Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Traces of agreement: On the DOT-product as a coefficient of agreement

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brennan, R.L. and Light, R.J. (1974). “Measuring agreement when two observers classify people into categories not defined in advance”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 27: 154–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifi, A. (1981) Nonlinear Multivariate analysis. Leyden: Department of Data Theory of the Faculty of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, L.J. (1977). “Nominal scale response agreement as a generalized correlation”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 30: 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. and Barton, A.H. (1955). “Some general principles of questionaire classification”, pp. 83–93 in P.F.Lazarsfeld and M.Rosenberg, eds., The Language of Social Research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klastorin, T.D. (1980). “Merging groups to maximize object partition comparison”, Psychometrika 45: 425–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroonenberg, P.M. and Verbeek, A. (1980). “Exact distributions of chi-square-tests in contingency tables with small numbers”, WEP reeks 80-18-EX, Vakgroep Wijsgerige en Empirische Pedagogiek. University of Leyden (Poster session at the 4th COMPSTAT Symposium, Edinburgh, August 1980).

  • Mokken, R.J. (1971). A theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis, with Applications in Political Research. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgommery, A.C. and Crittenden, K.S. (1977). “Improving coding reliability for open-ended questions”, Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popping, R. (1980). Notitite met Betrekking tot Overeenstemming bij het Analyseren van Open Vragen. (Note on Agreement when Analyzing Open-Ended Questions). Bull. No. 39, Vakgroep Methoden end Technieken, Department of Sociology, Groningen.

  • Theil, H. (1970). “On the estimation of relationships involving qualitative variables”, American Journal of Sociology 76: 103–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, W.I. (1969). Nonlinear Programming. A Unified Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, Germany

    Roel Popping

Authors
  1. Roel Popping
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popping, R. Traces of agreement: On the DOT-product as a coefficient of agreement. Qual Quant 17, 1–18 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180886

Search

Navigation