact how firms’ deferred tax assets may be valued? Using a sample of 433 banks from 2006 to 2010, we find that prior to the financial crisis of 2008 the components of net deferred tax assets of banks, other than those deferred tax assets related to NOLs, were viewed as valuable assets, similar to the deferred tax assets of industrial firms. The coefficient on deferred tax assets related to NOLs is negative throughout the period examined. Also, post-crisis, even the coefficients on the other components of deferred tax assets either became significantly negative or lost any positive association with stock prices, consistent with the assets being viewed primarily as an indicator of bankruptcy risk. We also find that, consistent with a market perception that a too-big-to-fail policy continues to exist, the valuation of large banks’ deferred tax assets is less affected by the financial crisis.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
See for example, Amir et al. (1997). Also, Guenther and Sansing (2000) find that the market values deferred tax assets and liabilities at an amount approximating present value, which implies a valuation coefficient of less than one for deferred tax assets and liabilities which are reported at the sum of undiscounted future cash flows.
 
2
See ASC 740 for more discussion of this requirement.
 
3
Miller and Skinner (1998) report that the level of a firm’s net operating loss carryforwards is the single most important explanatory variable for the existence of a valuation allowance which reduces the reported value of the deferred tax assets.
 
4
Poterba et al. (2011) document that financial firms are more likely to have net deferred tax assets than non-financial firms.
 
5
Compustat: EPSPXt − (0.10 * (CEQt−1/CSHOt−1)).
 
6
In unreported tests, we also added a dummy variable to indicate if a bank was in violation of its minimum capital adequacy ratio. The inclusion of this variable does not change the results reported through the paper.
 
7
All variables are scaled by the number of shares outstanding.
 
8
It should be noted that U.S. regulations severely restrict the amount of deferred tax assets that can count towards a bank’s legal capital. The international BASEL accords governing banks have become increasingly restrictive in the amount of deferred tax assets that count towards banks’ legal capital and are converging to a position very similar to that currently held in the U.S. The amount of Tier 1 legal capital that can be comprised of deferred tax assets that are dependent upon future taxable income, net of any valuation allowance, is currently limited to the lesser of: (A) the amounts of deferred tax assets expected to be realized within one year of the calendar quarter, based on projected future income; or (B) 10% of the amount of Tier 1 capital (before various exclusions).
 
9
We considered two alternative approaches to capture risk; (1) the spread on credit default swaps and (2) a z-score. Unfortunately, credit default swap information is not available for most of the smaller banks in our sample. We did, however, add a z-score variable to our regression proposed by Li et al. (2017). We found that all definitions were highly correlated with CAPR1 and did not change any interpretation in the paper.
 
10
DNOLPS and DLLRPS are negatively correlated. This is not surprising. DLLRPS is created when a firm records a reserve for loan losses for financial reporting purposes, but the firm is not yet eligible for an associated tax deduction. Later, when the loans are written off, a deduction is created for tax purposes resulting in a larger NOL and, therefore, increasing DNOLPS. Simultaneously with getting the tax deduction, the loan loss reserves are decreased and the associated deferred tax asset, DLLRP would be reduced by the same amount that DNOLPS is increasing.
 
11
Several of the prior studies focused on valuation of deferred taxes after an accounting pronouncement, the passage of FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, or FAS 106, Employers’ Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. Therefore, these studies did not attempt to address the impact of economic shocks and the implications for deferred taxes of the resulting changes to firm bankruptcy risk.
 
12
Mamun and Tannous (2018) found that an SEC action in 2001 lead to greater accuracy in the estimation of the loan loss reserve, suggesting greater confidence in the DLLRPS variable to capture the value of future cash flows.
 
13
Cyree et al. (2017) provide evidence of a continued presence of the TBTF policy during the financial crisis by demonstrating that larger banks were less likely to borrow through the Federal Reserve’s term auction facility.
 
14
We tested the sensitivity of the split two ways. First, we tested the top one-eighth of the banks versus the bottom seven-eighths. We also split the firms by classifying large banks as banks with total assets greater than $13 billion in 2006. The smaller banks all had assets of less than $11 billion. This was the largest natural split in asset size in our sample. Regressions reported using these splits are substantially similar to those reported in Tables 4 and 5. We also ran the regressions for each quintile. Results for the smallest three quintiles are substantially identical as those for the aggregated 80% small bank group. Results for the fourth largest quintile are similar to the small bank group but weaker. Berger and Bouwman (2013) also use total assets to partition their sample of banks into large and small.
 
15
Akhigbe et al. (2016) provide evidence that Dodd-Frank reduced risk in the financial system which would support hypothesis 4.
 
16
We initially use the small banks as a surrogate for takeover candidates, given the TBTF policy would not be available to these firms. As noted in the results, we rerun the pre-period observations identifying the 63 firms that were subsequently taken over to test the sensitivity of the identification.
 
17
Of the 1514 bank-year observations, only ten banks reported CAPR1 at less than the required level of 4%. Also, less than 10% of the observations in any year were below the higher level of 6% that was required after 2011.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Akhigbe A, Martin A, Whyte A (2016) Dodd-Frank and risk in the financial services industry. Rev Quant Finance Account 47(2):395–417CrossRef Akhigbe A, Martin A, Whyte A (2016) Dodd-Frank and risk in the financial services industry. Rev Quant Finance Account 47(2):395–417CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amir E, Sougiannis T (1999) Analysts’ interpretation and investors’ valuation of tax carryforwards. Contemp Account Res 16(1):1–33CrossRef Amir E, Sougiannis T (1999) Analysts’ interpretation and investors’ valuation of tax carryforwards. Contemp Account Res 16(1):1–33CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amir E, Kirshenheiter M, Willard K (1997) The valuation of deferred taxes. Contemp Account Res 14(4):597–622CrossRef Amir E, Kirshenheiter M, Willard K (1997) The valuation of deferred taxes. Contemp Account Res 14(4):597–622CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beatty A, Liao S (2011) Do delays in expected loss recognition affect banks’ willingness to lend? J Account Econ 52:1–20CrossRef Beatty A, Liao S (2011) Do delays in expected loss recognition affect banks’ willingness to lend? J Account Econ 52:1–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berger A, Bouwman C (2013) How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? J Financ Econ 109:146–176CrossRef Berger A, Bouwman C (2013) How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? J Financ Econ 109:146–176CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blaylock B, Shevlin T, Wilson R (2012) Tax avoidance, large positive temporary book-tax differences, and earnings persistence. Account Rev 87(1):91–120CrossRef Blaylock B, Shevlin T, Wilson R (2012) Tax avoidance, large positive temporary book-tax differences, and earnings persistence. Account Rev 87(1):91–120CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cyree K, Griffiths M, Winters D (2017) Implications of a TAF program stigma for lenders: the case of publicly traded banks versus private banks. Rev Quant Finance Account 49(2):545–567CrossRef Cyree K, Griffiths M, Winters D (2017) Implications of a TAF program stigma for lenders: the case of publicly traded banks versus private banks. Rev Quant Finance Account 49(2):545–567CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feltham G, Olson J (1995) Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemp Account Res 11(2):689–731CrossRef Feltham G, Olson J (1995) Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemp Account Res 11(2):689–731CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guenther D, Sansing R (2000) Valuation of the firm in the presence of temporary book-tax differences: the role of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Account Rev 75(1):1–12CrossRef Guenther D, Sansing R (2000) Valuation of the firm in the presence of temporary book-tax differences: the role of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Account Rev 75(1):1–12CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hayn C (1995) The information content of losses. J Account Econ 20(2):125–153CrossRef Hayn C (1995) The information content of losses. J Account Econ 20(2):125–153CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Tripe D, Malone C (2017) Measuring bank risk: an exploration of Z-score. Massey University. Working paper Li X, Tripe D, Malone C (2017) Measuring bank risk: an exploration of Z-score. Massey University. Working paper
Zurück zum Zitat Mamun A, Tannous G (2018) Did the regulatory changes of 1999 and 2001 affect income smoothing behavior of US banks. Rev Quant Finance Account 50:1–27CrossRef Mamun A, Tannous G (2018) Did the regulatory changes of 1999 and 2001 affect income smoothing behavior of US banks. Rev Quant Finance Account 50:1–27CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller G, Skinner D (1998) Determinants of the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets under SFAS no. 109. Account Rev 73(2):213–233 Miller G, Skinner D (1998) Determinants of the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets under SFAS no. 109. Account Rev 73(2):213–233
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hara M, Shaw W (1990) Deposit insurance and wealth effects: the value of being ‘too big to fail’. J Finance 45(5):1587–1600 O’Hara M, Shaw W (1990) Deposit insurance and wealth effects: the value of being ‘too big to fail’. J Finance 45(5):1587–1600
Zurück zum Zitat Poterba J, Rao N, Seidman J (2011) Deferred tax positions and incentives for corporate behavior around corporate tax changes. Natl Tax J 64(1):27–58CrossRef Poterba J, Rao N, Seidman J (2011) Deferred tax positions and incentives for corporate behavior around corporate tax changes. Natl Tax J 64(1):27–58CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Skinner D (2008) The rise of deferred tax assets in Japan: the role of deferred tax accounting in the Japanese banking crisis. J Account Econ 46:218–239CrossRef Skinner D (2008) The rise of deferred tax assets in Japan: the role of deferred tax accounting in the Japanese banking crisis. J Account Econ 46:218–239CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Banks’ deferred tax assets during the financial crisis
verfasst von
J. Douglas Hanna
Zining Li
Wayne Shaw
Publikationsdatum
04.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0924-865X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7179
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0757-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe