Regular Article
Efficiency in Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma with Private Monitoring

https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1997.2313Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper analyzes repeated games with private monitoring, where in each period each player receives a signal of the other player's action in the previous period, and that signal is private information. Previous literature on discounted repeated games with private monitoring has not shown whether or not (nearly) efficient equilibria exist. For a repeated prisoner's dilemma satisfying a certain assumption regarding stage game payoffs, we show that there exists a nearly efficient sequential equilibrium, provided that imperfectness of signals is small and players are patient.Journal of Economic LiteratureClassification number: C73.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (101)

  • The analogical foundations of cooperation

    2023, Journal of Economic Theory
  • A stochastic stability analysis with observation errors in normal form games

    2021, Games and Economic Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    Information about players' actions is commonly observed and thus directly affects all players in games with public monitoring, while such information is privately observed and its direct influence is limited to observing players in games with private monitoring. See, for example, Sekiguchi (1997) and Kandori (2002) for a discussion on public/private monitoring. See also Miyagawa et al. (2008), Yamamoto (2012), and Sugaya (2020) for recent developments in this literature.

  • Repeated coordination with private learning

    2020, Journal of Economic Theory
  • Strategies that enforce linear payoff relationships under observation errors in Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma game

    2019, Journal of Theoretical Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    There are typically two types of errors: perception errors (Fudenberg et al., 2012) and implementation errors (Fudenberg et al., 1994). Hao et al. considered the former case of the errors where players may misunderstand their opponent’s action because the players can only rely on their private monitoring (Kandori, 2002; Sekiguchi, 1997) instead of their opponent’s direct action. They remarkably showed that ZD strategies can exist even in the case that such observation errors are incorporated (Hao et al., 2015).

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

I am grateful to Michihiro Kandori, Hitoshi Matsushima and an associate editor for their helpful comments. Of course, any remaining errors are my own.

View full text