Abstract
According to Semiotic Dynamic Cultural Psychology Theory, symbolic universes denote affective-laden systems of assumptions that inform people’s identity as well as their thinking, acting and behaving. Given their affective nature, symbolic universes can be considered embodied forms of meanings that mould bodily activation. Along with results from previous transnational research that detected five main symbolic universes characterizing the cultural milieu of European societies-Ordered Universe, Interpersonal Bond, Caring Society, Niche of Belongingness, and Other’s world—this study aimed at addressing the embodied nature of symbolic universes. In particular, it explored the association between the symbolic universes and the level of exploration of a visual stimulus (a picture)—namely the amount of time dedicated to the peripheral regions of the visual stimulus. To this end, an eye-tracking paradigm was implemented in a study involving 29 (F = 15) participants (university students aged 20–23). The classification of each participant in terms of the most representative symbolic universe was carried out by means of the questionnaire designed for this purpose (VOC questionnaire). The research findings showed the association between the symbolic universes and level of exploration, in so doing suggesting that the symbolic universes may affect the spatial visual attention of individuals. Theoretical, methodological and practical implications of the study are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, T., & Olatunji, B. O. (2012). Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A metaanalytic review and synthesis. Clinical Psychological Review, 32(8), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004.
Baerveldt, C., & Verheggen, T. (2012). Enactivism. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 165–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickhard, M. (2009). Interactionism: A Manifesto. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 85–95.
Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2007). Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science, 315(5820), 1860–1862. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138071.
Carli, R., & Paniccia, R. M. (1999). Psicologia della formazione [Psychology of training]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Carli, R., & Salvatore, S. (2001). L’immagine della psicologia: Una ricerca sulla popolazione del Lazio [The image of psychology: A study on the Lazio’s population]. Roma: Kappa.
Ciavolino, E., Redd, R., Avdi, E., Falcone, F., Fini, V., Kadianaki, I., et al. (2017). Views of Context. An instrument for the analysis of the cultural milieu. A first validation study. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 10(2), 599–628.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice (Vol. 373). London, UK: Springer Science & Business Media.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modulary of mind. An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Graham, D. J., Orquin, J. L., & Visschers, V. H. (2012). Eye tracking and nutrition label use: A review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement. Food Policy, 37(4), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.03.004.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London, UK: Routledge.
ISBEM. (2017). TR synchronic analysis. [Scientific report. Re.Cri.Re. Consortium. Deliverable 3.2.]. http://www.recrire.eu/documents.
Kharlamov, N. (2012). The city as a sign. A developmental-experiential approach to spatial life. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 277–302). Oxford: Oxford Press.
Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861–876.
Mancas, M. (2009). Relative influence of bottom-up and top-down attention. In L. Paletta & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.), Attention in cognitive systems (pp. 212–226). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Mannarini, T. M., Nitti, M., Ciavolino, E., & Salvatore, S. (2012). The role of affects in culture-based interventions: Implications for practice. Psychology, 3, 569–577. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.38085.
Mannarini, T., Veltri, G. A., & Salvatore, S. (in preparation). Portraits of otherness. Mapping change and continuity in the European media representations of immigrants, Muslims, and LGBT. New York: Springer.
Nitti, M., Ciavolino, E., Salvatore, S., & Gennaro, A. (2010). Analyzing psychotherapy process as intersubjective sensemaking. An approach based on discourse analysis and neural network. Psychotherapy Research, 20(5), 546–563.
Rocco, D., Gennaro, A., Salvatore, S., Stoycheva, V., & Bucci, W. (2017). Clinical mutual attunement and the development of therapeutic process: A preliminary study. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 30(4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2016.1227950.
Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in black and white. The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte, NC: InfoAge Publishing.
Salvatore S. (2018). Culture as dynamics of sense-making. A semiotic and embodied framework for socio-cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner, & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture & psychology (2nd ed., pp. 35–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Veltri, G. A., Avdi, E., Battaglia, F., et al. (2018). Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies’ cultural milieu. PLoS ONE, 13(1): e0189885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189885.
Salvatore, S., Gelo, O., Gennaro, A., & Manzo, S. (2010). Looking at the psychotherapy process as an intersubjective dynamic of meaning-making. A case study with discourse flow analysis. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 23(3), 195–230.
Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2013). Field dependency and contingency in the modelling of sensemaking. Papers on Social Representation [On Line Journal], 22(2), 21.1–21.41.
Salvatore, S., & Zittoun, T. (2011). Outlines of a psychoanalytically informed cultural psychology. In S. Salvatore, & T. Zittoun (Eds.), Cultural psychology and psychoanalysis in dialogue. Issues for constructive theoretical and methodological synergies (pp. 3–46). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage Publications.
Veltri, G., Redd, R., Mannarini, T., & Salvatore, S. (2019). The identity of Brexit: a cultural psychology analysis. Journal of Applied and Community Psychology, 29 (1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2378.
Venuleo, C., Mossi P., & Salvatore, S. (2016). Educational subcultures and dropping out in higher education. A longitudinal case study. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927847.
Venuleo, C., Salvatore, S., & Mossi, P. G. (2015). The role of cultural factors in pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(4), 1353–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9476-z.
Verheggen, T., & Baerveldt, C. B. (2007). We Don't Share! Exploring the theoretical ground for social and cultural psychology: The social representation approach versus an enactivism framework. Culture & Psychology, 13(1), 5–27.
Vraga, E., Bode, L., & Troller-Renfree, S. (2016). Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J., & Frank, R. R. (Eds.). (2007). Body, language and mind. Volume 1: Embodiment. Berlin: Mounton De Gruyte.
Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salvatore, S., Rochira, A., Kharlamov, N. (2019). The Embodiment of Cultural Meanings. Symbolic Universes as Forms of Life. In: Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Valsiner, J., Veltri, G. (eds) Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis. Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19496-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19497-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)