Elsevier

Brain and Language

Volume 71, Issue 2, February 2000, Pages 310-336
Brain and Language

Regular Article
Right and Left Hemisphere Cooperation for Drawing Predictive and Coherence Inferences during Normal Story Comprehension

https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2268Get rights and content

Abstract

In three experiments, healthy young participants listened to stories promoting inferences and named inference-related test words presented to the right visual field–Left Hemisphere (rvf-LH) or to the left visual field–Right Hemisphere (lvf-RH). Participants showed priming for predictive inferences only for target words presented to the lvf-RH; in contrast, they showed priming for coherence inferences only for target words presented to the rvf-LH. These results, plus the fact that patients with RH brain damage have difficulty drawing coherence inferences and do not show inference-related priming, suggest that information capable of supporting predictive inferences is more likely to be initially activated in the RH than the LH, but following coherence breaks these concepts (now coherence inferences) are completed in the LH. These results are consistent with the theory that the RH engages in relatively coarse semantic coding, which aids full comprehension of discourse.

References (74)

  • S. McDonald et al.

    An investigation of the ability to process inferences in language following right hemisphere brain damage

    Brain and Language

    (1986)
  • J.D. Murray et al.

    Forward inferences in narrative text

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (1993)
  • L.G. Noordman et al.

    Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (1992)
  • S. Paris et al.

    The role of inferences in children's comprehension and memory for sentences

    Cognitive Psychology

    (1976)
  • G.R. Potts et al.

    Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (1988)
  • M. Rodel et al.

    Hemispheric dissociation in judging semantic relations: Complementarity for close and distant associates

    Brain and Language

    (1992)
  • E.I. Schneiderman et al.

    Story arrangement abilities in right-brain damaged patients

    Brain and Language

    (1992)
  • M. Singer et al.

    Inferring consequences in story comprehension

    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

    (1983)
  • M. Singer et al.

    Minimal or global inference during reading

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (1994)
  • D. Titone

    Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution

    Brain and Language

    (1998)
  • D.R. Van Lancker et al.

    Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not right-hemisphere damaged patients

    Brain and Language

    (1987)
  • S.T. Weylman et al.

    Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording

    Brain and Language

    (1989)
  • Y.G. Abdullaev et al.

    Time course of activating brain areas in generating verbal associations

    Psychological Science

    (1997)
  • A. Allport

    Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action

  • M.T. Banich et al.

    The sum of the parts does not equal the whole: Evidence from bihemispheric processing

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1992)
  • M.T. Banich et al.

    Integration of processing between the hemispheres in word recognition

  • Beeman, M. 1990, Coherence inferencing and structure building in the cerebral hemispheres. Unpublished doctoral...
  • M. Beeman

    Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension

  • Beeman, M. J, &, Bowden, E. M. In press, The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation in yet-to-be-solved...
  • Beeman, M, Bowden, E, Hassenfeld, K, &, Shivde, G. November, 1996, Right hemisphere advantage for some summation...
  • M. Beeman et al.

    Sum-mation priming and coarse coding in the right hemisphere

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (1994)
  • G. Bottini et al.

    The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study

    Brain

    (1994)
  • E. Bowden et al.

    Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems

    Psychological Science

    (1998)
  • Bramucci, R. S, Budd, D, &, Whitney, P. November, 1995, Task effects on the activation and incorporation of predictive...
  • C. Burgess et al.

    Hemispheric processing of ambiguous words

    Brain and Language

    (1988)
  • M.G. Calvo et al.

    Predictive inferences occur on-line, but with delay: Convergence of naming and reading times

    Discourse Processes

    (1996)
  • Cited by (170)

    • Wrong or right? Brain potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries to semantic relations during word-by-word sentence reading as a function of (fictional) knowledge

      2022, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      If fictional categories from HP (e.g., balls used in Quidditch or names of magical school classes) also engender a set of semantic features that are pre-activated by HP experts, then LH related anomaly effects might be observed for categorically related anomalies. By contrast, in Metusalem et al. (2016), event-related anomaly (e.g., boots in a scenario describing a hiking event) effects were restricted to the RH, consistent with RH involvement in elaborative inferencing (Beeman et al., 2000). Metusalem et al. interpreted their findings as consonant with a RH bias for integrating incoming words not only with message-level information, but also with the ongoing situation model, expanding a proposal by Federmeier (2007) that the LH is relatively more predictive while the RH is relatively more integrative.

    • An EEG study of the relationship between design problem statements and cognitive behaviors during conceptual design

      2018, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported in part by Grant R29 DC02160 from the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders, NIH, to M.J.B. and by Grant RO1 NS 29926 from NIH and Army Research Institute awards DASW0194-K-0004, DASW0196-K-0013, and DAAG55-97-1-0224 to M.A.G. Thanks to Jim Tanaka, Marie Banich, Christine Chiarello, Art Graesser, and Edward O'Brien for useful comments on an earlier versions of the manuscript. Thanks to the following people for help with stimulus preparation and data collection: Caroline Bollinger, Julie Foertsch, Kim Hassenfeld, Donald Haughton, Dana Janes, Ying Lu, Rachel Roberston, Geeta Shivde, Beth Travis, and Linda Whitcombe. Correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed to Mark Jung Beeman, Rush Cognitive Neuroscience Section, 1645 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 450, Chicago, IL 60612, E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text