Skip to main content

Innovative User Experience Design and Customer Engagement Approaches for Residential Demand Response Programs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainability in Energy and Buildings

Abstract

The increasing share of intermittent sources is making it more difficult to guarantee a real-time balance between demand and supply on the electricity grid. To decrease the dependency from fossil fuel generation, a change in paradigm is required: from supply following demand whenever it occurs to demand following generation when it is available. Demand response (DR) programs enclose all practices that allow demand to take part in actively managing the grid. According to this perspective, the residential sector hides a huge still unexploited flexibility resource. Therefore, utilities and aggregators need to address weak customer engagement and a lack of regulation in order to employ innovative business models for harnessing residential DR programs potential. Within this paper, some of these challenges are investigated, with the view to improve the design of an appropriate engagement strategy and an incentive scheme to involve residential customers. The innovation consists in the development of a questionnaire as a tool to understand customers’ behavior and preferences, so as to consequently design customized solutions. Finally, a first-order approximation techno-economic analysis is conducted to contextualize the actual incentives for the single customer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

DCE:

Discrete choice experiment

DESWH:

Domestic electric storage water heater

DR:

Demand response

DUoS:

Distribution use of system

FFR:

Firm frequency response

STOR:

Short-term operating reserve

TNUoS:

Transmission network use of system

WTP:

Willingness to pay

References

  1. Crosbie, T., Broderick, J., Short, M., Charlesworth, R., Dawood, M.: Demand response technology readiness levels for energy management in blocks of buildings. Buildings 8(2), 13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albadi, M.H., El-Saadany, E.F.: A summary of demand response in electricity markets. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 78(11), 1989–1996 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. IEA: The Power to Choose: Demand Response in Liberalised Electricity Markets. OECD Publishing (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eid, C.: Demand response in Europe’s electricity sector: market barriers and outstanding issues. INIS 48(8), INIS-FR—170-0182 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parrish, B., Heptonstall, P., Gross, R.: The potential for UK residential demand side participation. HubNet, Tech. Rep. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hledik, R., Gorman, W., Irwin, N., Fell, M., Nicolson, M., Huebner, G.: The value of TOU tariffs in Great Britain: insights for decision makers. Citizen Advice, Final Report 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chase, A., Gross, R., Heptonstall, P., Jansen, M., Kenefick, M., Parrish, B., Robson, P.: Realising the potential of demand-side response to 2025: A focus on small energy users. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (UK), Sum. Report (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carmichael, R., Gross, R., Rhodes, A.: Unlocking the potential of residential electricity consumer engagement with demand response. Energy Futures Lab (Imperial College London), Briefing Paper (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mangham-Jefferies, L., Hanson, K., Mcpake, B.: How to Do (or Not to Do) … Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan. 24(2), 151–158 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pentland, A.: Social Physics: How Social Networks Can Make Us Smarter. Penguin Publishing Group (Kindle version), New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bottero, M., Cozza, G., Fontana, R., Monaco, R.: Choice experiments: an application for the corona verde landscape in Turin (Italy). In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10406, pp. 532–546. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Haab, T.C., McConnell, K.E.: Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Frontier Economic, LCP, Sustainability First: Future potential for SDR in GB (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKenna, E., Thomson, M.: High-resolution stochastic integrated thermal–electrical domestic demand model. Appl. Energy 165, 445–461 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carmichael, R., Schofield, J., Woolf, M., Bilton, M., Ozaki, R., Strbac, G.: Residential consumer attitudes to time-varying pricing. “Low Carbon London” LCNF project (Imperial College London), Tech. Rep. A2 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. KEMA: 2005 Smart Thermostat Program Impact Evaluation prepared for San Diego Gas and Electric Company, California, US (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parrish, B., Heptonstall, P., Gross, R.: How Much Can We Really Expect from Smart Consumers?. HubNet, Position Paper (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wegner, M.S., Hall, S., Hardy, J., Workman, M.: Valuing energy futures; a comparative analysis of value pools across UK energy system scenarios. Appl. Energy 206, 815–828 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong, J., Kelly, N.J., Richardson, I., Thomson, M.: Assessing heat pumps as flexible load. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy 227(1), 30–42 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pagliuca, S., Lampropoulos, I., Bonicolini, M., Rawn, B., Gibescu, M., Kling, W.L.: Capacity assessment of residential demand response mechanisms. In: 46th International Universities’ Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), pp. 1–6, Soest, Germany (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. UK Power Networks: Industrial and Commercial Demand Response for Outage Management and as an Alternative to Network Reinforcement. “Low Carbon London” LCNF project, Tech. Rep. A4 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., Louviere, J.: Stated preferences approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 80(1), 64–75 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Barsanti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Barsanti, M. et al. (2020). Innovative User Experience Design and Customer Engagement Approaches for Residential Demand Response Programs. In: Littlewood, J., Howlett, R., Capozzoli, A., Jain, L. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 163. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_52

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics