Abstract
Regarding scientific research, value ladenness and the value-free ideal represent two poles. At the beginning of the twentieth century, the influential view was science as “value-free” (Wertfrei), whereas in the first decade of the twenty-first century the dominant perspective is science as “value-laden.” After considering the historical setting on values in science, the analysis here deals with the characteristics and relations between axiology of research and ethics of science. This involves taking into account the option in favor of holism of values and the alternative in terms of fractional orientations, either in “internal” terms or in “external” ones. Thus, the presence of values in basic science and in applied science is considered. After that, economics as a relevant case study is addressed through the distinction between positive economics and normative economics. There is also a coda with final remarks on the topics analyzed.
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
The designs in the sciences of the artificial take into account values, as can be seen in the case of the evaluative rationality regarding the ends of the designs, cf. [30].
- 4.
- 5.
The characteristics of Historismus can be found in W. Dilthey, cf. [20] pp. 109–137; especially, pp. 110–112 and 115–117.
- 6.
“The idea of truth as the fundamental regulative principle – the principle that guides our search – can be regarded as an ethical principle. The search for truth and the idea of approximation to the truth are also ethical principles; as are the ideas of intellectual integrity and of fallibility, which lead us to a self-critical attitude and to toleration” [67, p. 199]. On the truth as epistemic value and ethical value in Popper, see [59], pp. 282–293.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
This discussion on this issue is in [65].
- 11.
- 12.
However, following a pragmatic approach (sites, products, etc.), he does not see a clear distinction between “science” and “technology” (including “basic research” and technology), cf. [41] pp. 85–91, especially, p. 86.
- 13.
This can be seen in the case of scientific prediction: “Probably the most deeply held values concern predictions: they should be accurate; quantitative predictions are preferable to qualitative ones; whatever the margin of permissible error, it should be consistently satisfied in a given field; and so on” [46], p. 185.
- 14.
On the distinction between “applied science” and “application of science,” see [62], p. 9.
- 15.
According to Imre Lakatos, “Scientists, as citizens, have responsibility, like other citizens, to see that science is applied to the right social and political ends,” in [50], p. 258.
- 16.
Cf. [24], pp. 11–44; especially, pp. 22–26.
- 17.
- 18.
On this notion, see [73].
- 19.
This thematic realm is receiving an increasing attention. Cf. [8].
- 20.
The social consequences in this field are visible. See, for example, [40].
- 21.
- 22.
Cf. Rescher, N, Personal Communication, 27 Aug 1998. Cf. [24], p. 22.
- 23.
For Laudan, “epistemic values” (truth, falsity, …) can be distinguished from “cognitive values” (scope, generality, coherence, consilience, explanatory, …), cf. [52], p. 20.
- 24.
Rescher, N, Personal Communication, 27 Aug 1998.
- 25.
Cf. [51], pp. xi–xii, n. 2. The subtitle of his book is very clear: The Aims of Science and their Role in Scientific Debate. In his reticular model of scientific rationality, Laudan emphasizes that those values are good enough for the task: “Doubtless a wide range of cognitive goals or values can satisfy the demands laid down here” [51], p. 63.
- 26.
- 27.
There is usually a tension in the scientist between the defense of his or her autonomy and the need for responsibility, cf. [14].
- 28.
The constitutive elements of science are presented in [28], pp. 3–49; especially, pp. 10–11.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
This means that scientific progress is commonly modulated by an “economics of research.”
- 32.
Cf. [72], Chaps. 7, 8, and 9, pp. 151–203.
- 33.
- 34.
The concept of “neutrality” in science has been analyzed in [1], Chap. III.
- 35.
Rescher, N, Personal Communication, 27 Aug 1998.
- 36.
References
Agazzi E (1992) Il bene, il male e la scienza: Le dimensioni etiche dell'impresa scientifico-tecnologica. Rusconi, Milan
Agazzi E (1999) Valores éticos en la empresa científico-tecnológica: De la Ciencia como value-free al compromiso ético de la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Arbor 162(638):173–193
Agazzi E (1999) Límites éticos del quehacer científico y tecnológico. Arbor 162(637):241–263
Agazzi E, Minazzi F (eds) (2008) Science and ethics. The axiological contexts of science. P. Lang, Brussels
Alexandra A, Matthews S, Miller S (2002) Reasons, values and institutions. Tertiary Press, Croydon
Alexandra A, Miller S (2005) Common morality and “institutionalising” ethics. Australian J Prof Appl Ethics 7(1):24–33
Alexandra A (2009) “Ethical theory”, “common morality”, and professional obligations. Theor Med Bioeth 30(1):69–80
Audin R (2009) Business ethics and ethical business. Oxford University Press, New York
Bradley B (1998) Extrinsic value. Philos Stud 91:109–126
Brown C (2007) Two kinds of holism about values. Philos Q 57(228):456–463
Bruun HH (2007) Science, values and politics in Max Weber’s methodology, new expanded edition. Ashgate, Farnham, (1st edition 1972)
Ciaffa JA (1998) Max Weber and the problems of value-free social science: a critical examination of the Werturteilsstreit. Associated University Presses, New Jersey
Douglas HE (2000) Inductive risk and values in science. Philos Sci 67:559–579
Douglas HE (2003) The moral responsibilities of scientists: tensions between autonomy and responsibility. Am Philos Q 40(1):59–68
Douglas HE (ed) (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
Elliot KC (2011) Direct and indirect roles for values in science. Philos Sci 78(2):303–324
Floridi L (ed) (2010) The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Forge J (2009) Science is value-laden: you can count on that! Metascience 18(2):257–260
Fortner RS, Fackler M (eds) (2011) The handbook of global communication and media ethics. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden
Gonzalez WJ (1984) La interpretación historicista de las Ciencias Sociales. Anales de Filosofía 2:109–137
Gonzalez WJ (1994) Economic prediction and human activity. An analysis of prediction in economics from action theory. Epistemologia 17:253–294
Gonzalez WJ (1998) Prediction and prescription in economics: a philosophical and methodological approach. Theoria 13(32):321–345
Gonzalez WJ (1999) Ciencia y valores éticos: De la posibilidad de la Ética de la Ciencia al problema de la valoración ética de la Ciencia Básica. Arbor 162(637):139–171
Gonzalez WJ (1999) Racionalidad científica y actividad humana. Ciencia y valores en la Filosofía de N. Rescher. In: Rescher N Razón y valores en la Era científico-tecnológica. Paidós, Barcelona, pp 11–44
Gonzalez WJ (2001) De la Ciencia de la Economía a la Economía de la Ciencia: Marco conceptual de la reflexión metodológica y axiológica. In: Avila A, Gonzalez WJ, Marques G (eds) Ciencia económica y Economía de la Ciencia: Reflexiones filosófico-metodológicas. FCE, Madrid, pp 11–37
Gonzalez WJ (2003) Erklären-Verstehen to Prediction-Understanding: the methodological framework in economics. In: Sintonen M, Ylikoski P, Miller K (eds) Realism in action: essays in the philosophy of social sciences. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 33–50
Gonzalez WJ (2004) Las revoluciones científicas y la evolución de Thomas S. Kuhn. In: Gonzalez WJ (ed) Análisis de Thomas Kuhn: Las revoluciones científicas. Trotta, Madrid, pp 15–103
Gonzalez WJ (2005) The philosophical approach to science, technology and society. In: Gonzalez WJ (ed) Science, technology and society: a philosophical perspective. Netbiblo, A Coruña, pp 3–49
Gonzalez WJ (2006) Novelty and continuity in philosophy and methodology of science. In: Gonzalez WJ, Alcolea J (eds) Contemporary perspectives in philosophy and methodology of science. Netbiblo, A Coruña, pp 1–28
Gonzalez WJ (2008) Rationality and prediction in the sciences of the artificial: economics as a design science. In: Suppes P, Galavotti MC, Scazzieri R (eds) Reasoning, rationality and probability. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 165–186
Gonzalez WJ (2008) Economic values in the configuration of science. In: Agazzi E, Echeverría J, Gómez A (eds) Epistemology and the social, Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 85–112
Haddock A, Millar A, Pritchard D (eds) (2009) Epistemic value. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hausman DM, McPherson MS (1996) Economic analysis and moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hausman DM, McPherson MS (2006) Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (This is the second edition of the previous book. But it is an enlarge version – 93 pages more – and with an addition in the title – and Public Policy –, details that justified to list here in two entries.)
Hempel CG (1960) Science and human values. In: Spillar R (ed) Social control in a free society. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 39–64 (Reprinted in: Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. Free Press, New York, pp 81–96)
Himma KE, Tavani HT (eds) (2008) The handbook of information and computer ethics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Kagan S (1998) Rethinking intrinsic value. J Ethics 2(4):277–297
Kincaid H, Dupré J, Wyley A (eds) (2007) Value-free science: ideals and illusions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kitcher PH (1993) The advancement of science: science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford University Press, New York
Kitcher PH (1996) The lives to come: the genetic revolution and human possibilities. Simon and Schuster/Penguin, N. York/London (Reprinted with an important postscript in 1997)
Kitcher PH (2001) Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press, New York
Koertge N (1998) Science, values, and the value of science. Philos Sci 67(3):S45–S57
Koslowski P (ed) (2000) Contemporary economic ethics and business ethics. Springer, Dordrecht
Koslowski P (2001) Principles of ethical economy. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Kuhn ThS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. International Encyclopedia of unified science: foundations of the unity of science 2(2). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2nd edn., 1970).
Kuhn ThS (1970) Postscript – 1969. In: Kuhn ThS The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 174–210
Kuhn ThS (1973) Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. Lecture at the University of Furman, 30 Nov 1973; reprinted in: Kuhn ThS (1977) The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 320–339
Lacey H (2002) The ways in which the sciences are and are not value free. In: Gardenfors P, Kijania-Placek K, Wolenski J (eds) In the scope of logic, methodology, and philosophy of science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 513–526
Lacey H (2005) Is science value free?: Values and scientific understanding. Routledge, London, 1999; 2nd edn, Routledge, New York
Lakatos I (1970) The social responsibility of science, Paper delivered on 18 Feb 1970, and published in: Lakatos I (1978) Mathematics, science and epistemology (ed by Worrall J, Currie G) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 256–258
Laudan L (1984) Science and values: an essay on the aims of science and their role in scientific debate. University of California Press, Berkeley
Laudan L (2004) The epistemic, the cognitive, and the social. In: Machamer P, Wolters G (eds) Science, values, and objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press/Universitätsverlag, Pittsburgh/Konstanz, pp 14–23
Lekka-Kowalik A (2010) Why science cannot be value-free: understanding the rationality and responsibility of science. Sci Eng Ethics 16(1):33–41
Longino HE (1990) Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Machamer PK, Douglas H (1998) How values are in science. Crit Q 40(2):29–43
Machamer PK, Douglas H (1999) Cognitive and social values. Sci Educ 8:45–54
Machamer P, Wolters G (eds) (2004) Science, values, and objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press/Universitätsverlag, Pittsburgh/Konstanz
Martin JD, Petty JW, Wallace JS (eds) (2009) Value-based management with corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, New York
Martínez Solano JF (2005) El problema de la verdad en K. R. Popper: Reconstrucción histórico-sistemática. Netbiblo, A Coruña
McMullin E (1983) Values in science. In: Asquith PD, Nickles Th (eds) PSA 1982. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp 3–28
McNaugton D, Rawling P (2008) Holism about value. In: Lance MN, Potrč M, Strahovnik V (eds) Challenging moral particularism. Routledge, New York, pp 166–184
Niiniluoto I (1993) The aim and structure of applied research. Erkenntnis 38:1–21
Niiniluoto I (1995) Approximation in applied science. Poznan Stud Philos Sci Humanit 42:127–139
Niiniluoto I (1995) The emergence of scientific specialities: six models. Poznan Stud Philos Sci Humanit 44:211–223
Niiniluoto I (2009) Facts and values – a useful distinction. Acta Philos Fennica 86:109–133
Popper KR (1969) The moral responsibility of the scientist. Encounter 32(3):52–54 and 56–57. (Reprinted in: Popper, KR (1994) The myth of the framework. In defence of science and rationality. Routledge, London, pp 121–129)
Popper, KR (1982) Duldsamkeit und Intellektuelle Veranwortlichkeit. In: Stuhlmacher, P, Abramowski, L (eds) Toleranz. Atempto Verlag, Tubinga, pp 173–185. Reprinted as Duldsamkeit und intellektuelle Verantwortlichkeit (gestohlen von Xenophanes und von Voltaire). In: Popper, KR (1984) Auf der Suche nach einer besseren Welt. Piper, Munich, pp 213–230. English translation: Toleration and intellectual responsibility. In: Mendus, S, Edwards, D (eds) (1987) On toleration. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 17–34. Later published as Toleration and intellectual responsibility (Stolen from Xenophanes and Voltaire), in: Popper, KR (1992) In search of a better world. Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years. Routledge, London, pp 188–203
Pritchard D (2007) Recent work on epistemic value. Am Philos Q 44:85–110
Radnitzky G (1981) Wertfreiheitsthese: Wissenschaft, Ethik und Politik. In: Radnitzky G, Andersson G (eds) Voraussetzungen und Grenzen der Wissenschaft. Mohr, Tubingen, pp 47–126
Rescher N (1965) The ethical dimension of scientific research. In: Colodny RG (ed) Beyond the edge of certainty, Essays in contemporary science and philosophy. University Press of America, Lanham, MD, (reprinted in 1983), pp 261–276
Rescher N (1977) Values in science. Proceedings of the eight international conference on the unity of the sciences, (Washington, 1976), New York, Vol 2, pp 1023–1030
Rescher N (1999) Razón y valores en la Era científico-tecnológica, edited by WJ Gonzalez, Paidós, Barcelona
Rescher N (2003) Collective responsibility. In: Rescher N (ed) Sensible decisions. Issues of rational decision in personal choice and public policy. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp 125–138
Rescher N (1993) A system of pragmatic idealism, vol II: The validity of values: human values in pragmatic perspective, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Rescher N (2004) Value matters: studies in axiology. Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt
Rescher N (2006) Studies in value theory. Collected papers, vol 8. Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt
Resnik DB (1998) The ethics of science. Routledge, London
Schumpeter J (1949) Science and ideology. American economic review 39. Reprinted in: Hausman D (ed) (2008) The philosophy of economics, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 207–221
Sen A (1986) Prediction and economic theory. In: Mason J, Mathias P, Westcott JH (eds) Predictability in science and society. The Royal Society/The British Academy, London, pp 3–23
Sintonen M (1990) Basic and applied sciences – can the distinction (still) be drawn? Sci Stud 3(2):23–31
Solow R (1971) Science and ideology in economics. Public Interest 21:94–107
Todt O, Rodríguez Alcázar J, Luján JL (2010) Practical values and uncertainty in regulatory decision-making. Soc Epistemol 24(4):349–362
Weber M (1904) Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In: Weber M (1968) Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 3rd edn., foreword by Johannes Winckelmann J. C. B. Mohr-Paul Siebeck, Tübingen, (1st edn., J. C. B. Mohr, Tubinga, 1922), pp 146–214. Translated and edited by Shils EA, Finch HA: “Objectivity” in Social science and social policy, in: Weber M (1949) The methodology of the social sciences. The Free Press, New York, pp 50–112
Weber M (1917) Der Sinn der ‘Wertfreiheit’ der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften. In: Weber M Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 3rd edn., foreword by Johannes Winckelmann J. C. B. Mohr-Paul Siebeck, Tübingen, 1968 (1st edn., J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1922), pp 489–540. Translated and edited by Shils EA, Finch HA: The meaning of ‘ethical neutrality’ in Sociology and economics, in: Weber M (1949) The methodology of the social sciences. The Free Press, New York, pp 1–47
Worrall J (2006) Why randomize? Evidence and ethics in clinical trials. In: Gonzalez WJ, Alcolea J (eds) Contemporary perspectives in philosophy and methodology of science. Netbiblo, A Coruña, pp 65–82
Worrall J (2007) Why there’s no cause to randomize. Brit J Philos Sci 58(3):451–488
Wusterhube A, Quante M (eds) (1998) Pragmatic idealism: critical essays on Nicholas Rescher’s system of pragmatic idealism. Rodopi, Amsterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gonzalez, W.J. (2013). Value Ladenness and the Value-Free Ideal in Scientific Research. In: Luetge, C. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_78
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1493-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1494-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law