Regular ArticleSEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search
References (0)
Cited by (212)
Dwelling on distractors varying in target-distractor similarity
2019, Acta PsychologicaInhibition drives configural superiority of illusory Gestalt: Combined behavioral and drift-diffusion model evidence
2016, CognitionCitation Excerpt :One reason for the stronger effect of closure in distractors than in the target might simply derive from the fact that, in the typical CSE paradigm, there are more (most often three) distractors as compared to only a single target. In fact, visual search experiments show that, as set size increases, grouped distractors usually bring about a strong modulation of search efficiency (Conci et al., 2007a, 2007b), suggesting that the benefit of grouping in distractors increases as the number of candidate target configurations becomes larger (see also below and Humphreys & Müller, 1993). In this view, the ‘emergence’ of a configural target thus appears to be a by-product of the efficient suppression of a grouped array of distractors.
Directing memory content to attentional templates: The finiteness effect of predictive information
2023, Frontiers in PsychologyInvestigating the role of spatial filtering on distractor suppression
2023, Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Copyright © 1993 Academic Press. All rights reserved.