Regular ArticlePerceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation
References (21)
- et al.
Combining stated and revealed preference methods for valuing environmental amenities
J. Environ. Econom. Manage.
(1994) - et al.
Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions
Transport. Res. A
(1990) - et al.
Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand
(1985) Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods
Land Econom.
(1992)- R. T. Carson, J. J. Louviere, D. Anderson, P. Arabie, D. S. Bunch, D. A. Hensher, R. M. Johnson, W. F. Kuhfeld, D....
- W. M. Hanemann, 1984, Applied Welfare Analysis with Quantitative Response Models, University of California,...
Statistical comparison of non-nested probabilistic discrete choice models
Transport. Sci.
(1982)- et al.
Using random utility models to estimate the recreational value of estuarine resources
Amer. J. Agri. Econom.
(1995) - et al.
Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: An approach based on aggregate data
J. Market. Res.
(1983) - J. J. Louviere, 1994, Relating Stated Preference Measures and Models to Choices in Real Markets: Calibration of CV...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (0)
The authors thank three anonymous reviewers, the participants of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Canadian Resource and Environmental Economics Study Goup and Forestry and the Environment: Economic Perspectives II for comments on this paper. The research assistance of Kristy McLeod and Bonnie McFarlane is also gratefully acknowledged. Funding was provided by the Science and Technology Opportunities fund of the Canadian Forest Service, the Canada–Alberta Partnership Agreement in Forestry, and the NCE program in Sustainable Forest Management.
D. Lehmann, Ed.
Copyright © 1997 Academic Press. All rights reserved.