Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Tax and Public Finance 3/2019

14.09.2018

Tax competition and the efficiency of “benefit-related” business taxes

verfasst von: Elisabeth Gugl, George R. Zodrow

Erschienen in: International Tax and Public Finance | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We construct a tax competition model in which local governments finance business public services with either a source-based tax on mobile capital, such as a property tax, or a tax on production, such as an origin-based value-added tax, and then assess which of the two tax instruments is more efficient. Many taxes on business apply to mobile inputs or outputs, such as property taxes, retail sales taxes, and destination-based VATs, and their inefficiency has been examined in the literature; however, proposals from several prominent tax experts to utilize a local origin-based VAT have not been analyzed theoretically. Our primary finding is that the production tax is less inefficient than the capital tax under many—but not all—conditions. The intuition underlying this result is that the efficiency of a user fee on the public business input is roughly approximated by a production tax, which applies to both the public input and immobile labor (in addition to mobile capital). In marked contrast, the capital tax applies only to mobile capital and is thus likely to be relatively inefficient.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
This problem has been mitigated recently in the USA by the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., which specifies that remote sellers can under certain circumstances be required to collect sales taxes even in states in which they have no physical presence.
 
2
The 11 states with origin-based treatment of intrastate sales are Arizona, Illinois, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Virginia (Faggiano 2017).
 
3
The Hall–Rabushka flat tax uses the “subtraction” method rather than the almost universally used “invoice-credit” VAT method. Under the subtraction method wages are deductible from the tax base at the business level, but taxed, subject to a standard deduction and personal exemptions, at the individual level.
 
4
Gugl and Zodrow (2015) provide further discussion of the assumptions of the model.
 
5
See also Wilson (1986). For reviews of the tax competition literature, see Wilson (1999), Wilson and Wildasin (2004), and Zodrow (2003, 2010).
 
6
The fixed factor can also be thought of as a combination of labor and land, as assumed by ZM.
 
7
See, e.g., ZM, Bayindir-Upmann (1998), Keen and Marchand (1997), and Dhillon et al. (2007) for the same assumptions.
 
8
We follow most of the literature in assuming constant marginal costs for business public services (Oates and Schwab 1988, 1991; Sinn 1997; Bayindir-Upmann 1998; Keen and Marchand 1997; Richter 1994; Matsumoto 2000). Two alternative approaches, which Matsumoto (2000) points out to be equivalent, would be to assume either an imperfectly congestible public input and a constant marginal cost of producing that public input, or a perfectly congestible public input (i.e., our publicly provided private service) and decreasing marginal costs of producing the public service.
 
9
For a detailed literature review, see Gugl and Zodrow (2015).
 
10
Such is the case for a Cobb–Douglas production function and any CES production function with substitution elasticity greater than 1; see, e.g., Gugl and Zodrow (2015).
 
11
In an earlier version of this paper (Gugl and Zodrow, cesifo1_wp5555.pdf), we also compared the production tax to a uniform tax on only private inputs, under the assumption of Cobb–Douglas production functions. The latter tax is efficient in Matsumoto and Sugahara (2017) where the production function is CRS in private inputs only, but we show that it is inefficient in the case of many Cobb–Douglas production functions if the function is CRS in all inputs including public services even though such technology implies that the production tax is efficient.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bayindir-Upmann, T. (1998). Two games of interjurisdictional competition when local governments provide industrial public goods. International Tax and Public Finance, 5, 471–487.CrossRef Bayindir-Upmann, T. (1998). Two games of interjurisdictional competition when local governments provide industrial public goods. International Tax and Public Finance, 5, 471–487.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bird, R. M. (2000). Subnational VATs: Experience and prospects. In Proceedings. Annual conference on taxation and minutes of the annual meeting of the National Tax Association (Vol. 93, pp. 223–228). Bird, R. M. (2000). Subnational VATs: Experience and prospects. In Proceedings. Annual conference on taxation and minutes of the annual meeting of the National Tax Association (Vol. 93, pp. 223–228).
Zurück zum Zitat Bird, R. M. (2003). A new look at business taxes. Tax Notes International, 30(7), 695–711. Bird, R. M. (2003). A new look at business taxes. Tax Notes International, 30(7), 695–711.
Zurück zum Zitat Bird, R. M., & Gendron, P.-P. (2007). The VAT in developing and transitional countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Bird, R. M., & Gendron, P.-P. (2007). The VAT in developing and transitional countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford, I., Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2010). Value-added tax and excises. In Institute for Fiscal Studies (Ed.), Dimensions of tax design: The Mirrlees review (pp. 275–362). London: Oxford University Press. Crawford, I., Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2010). Value-added tax and excises. In Institute for Fiscal Studies (Ed.), Dimensions of tax design: The Mirrlees review (pp. 275–362). London: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Dhillon, A., Wooders, M., & Zissimos, B. (2007). Tax competition reconsidered. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(3), 391–423.CrossRef Dhillon, A., Wooders, M., & Zissimos, B. (2007). Tax competition reconsidered. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(3), 391–423.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gugl, E., & Zodrow, G. R. (2015). Competition in business taxes and public services: Are production-based taxes superior to capital taxes? National Tax Journal, 68(3S), 767–802.CrossRef Gugl, E., & Zodrow, G. R. (2015). Competition in business taxes and public services: Are production-based taxes superior to capital taxes? National Tax Journal, 68(3S), 767–802.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, R., & Rabushka, A. (2007). The flat tax. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press. Hall, R., & Rabushka, A. (2007). The flat tax. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Haufler, A., & Pfļueger, M. (2007). International oligopoly and the taxation of commerce with revenue-constrained governments. Economica, 74(295), 451–473.CrossRef Haufler, A., & Pfļueger, M. (2007). International oligopoly and the taxation of commerce with revenue-constrained governments. Economica, 74(295), 451–473.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hines, J. R., Jr. (2003). Michigan’s flirtation with the single business tax. In C. L. Ballard, P. N. Courant, D. C. Drake, R. C. Fischer, & E. R. Gerber (Eds.), Michigan at the Millennium: A benchmark and analysis of its fiscal and economic structure (pp. 603–628). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. Hines, J. R., Jr. (2003). Michigan’s flirtation with the single business tax. In C. L. Ballard, P. N. Courant, D. C. Drake, R. C. Fischer, & E. R. Gerber (Eds.), Michigan at the Millennium: A benchmark and analysis of its fiscal and economic structure (pp. 603–628). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanbur, R., & Keen, M. (1993). Jeux sans frontiers: Tax competition and tax coordination when countries differ in size. American Economic Review, 83(4), 877–892. Kanbur, R., & Keen, M. (1993). Jeux sans frontiers: Tax competition and tax coordination when countries differ in size. American Economic Review, 83(4), 877–892.
Zurück zum Zitat Keen, M., & Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 33–53.CrossRef Keen, M., & Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 33–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lockwood, B. (2001). Tax competition and tax co-ordination under destination and origin principles: A synthesis. Journal of Public Economics, 81(2), 279–319.CrossRef Lockwood, B. (2001). Tax competition and tax co-ordination under destination and origin principles: A synthesis. Journal of Public Economics, 81(2), 279–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto, M. (1998). A note on tax competition and public input provision. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28(4), 465–473.CrossRef Matsumoto, M. (1998). A note on tax competition and public input provision. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28(4), 465–473.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto, M. (2000). A tax competition analysis of congestible public inputs. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(2), 242–259.CrossRef Matsumoto, M. (2000). A tax competition analysis of congestible public inputs. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(2), 242–259.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto, M., & Sugahara, K. (2017). A note on production taxation and public-input provision. The Annals of Regional Sciences, 59(2), 419–426.CrossRef Matsumoto, M., & Sugahara, K. (2017). A note on production taxation and public-input provision. The Annals of Regional Sciences, 59(2), 419–426.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McLure, C. E., Jr. (2003). The value added tax on electronic commerce in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(6), 753–762.CrossRef McLure, C. E., Jr. (2003). The value added tax on electronic commerce in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(6), 753–762.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mintz, J. M., & Tulkens, H. (1986). Commodity tax competition between member states of a federation, equilibrium and efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 29(2), 133–372.CrossRef Mintz, J. M., & Tulkens, H. (1986). Commodity tax competition between member states of a federation, equilibrium and efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 29(2), 133–372.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noiset, L. (1995). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods: A comment. Journal of Urban Economics, 38(3), 312–316.CrossRef Noiset, L. (1995). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods: A comment. Journal of Urban Economics, 38(3), 312–316.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?”. Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 333–354.CrossRef Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?”. Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 333–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1991). The allocative and distributive implications of local fiscal competition. In D. A. Kenyon & J. Kincaid (Eds.), Competition among states and local governments: Efficiency and equity in American federalism (pp. 127–146). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press. Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1991). The allocative and distributive implications of local fiscal competition. In D. A. Kenyon & J. Kincaid (Eds.), Competition among states and local governments: Efficiency and equity in American federalism (pp. 127–146). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter, W. F. (1994). The efficient allocation of local public factors in Tiebout’s tradition. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(3), 323–340.CrossRef Richter, W. F. (1994). The efficient allocation of local public factors in Tiebout’s tradition. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(3), 323–340.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sinn, H.-W. (1997). The selection principle and market failure in systems of competition. Journal of Public Economics, 66(2), 247–274.CrossRef Sinn, H.-W. (1997). The selection principle and market failure in systems of competition. Journal of Public Economics, 66(2), 247–274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, J. D. (1986). A theory of interregional tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 19(3), 296–315.CrossRef Wilson, J. D. (1986). A theory of interregional tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 19(3), 296–315.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, J. D. (1999). Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52(2), 269–304. Wilson, J. D. (1999). Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52(2), 269–304.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, J. D., & Wildasin, D. E. (2004). Tax competition: Bane or boon? Journal of Public Economics, 88(6), 1065–1091.CrossRef Wilson, J. D., & Wildasin, D. E. (2004). Tax competition: Bane or boon? Journal of Public Economics, 88(6), 1065–1091.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zodrow, G. R. (2003). Tax competition and tax coordination in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance, 10, 651–671.CrossRef Zodrow, G. R. (2003). Tax competition and tax coordination in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance, 10, 651–671.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zodrow, G. R. (2010). Capital mobility and capital tax competition. National Tax Journal, 63(4), 865–901.CrossRef Zodrow, G. R. (2010). Capital mobility and capital tax competition. National Tax Journal, 63(4), 865–901.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19(3), 356–370.CrossRef Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19(3), 356–370.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Tax competition and the efficiency of “benefit-related” business taxes
verfasst von
Elisabeth Gugl
George R. Zodrow
Publikationsdatum
14.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Tax and Public Finance / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0927-5940
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6970
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9514-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

International Tax and Public Finance 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe