Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Behavior and Quality of Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life ((IHQL))

Abstract

Sustainable development aims at improving quality of life by guaranteeing satisfaction of human needs and environmental conservation. Individuals and society participate in achieving the goals of sustainability by means of engagement in sustainable behavior (SB). SB is the set of deliberate and effective actions that result in the conservation of natural and social resources; it encompasses pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable behaviors. These behaviors allow the conservation of the natural environment, and the protection of the integrity of society; this is their first contribution to quality of life. In addition, SB frequently results in positive psychological consequences (satisfaction, self-efficacy, psychological wellbeing and restoration, happiness, and even pleasure) for individuals that engage in these practices. Such consequences represent the subjective factors of quality of life that should be added to the list of the positive repercussions of sustainable behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amato, P., Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Rogers, S. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., & Sen, A. (2000). Human development and economic sustainability. World Development, 28, 2029–2050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artaraz, M. (2002). Teoría de las tres dimensiones de desarrollo sostenible [Theory of the three dimensions of sustainable development]. Ecosistemas, 11, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldi-López, G., & García-Quiroga, E. (2006). Una aproximación a la psicología ambiental. Fundamentos en Humanidades, 7(1), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (1987). The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation, 14, 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2009). Sociability predicts happiness: Worldwide evidence from time series. Siena: Department of Economics University of Siena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, R. B., & Corral, V. (2010). Happiness and sustainable behavior. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Hanson, M., Liverman, D., & Merideth, R. (1987). Global sustainability: Toward definition. Environmental Management, 11(6), 713–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collado, S., & Corraliza, J. A. (2014). Children’s restorative experiences and self-reported environmental behaviors. Environment & Behavior, 47, 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V. (1996). A structural model of reuse and recycling in Mexico. Environment & Behavior, 28, 665–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V. (2001). Comportamiento Pro-ambiental: una introducción al estudio de las conductas protectoras del ambiente [Pro-environmental behavior: An introduction to the study of environmentally protective behaviors]. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Ed. Resma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V. (2012). Sustentabilidad y Psicología Positiva. Una visión optimista de las conductas protectoras del ambiente. [Sustainability and positive psychology: An optimistic vision of environmentally protective behaviors]. Mexico: El Manual Moderno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (2004). Aproximaciones al estudio de la conducta sustentable [Approaches to the study pf sustainable behavior]. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 5, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Varela, C., & González, D. (2004). O papel da Psicologia Ambiental na promoção de competência pró-ambiental [The role of environmental psychology in the promotion of pro-environmental competence]. In E. Tassara, E. Rabinovich, & M. C. Guedes (Eds.), Psicologia e Ambiente. São Paulo: EDUC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G., & Sinha, J. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: Towards a “New Human Interdependence Paradigm” scale. Environment & Behavior, 40, 703–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Bonnes, M., Tapia, C., Fraijo, B., Frías, M., & Carrus, G. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., García, C., Castro, L., Viramontes, I., & Limones, R. (2010). Equity and sustainable lifestyles. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Montiel, M., Sotomayor, M., Frías, M., Tapia, C., & Fraijo, B. (2011). Psychological wellbeing as correlate of sustainable behaviors. International Journal of Hispanic psychology, 4, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C., García, F., Varela, C., Cuen, A., & Barrón, M. (2012). Validation of a scale assessing psychological restoration associated with sustainable behaviours. Psyecology, 3, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C., Ortiz, A., & Fraijo, B. (2013). Las virtudes de la Humanidad, Justicia y Moderación y su relación con la conducta sustentable [Virtues of humanity, justice and temperance and their relationship with sustainable behavior]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45, 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Frías, M., Gaxiola, J., Tapia, C., Fraijo, B., & Corral, N. (2015). Ambientes positivos [Positive environments]. Mexico: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C., & Ortiz, A. (in press). On the relationship between character strengths and sustainable behavior. Environment & Behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalziel, P., & Saunders, C., with Fyfe, R., & Newton, B. (2009). Sustainable development and equity (Official statistics research series, 6). http://www.statisphere.govt.nz/officialstatisticsresearch/series/default.htm.

  • De Young, R. (1991). Some psychological aspects of living lightly: Desired lifestyle patterns and conservation behavior. Journal of Environmental Systems, 20, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Young, R. (1996). Some psychological aspects of a reduced consumption lifestyle: The role of intrinsic satisfaction and competence motivation. Environment & Behavior, 28, 358–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. In L. Zelezny, & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Promoting environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (2000). Drei Konzepte ökologischer Nachhaltigkeit [Three concepts of ecological sustainability]. Natur und Kultur — Transdisziplinäre Zeitschriftfür ökologische Nachhaltigkeit, 7, 62–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 276–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers, S. (1990). Sustainability in context: An Australian perspective. Environmental Management, 14(3), 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebreo, A., Hershey, J., & Vining, J. (1999). Reducing solid waste: Linking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. Environment & Behavior, 31, 107–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergus, A. H. T., & Rowney, J. I. A. (2005). Sustainable development: Lost meaning and opportunity? Journal of Bussines Ethics, 60, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraijo, B., Tapia, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Mireles, J. (2007). Orientación hacia la sustentabilidad en estudiantes universitarios: un estudio diagnóstico [Orientation towards sustainability in undergraduate students: A diagnostic study]. In D. González & M. Maytorena (Eds.), Estudios Empíricos en Educación Superior. Mexico: Universidad de Sonora-Conacyt.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, M., Estévez, I., & Letamendía, P. (2007). El CUIDA como instrumento para la valoración de la personalidad en la evaluación de adoptantes, cuidadores, tutores y mediadores [CUIDA as instrument to assess personality in the evaluation of adopting parents, tutors and mediators]. Intervención Psicosocial, 16, 393–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T., Biel, A., & Gustafsson, M. (2003). The new environmental psychology: The human interdependence paradigm. In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasby, G. (2002). Sustainable development: The need for a new paradigm. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 4, 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia, V. (2002). Self, culture and sustainable development. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. Norwell: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grob, A. (1995). Meinungen im umweltbereich und umweltgerechtes Verhalten. Ein psychologisches ursachenntzmodell. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bern: University of Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (2001). Psychological restoration in natureas a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33, 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, M. (2000). Geschichte der Nachhaltigkeit. Natur und Kultur-Transdisziplinäre Zeitschrift für ökogishe Nachhaltigkeit, 1, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being and social capital: Does suicide pose a puzzle? Economic Journal, 116, C34–C45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, B., Tabernero, C., & Suarez, E. (2009). Psychosocial motivations and self-regulation processes that actívate environmentally responsible behavior. In J. Valentin & L. Gamez (Eds.), Environmental psychology: New developments. New York: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S., Suárez, E., & Martínez-Torvisco, J. (1997). Estructura de la conducta ecológica responsable mediante el análisis de la teoría de facetas [Structure of responsibly ecological behavior through the analysis of facet theory]. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 7, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment & Behavior, 23, 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, O. (2002). Some psychological determinants of environmentally responsible behavior. The Human Science Research Bulletin of Osaka Shoin Women’s University, 1, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiner, M. (2004). Re-emphasizing sustainable development-the concept of ‘evolutionability’. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6, 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2001). Social norms and the rule of law: Fostering trust in a socially diverse society. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, E. (1999). La racionalidad ambiental y el fin del naturalismo dialéctico [Environmental rationality and the end of dialectic naturalism]. Persona y sociedad. Special issue. Santiago de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lélé, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19, 607–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lélé, S., & Jayaraman, T. (2011). Equity in the context of sustainable development, Note for UN-GSP. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumley, S., & Armstrong, P. (2004). Some of the nineteenth century origins of the sustainability concept. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6, 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C. (1995). The concept of sustainable development: Its origins and ambivalence. Technology in Society, 17, 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., Oliveira, R., & Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 15623–15628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, G. (2009a). Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person-environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, G. (2009b). Psychologie environnementale. Bruxelles: de Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development betrayed. The end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, C. (2008). Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Canadian Psychology, 49(4), 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pato, C., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2013). Self-care behaviors and sustainable behaviors. Paper presented at the XXXIV international congress of psychology, Brasilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (1988). Economics, equity and sustainable development. Futures, 20(6), 595–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (1987). Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions. London: Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roseland, M. (2012). Toward sustainable communities: Solutions for citizens and their governments. Gabriola Island: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandbach, F. (1978). Ecology and the ‘Limits of Growth’ debate. Antipeze, 10(2), 22–32, University of Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck, P., & Schultz, P. W. (2002). Psychology of sustainable development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern. Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearman, R. (1990). The meaning and ethics of sustainability. Environmental Management, 14, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. (1989). Sustainable development: Theoretical construct or attainable goal? Environmental Conservation, 16(1), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1993). Sustainability: An economist’s perspective. In R. Dorfman & N. S. Dorfman (Eds.), Economics of the environment. NewYork: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutz, J. (2006). The role of well-being in a great transition (GTI paper series N°10). Tellus Institute. www.gtinitiative.org/documents/PDFFINALS/10WellBeing.pdf.

  • Tapia, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo, B., & Durón, F. (2013a). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: A measure of pro-Ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5, 711–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo B., & Durón, M. (2013b). Construcción y prueba de una escala del capital social: Correlatos con la conducta sustentable. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, Número Especial. Memorias del XXI Congreso Mexicano de Psicología. Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell, D. L., & Moser, G. (2006). Environment and quality of life. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, A., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2006). Is life getting better? How long and happy people live in modern society. European Psychologist, 10, 330–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED, World Comission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. (2002). Gendering sustainable development. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sonora (Mexico), Hermosillo, Mexico

    Cesar Tapia-Fonllem, Victor Corral-Verdugo & Blanca Fraijo-Sing

Authors
  1. Cesar Tapia-Fonllem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victor Corral-Verdugo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Blanca Fraijo-Sing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesar Tapia-Fonllem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Nantes, Nantes, France

    Ghozlane Fleury-Bahi

  2. Department of Social Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Enric Pol

  3. Faculty of Psychology, University of Nantes, Nantes, France

    Oscar Navarro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B. (2017). Sustainable Behavior and Quality of Life. In: Fleury-Bahi, G., Pol, E., Navarro, O. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31414-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31416-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation