Abstract
This chapter reviews the experimental research on survey modes, in which respondents are randomly exposed to different modes of delivering questions and obtaining responses, to determine which modes yield the highest rates of admission of illegal behaviors. The results indicate that telephone interviewing and face-to-face interviewing are the least effective modes in getting people to admit to illegal acts, while Web, mail, and telephone audio computer-assisted interviewing are the most effective modes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aquilino, W. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 210–240.
Bason, J. J. (2000). Comparison of telephone, mail, web, and IVR surveys of drug and alcohol use among University of Georgia students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR.
Beebe, T. J., Harrison, P. A., McRae, J. A. Jr., Anderson, R. E., & Fulkerson, J. A. (1998). An evaluation of computer-assisted self-interviews in a school setting. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 623–632.
Brenek, N. D., Eaton, D. K., Kann, L., Grunbaum, J. A., Gross, L. A., Kyle, T. M., et al. (2006). The association of survey setting and mode with self-reported health risk behaviors among high school students. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 354–374.
Clark, J. P., & Tifft, L. L. (1966). Polygraph and interview validation of self-reported deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 34, 516–523.
Corkrey, R., & Parkinson, L. (2002). A comparison of four computer-based telephone interviewing methods: Getting answers to sensitive questions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 354–363.
Couper, M. P., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2003). Understanding the effects of Audio-CASI on self-reports of sensitive behavior. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 385–395.
Eaton, D. K., Brener, N. D., Kann, L., Denniston, M. M., McManus, T., Kyle, T. M., et al. (2010). Comparison of paper-and-pencil versus web administration of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YEARBS): Risk behavior prevalence estimates. Evaluation Review, 34, 137–153.
Gribble, J. N., Miller, H. G., Cooley, P. C., Catania, J. A., Pollack, L., & Turner, C. F. (2000). The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men. Substance Use and Misuse, 35, 869–890.
Hamby, S., Sugarman, D. B., & Boney-McCoy, S. (2006). Does questionnaire format impact reported partner violence rates? An experimental study. Violence and Victims, 21, 507–518.
Harrison, L. (1995). The validity of self-reported data on drug use. Journal of Drug, 25, 91–111.
Johnson, T. P., Hougland, J. G., & Clayton, R. R. (1989). Obtaining reports of sensitive behavior: A comparison of substance use reports from telephone and face-to-face interviews. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 174–183.
Kleck, G., Tark, J., & Bellows, J. J. (2006). What methods are most frequently used in research in criminology and criminal justice? Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(2), 147–152.
Knapp, H., & Kirk, S. A. (2003). Using pencil and paper, Internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: Does methodology matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 117–134.
Li, S.-M., Yu, Rwei-Ling, S., Hu, H.-C., & Huang, J.-S. (2003). Areca quid chewing by Taiwanese adolescents: Application of the Attitudes Social Influence Self-efficacy (ASE) model. Addiction, 98, 1723–1729.
Lucia, S., Herrmann, L., & Killias, M. (2007). How important are interview methods and questionnaire designs in research on self-reported juvenile delinquency? An experimental comparison of Internet vs paper-and-pencil questionnaires and different definitions of the reference period. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 39–64.
McCabe, S. E. (2004). Comparison of Web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: A randomized experiment. Journal of Drug Education, 34, 61–72.
McCabe, S. E., Boyd, C. J., Couper, M. P., Crawford, S., & D’Arcy, H. (2002). Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 755–761.
Newman, J. C., Des Jarlais, D. C., Turner, C. F., Gribble. J., Cooley, P., & Paone, D. (2002). The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 294–297.
O’Reilly, J. M., Hubbard, M. L., Lessler, J. T., Biemer, P. P., & Turner, C. F. (1994). Audio and video computer-assisted self-interviewing: Preliminary tests of new technologies for data collection. Journal of Official Statistics, 10, 197–214.
Rogers, S. M., Miller, H. G., & Turner, C. F. (1998). Effects of interview mode on bias in survey measurements of drug use: Do respondent characteristics make a difference? Substance Use and Misuse, 3, 2179–2200.
Schober, S., Caces, M. F., Pergamit, M., & Branden, L. (1992). Effect of mode of administration on reporting of drug use in the National Longitudinal Survey. In C. F. Turner, J. T. Lessler & J. C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey measurement of drug use: Methodological studies (pp. 267–276). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse
Supple, A. J., Aquilino, W. S., & Wright, D. L. (1999). Collecting sensitive self-report data with laptop computers: Impact on the response tendencies of adolescents in a home interview. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 467–488.
Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In Criminal justice 2000: Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (Vol. 4, pp. 33–83). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
Tourangeau, R., Jared, B. J., William, F. P., & Kenneth, R. (1997). Design and results of the women’s health study. In Harrison, L., & Hughes, A. (Eds.), The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates (pp. 344–365). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275–304.
Tourangeau, R., & Ting, Y. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883
Turner, C. F., Lessler, J. T., & Devore, J. W. (1992). Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In C. F. Turner, J. T. Lessler & J. C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey measurement of drug use: Methodological studies. Washington, D.C.: DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)92-1929.
Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867–873.
Turner, C. F., Villarroel, M. A., Rogers, S. M., Eggleston, E., Ganapathi, L., Roman, A. M., et al. (2005). Reducing bias in telephone survey estimates of the prevalence of drug use: A randomized trial of Telephone Audio-CASI. Addiction, 100, 1432–1444.
van de Looij-Jansen, P. M., & de Wilde, E. J. (2008). Comparison of Web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: Effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents. Health Services Research, 43, 1708–1721.
Wang, Y.-C., Lee, C.-M., Lew-Ting, C.-Y., Hsiao, C. K., Chen, D.-R., & Chen, W. J. (2005). Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: Web-based questionnaire versus paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 289–295.
Wright, D. L., Aquilino, W. S., & Supple, A. J. (1998). A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and drug use. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 331–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
 
 
Appendix Table A Individual findings of experimental studies of the effect of survey mode on the reporting of illegal behaviors (in chronological order)
Study | Sample description | Sample size | Modes compared | Illegal behavior | Better Mode, significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Johnson et al. (1989) | P | 780 | FTF/Tel | Marijuana use, L | FTF, >.05 |
 | U of Kentucky students, 1987 |  | FTF/Tel | Cocaine use, L | FTF, <.01 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Tranquilizer use, L | FTF, <.001 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Amphetamine use, L | FTF, <.05 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Downer use, L | FTF, <.001 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Other pill use, L | FTF, <.001 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Hallucinogen use, L | FTF, <.01 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Heroin use, L | FTF, <.01 |
Schober et al. (1992) | P | 9,308 | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, R | F-P, <.001 |
 | NLSY, 1988 |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, past year | F-P, <.001 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, L | F-P, <.001 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, R | F-P, <.001 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, past year | F-P, <.001 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, L | F-P, > .10 |
Turner et al. (1992) | P | 3,284 | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, R | F-P, .039 |
 | NHSDA, 1990(HH residents in 33 US metro areas) |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, past year | F-P, .18 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, L | F-P, >.20 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, R | F-P, .081 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, past year | F-P, .185 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, L | F-P, >.20 |
Aquilino (1994) | P | 1,508 | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, L | F-P, >.10 |
 | HH residents in 37 Largest US SMSAs, 1991 |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, past year | F-P, <.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, R | F-P, >.10 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use,L | F-P, <.10 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, past year | F-P, >.10 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, R | () |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Crack use, L | F-P, >.10 |
 |  | 1,499 | F-P/Tel | Marijuana use, L | F-P, >.10 |
 |  |  | F-P/Tel | Marijuana use, past year | F-P, <.001 |
 |  |  | F-P/Tel | Marijuana use, R | F-P, <.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/Tel | Cocaine use, L | F-P, <.01 |
 |  |  | F-P/Tel | Cocaine use, past year | () |
 |  |  | F-P/Tel | Cocaine use, R | () |
 |  |  | F-P/Tel | Crack use, L | F-P, <.05 |
 |  | 1,489 | FTF/Tel | Marijuana use, L | FTF, >.10 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Marijuana use, past year | FTF, <.10 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Marijuana use, R | FTF, >.10 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Cocaine use, L | FTF, <.10 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Cocaine use, past year | Tel, >.10 |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Cocaine use, R | () |
 |  |  | FTF/Tel | Crack use, L | FTF, >.10 |
O’Reilly et al. (1994) | NP | 26 | ACASI/CASI | Marijuana use, R | ACASI, .58 |
 | Volunteers |  | ACASI/CASI | Marijuana use, past year | CASI, .24 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Marijuana use, L | CASI, .26 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Cocaine use, R | () |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Cocaine use, past year | CASI, .72 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Cocaine use, L | CASI, .56 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Crack use, R | () |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Crack use, past year | CASI, .44 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Crack use, L | ACASI, .58 |
 |  | 27 | ACASI/PAP | Marijuana use, R | ACASI, .12 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Marijuana use, past year | ACASI, .19 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Marijuana use, L | ACASI, .29 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Cocaine use, R | () |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Cocaine use, past year | ACASI, .52 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Cocaine use, L | ACASI, .06 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Crack use, R | () |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Crack use, past year | ACASI, .52 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Crack use, L | ACASI, .12 |
 |  | 25 | CASI/PAP | Marijuana use, R | CASI, .22 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Marijuana use, past year | CASI, .03 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Marijuana use, L | CASI, .06 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Cocaine use, R | () |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Cocaine use, past year | CASI, .48 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Cocaine use, L | CASI, .04 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Crack use, R | () |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Crack use, past year | CASI, .22 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Crack use, L | CASI, .22 |
Tourangeau and Smith (1996) | P | 197 | ACASI/FTF | Marijuana use, L | ACASI, <.01 |
 | HH residents in Cook County, Illinois, 1994 |  | ACASI/FTF | Marijuana use, past year | ACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | ACASI/FTF | Marijuana use, R | ACASI, <.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/FTF | Cocaine use,L | ACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | ACASI/FTF | Cocaine use, past year | ACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/FTF | Cocaine use, R | ACASI, >.10 |
 |  | 205 | ACASI/CASI | Marijuana use, L | ACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Marijuana use, past year | ACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Marijuana use, R | ACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Cocaine use,L | ACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Cocaine use, past year | ACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Cocaine use, R | ACASI, >.10 |
 |  | 219 | CASI/FTF | Marijuana use, L | CASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Marijuana use, past year | FTF, >.10 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Marijuana use, R | CASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Cocaine use, L | CASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Cocaine use, past year | CASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Cocaine use, R | FTF, >.10 |
Tourangeau et al. (1997) | P & NP | 1,100 | F-P/FTF | Any illegal drug use, L | ?, >.05 |
 | Chicago & sample of women who had an abortion, 1993 |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Amphetamine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Barbiturates use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Tranquilizer use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Psychedelics use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Crack use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Heroin use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Injectable drugs use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Any illegal drug use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Marijuana use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Amphetamine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Barbiturates use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Tranquilizer use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Psychedelics use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Cocaine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Crack use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Heroin use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/F-P | Injectable drugs use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Any illegal drug use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Marijuana use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Amphetamine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Barbiturates use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Tranquilizer use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Psychedelics use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Cocaine use,L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Crack use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Heroin use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Injectable drugs use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Any illegal drug use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Marijuana use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Amphetamine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Barbiturates use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Tranquilizer use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Psychedelics use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Cocaine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Crack use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Heroin use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | PAP/FTF | Injectable drugs use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Any illegal drug use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Marijuana use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Amphetamine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Barbiturates use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Tranquilizer use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Psychedelics use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Crack use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Cocaine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Heroin use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/FTF | Injectable drugs use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Any illegal drug use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Marijuana use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Amphetamine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Barbiturates use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Tranquilizer use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Psychedelics use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Cocaine use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Crack use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Heroin use, L | ?, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Injectable drugs use, L | ?, >.05 |
Beebe et al. (1998) | NP | 368 | CASI/PAP | Marijuana use, past year | PAP, <.05 |
 | US students, 1996 |  | CASI/PAP | LSD/psychedelic use, past year | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Amphetamine use, past year | PAP, <.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Cocaine use, past year | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Damaged property, past year | PAP, <.001 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Beat person up, past year | PAP, <.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Stolen something, past year | PAP, >.05 |
Rogers et al. (1998) | P | 1,877 | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, R | F-P, .01 |
 | NHSDA, 1990 |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, past year | F-P, .025 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Cocaine use, L | F-P, .33 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, R | F-P, .005 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, past year | F-P, .04 |
 |  |  | F-P/FTF | Marijuana use, L | F-P, .37 |
Turner et al. (1998) | P | 1,672 | ACASI/PAP | Sex with prostitute | ACASI, <.01 |
 | Male residents of US HHs, 1995 |  | ACASI/PAP | Paid for sex | ACASI, <.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Street drugs w/needle | ACASI, <10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Injected drugs, past year | ACASI, .13 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Daily marijuana use, past year | ACASI, <.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Cocaine/crack use, past year | ACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Marijuana use, L | ACASI, <.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Threaten someone, past year | ACASI, <.01 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Physical fight, past year | ACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | ACASI/PAP | Pulled knife/gun, past year | ACASI, <.05 |
Wright et al. (1998) | P | 3,169 | CASI/PAP | Illicit drug use | CASI, >.05 |
 | US urban & suburban residents, 1995–1996 |  |  |  |  |
Supple et al. (1999) | P | 1,072 | CASI/F-P | Marijuana use, L | CASI, >.05 |
 | US urban & suburban residents, 1995-1996 |  | CASI/F-P | Marijuana use, R | CASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Marijuana use, >12x ever | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Illicit drug use, L | CASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/F-P | Illicit drug use, R | CASI, <.05 |
Bason (2000) | P | 365 | Mail/Tel | Marijuana use, R | Tel, >.05 |
 | US college students, 2000 |  | Mail/Tel | Cocaine use, R | Mail, >.05 |
 |  |  | Mail/Tel | Hallucinogens | Tel, >.05 |
 |  |  | Mail/Tel | Designer drugs | Tel, >.05 |
 |  | 276 | Web/Tel | Marijuana use, R | Tel, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/Tel | Cocaine use, R | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/Tel | Hallucinogens | Tel, <.005 |
 |  |  | Web/Tel | Designer drugs | Tel, >.05 |
 |  | 289 | TACASI/Tel | Marijuana use, R | Tel, <.05 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Cocaine use, R | TACASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Hallucinogens | () |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Designer drugs | Tel, >.05 |
 |  | 319 | Web/Mail | Marijuana use, R | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Cocaine use, R | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Hallucinogens | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Designer drugs | Mail, >.05 |
 |  | 332 | Mail/TACASI | Marijuana use, R | Mail, >.05 |
 |  |  | Mail/TACASI | Cocaine use, R | Mail, >.05 |
 |  |  | Mail/TACASI | Hallucinogens | TACASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | Mail/TACASI | Designer drugs | TACASI, >.05 |
 |  | 243 | Web/TACASI | Marijuana use, R | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/TACASI | Cocaine use, R | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/TACASI | Hallucinogens | TACASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/TACASI | Designer drugs | TACASI, >.05 |
Gribble et al. (2000) | P | 2,343 | TACASI/Tel | Crack, past 6Â months | TACASI, .026 |
 | Men who have sex w/men in 4 US cities, 1996–1998 |  | TACASI/Tel | Inhalants, past 6 months | TACASI, .004 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Downers, past 6 months | TACASI, .001 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Opiates, past 6 months | TACASI, .039 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Marijuana, past 6 months | Tel, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Psychedelics, past 6 months | Tel, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Meth, past 6 months | TACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Other amphet, past 6 months | Tel, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Ecstasy, past 6 months | Tel, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Cocaine, past 6 months | TACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Party drugs, past 6 months | TACASI, .17 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Rcvd drugs/money for sex, R | TACASI, .009 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Gave drugs/money for sex, R | TACASI, .018 |
Corkrey & Parkinson (2002) | P | 406 | TACASI/Tel | Marijuana use, L | TACASI, >.10 |
 | Australia |  | TACASI/Tel | Marijuana use, past year | TACASI, >.10 |
 | residents, 2000 |  | TACASI/Tel | Monthly marijuana use | TACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Amphetamine use, L | Tel, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Amphetamine use, past year | TACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Monthly amphetamine use | TACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Heroin use, L | TACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Heroin use, past year | TACASI, >.10 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Monthly heroin use | TACASI, >.10 |
McCabe et al. (2002) | P | 3,567 | Web/Mail | Marijuana use, R | Mail, <.0005 |
 | US college students, 2001 |  |  |  |  |
Newman et al. (2002) | NP | 1,417 | ACASI/FTF | Marijuana use, R | ACASI, .731 |
 | Syearinge prog participants in 4 U.S. cities, 1997–1998 |  | ACASI/FTF | Non-Rx methadone use, R | ACASI, .004 |
Couper et al. (2003) | NP | 195 | ACASI/CASI | Drive under infl, past year | CASI, >.05 |
 | Convenience sample (newspaper ads, flyers) |  | ACASI/CASI | Marijuana use, L | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | ACASI/CASI | Cocaine use,L | CASI, >.05 |
Knapp & Kirk (2003) | NP | 231 | Web/Mail | Marijuana use, L | Web, >.10 |
 | US college students, 1999 |  | Web/Mail | Been in jail, L | Mail, .07 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Used CC w/o permission | Web, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Accepted money for sex | Mail, >.10 |
 |  | 295 | Mail/TACASI | Marijuana use, L | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Mail/TACASI | Been in jail, L | Mail, .10 |
 |  |  | Mail/TACASI | Used CC w/o permission | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Mail/TACASI | Accepted money for sex | Mail, >.10 |
 |  | 178 | Web/TACASI | Marijuana use, L | Web, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/TACASI | Been in jail, L | TACASI, .46 |
 |  |  | Web/TACASI | Used CC w/o permission | Web, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/TACASI | Accepted money for sex | TACASI, >.10 |
McCabe (2004) | P | 3,606 | Web/Mail | Marijuana use, L | Mail, <.05 |
 | US college students, 2001 |  | Web/Mail | Marijuana use, past year | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Ecstasy use, L | Web, <.05 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Ecstasy use, past year | Web, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Narcotics use, L | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Narcotics use, past year | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | LSD use, L | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | LSD use, past year | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Psychedelics, L | Web, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Psychedelics, past year | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Inhalant use, L | Web, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Inhalant use, past year | Mail, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Cocaine use, L | Web, <.001 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Cocaine use, past year | Web, >.10 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Amphetamines, L | Mail, <.05 |
 |  |  | Web/Mail | Amphetamines, past year | Mail, <.10 |
Turner et al. (2005) | P | 2,228 | TACASI/Tel | Marijuana use, R | TACASI, <.001 |
 | USA & Baltimore, 1999–2000 |  | TACASI/Tel | Marijuana use, past year | TACASI, <.001 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Marijuana use, past 3 years | TACASI, <.001 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Marijuana use, L | TACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Cocaine use, R | TACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Cocaine use, past year | TACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Cocaine use, past 3 years | TACASI, <.001 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Cocaine use, L | TACASI, <.05 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Drug injection use, past year | TACASI, <.01 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Drug injection use, past 5 years | TACASI, <.01 |
 |  |  | TACASI/Tel | Drug injection use, L | TACASI, <.05 |
Wang et al. (2005) | P | 1,918 | Web/PAP | Ecstasy use | Web, >.05 |
 | Students in Taipei, 2003 |  | Web/PAP | Ketamine use | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Marijuana use | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Amphetamine use | Web, <.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Illicit drug use, L | Web, >.05 |
Brenek et al. (2006) | NP | 4,506 | CASI/PAP | Drunk driving, R | CASI, <.05 |
 | High school students in 8 states, 2004 |  | CASI/PAP | Carried a gun, R | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Weapon carrying, R | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Marijuana use, L | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Marijuana use, before 13 | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Marijuana use, R | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Cocaine use, L | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Inhalant use, L | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Meth use, L | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Ecstacy use, L | CASI, >.05 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Steroid use, L | PAP, >.05 |
Hamby et al. (2006) | NP | 160 | CASI/PAP | Physical assault perp. | CASI, <.05 |
 | US college students |  | CASI/PAP | Sexual coercion perp. | PAP, <.01 |
 |  |  | CASI/PAP | Injury perp. | CASI, <.10 |
Lucia et al. (2007) | NP | 1,203 | Web/PAP | Marijuana use, L | PAP, >.05 |
 | Students in Lausanne, Switzerland, 2004 |  | Web/PAP | Heroin, L | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Cocaine, L | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Ecstasy, L | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Hallucinogens | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Amphetamines | Web, >05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Driving w/o license | Web, <.01 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Shoplifting | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Breaking into car | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Theft at school | Web, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Theft at home | Web, <.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Vehicle theft | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Assault | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Threat w/weapon | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Racket | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Robbery | () |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Arson | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Selling soft drugs | PAP, <.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Selling hard drugs | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Graffiti | PAP, >.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Vandalism | PAP, <.01 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Theft from person | PAP, >.05 |
van de Looij-Jansen and de Wilde (2008) | NP | 531 | Web/PAP | Vandal & steal, past year | ?, >.05 |
 | Schools in Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2005 |  | Web/PAP | Carrying a weapon | W, <.05 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Marijuana use, R | ?, >.05 |
Eaton et al. (2010) | NP | 5,227 | Web/PAP | Drunk driving | Web, .01 |
 | 85 schools in 15 states, 2008 |  | Web/PAP | Carried a gun | Web, .02 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Weapon carrying | Web, .01 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Weapon carrying @ school | Web, .005 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Marijuana use, L | Web, .12 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Marijuana use, before 13 | Web, .07 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Marijuana use, R | Web, .02 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Marijuana use @ school | Web, .005 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Cocaine use, L | Web, .145 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Cocaine use, R | Web, .0175 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Inhalant use, L | Web, .085 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Heroin use, L | Web, .145 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Meth use, L | Web, .12 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Ecstacy use, L | Web, .02 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Steroid use, L | Web, .155 |
 |  |  | Web/PAP | Injection drug use, L | Web, .125 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kleck, G., Roberts, K. (2012). What Survey Modes are Most Effective in Eliciting Self-Reports of Criminal or Delinquent Behavior?. In: Gideon, L. (eds) Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3875-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3876-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)