Skip to main content

Nature-Inspired Metaheuristics Search Algorithms for Solving the Economic Load Dispatch Problem of Power System: A Comparison Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Nature-Inspired Computing: Algorithms and Case Studies

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing ((STNIC))

Abstract

This work proposes a new approach in addressing Economic Load Dispatch (ELD) optimization problem in power unit systems using nature-inspired metaheuristics search algorithms. Solving such a problem requires a degree of maximization of the economic pact of a power network system, where this is possible with some existing population-based metaheuristic search algorithms. The key issue to be handled here is how to maximize the economic benevolence of a power network under a variety of operational constraints, taking into account the reduction in the generated fuel cost as well as the aggregate power loss in the transmission power network system. Some nature-inspired metaheuristics will be explored. Meanwhile, we shall focus our attention on a newly developed nature-inspired search algorithm, referred to as the Crow Search Algorithm or CSA for short, as well as the Differential Evolution (DE) that is commonly known as a metaheuristic. The CSA emerged to light by simulating the intelligent flocking behavior of crows. The practicability of the proposed approach-based CSA was conducted to common types of power generators, including three and six buses (nodes) in addition to the IEEE 30-bus standard system. The results of the presented approaches were compared to other results developed using existing nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms like particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms and also compared to traditional approaches such as quadratic programming method. The results reported here support that CSA has achieved an outstanding performance in solving the problem of ELD in power systems, demonstrating their good optimization capabilities through arriving at a combination of power loads that consummate the constraints of the ELD problem while simultaneously lessening the entire fuel cost. The experimental results also showed that the CSA solutions were capable of maximizing the reliability of the power supplied to the customers, and also reducing both the generated power cost and the loss of power in the transmission power systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afful-Dadzie, A., Afful-Dadzie, E., Awudu, I., & Banuro, J. K. (2017). Power generation capacity planning under budget constraint in developing countries. Applied Energy, 188, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aristidis, V. (2006). An ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm solution to economic load dispatch (ELD) problem. In Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on Systems, ICS’06 (pp. 153–160). Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA: WSEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Askarzadeh, A. (2016). A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm. Computers & Structures, 169, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergen, A. R. (1986). Power systems analysis. Prentice-Hall series in electrical and computer engineering. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharya, A., & Chattopadhyay, P. K. (2010). Solving complex economic load dispatch problems using biogeography-based optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 3605–3615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharya, A., & Chattopadhyay, P. K. (2011). Solving economic emission load dispatch problems using hybrid differential evolution. Applied Soft Computing, 11(2), 2526–2537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Braik, M., & Sheta, A. (2011). Exploration of genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization in improving the quality of medical images.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chakraborty, P., Roy, G. G., Panigrahi, B. K., Bansal, R. C., & Mohapatra, A. (2012). Dynamic economic dispatch using harmony search algorithm with modified differential mutation operator. Electrical Engineering, 94(4), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, P. H., & Chang, H. C. (1995). Large-scale economic dispatch by genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10, 1919–1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Das, S., Abraham, A., & Konar, A. (2008). Particle swarm optimization and differential evolution algorithms: Technical analysis, applications and hybridization perspectives. In Advances of computational intelligence in industrial systems (pp. 1–38). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dewangan, S. K., Jain, A., & Huddar, A. P. (2010). Comparison of particle swarm optimization with lambda iteration method to solve the economic load dispatch problem. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 4(4), 1900–1907.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dubey, H. M., Panigrahi, B. K., & Pandit, M. (2014). Bio-inspired optimisation for economic load dispatch: A review. IJBIC, 6(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Faris, H., Aljarah, I., et al. (2015). Optimizing feedforward neural networks using Krill Herd algorithm for e-mail spam detection. In 2015 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Faris, H., Mafarja, M. M., Heidari, A. A., Aljarah, I., AlaM, A. Z., Mirjalili, S., et al. (2018). An efficient binary salp swarm algorithm with crossover scheme for feature selection problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 154, 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faris, H., & Sheta, A. F. (2016). A comparison between parametric and non-parametric soft computing approaches to model the temperature of a metal cutting tool. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(1), 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Faris, H., Sheta, A. F., & Öznergiz, E. (2016). MGP-CC: A hybrid multigene GP-Cuckoo search method for hot rolling manufacture process modelling. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 4(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaing, Z. L. (2003). Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18, 1187–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghatasheh, N., Faris, H., Aljarah, I., & Al-Sayyed, R. M. (2015). Optimizing software effort estimation models using firefly algorithm. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 8(03), 133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardiansyah, Junaidi, & Yohannes, M. S. (2012). Solving economic load dispatch problem using particle swarm optimization technique. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 12, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Jabr, R. A., Coonick, A. H., & Cory, B. J. (2000). A homogeneous linear programming algorithm for the security constrained economic dispatch problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(3), 930–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirchmayer, L. (1979). Economic operation of power systems (1st ed.). New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuo, C. C. (2008). A novel coding scheme for practical economic dispatch by modified particle swarm approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 23, 1825–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lazzerini, B., & Pistolesi, F. (2015). A linear programming-driven MCDM approach for multi-objective economic dispatch in smart grids. In 2015 SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) (pp. 475–484).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, K. Y., Sode-Yome, A., & Park, J. H. (1998). Adaptive hopfield neural networks for economic load dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13(2), 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin, W. M., Cheng, F. S., & Tsay, M. T. (2002). An improved tabu search for economic dispatch with multiple minima. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17(1), 108–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lowery, P. (1966). Generating unit commitment by dynamic programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 5, 422–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirjalili, S., Gandomi, A. H., Mirjalili, S. Z., Saremi, S., Faris, H., & Mirjalili, S. M. (2017). Salp swarm algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Advances in Engineering Software, 114, 163–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen, T. T., & Vo, D. N. (2015). The application of one rank cuckoo search algorithm for solving economic load dispatch problems. Applied Soft Computing, 37(C), 763–773.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Noman, N., & Iba, H. (2008). Differential evolution for economic load dispatch problems. Electric Power Systems Research, 78(8), 1322–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Orero, S., & Irving, M. (1996). Economic dispatch of generators with prohibited operating zones: A genetic algorithm approach. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 143(6), 529–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Osman, I., & Kelly, J. (1996). Meta-heuristics: Theory and applications.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Poli, R., Kennedy, J., & Blackwell, T. (2007). Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intelligence, 1(1), 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rahmani, R., Othman, M. F., Yusof, R., & Khalid, M. (2012). Solving economic dispatch problem using particle swarm optimization by an evolutionary technique for initializing particles. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 46(2), 526–536.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rashaideh, H., Sawaie, A., Al-Betar, M. A., Abualigah, L. M., Al-Laham, M. M., Raed, M., et al. (2018). A grey wolf optimizer for text document clustering. Journal of Intelligent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rayapudi, S. R. (2011). An intelligent water drop algorithm for solving economic load dispatch problem. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 5(2), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Reid, G. F., & Hasdorff, L. (1973). Economic dispatch using quadratic programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-92(6), 2015–2023.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Saadat, H. (2008). Power system analysis. McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sahoo, S., Dash, K. M., Prusty, R., & Barisal, A. (2015). Comparative analysis of optimal load dispatch through evolutionary algorithms. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6(1), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sen, D., & Acharjee, P. (2016). Hybridization of cuckoo search algorithm and chemical reaction optimization for economic load dispatch problem. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE) (pp. 798–804).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sheta, A., Braik, M. S., & Aljahdali, S. (2012). Genetic algorithms: A tool for image segmentation. In 2012 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS) (pp. 84–90). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sheta, A. F., Faris, H., & Aljarah, I. (2018). Estimating ARMA model parameters of an industrial process using meta-heuristic search algorithms. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.10), 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Storn, R., & Price, K. (1995). Differential evolution-a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces [r]. Berkeley: ICSI.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution: A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Surekha, P., & Sumathi, D. S. (2012). Solving economic load dispatch problems using differential evolution with opposition based learning. WSEAS Transactions On Information Science And Applications (1).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vesterstrom, J., & Thomsen, R. (2004). A comparative study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2, 1980–1987.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wadhwa, C. (2006). Electrical power systems. New Age International.

    Google Scholar 

  48. WKennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. C. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ, USA (pp. 1942–1948).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wood, A. J., & Wollenberg, B. F. (2010). Power generation operation and control (2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wood, A. J., & Wollenberg, B. F. (2012). Power generation, operation, and control. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yang, X. S. (2008). Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zaharie, D. (2007). A comparative analysis of crossover variants in differential evolution. In Proceedings of IMCSIT (pp. 171–181).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossam Faris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sheta, A., Faris, H., Braik, M., Mirjalili, S. (2020). Nature-Inspired Metaheuristics Search Algorithms for Solving the Economic Load Dispatch Problem of Power System: A Comparison Study. In: Dey, N., Ashour, A., Bhattacharyya, S. (eds) Applied Nature-Inspired Computing: Algorithms and Case Studies. Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9263-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics