Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dimensionen enger Beziehungen

  • Chapter
Sozialpsychologie der Partnerschaft

Zusammenfassung

Schon Sigmund Freud wusste, dass Liebe yod Arbeit die wichtigsten menschlichen Anliegen sind (vgl. McCrae & Costa, 1991). Wir beziehen unsere größten Befriedigungen und unsere größten Enttäuschungen aus diesen beiden Lebensbereichen. Allerdings findet sich zwischen ihnen ein deutlicher Unterschied: Der Berufsbereich wird von vorneherein eher als eine Last verstanden, während die Erfahrungen in Partnerschaften, die im Mittelpunkt dieses Beitrags stehen, als Quelle von Freude und Ausgleich angesehen werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. S., Waters, S. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2001). Evolutionäre Sozialpsychologie. In: Stroebe, W, Jonas, K. & Hewstone, M. (eds.). Sozialpsychologie (4th edn., pp. 25–51). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7,147–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 57,792–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff; H. W. & Grau, I. (1997). Dimensionen enger Beziehungen: Entwicklung von globalen Skalen zur Einschätzung von Beziehungseinstellungen. Diagnostica, 43,210–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H. W. & Grau, I. (1999). Romantische Beziehungen. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H. W. & Rohmann, E. (2000). Stability and change in romantic relationships. In: Heckhausen, J. (ed.). Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 325–337). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H. W, Grau, I. & Ludwig, A. (1993). Marburger Einstellungs-Inventar für Liebesstile (MEIL). Göttingen: Hogrefe

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969/1975). Bindung. Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35,19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion. Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., Ouelette, R., Powell, M. C. & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient's mood, relationship type and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53,94–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. & Enouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50,116–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E. & Verette, J. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6,389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C. & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,1198–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1993). The role of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61,6–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, I. (1999). Entwicklung von Kurzskalen zur Erfassung von Bindungsrepräsentationen in Paarbeziehungen. Zeitschrift für Différentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 20,142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, I. (2000). Was ist emotionale Nähe? Vortrag auf dem 42. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahlweg, K. (1979). Konstruktion und Validierung des Partnerschafts-Fragebogens PFB. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 8,17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahlweg, K., Klann, N. & Hank, G. (1992). Zur Erfassung der Ehequalität: Ein Vergleich der »Dyadic Adjustment Scale« (DAS) und des »Partnerschaftsfragebogens« PFB. Diagnostica, 38,312–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassebrauck, M. (1995). Kognitionen von Beziehungsqualität: Eine Prototypenanalyse. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26,160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E. (1984). The dangers of intimacy. In: Derlega, V. J. (ed.). Communication, intimacy, and close relationships (pp. 207–220). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, S. & Bierhoff, H. W. (1999). Zusammen und getrennt wohnende Paare: Unterschiede in grundlegenden Beziehungsdimensionen. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 11,59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, J. & Schulz, R. (1995). A lifespan theory of control. Psychological Review, 102,284–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (1991). Dimensions of love: sociobiological interpretation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10,206–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, A., Stöbel-Richter, Y. & Brähler, E. (2001). Der Partnerschaftsfragebogen (PFB): Normierung und soziodemographische Einflussgrößen auf die Partnerschaftsqualität. Diagnostica, 47,132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Angleitner, A. & Ostendorf, F. (1988). Lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2,171–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspective. In: Pervin, L. A. & John O. P. (eds.). Handbook of personality. Theory and research. (2nd edn., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. A. (1976). The colors of love. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1980). Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16,510–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2,3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17,227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In: Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (eds.). Handbook of personality. Theory and research. (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. & Schulze, E. (1989). Balancen des Glücks: neue Lebensformen: Paare ohne Trauschein, Alleinerziehende und Singles. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,97–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B.I. (1986). Paths to marriage. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. & Arriaga, X. B. (1997). Interdependence theory. In: Duck, S. (ed.). Handbook of personal relationships (2nd edn., pp. 221–250). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21,558–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., Wu, S. & Schwartz, J. C. (1992). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in emotion and its representation. In: Clark, M. S. (ed.). Emotion (pp. 175–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 59,971–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. L. (1980). The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation. The costs of pleasure and the benefits of pain. American Psychologist, 35,691–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93,119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell, B. B. (ed.). Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeifman, D. & Hazan, C. (1997). Attachment: The bond in pair-bonds. In: Simpson, J. A. & Kenrick, D. T. (eds.). Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 237–263). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arbeitseinheit Sozialpsychologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Fakultät für Psychologie, 44780, Bochum

    Hans-Werner Bierhoff (Prof. Dr.)

Authors
  1. Hans-Werner Bierhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Soziologie, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33501, Bielefeld, Deutschland

    Ina Grau

  2. Fakultät für Psychologie, Universität Bochum, GAFO 04/918, 44780, Bochum, Deutschland

    Hans-Werner Bierhoff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bierhoff, HW. (2003). Dimensionen enger Beziehungen. In: Grau, I., Bierhoff, HW. (eds) Sozialpsychologie der Partnerschaft. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55590-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55590-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62748-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55590-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation