Skip to main content

Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts

Perspectives from Educational Psychology and Computer Science

  • Chapter
Technology-Enhanced Learning

Students are often at a loss for what to do or have inadequate ideas of how to build knowledge collaboratively through computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Facilitating specific CSCL processes by providing learners with computer-supported collaboration scripts is regarded as a promising approach. Implemented in CSCL environments, computer-supported collaboration scripts specify, sequence and distribute roles and activities. Scripts are intended to scaffold activities that students could not yet engage in on their own. One of the main challenges of this approach for realising effective CSCL is the continuous adaptation of scripts to learners’ needs and knowledge. Efforts to specify and formalise script components and mechanisms have led to an integrative framework for computer scientists, educational scientists and psychologists of what constitutes computer-supported collaboration scripts as well as a growing library of prototypical CSCL scripts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ADL (2004). Sharable content object reference model 3rd edition. Overview, 2004. Retrieved May 7, 2008 from http://www.adlnet.gov/downloads/

  • Aronson, B., Blaney,N., Stephan,C., Sikes,J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, O., & Slotta, J. (2007). Learning technology standards and inquiry-based learning. In A. Koohung & K. Haarman (Eds.), Learning objects and instructional design (pp. 327–358). Santa Rosa, CA: Information Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bote-Lorenzo, M., Gòmez-Sánchez,E., Vega-Gorgojo,G., Dimitriadis,Y. A., Asensio-Pérez,J. I., & Jorrìn-Abellán, I. M. (2008). Gridcole: A tailorable grid service based system that supports scripted collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 51, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botturi, L., & Stubbs, T. (2008). Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edn.) (pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caeiro-Rodrìguez, M., Anido-Rifòn,L., & Llamas-Nistal, M. (2003). A critical analysis of IMS Learning Design. In B. Wasson, L. Anido, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (pp. 363–367). Bergen, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (2000). Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner, & D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning (pp. 161–178). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, R. H. (1995). Distributed presence and community in cyberspace. Interpersonal Communication and Technology: A Journal for the 21st Century, 3, 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275–301). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dönmez, P., Rosé,C. P., Stegmann,K., Weinberger,A., & Fischer, F. (2005). Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning – CSCL 2005 (pp. 125–134). Taipei, Taiwan: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 405–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Kollar I., Mandl,H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.) (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Weinberger,A., Kobbe,L., Dillenbourg,P., Häkkinen,P., & Harrer, A. (2007). Computer-supported collaboration scripts. Workshop at the CSCL Alpine Rendez-Vous. Retrieved May 2007, from http://craftwww.epfl.ch/events/alpine/programme/ programme_w1.html

  • Häkkinen, P., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2007). Educational perspectives on scripting CSCL. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational approaches (pp. 263–271). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harrer, A. (2006). Report on the formalization of collaboration scripts (Tech. Rep. No. D.29.6.1). [n.p.]: Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence. Retrieved May 07, 2008, from http://www.noe-kaleidoscope.org/intra/docs/full_deliverables/D29-06-01-F.pdf.

  • Harrer, A., Malzahn,N., & Roth, B. (2006). The remote control approach. How to apply scaffolds to existing collaborative learning environments. In Y. A. Dimitriadis, I. Zigurs, & E. Gòmez-Sánchez (Eds.), Groupware: Design, implementation, and use. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG 2006). Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 118–131). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Leo, D. (2007). A pattern-based design process for the creation of CSCL macro-scripts computationally represented with IMS-LD. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Leo, D., Harrer,A., Dodero J. M., Asensio-Pérez,J. I., & Burgos, D. (2007). A framework for the conceptualization of approaches to “Create-by-Reuse” of learning design solutions. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13, 991–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández,E. D., Jorrìn-Abellán,I. M., Asensio-Pérez,J. I., Dimitriadis,Y., Ruiz-Requies,I., et al. (2006). COLLAGE, a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology and Society, 9, 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMS (2003). IMS learning design specification. Retrieved April 2007 from http://www. imsglobal.org/learningdesign/

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Social interdependence theory and university instruction – Theory into practice. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, F., Kollöffel,B., van der Meijden, H., Kleine Staarman, J., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87–115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 13–37). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller,J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobbe, L., Weinberger,A., Dillenbourg,P., Harrer,A., Hämäläinen,R., Häkkinen,P., et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, I. (2006). Webbasiertes Forschendes Lernen in der Biologie. Effekte internaler und externaler Kooperationsskripts auf Prozesse und Ergebnisse des gemeinsamen Argumentierens [Web-based inquiry learning in biology. Effects of internal and external collaboration scripts on processes and outcomes of collaborative argumentation]. Berlin, Germany: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learners for a while and what computers can contribute. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, I., Fischer,F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts – a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, I., Fischer,F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 708–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. (2007). The roles of scripts in promoting collaborative discourse in learning by design. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported learning of knowledge: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 237–262). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., Williams,K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Social loafing. Psychology Today, 110, 104–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learning Technology Standards Observatory (2007). Educational modelling languages. Retrieved August 2007 from http://www.cen-ltso.net/Users/main.aspx?put=196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkitalo, K., Pöysä,J., Järvelä,S., & Häkkinen, P. (2005). Mechanisms of grounding processes in online conferences: A case study in teacher education. In R. Nata (Ed.), Issues in higher education (pp. 115–146). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkitalo, K., Weinberger,A., Häkkinen,P., Järvelä,S., & Fischer, F. (2005). Epistemic cooperation scripts in online learning environments: Fostering learning by reducing uncertainty in discourse? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. N., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interactions in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120–141). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimension of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, H. R. (2005). How to support synchronous net-based learning discourses: Principles and perspectives. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 39–57). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana, C., Reiser,B. J., Davis,E. A., Krajcik,J., Fretz,E., Duncan,R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (1997). Lernen durch Lehren – Zentrale Wirkmechanismen beim kooperativen Lernen [Learning through teaching – central mechanisms in cooperative learning]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Exploring social communication in computer conference. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13, 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 3, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. B., Neuman,Y., Gil,J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 219–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotta, J. D., & Aleahmad, T. (in press). Challenges to technology enhanced learning – the case for open source and content communities. International Journal of Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann,T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–425). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann, K., Weinberger,A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 421–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1988). Representing practice in cognitive science. Human Studies, 11, 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (2003). Writing and reading: A response to comments on “plans and situated actions”. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vantroys, T., & Peter, Y. (2003). COW, a flexible platform for the enactment of learning scenarios. In J. Favela & D. Decouchant (Eds.), Groupware: Design, implementation, and use. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG 2003). Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 168–182). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignollet, L., David,J. P., Ferraris,C., Martel,C., & Lejeune, A. (2006). Comparing educational modelling languages on a case study. In R. Kinshuk, P. Koper, P. Kommers, P. A. Kirschner, D. G. Sampson, & W. Didderen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies ICALT-2006 (pp. 1149–1150). Kerkrade, The Netherlands: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky!, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2007 August). Fading process-related support: The role of distributed monitoring for the acquisition of cognitive skills. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2004). Motivation. In J. Haake, G. Schwabe & M. Wessner (Eds.), CSCL-Kompendium. Lehr- und Handbuch zum computerunterstützten kooperativen Lernen (pp. 252–257). München, Germany: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann,K., & Fischer, F. (2007a september). Inwieweit beeinflussen sich Lernpartner gegenseitig beim computerunterstützten kooperativen Lernen im Hinblick auf ihre Motivation? [To what extent do learning partners influence each others’ motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning?]. Paper presented at the 11th Fachtagung Pädagogische Psychologie, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann,K., & Fischer, F. (2007b August). Role scripts for improving group learning beyond individual learning: Does it work? Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Ertl,B., Fischer,F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann,K., Fischer,F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported learning. Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 191–211). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Clark,D. B., Häkkinen,P., Tamura,Y., & Fischer, F. (2007). Argumentative knowledge construction in online learning environments in and across different cultures: A collaboration script perspective. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2, 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities (pp. 1–47). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Weinberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weinberger, A., Kollar, I., Dimitriadis, Y., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Fischer, F. (2009). Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts. In: Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics