Regular Article
Choosing Work Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence, and Familiarity

https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2875Get rights and content

Abstract

This study explores one of the contributors to group composition—the basis on which people choose others with whom they want to work. We use a combined model to explore individual attributes, relational attributes, and previous structural ties as determinants of work partner choice. Four years of data from participants in 33 small project groups were collected, some of which reflects individual participant characteristics and some of which is social network data measuring the previous relationship between two participants. Our results suggest that when selecting future group members people are biased toward others of the same race, others who have a reputation for being competent and hard working, and others with whom they have developed strong working relationships in the past. These results suggest that people strive for predictability when choosing future work group members.

References (76)

  • L. Berkowitz et al.

    Effects of performance evaluations on group integration and motivation

    Human Relations

    (1957)
  • P.M. Blau

    Exchange and power in social life

    (1964)
  • D.J. Brass

    Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1985)
  • D.J. Brass et al.

    Centrality and power in organizations

  • D. Byrne

    Interpersonal attraction as a function of affiliation need and attitude similarity

    Human Relations

    (1961)
  • K. Carley

    Group stability: A socio-cognitive approach

  • K. Carley

    A theory of group stability

    American Sociological Review

    (1991)
  • K.M. Carley

    On the evolution of social and organizational networks

    Research in the Sociology of Organizations

    (1999)
  • R.B. Cialdini et al.

    Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1976)
  • A. Etzioni

    Modern organizations

    (1964)
  • L. Festinger

    Group attraction and membership

  • J.C. Gilchrist

    The formation of social groups under conditions of success and failure

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1952)
  • P.S. Goodman et al.

    Familiarity and group productivity

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1991)
  • L.V. Hedges et al.

    Statistical methods for meta-analysis

    (1985)
  • J.R. Hollenbeck et al.

    The multi-level theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1995)
  • L.J. Hubert

    Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis

    (1987)
  • L. Hubert et al.

    Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy

    British Journal of Mathematical Psychology

    (1976)
  • H. Ibarra

    Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1992)
  • S.E. Jackson

    Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force

  • I.L. Janis

    Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes

    (1982)
  • Jehn, K, Northcraft, G, &, Neale, M. (, 1997, ), Opening Pandora's box: A field study of diversity, conflict, and...
  • G.G. Judge et al.

    The theory and practice of econometrics

    (1990)
  • R.M. Kanter

    Men and women of the corporation

    (1977)
  • D.S. Kaufer et al.

    Communication at a distance: The effect of print on socio-cultural organization and change

    (1993)
  • D.A. Kenny et al.

    Do we know how much people like one another?

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1996)
  • M. Kilduff et al.

    Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1994)
  • D. Krackhardt

    QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness

    Social Networks

    (1987)
  • Cited by (303)

    • Multiple perspectives on group work in a multilingual context

      2024, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation, IRI-9216760.

    f2

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Pamela J. Hinds, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4024. E-mail: [email protected]

    View full text