Brief Research Report
Motivational and Cognitive Contributions to Students' Amount of Reading

https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1044Get rights and content

Abstract

The amount that students read for enjoyment and for school is a major contributor to students' reading achievement and knowledge of the world. Consequently, it is important to identify the factors that predict amount of reading. A literature review revealed that motivation, strategy-use, and past reading achievement all may be expected to predict reading amount. To examine these variables, a total of 251 students in Grades 3 and 5 was administered questionnaires of these constructs and a reading test. Results showed that amount of reading for enjoyment was predicted most highly by motivation, when all other variables were controlled statistically in multiple-regression analyses. In contrast, amount of reading for school was predicted most highly by strategy use, when all other variables were controlled. However, these predictions were different for students in Grades 3 and 5. Findings of the study indicate that amount of reading is multiply determined by cognitive and motivational constructs, which is consistent with an engagement perspective on reading development.

References (25)

  • J. Cipielewski et al.

    Predicting growth in reading ability from children's exposure to print

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (1992)
  • R.C. Anderson et al.

    Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school

    Reading Research Quarterly

    (1988)
  • A. Bandura

    Self-efficacy: The exercise of control

    (1998)
  • A.G. Bus et al.

    Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy

    Review of Educational Research

    (1995)
  • D.I. Cordova et al.

    Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1994)
  • M. Csikszentmihalyi

    Literacy and intrinsic motivation

    Daedalus

    (1990)
  • A.E. Cunningham et al.

    Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later

    Developmental Psychology

    (1997)
  • E.L. Deci

    On the nature and functions of motivation theories

    Psychological Science

    (1992)
  • E.L. Deci et al.

    Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective

    Educational Psychologist

    (1991)
  • W.B. Elley

    How in the world do students read?

    (1994)
  • A.E. Gottfried

    Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1990)
  • Guthrie, J. T, McGough, K, &, Wigfield, A. 1994, Measuring reading activity: An inventory, Instructional Resource No....
  • Cited by (140)

    • Long-term effects of the home literacy environment on reading development: Familial risk for dyslexia as a moderator

      2022, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The hypothesized model proposes further that intrinsic reading motivation supports reading comprehension. Those who are intrinsically motivated are expected to read more frequently and therefore, through practice, gain the various skills and knowledge needed in reading (e.g., Cox & Guthrie, 2001; Torppa et al., 2020; Wigfield & Guthrie, 1997). Wigfield and Guthrie (1997), for example, showed that children high in intrinsic reading motivation spent three times longer reading during a day than their peers with low intrinsic reading motivation.

    • A cross-cultural perspective on the relationships among social media use, self-regulated learning and adolescents’ digital reading literacy

      2021, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      Intrinsically motivated people read because it is “satisfying or rewarding in its own right” while extrinsically motivated ones do so for rewards “external to both the activity of reading and the topic of the text” (Schiefele et al., 2012, p. 429). Compared with extrinsic motivation, there is more compelling evidence that intrinsic motivation significantly contributes to reading competence (Stutz et al., 2016), and this positive effect has been assumed to operate by facilitating and intensifying reading behaviors (Wigfield & Guthrie, 1997), e.g., in terms of reading amount (Schaffner et al., 2013), reading-strategy use (Cox & Guthrie, 2001), and genre preferences (Wigfield & Guthrie, 1997). An equally prominent motivational construct is reading self-concept, generally defined as individuals' perceptions of their own reading abilities (OECD, 2019a).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The research reported herein was supported under the National Reading Research Center project of the University of Georgia and University of Maryland through a cooperative agreement (PR/Award No. 117A20007) with the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. The findings and opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect the position or policies of the National Reading Research Center, the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, or the U.S. Department of Education.

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to John T. Guthrie, University of Maryland, Department of Human Development, 3304 Benjamin Building, College Park, Maryland 20742. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text