Skip to main content
Log in

Adult-equivalence scales and the economic implementation of interpersonal comparisons of well-being

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Equivalence Scale Exactness (ESE) or Independence of Base (IB), a condition on household preferences and interpersonal comparisons, makes adult-equivalence scales independent of utility levels. ESE is characterized by Income-Ratio Comparability (IRC) which assumes that utility equality is preserved by income scaling. If ESE/IRC is a maintained hypothesis, equivalence scales can be estimated from behaviour alone if preferences are not piglog. This condition is not met by a family of translog expenditure functions or by the Almost Ideal Demand System. A translog expenditure function can be used for the ‘reference’ household, however, together with an independent specification of the equivalence scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barten A (1964) Family composition, prices, and expenditure patterns. In: Hart P, Mills G, Whittaker J (eds.) Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning: 16th Symposium of the Calston Society. Butterworth, London, pp 277–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Donalsdson D (1987) Welfare ratios and distributionally sensitive cost-benefit analysis. J Publ Econ 34: 265–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1988) Money metric utility: a harmless normalization? J Publ Econ 46: 120–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1991a) Adult-equivalence scales, interpersonal comparisons of well-being, and applied welfare economics. In: Elster J, Roemer J (eds.) Interpersonal Comparisons and Distributive Justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 164–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1991b) Measuring the cost of children: a theoretical framework. Discussion Paper no. 91–40, University of British Columbia (forthcoming In: Blundell R (ed.) The Measurement of Household Welfare. Oxford University Press, Oxford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1993) Household equivalence scales and welfare comparisons: a comment. J Publ Econ 50: 143–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Donaldson D, Weymark J (1984) Social choice with interpersonal utility comparisons: a diagrammatic introduction. Int Econ Rev 25: 327–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Lewbel A (1991) The information content of equivalence scales. J Econometrics 50: 49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning M (1988) The effects of household characteristics on behaviour and welfare, mimeo, Department of Economics, McMaster University

  • Browning M (1992) Children and household economic behaviour. J Econ Literat 30: 1434–1475

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori P (1992) Collective labour supply and welfare. J Pol Econ 100: 437–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A, Muellbauer J (1989) Economics and Consumer behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens R, Fry V, Pashardes P (1992) Non-linearities, aggregation and equivalence scales, mimeo, Institute for Fiscal Policy, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn W (1978) Functional Equations in Economics. Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman WM (1976) Tricks with utility functions. In: Artis M, Nobay R (eds.) Essays in Economic Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 211–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunau R (1988) Consumption technology and the intrafamily distribution of resources: adult equivalence scales reexamined. J Pol Econ 96: 1183–1205

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson D (1990) Aggregate consumer behaviour and the measurement of social welfare. Econometrica 58: 1007–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson D, Lau L, Stoker T (1980) Welfare comparison under exact aggregation. Am Econ Rev 80: 268–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson D, Lau L, Stoker T (1992) The transcendental logarithmic model of aggregate consumer behaviour. In: Basmann R, Rhodes G, Jr (eds.) Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 161–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson D, Slesnick D (1983) Individual and social cost of living indexes. In: Diewert WE, Montmarquette C (eds.) Price Level Measurement. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, pp 241–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson D, Slesnick D (1984a) Aggregate consumer behaviour and the measurement of inequality. Rev Econ Stud 51: 369–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson D, Slesnick D (1984b) Inequality in the distribution of individual welfare. In: Basmann R, Rhodes G, Jr (eds.) Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 3. JAI Press, Greewich, pp 67–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson D, Slesnick D (1987) Aggregate consumer behaviour and household equivalence scales. J Business Econ Stat 5: 219–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwong S (1985) Price-Sensitive Inequality Measurement. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia

  • Lau L (1982) A note on the fundamental theorem of exact aggregation. Econ Lett 9: 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewbel A (1989) Household equivalence scales and welfare comparisons. J Publ Econ 39: 377–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewbel A (1991) Cost of characteristics indices and household equivalence scales. Eur Econ Rev 35: 1277–1293

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1978) Duality of production, cost, and profit functions. In: Fuss M, McFadden D (eds.) Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Muellbauer J (1974) Household composition, Engel curves and welfare comparisons between households: a duality approach. Eur Econ Rev 5: 103–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Muellbauer J (1975) Aggregation, income distribution, and consumer demand. Rev Econ Stud 62: 269–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Muellbauer J (1976) Community preferences and the representative consumer. Econometrica 44: 979–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Negishi T (1963) On social welfare function. Quart J Econ 77: 156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson J (1988) Household economies of scale in consumption: theory and evidence. Econometrica 56: 1301–1314

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps S (1990) Price-sensitive adult-equivalence scales for Canada, mimeo, Dalhousie University, revised, 1992

  • Pollak RA, Wales TJ (1979) Welfare comparisons and equivalence scales. Am Econ Rev 69: 216–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak RA, Wales TJ (1981) Demographic variables in demand analysis. Econometrica 49: 1533–1551

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray R (1992) Modelling the impact of children on household expenditure and welfare, mimeo, University of British Columbia, 1992

  • Samuelson P (1956) Social indifference curves. Quart J Econ 70: 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1977) On weights and measures: informational constraints in social welfare analysis. Econometrica 45: 1539–1572

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymark J (1985) Money-metric utility functions. Int Econ Rev 26: 219–232

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blackorby, C., Donaldson, D. Adult-equivalence scales and the economic implementation of interpersonal comparisons of well-being. Soc Choice Welfare 10, 335–361 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182510

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182510

Keywords

Navigation