Conclusion
What stands in the way of inquiry to help communities clarify and secure theircommon interests? The problem is not the theories and procedures available,as many scholars presume. The framework presented in Jurisprudence for aFree Society is quite adequate even if it is provisional. The problem is professionalism(Torgerson, 1985), or more precisely, the decline of professionalismas it was understood in the Law, Science, and Policy seminar over severaldecades. As McDougal recalls in the Preface:
A profession, we insisted, is best regarded as a group with both a specialskill and a sense of responsibility for the consequences upon the communityof the exercise of that skill. The special skill of the lawyer is in the managementof authority and control in the making of decisions, and the genuineprofessional must seek to synthesize all relevant knowledge and pro-cedures toward decisions that serve common interests' (p. xxiii; emphasisadded).
The decline of professionalism is all around us. It reflects and reinforces thesame specializing and fragmenting factors that call into question the sustainabilityof late modem or post-modern society. The question for this generationof policy scientists is whether the policy sciences, subject to the samepressures as other skill groups, can maintain the professional standards exemplifiedby Lasswell and McDougal and stay the course they have set in Jurisprudencefor a Free Society.
References
Amsterdamska, O. (1994). “Editorial,” Science, Technology and Human Values 19: 3–4.
Anon. (1992). ‘Whistleblower prize for O'Toole,’ Science 257 (July 3): 27.
Boulding, K. E. (1961). The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Brunner, R. D. (1991). ‘The policy movement as a policy problem,’ Policy Sciences 24:65–98.
Brunner, R. D. (1994). ‘Myth and American politics,’ Policy Sciences 27:1–18.
Brunner, R. D. and W. Ascher (1993). ‘Science and social responsibility,’ Policy Sciences 25: 295–331.
deLeon, P. (1994). ‘Reinventing the policy sciences: Three steps back to the future,’ Policy Sciences 27: 77–95.
Dahl, R. A. (1970). After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1994). The New American Political (Dis)order. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press, University of California.
Day, D. D. (1995). ‘Paradigm lost,’ Space Policy 11:153–159.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York: Harper Business.
Falk, R. A. (1995). ‘Casting the spell: The New Haven School of international law,’ Yale Law Journal 104: 1991–2008.
Fischhoff, B., S. R. Watson and C. Hope (1984). ‘Defining risk,’ Policy Sciences 17: 123–139.
Holling, C. S. (1995). ‘What barriers? What bridges?’ in L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling and S. S. Light, eds., Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3–34.
Kronman, A. T. (1995). Letter to the editor, New York Times. (September 28): A12.
Lasswell, H. D. (1943a). Memorandum: Personal policy objectives (October 1). Archived at Sterling Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Lasswell, H. D. (1943b). Proposal: The Institute of Policy Sciences (October 1). Archived at Sterling Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Lasswell, H. D. (1966). ‘The world revolution of our time: A framework for basic policy research,’ in H. D. Lasswell and D. Lerner, eds., World Revolutionary Elites: Studies in Coercive Ideological Movements. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, pp. 29–96.
Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: Elsevier.
Lasswell, H. D. and McDougal (1943). ‘Legal education and public policy: Professional training in the public interest,’ Yale Law Journal 52: 203–295.
Levi, E. H. (1948). An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lippmann, W. (1965). Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.
Mayer, M. (1990). The Greatest-Ever Bank Robbery: The Collapse of the Savings and Loan Industry. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Meyerson, H. (1995). ‘Space exploration policy: Toward an operational vision,’ Space Policy 11: 161–170.
Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Peirce, N. R. and R. Guskind (1993). Breakthroughs: Recreating the American City. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
Perry, W. A. (1985). ‘Different worlds in the same classroom: Students' evolution in their vision of knowledge and their expectations of teachers,’ On Teaching and Learning (May): 3-17.
Rappaport, R. A. (1979). ‘On cognized models,’ in his Ecology, Meaning, and Religion. Richmond, CA: North Atlantic Books, pp. 97–144.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Mature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schön, D. A. and M. Rein (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Simon, H. A. (1957). ‘Rationality and administrative decision making,’ in his Models of Man. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 196–206.
Simon, H. A. (1985). ‘Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science,’ American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.
Slovic, P. (1993). ‘Perceived risk, trust, and democracy,’ Risk Analysis 13: 675–682.
Smith, H. (1995) Rethinking America. New York: Random House.
Stanley, T. R., Jr. (1995). ‘Ecosystem management and the arrogance of humanism,’ Conservation Biology 9: 255–262.
Torgerson, D. (1985). ‘Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell,’ Policy Sciences 18: 241–261.
Torgerson, D. (1992). ‘Priest and Jester in the policy sciences: Developing the focus of inquiry,’ Policy Sciences 25:225–235.
Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brunner, R.D. A milestone in the policy sciences. Policy Sci 29, 45–68 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141479
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141479