Skip to main content

Quantitative and Qualitative Classroom Research—Friendship or War?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Classroom-Oriented Research

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

Qualitative research is often presented in contrast to quantitative methodologies as an option which makes it possible to avoid pitfalls and shortcomings of the latter, yet often enough is itself attacked for a lack of scientific discipline. Placing quantitative and qualitative research on opposite sides of the barricade was understandably needed in the times of criticism directed against neo-positivist thinking, yet it does not seem particularly fruitful any more, especially in classroom research. In order to decide if reconciliation seems to be a more useful option here, we need to look at those paradigms in their radically opposite forms and identify reasons for frequent tendencies to dichotomize them. In the first part of the present text, historical processes taking place since the launch of the first ethnographic research projects are analyzed, through the development of quantitative methodologies, the birth of the grounded theory and the conflict between paradigms up to the present paradigm shift. In the second part, research paradigms in applied linguistics and language teaching are discussed with emphasis on examples of early qualitative and mixed research types. In the final part, the frequently overlooked similarity of research aims and procedures in the fields of education and applied linguistics is presented, the use of combined approaches is advocated, and their implications for teacher education are discussed. Promising heuristic paths for the future are also sought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AERA (American Educational Research Association). (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L. M. (2010). A critique of four grounded theory texts. The Qualitative Report, 5, 1606–1620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1980). Initial encounters in the classroom and the process of establishment. In P. Woods (Ed.), Pupil strategies. Explorations in the sociology of the school (pp. 142–161). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1981). Beachside comprehensive. A case study of secondary schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baralt, M., Pennestri, S., & Selvandin, M. (2011). Action research. Using wordless to teach foreign language writing. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellack, A., & Davitz, J. (1972). The language of the classroom. Meanings communicated in high school teaching. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, N. (1976). Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, B. J., & Ellena, W. J. (1964). Contemporary research on teacher effectiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, M. (1969). L’entretien infini. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2006). Paradigm peace and the implications for quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1963). Werke – III Schriften zum Chassidismus. Berlin: Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften/Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1908/2005). Opowieści chasydów [Tales of the Hasidim]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo w Drodze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38, 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, C. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (1982). Educational research and development in Britain 1970–1980. Windsor: N.F.E.R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (1976). Interaction in the classroom. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S., & Hamilton, D. (1984). Revisiting classroom research. A continuing cautionary tale. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Readings on interaction in the classroom (pp. 3–38). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmoyer, R. (2006). Take my paradigm … please! The legacy of Kuhn’s construct in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, (special issue—Paradigm proliferation in educational research), 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (2012). Symbols of category membership. In L. Monaghan, J. Goodman & J. M. Robinson (Eds.), A cultural approach to interpersonal communication (pp. 255–273). Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, K. (1972). Games students play. Millbrae, California: Celestial Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. M. (1966). Group methods. Educational Research, 9, 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. I. (2012). Understanding research coping with the quantitative-qualitative divide. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, V. (1977). Anancy goes to school. A case study of pupils’ knowledge of their teachers. In P. Woods & M. Hammersley (Eds.), School experience (pp. 162–185). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabryś-Barker, D. (2012). Reflectivity in pre-service teacher education. A survey of theory and practice. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M., Simon, B., & Croll, P. (1980). Inside the primary classroom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. San Francisco: The Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. L. (1984). A place called school. Prospect for the future. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with ethnography. Methodological explorations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1975). Deviance in classrooms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Heigham, J., & Croker, R. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics. A practical introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyworth, F. (2013). Applications of quality management in language education. Language Teaching, 46, 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. (1964). How children fail. New York, Toronto, London: Pitman Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. (1967). How children learn. New York, Toronto, London: Pitman Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1913/1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in the classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P., & Lahaderne, H. (1972). Inequality of teacher pupil contacts. In A. Morrison & D. Mc Intyre (Eds.), The social psychology of teaching (pp. 204–211). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. M., & Farrel, T. S. C. (2001). Paradigm shift: Understanding and implementing change in second language education. TESL-EJ, 5, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamiński, A. (1970). Metoda, technika, procedura badawcza w pedagogice empirycznej. Studia Pedagogiczne [Studies in Education], 19, 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, V. (2000). Towards experiential foreign language education. In V. Kohonen, R. Jaatinen, P. Kaikonen & J. Lehtovaara (Eds.), Experiential learning in foreign language education (pp. 8–60). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorowska, H. (2012). 18th c. Hasidic thought and the contemporary approaches to language and education. In L. Aleksandrowicz-Pędich & M. Pakier (Eds.), Reconstructing Jewish identity in pre- and post-Holocaust literature and culture (pp. 65–84). Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorowska, H. (2013). Metaphor in language education. In K. Droździał-Szelest & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching (pp. 57–72). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konecki, K. T. (2000). Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych [Studies in the methodology of qualitative research]. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubinowski, D. (2011). Jakościowe badania pedagogiczne [Qualitative research in education]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A progress report. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lèvinas, E. (1982). L'au-delà du verset. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łobocki, M. (2000). Metody i techniki badań pedagogicznych [Methods and techniques in educational research]. Kraków: Impuls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer, J. (2003). Interactive discourse in the foreign language classroom. Łódż: University of Łódź Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1929/2005). The sexual life of savages in North-Western Melanesia. An ethnographic account of courtship, marriage, and family life among the natives of the Trobriand Islands, British New Guinea. Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa. New York: William Morrow & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). La phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., & Mc Intyre, D. (Eds.). (1972). The social psychology of teaching. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niżegorodcew, A., Bystrov, Y., & Kleban, M. (Eds.). (2011). Developing intercultural competence through English: Focus on Ukrainian and Polish cultures. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, A. S., & Nakone, T. (2004). When students ask questions: Teacher and peer answers in the foreign language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R., Burgess, E., & Mac Kenzie, R. (1925). The city. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28, 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, F. L, Jr. (2005). Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42, 147–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richer, S. (1975). School effects. The case of grounded theory. Sociology of Education, 48, 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rist, R. C. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1980). Fifteen thousand hours. Secondary schools and their effect on children. Somerset: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saukko, P. (2005). Methodologies for cultural studies. An integrative approach. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 343–356). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevigny, M. (1981). Triangulated inquiry: A methodology for the analysis of classroom interaction. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 65–85). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2012). Interpretacja danych jakościowych [Interpreting qualitative data]. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Geoffrey, W. (1968). The complexities of the urban classroom. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevick, E. (1989). Success with foreign languages. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1976). Language, school and classrooms. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M., & Delamont, S. (Eds.). (1976). Explorations in classroom observation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szkudlarek, T. (1992). McLaren i Agata: O pewnej możliwości interpretacji rytualnego oporu przeciw szkole. In Z. Kwieciński (Ed.), Nieobecne dyskursy [Absent discourses] (pp. 45–51). Toruń: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W., & Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Monograph of an immigrant group. Boston: Richard G. Badger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbaniak-Zając, D., & Kos, E. (2013). Badania jakościowe w pedagogice [Qualitative research in educational sciences]. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P. (1983). Sociology and the school. An interactionist viewpoint. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaborowski, Z. (1973). Wstęp do metodologii badań pedagogicznych [Introduction to the methodology of educational research]. Wrocław: Ossolineum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaczyński, W. (1967). Rozwój metody eksperymentalnej i jej zastosowanie [The development of the experimental method and its application]. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Komorowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Komorowska, H. (2016). Quantitative and Qualitative Classroom Research—Friendship or War?. In: Pawlak, M. (eds) Classroom-Oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30371-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30373-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics