Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Theory and Decision 1/2019

22.09.2018

Coalitional desirability and the equal division value

verfasst von: Sylvain Béal, Eric Rémila, Philippe Solal

Erschienen in: Theory and Decision | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We introduce three natural collective variants of the well-known axiom of desirability (Maschler and Peleg in Pac J Math 18:289–328, 1966), which require that if the (per capita) contributions of a first coalition are at least as large as the (per capita) contributions of a second coalition, then the (average) payoff in the first coalition should be as large as the (average) payoff in the second coalition. These axioms are called coalitional desirability and average coalitional desirability. The third variant, called uniform coalitional desirability, applies only to coalitions with the same size. We show that coalitional desirability is very strong: no value satisfies simultaneously this axiom and efficiency. To the contrary, the combination of either average coalitional desirability or uniform coalitional desirability with efficiency and additivity characterizes the equal division value.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The results in this note are still valid if this assumption is relaxed in the definition of our new axioms.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aadland, D., & Kolpin, V. (1998). Shared irrigation costs: An empirical and axiomatic analysis. Mathematical Social Sciences, 35, 203–218.CrossRef Aadland, D., & Kolpin, V. (1998). Shared irrigation costs: An empirical and axiomatic analysis. Mathematical Social Sciences, 35, 203–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Banzhaf, J. F. (1965). Weighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317–343. Banzhaf, J. F. (1965). Weighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317–343.
Zurück zum Zitat Béal, S., Casajus, A., Huettner, F., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2014). Solidarity within a fixed community. Economics Letters, 125, 440–443.CrossRef Béal, S., Casajus, A., Huettner, F., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2014). Solidarity within a fixed community. Economics Letters, 125, 440–443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Béal, S., Casajus, A., Huettner, F., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2016a). Characterizations of weighted and equal division values. Theory and Decision, 80, 649–667.CrossRef Béal, S., Casajus, A., Huettner, F., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2016a). Characterizations of weighted and equal division values. Theory and Decision, 80, 649–667.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Béal, S., Deschamps, M., & Solal, P. (2016b). Comparable axiomatizations of two allocation rules for cooperative games with transferable utility and their subclass of data games. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 18, 992–1004.CrossRef Béal, S., Deschamps, M., & Solal, P. (2016b). Comparable axiomatizations of two allocation rules for cooperative games with transferable utility and their subclass of data games. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 18, 992–1004.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Béal, S., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2015a). Axioms of invariance for TU-games. International Journal of Game Theory, 44, 891–902.CrossRef Béal, S., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2015a). Axioms of invariance for TU-games. International Journal of Game Theory, 44, 891–902.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Béal, S., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2015b). Preserving or removing special players: what keeps your payoff unchanged in TU-games? Mathematical Social Sciences, 73, 23–31.CrossRef Béal, S., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2015b). Preserving or removing special players: what keeps your payoff unchanged in TU-games? Mathematical Social Sciences, 73, 23–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Béal, S., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2017). Axiomatization and implementation of a class of solidarity values for TU-games. Theory and Decision, 83, 61–94.CrossRef Béal, S., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2017). Axiomatization and implementation of a class of solidarity values for TU-games. Theory and Decision, 83, 61–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berghammer, R., & Bolus, S. (2012). On the use of binary decision diagrams for solving problems on simple games. European Journal of Operational Research, 222, 529–541.CrossRef Berghammer, R., & Bolus, S. (2012). On the use of binary decision diagrams for solving problems on simple games. European Journal of Operational Research, 222, 529–541.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carreras, F., & Freixas, J. (1996). Complete simple games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 32, 139–155.CrossRef Carreras, F., & Freixas, J. (1996). Complete simple games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 32, 139–155.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Casajus, A., & Huettner, F. (2013). Null players, solidarity, and the egalitarian Shapley values. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 49, 58–61.CrossRef Casajus, A., & Huettner, F. (2013). Null players, solidarity, and the egalitarian Shapley values. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 49, 58–61.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Courtin, S., & Tchantcho, B. (2015). A note on the ordinal equivalence of power indices in games with coalition structure. Theory and Decision, 78, 617–628.CrossRef Courtin, S., & Tchantcho, B. (2015). A note on the ordinal equivalence of power indices in games with coalition structure. Theory and Decision, 78, 617–628.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dehez, P., & Tellone, D. (2013). Data games: Sharing public goods with exclusion. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 15, 654–673.CrossRef Dehez, P., & Tellone, D. (2013). Data games: Sharing public goods with exclusion. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 15, 654–673.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Einy, E. (1985). The desirability relation of simple games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 10, 155–168.CrossRef Einy, E. (1985). The desirability relation of simple games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 10, 155–168.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Einy, E., & Lehrer, E. (1989). Regular simple games. International Journal of Game Theory, 18, 195–207.CrossRef Einy, E., & Lehrer, E. (1989). Regular simple games. International Journal of Game Theory, 18, 195–207.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Einy, E., & Neyman, A. (1988). Large symmetric games are characterized by completeness of the desirability relation. Journal of Economic Theory, 48, 369–385.CrossRef Einy, E., & Neyman, A. (1988). Large symmetric games are characterized by completeness of the desirability relation. Journal of Economic Theory, 48, 369–385.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, S., & Mas-Colell, A. (1989). Potential, value, and consistency. Econometrica, 57, 589–614.CrossRef Hart, S., & Mas-Colell, A. (1989). Potential, value, and consistency. Econometrica, 57, 589–614.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herings, P. J.-J., van der Laan, G., & Talman, A. J. J. (2008). The average tree solution for cycle-free graph games. Games and Economic Behavior, 62, 77–92.CrossRef Herings, P. J.-J., van der Laan, G., & Talman, A. J. J. (2008). The average tree solution for cycle-free graph games. Games and Economic Behavior, 62, 77–92.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Isbell, J. R. (1958). A class of majority games. Duke Mathematical Journal, 25, 423–439.CrossRef Isbell, J. R. (1958). A class of majority games. Duke Mathematical Journal, 25, 423–439.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kamijo, Y., & Kongo, T. (2012). Whose deletion does not affect your payoff? the difference between the Shapley value, the egalitarian value, the solidarity value, and the Banzhaf value. European Journal of Operational Research, 216, 638–646.CrossRef Kamijo, Y., & Kongo, T. (2012). Whose deletion does not affect your payoff? the difference between the Shapley value, the egalitarian value, the solidarity value, and the Banzhaf value. European Journal of Operational Research, 216, 638–646.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kongo, T. (2018). Effects of players’ nullification and equal (surplus) division values. International Game Theory Review, 20, 1750029.CrossRef Kongo, T. (2018). Effects of players’ nullification and equal (surplus) division values. International Game Theory Review, 20, 1750029.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lapidot, E. (1968). Weighted majority games and symmetry group of games. MSc Thesis in hebrew, Technion, Haifa. Lapidot, E. (1968). Weighted majority games and symmetry group of games. MSc Thesis in hebrew, Technion, Haifa.
Zurück zum Zitat Levínský, R., & Silársky, P. (2004). Global monotonicity of values of cooperative games: An argument supporting the explanatory power of Shapley’s approach. Homo Oeconomicus, 20, 473–492. Levínský, R., & Silársky, P. (2004). Global monotonicity of values of cooperative games: An argument supporting the explanatory power of Shapley’s approach. Homo Oeconomicus, 20, 473–492.
Zurück zum Zitat Malawski, M. (2013). “Procedural” values for cooperative games. International Journal of Game Theory, 42, 305–324.CrossRef Malawski, M. (2013). “Procedural” values for cooperative games. International Journal of Game Theory, 42, 305–324.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maschler, M., & Peleg, B. (1966). A characterization, existence proof and dimension bounds for the kernel of a game. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 18, 289–328.CrossRef Maschler, M., & Peleg, B. (1966). A characterization, existence proof and dimension bounds for the kernel of a game. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 18, 289–328.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Molinero, X., Riquelme, F., & Serna, M. (2015). Forms of representation for simple games: Sizes, conversions and equivalences. Mathematical Social Sciences, 76, 87–102.CrossRef Molinero, X., Riquelme, F., & Serna, M. (2015). Forms of representation for simple games: Sizes, conversions and equivalences. Mathematical Social Sciences, 76, 87–102.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nembua, C. C., & Wendji, C. M. (2016). Ordinal equivalence of values, Pigou-Dalton transfers and inequality in TU-games. Games and Economic Behavior, 99, 117–133.CrossRef Nembua, C. C., & Wendji, C. M. (2016). Ordinal equivalence of values, Pigou-Dalton transfers and inequality in TU-games. Games and Economic Behavior, 99, 117–133.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, G. (1977). Values of games with a priori unions. In R. Henn & O. Moeschlin (Eds.), Essays in mathematical economics and game theory (pp. 76–88). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Owen, G. (1977). Values of games with a priori unions. In R. Henn & O. Moeschlin (Eds.), Essays in mathematical economics and game theory (pp. 76–88). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peleg, B. (1980). A theory of coalition formation in committees. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 7, 115–134.CrossRef Peleg, B. (1980). A theory of coalition formation in committees. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 7, 115–134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peleg, B. (1981). Coalition formation in simple games with dominant players. International Journal of Game Theory, 10, 11–33.CrossRef Peleg, B. (1981). Coalition formation in simple games with dominant players. International Journal of Game Theory, 10, 11–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Radzik, T., & Driessen, T. (2013). On a family of values for TU-games generalizing the Shapley value. Mathematical Social Sciences, 65, 105–111.CrossRef Radzik, T., & Driessen, T. (2013). On a family of values for TU-games generalizing the Shapley value. Mathematical Social Sciences, 65, 105–111.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Radzik, T., & Driessen, T. (2016). Modeling values for TU-games using generalized versions of consistency, standardness and the null player property. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 83, 179–205.CrossRef Radzik, T., & Driessen, T. (2016). Modeling values for TU-games using generalized versions of consistency, standardness and the null player property. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 83, 179–205.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for \(n\)-person games. In H. W. Kuhn & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contribution to the theory of games vol. II. Annals of mathematics studies 28. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for \(n\)-person games. In H. W. Kuhn & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contribution to the theory of games vol. II. Annals of mathematics studies 28. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Brink, R. (2007). Null players or nullifying players: The difference between the Shapley value and equal division solutions. Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 767–775.CrossRef van den Brink, R. (2007). Null players or nullifying players: The difference between the Shapley value and equal division solutions. Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 767–775.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van den Brink, R., Chun, Y., Funaki, Y., & Park, B. (2016). Consistency, population solidarity, and egalitarian solutions for TU-games. Theory and Decision, 81, 427–447.CrossRef van den Brink, R., Chun, Y., Funaki, Y., & Park, B. (2016). Consistency, population solidarity, and egalitarian solutions for TU-games. Theory and Decision, 81, 427–447.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van den Brink, R., & Funaki, Y. (2009). Axiomatizations of a class of equal surplus sharing solutions for TU-games. Theory and Decision, 67, 303–340.CrossRef van den Brink, R., & Funaki, Y. (2009). Axiomatizations of a class of equal surplus sharing solutions for TU-games. Theory and Decision, 67, 303–340.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van den Brink, R., Funaki, Y., & Ju, Y. (2013). Reconciling marginalism with egalitarianism: Consistency, monotonicity, and implementation of egalitarian Shapley values. Social Choice and Welfare, 40, 693–714.CrossRef van den Brink, R., Funaki, Y., & Ju, Y. (2013). Reconciling marginalism with egalitarianism: Consistency, monotonicity, and implementation of egalitarian Shapley values. Social Choice and Welfare, 40, 693–714.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Coalitional desirability and the equal division value
verfasst von
Sylvain Béal
Eric Rémila
Philippe Solal
Publikationsdatum
22.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Theory and Decision / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0040-5833
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7187
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-018-9672-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Theory and Decision 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe