Skip to main content

Subjacency in a Principle-Based Parser

  • Chapter
Principle-Based Parsing

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 44))

Abstract

Recent wide-spread shifts in the conception of grammar from a system of rules to a system of constraints on representation has raised the possibility that a similar refocusing might also be appropriate with respect to performance and in particular natural language processing. This chapter explores certain empirical and theoretical issues relevant to principle-based approaches to parsing with special attention to the processing of long-distance dependencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, S.: 1987, The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute sof Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abney, S.: 1988, ‘On the Notion GB-parser and Psychological Reality’, in S. Abney (ed.), The MIT Parsing Volume, 1987–1988, Center for Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J.: 1979, Generalized Binding, Foris, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C.: 1970, ‘Notes on the Description of the English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme’, Foundations of Language 6, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R.: 1988 Principle-Based Parsing and Parsing Efficiency, paper presented at the University of Maryland Conference on Grammar and Language Processing, University of Maryland and College Park, College Park, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R.: 1987, 1991 forthcoming, ‘Principle-Based Parsing’, in P. Sells, S. Shieber, and T. Wasow (eds.), Foundational Issues in Natural Language Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Also MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Technical Report 972, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R. and A. Weinberg: 1984, The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bever, T. and B. McElree: 1988, ‘Empty Categories Access Their Antecedents During Comprehension’, Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. and M. Tanenhaus: 1988, ‘Thematic Roles and Language Comprehension’, in W. Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relations, Academic Press, New York, pp. 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1988, ‘Linguistics and Adjacent Fields: the State of the Art’, unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1973, ‘Conditions on Transformations’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparksy (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 232–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1977, ‘On Wh-Movement’, in P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures, Foris, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1982, Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986a, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986b, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S.: forthcoming, ‘Sentential Subjects and Proper Government in Chamorro’, in C. Georgeopolous and R. Ishihara (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S. Y. Kuroda, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E.: 1983, ‘Parasitic Gaps’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, R., J. Huang, H. Lasnik, and T. Reinhart: 1988, ‘The Syntax of Wh-in-situ’, Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford, California, pp. 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.D.: 1978, ‘Parsing Strategies and Constraints on Transformations’, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 427–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.D.: 1983, ‘Phrase Structure Parsing and the Island Constraints’, Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 163–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.D.: 1984, ‘Constraints on Gaps: Is the Parser a Significant Influence’, in B. Butterword, B. Comrie, and O. Dahl (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals, Mouton, Cambridge, England, pp. 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.D.: 1985, ‘Deterministic Parsing and Subjacency’, Language and Cognitive Processes 1, pp. 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. and K. Rayner: 1982, ‘Making and Correcting Errors During Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences’, Cognitive Psychology 14, 178–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson T.: 1988, ‘Subjacency and the Minimality Condition’, Proceedings of the New England Linguistic Society 19, pp. 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.: this volume, ‘Deductive Parsing: the Use of Knowledge of Language’, pp. 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and A. Zaenen: 1989, ‘Long-Distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure, and Functional Uncertainty’, in M. Baltin and A. Kroch (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, S. and K. Takami: 1990, ‘Remarks on Barriers’, unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R.: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H. and M. Saito: 1984, ‘On the Nature of Proper Government’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H. and M. Saito: 1990, ‘Move-α’, unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, D. and A. Weinberg: 1988, ‘Review of Chomsky’s Barriers’, Language 64, 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, M.: 1980, A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B. and T. Bever: 1989, ‘The Psychological Reality of Linguistically Defined Gaps’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J. and D. Swinney: 1989, ‘The Role of Structure in Coreference Assignment During Comprehension’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, T.: 1986, Quantification in Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D.: 1982, Paths and Categories, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D.: 1987, ‘Wh-in-Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 98–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, B.: 1987, Garden Path Phenomena and the Grammatical Basis of Language Processing, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (forthcoming University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, B.: 1988a, ‘Garden Path Phenomena and the Grammatical Basis of Language Processing’, Language 64, 539–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, B.: 1988b, ‘Processing Double Object Constructions’, paper presented at the University of Maryland Conference on Grammar and Language Processing, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, B.: 1989, ‘Island Violations Are Garden Paths’, paper presented at the Ottawa Psycholinguistics of Island Constraints Conference, Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1982, Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.: 1967, Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts (also published 1986 as Infinite Syntax!, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1988, ‘Conditions on Silent Categories’, unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, L.: 1984, Models of Gap-Location in the Human Language Processor, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: 1989, ‘Subjects, Specifiers, and \( \bar{X} \) Theory’s, in M. Baltin and A. Kroch (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 232–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraldsen, K.: 1981, ‘The Theoretical Interpretation of a Class of Marked Extractions’, in A. Beletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.), The Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy, pp. 475–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrli, E.: 1988, ‘Parsing with a GB-Grammar’, in U. Reyle and C. Rohrer (eds.), Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 177–201.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A.: 1988, Locality Principles in Syntax and Parsing, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, J.: 1987, ‘Configurationality Parameters’, in T. Imai and M. Saito (eds.), Issues in Japanese Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pritchett, B.L. (1991). Subjacency in a Principle-Based Parser. In: Berwick, R.C., Abney, S.P., Tenny, C. (eds) Principle-Based Parsing. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3474-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3474-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-1637-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3474-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics