Abstract
Nowadays, several studies assure that digital fabrication and making technologies, if coupled with proper learning methodologies such as constructivism and constructionism, can provide learning experiences that promote young people’s creativity, critical thinking, teamwork and problem-solving skills – the essential skills necessary in the workplace of the twenty-first century. Robotic technologies combined with digital fabrication and DIY electronics emerge as unique making tools that can create a learning environment attracting and keeping learners interested and motivated with hands-on, fun learning activities. The “maker movement” is seen as an inspiring and creative way for youth to deal with our world and able to develop technological interest and competences. However, in the field of educational robotics, the focus is often on prefabricated robots and ready-made code to program behaviours for the robots. This way, robotics is conceived as “black box” for children who are invited to play or interact with a robot without understanding “what’s inside” and how it works. The project eCraft2Learn researched, designed, piloted and evaluated an ecosystem intended to introduce digital fabrication and maker movement in formal and informal education, to make robots transparent for children and finally to help them make their own robotic artefacts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alimisis, D., & Kynigos, C. (2009). Constructionism and robotics in education. In D. Alimisis (Ed.), Teacher education on robotics enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods (pp. 11–26). Αthens: School of Pedagogical and Technological Education.
Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63–71.
Alimisis, D. (2014), Educational Robotics in Teacher Education: an Innovative Tool for Promoting Quality Education, In L. Daniela, I. Lūka, L. Rutka and I. Žogla (Eds) “Teacher of the 21st Century: Quality Education for Quality Teaching”, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, p.14-27.
Alimisis, D., Moro, M., & Menegatti, E. (Eds.). (2017). Educational robotics in the makers era. In Advances in intelligent systems and computing book series (Vol. 560). Springer Nature, Switzerland.
Alimisis, R., Loukatos, D., Zoulias, E., & Alimisis, D. (2018). Introducing the making culture in teacher education: The eCraft2Learn project. In M. Moro, D. Alimisis, & L. Iocchi (Eds.), Educational robotics in the context of the maker movement. Springer Nature, Switzerland (Pre-Print).
Ardublock. (2018). http://blog.ardublock.com. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Arduino Uno. (2018). https://www.arduino.cc/. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Asimakopoulos, K., Zoulias, E., Saranteas, I., Makaris, I. Sandali, G., & Spiliou, T. (2018). Τhe eCraft2Learn project in 1st EPAL KORYDALLOS: Integrating a FabLab in the school curriculum. Proceedings of the 11th Pan-Hellenic and international conference ICT in Education (Accepted for publication).
Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.
Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Children are not hackers: Building a culture of powerful ideas, deep learning, and equity in the maker movement. In: Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Kindle ed., Kindle Locations 56–59, Vol. 1). Taylor and Francis. New York, Accessed 30 November 2018.
Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Valente, M., Buselli, E., Salvini, P., & Dario, P. (2018). Can Educational Robotics introduce young children to robotics and how can we measure it? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34, 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12304.
Cesaretti, L., Storti, M., Mazzieri, E., Screpanti, L., Paesani, A., Principi, P., & Scaradozzi, D. (2017). An innovative approach to School-Work turnover programme with Educational Robotics. Mondo Digitale, 16(72), 2017-5.
Cura. (2018). https://ultimaker.com/en/products/cura-software. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Darrah, T. (2018). Design and development of a low-cost open-source robotics education platform. Proceedings of the 50th International Symposium on Robotics, Munich.
eCraft2Learn. (2018). https://project.ecraft2learn.eu. Accessed 21 October 2018.
FreeCAD. (2018). https://www.freecadweb.org/. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2013). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. http://www.newpedagogies.nl/images/towards_a_new_end.pdf. Accessed 21 October 2018.
MIT App Inventor. (2018). http://appinventor.mit.edu/explore. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Moro, M., Agatolio, F., & Menegatti, E. (2018). The development of robotic enhanced curricula for the RoboESL project: overall evaluation and expected outcomes. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society, 9(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Piaget, J. (1974). To understand is to invent. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Raspberry Pi. (2018). https://www.raspberrypi.org/. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Scaradozzi, D., Sorbi, L., Pedale, A., Valzano, M., & Vergine, C. (2015). Teaching robotics at the primary school: an innovative approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3838–3846.
Schon, S., Ebner, M., & Kumar, S. (2014). The Maker Movement Implications from modern fabrication, new digital gadgets, and hacking for creative learning and teaching. In L. Canals & P.A.U. Education (Eds.), eLearningPapers Special edition, Barcelona, (pp. 86–100).
Snap4Arduino. (2018). http://snap4arduino.rocks/. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Thingiverse. (2018). https://www.thingiverse.com/. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Tinkercad. (2018). https://www.Tinkercad.com/. Accessed 21 October 2018.
UUI. (2018). https://ecraft2learn.github.io/uui/index.html. Accessed 21 October 2018.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by the eCraft2Learn project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Action under Grant Agreement No. 731345.
Disclaimer
This communication reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alimisis, D., Alimisi, R., Loukatos, D., Zoulias, E. (2019). Introducing Maker Movement in Educational Robotics: Beyond Prefabricated Robots and “Black Boxes”. In: Daniela, L. (eds) Smart Learning with Educational Robotics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19912-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19913-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)