Skip to main content

Ordinal Conditional Functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States

  • Chapter
Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 42))

Abstract

Many of the philosophically most interesting notions are overtly or covertly epistemological. Overtly epistemological notions are, of course, the concept of belief itself, the concept of subjective probability, and, presumably the most important, the concept of a reason in the sense of a theoretical reason for believing something. Covertly epistemological notions are much more difficult to understand; maybe, they are not epistemological at all. However, a very promising strategy for understanding them is to try to conceive of them as covertly epistemological. One such notion is the concept of objective probability;1 the concept of explanation is another. A third, very important one is the notion of causation, which has been epistemologically problematic ever since Hume. Finally, there is the notion of truth. Many philosophers believe that there is much to be said for a coherence theory of truth or internal realism; they hold some version of the claim that something for which it is impossible to get a true reason cannot be true, and that truth is therefore covertly epistemological.

Many have helped. I am very much indebted: first to Godehard Link for spending a Christmas vacation making various helpful remarks and suggestions; to Wolfgang Stegmüller and Max Drömmer for fruitful discussion; to Kurt Weichselberger for decisive help in Section 7; to Brian Skyrms and Bill Harper for giving me the opportunity to present this paper at their conference; to Peter Gärdenfors for further fruitful discussion; to Isaac Levi for some enlightening controversies and for drawing my attention to the work of Shackle; not last and not least to Joe Lambert for carefully going through the whole stuff with me twice more and almost forgetting dinner about it; to Jeremy Adler for being so kind to descend from investigating Goethe’s German to correcting and improving my English; and finally to the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin for giving me the leisure for preparing the final version of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ellis, B. (1979) Rational Belief Systems, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. C. (1976) ‘Representation of conditional probabilities’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5, 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (1979) ‘Conditionals and changes of belief’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 30, 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (1981) ‘An epistemic approach to conditionals’, American Philosophical Quarterly 18, 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (1984) ‘Epistemic importance and minimal changes of belief’, Australian Journal of Philosophy 62, 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, W. L. (1976) ‘Rational belief change, Popper functions and counterfactuals’, in W. L. Harper, C. A. Hooker (eds.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, vol. I, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 73–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R. C. (1965) The Logic of Decision, Chicago, University Press (2nd ed. 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaua, D. (1969) Allgemeine Mengenlehre, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I. (1980) ‘Potential surprise: Its role in inference and decision-making’, in L. J. Cohen and M. Hesse (eds.), Applications of Inductive Logic, Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I. (1983) ‘Truth, fallibility, and the growth of knowledge’, in R. S. Cohen, M. W. Wartofsky (eds.), Language, Logic, and Method, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1973) Counterfactuals, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1980) ‘A subjectivisms guide to objective chance’, in R. C. Jeffrey (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, vol. II, Berkeley, University Press, pp. 263–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nute, D. (1980) Topics in Conditional Logic, Dordrecht, Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. L. (1976) Subjunctive Reasoning, Dordrecht, Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1969) Decision, Order, and Time in Human Affairs, Cambridge, University Press, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (1983) ‘Three ways to give a probability assignment a memory’, in J. Earman (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. X, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W. (1980) ‘Stochastic independence, causal independence, and shieldability’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 9, 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W. (1983) ‘Deterministic and probabilistic reasons and causes’, Erkenntnis 19, 371–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W. (1986) ‘The representation of Popper measures’, Topoi 5, 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spohn, W. (1988). Ordinal Conditional Functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States. In: Harper, W.L., Skyrms, B. (eds) Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2865-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2865-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7789-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2865-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics