Abstract
Qualitative research is often presented in contrast to quantitative methodologies as an option which makes it possible to avoid pitfalls and shortcomings of the latter, yet often enough is itself attacked for a lack of scientific discipline. Placing quantitative and qualitative research on opposite sides of the barricade was understandably needed in the times of criticism directed against neo-positivist thinking, yet it does not seem particularly fruitful any more, especially in classroom research. In order to decide if reconciliation seems to be a more useful option here, we need to look at those paradigms in their radically opposite forms and identify reasons for frequent tendencies to dichotomize them. In the first part of the present text, historical processes taking place since the launch of the first ethnographic research projects are analyzed, through the development of quantitative methodologies, the birth of the grounded theory and the conflict between paradigms up to the present paradigm shift. In the second part, research paradigms in applied linguistics and language teaching are discussed with emphasis on examples of early qualitative and mixed research types. In the final part, the frequently overlooked similarity of research aims and procedures in the fields of education and applied linguistics is presented, the use of combined approaches is advocated, and their implications for teacher education are discussed. Promising heuristic paths for the future are also sought.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AERA (American Educational Research Association). (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35, 33–40.
Allen, L. M. (2010). A critique of four grounded theory texts. The Qualitative Report, 5, 1606–1620.
Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. London: Sage.
Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ball, S. (1980). Initial encounters in the classroom and the process of establishment. In P. Woods (Ed.), Pupil strategies. Explorations in the sociology of the school (pp. 142–161). London: Croom Helm.
Ball, S. (1981). Beachside comprehensive. A case study of secondary schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baralt, M., Pennestri, S., & Selvandin, M. (2011). Action research. Using wordless to teach foreign language writing. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 12–22.
Bellack, A., & Davitz, J. (1972). The language of the classroom. Meanings communicated in high school teaching. New York: Columbia University.
Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Bennet, N. (1976). Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books.
Biddle, B. J., & Ellena, W. J. (1964). Contemporary research on teacher effectiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Blanchot, M. (1969). L’entretien infini. Paris: Gallimard.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A. (2006). Paradigm peace and the implications for quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 111–126.
Buber, M. (1963). Werke – III Schriften zum Chassidismus. Berlin: Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften/Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
Buber, M. (1908/2005). Opowieści chasydów [Tales of the Hasidim]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo w Drodze.
Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38, 57–74.
Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Charmaz, C. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cohen, L. (1982). Educational research and development in Britain 1970–1980. Windsor: N.F.E.R.
Delamont, S. (1976). Interaction in the classroom. London: Methuen.
Delamont, S., & Hamilton, D. (1984). Revisiting classroom research. A continuing cautionary tale. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Readings on interaction in the classroom (pp. 3–38). London: Methuen.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Donmoyer, R. (2006). Take my paradigm … please! The legacy of Kuhn’s construct in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, (special issue—Paradigm proliferation in educational research), 11–34.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckert, P. (2012). Symbols of category membership. In L. Monaghan, J. Goodman & J. M. Robinson (Eds.), A cultural approach to interpersonal communication (pp. 255–273). Oxford: Wiley.
Ernst, K. (1972). Games students play. Millbrae, California: Celestial Arts.
Evans, K. M. (1966). Group methods. Educational Research, 9, 44–50.
Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.
Franklin, M. I. (2012). Understanding research coping with the quantitative-qualitative divide. London: Routledge.
Furlong, V. (1977). Anancy goes to school. A case study of pupils’ knowledge of their teachers. In P. Woods & M. Hammersley (Eds.), School experience (pp. 162–185). New York: Wiley.
Gabryś-Barker, D. (2012). Reflectivity in pre-service teacher education. A survey of theory and practice. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.
Galton, M., Simon, B., & Croll, P. (1980). Inside the primary classroom. London: Routledge.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. San Francisco: The Sociology Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Goodlad, J. L. (1984). A place called school. Prospect for the future. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Company.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). London: Sage Publications.
Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with ethnography. Methodological explorations. London: Routledge.
Hargreaves, D. (1975). Deviance in classrooms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
Heigham, J., & Croker, R. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics. A practical introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Heyworth, F. (2013). Applications of quality management in language education. Language Teaching, 46, 281–315.
Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Holt, J. (1964). How children fail. New York, Toronto, London: Pitman Publishing Company.
Holt, J. (1967). How children learn. New York, Toronto, London: Pitman Publishing Company.
Husserl, E. (1913/1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in the classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jackson, P., & Lahaderne, H. (1972). Inequality of teacher pupil contacts. In A. Morrison & D. Mc Intyre (Eds.), The social psychology of teaching (pp. 204–211). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Jacobs, G. M., & Farrel, T. S. C. (2001). Paradigm shift: Understanding and implementing change in second language education. TESL-EJ, 5, 1–15.
Kamiński, A. (1970). Metoda, technika, procedura badawcza w pedagogice empirycznej. Studia Pedagogiczne [Studies in Education], 19, 25–48.
Kohonen, V. (2000). Towards experiential foreign language education. In V. Kohonen, R. Jaatinen, P. Kaikonen & J. Lehtovaara (Eds.), Experiential learning in foreign language education (pp. 8–60). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Komorowska, H. (2012). 18th c. Hasidic thought and the contemporary approaches to language and education. In L. Aleksandrowicz-Pędich & M. Pakier (Eds.), Reconstructing Jewish identity in pre- and post-Holocaust literature and culture (pp. 65–84). Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.
Komorowska, H. (2013). Metaphor in language education. In K. Droździał-Szelest & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching (pp. 57–72). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Konecki, K. T. (2000). Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych [Studies in the methodology of qualitative research]. Warszawa: PWN.
Kubinowski, D. (2011). Jakościowe badania pedagogiczne [Qualitative research in education]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A progress report. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 455–472.
Lèvinas, E. (1982). L'au-delà du verset. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Łobocki, M. (2000). Metody i techniki badań pedagogicznych [Methods and techniques in educational research]. Kraków: Impuls.
Majer, J. (2003). Interactive discourse in the foreign language classroom. Łódż: University of Łódź Press.
Malinowski, B. (1929/2005). The sexual life of savages in North-Western Melanesia. An ethnographic account of courtship, marriage, and family life among the natives of the Trobriand Islands, British New Guinea. Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa. New York: William Morrow & Company.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). La phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Morrison, A., & Mc Intyre, D. (Eds.). (1972). The social psychology of teaching. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Niżegorodcew, A., Bystrov, Y., & Kleban, M. (Eds.). (2011). Developing intercultural competence through English: Focus on Ukrainian and Polish cultures. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.
Ohta, A. S., & Nakone, T. (2004). When students ask questions: Teacher and peer answers in the foreign language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 217–237.
Park, R., Burgess, E., & Mac Kenzie, R. (1925). The city. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28, 163–188.
Perry, F. L, Jr. (2005). Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42, 147–180.
Richer, S. (1975). School effects. The case of grounded theory. Sociology of Education, 48, 383–399.
Rist, R. C. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411–451.
Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1980). Fifteen thousand hours. Secondary schools and their effect on children. Somerset: Open Books.
Saukko, P. (2005). Methodologies for cultural studies. An integrative approach. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 343–356). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sevigny, M. (1981). Triangulated inquiry: A methodology for the analysis of classroom interaction. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 65–85). Norwood: Ablex.
Silverman, D. (2012). Interpretacja danych jakościowych [Interpreting qualitative data]. Warszawa: PWN.
Smith, L., & Geoffrey, W. (1968). The complexities of the urban classroom. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Stevick, E. (1989). Success with foreign languages. New York: Prentice Hall.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Stubbs, M. (1976). Language, school and classrooms. London: Methuen.
Stubbs, M., & Delamont, S. (Eds.). (1976). Explorations in classroom observation. Chichester: Wiley.
Szkudlarek, T. (1992). McLaren i Agata: O pewnej możliwości interpretacji rytualnego oporu przeciw szkole. In Z. Kwieciński (Ed.), Nieobecne dyskursy [Absent discourses] (pp. 45–51). Toruń: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika.
Thomas, W., & Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Monograph of an immigrant group. Boston: Richard G. Badger.
Urbaniak-Zając, D., & Kos, E. (2013). Badania jakościowe w pedagogice [Qualitative research in educational sciences]. Warszawa: PWN.
Woods, P. (1983). Sociology and the school. An interactionist viewpoint. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Newbury Park: Sage.
Zaborowski, Z. (1973). Wstęp do metodologii badań pedagogicznych [Introduction to the methodology of educational research]. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Zaczyński, W. (1967). Rozwój metody eksperymentalnej i jej zastosowanie [The development of the experimental method and its application]. Warszawa: PWN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Komorowska, H. (2016). Quantitative and Qualitative Classroom Research—Friendship or War?. In: Pawlak, M. (eds) Classroom-Oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30371-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30373-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)