Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Allenby, G. M., Arora, N., and Ginter, J. L. (1998). On the heterogeneity of demand. Journal of Marketing Research, 35:384–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celeux, G., Hurn, M., and Robert, C. P. (2000). Computational and inferential difficulties with mixture posterior distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(451):957–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S. (1995). Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90:1313–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadou, E., Weingessel, A., and Hornik, K. (2001). Voting-merging: An ensemble method for clustering. In Dorffner, G., Bischof, H., and Hornik, K., editors, Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 2001, volume 2130 of LNCS, pages 217–224. Springer, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dolničar, S. and Leisch, F. (2003). Winter tourist segments in Austria: Identifying stable vacation styles using bagged clustering techniques. Journal of Travel Research, 41(3):281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (1995). Bayesian model discrimination and Bayes factors for linear Gaussian state space models. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57:237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2001). Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of classical and dynamic switching and mixture models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(453):194–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2004). Estimating marginal likelihoods for mixture and Markov switching models using bridge sampling techniques. The Econometrics Journal, 7:143–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. and Otter, T. (1999). Conjoint-analysis using mixed effect models. In Friedl, H., Berghold, A., and Kauermann, G., editors, Statistical Modelling. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Workshop on Statistical Modelling, pages 181–191, Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., Tüchler, R., and Otter, T. (2004). Bayesian analysis of the heterogeneity model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22(1):2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenk, P. J. and DeSarbo, W. S. (2000). Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of generalized linear models with random effects. Psychometrika, 65(1):93–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X.-L. and Wong, W. H. (1996). Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity: A theoretical exploration. Statistica Sinica, 6:831–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otter, T., Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., and Tüchler, R. (2004a). Unobserved preference changes in conjoint analysis. Technical report, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otter, T., Tüchler, R., and Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2002). Bayesian latent class metric conjoint analysis — A case study from the Austrian mineral water market. In Opitz, O. and Schwaiger, M., editors, Exploratory Data Analysis in Empirical Research, Studies in Classification, Data Analysis and Knowledge Organization, pages 157–169. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otter, T., Tüchler, R., and Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2004b). Capturing consumer heterogeneity in metric conjoint analysis using Bayesian mixture models. International Journal of Marketing Research, 21(1):285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, M. (2000). Dealing with label switching in mixture models. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 62(4):795–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M. and Wong, W. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82:528–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tüchler, R. and Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2003). Bayesian parsimonious estimation of observed and unobserved heterogeneity. In Verbeeke, G., Molenberghs, G., Aerts, M., and Fieuws, S., editors, Statistical Modelling in Society. Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Statistical Modelling, pages 427–431, Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüchler, R., Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., and Otter, T. (2002). The heterogeneity model and its special cases — an illustrative comparison. In Stasinopoulos, M. and Touloumi, G., editors, Statistical Modelling in Society. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Workshop on Statistical Modelling, pages 637–644, Chania, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, G. and Lesaffre, E. (1996). A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91:217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1971). An Introduction to Bayesian inference in Econometric. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., Tüchler, R., Otter, T. (2005). Capturing Unobserved Consumer Heterogeneity Using the Bayesian Heterogeneity Model. In: Taudes, A. (eds) Adaptive Information Systems and Modelling in Economics and Management Science. Interdisciplinary Studies in Economics and Management, vol 5. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-29901-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-29901-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-20684-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-29901-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics