Skip to main content
Log in

Processing of figure and background motion in the visual system of the fly

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The visual system of the fly is able to extract different types of global retinal motion patterns as may be induced on the eyes during different flight maneuvers and to use this information to control visual orientation. The mechanisms underlying these tasks were analyzed by a combination of quantitative behavioral experiments on tethered flying flies (Musca domestica) and model simulations using different conditions of oscillatory large-field motion and relative motion of different segments of the stimulus pattern. Only torque responses about the vertical axis of the animal were determined. The stimulus patterns consisted of random dot textures (“Julesz patterns”) which could be moved either horizontally or vertically. Horizontal rotatory large-field motion leads to compensatory optomotor turning responses, which under natural conditions would tend to stabilize the retinal image. The response amplitude depends on the oscillation frequency: It is much larger at low oscillation frequencies than at high ones. When an object and its background move relative to each other, the object may, in principle, be discriminated and then induce turning responses of the fly towards the object. However, whether the object is distinguished by the fly depends not only on the phase relationship between object and background motion but also on the oscillation frequency. At all phase relations tested, the object is detected only at high oscillation frequencies. For the patterns used here, the turning responses are only affected by motion along the horizontal axis of the eye. No influences caused by vertical motion could be detected. The experimental data can be explained best by assuming two parallel control systems with different temporal and spatial integration properties: TheLF-system which is most sensitive to coherent rotatory large-field motion and mediates compensatory optomotor responses mainly at low oscillation frequencies. In contrast, theSF-system is tuned to small-field and relative motion and thus specialized to discriminate a moving object from its background; it mediates turning responses towards objects mainly at high oscillation frequencies. The principal organization of the neural networks underlying these control systems could be derived from the characteristic features of the responses to the different stimulus conditions. The input to the model circuits responsible for the characteristic sensitivity of the SF-system to small-field and relative motion is provided by retinotopic arrays of local movement detectors. The movement detectors are integrated by a large-field element, the output cell of the network. The synapses between the detectors and the output cells have nonlinear transmission characteristics. Another type of large-field elements (“pool cells”) which respond to motion in front of both eyes and have characteristic direction selectivities are assumed to interact with the local movement detector channels by inhibitory synapses of the shunting type, before the movement detectors are integrated by the output cells. The properties of the LF-system can be accounted for by similar model circuits which, however, differ with respect to the transmission characteristic of the synapses between the movement detectors and the output cell; moreover, their pool cells are only monocular. This type of network, however, is not necessary to account for the functional properties of the LF-system. Instead, intrinsic properties of single neurons may be sufficient. Computer simulations of the postulated mechanisms of the SF-and LF-system reveal that these can account for the specific features of the behavioral responses under quite different conditions of coherent large-field motion and relative motion of different pattern segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E (1985) Direction-and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Perception 14:105–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker CL Jr, Braddick OJ (1985) Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion. Perception 14:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker CL Jr, Cynader MS (1988) Space-time separability of direction selectivity in cat striate cortex neurons. Vision Res 28:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausenwein B, Wolf R, Heisenberg M (1986) Genetic dissection of optomotor behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. Studies on wild-type and the mutant optomotor-blind H31. J Neurogenet 3:87–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop LG, Keehn DG, McCann GD (1968) Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the fliesCalliphora phaenicia andMusca domestica. J Neurophysiol 31:509–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1989) Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci (in press)

  • Buchner E (1976) Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol Cybern 24:85–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner E (1984) Behavioural analysis of spatial vision in insects. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 561–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Bülthoff H (1981) Figure-ground discrimination in the visual system ofDrosophila melanogaster. Biol Cybern 41:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS (1971) Visual neurones for tracking moving targets. Nature 232:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, King AJ (1975) Vision during flight. In: Horridge GA (ed) The compound eye and vision of insects. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 437–466

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVoe RD (1980) Movement sensitivities of cells in the fly's medulla. J Comp Physiol 138:93–119

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVoe RD, Ockleford EM (1976) Intracellular responses from cells of the medulla of the fly,Calliphora erythrocephala. Biol Cybern 23:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorn AJ van, Koenderink JJ (1982a) Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Exp Brain Res 45:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Doom AJ van, Koenderink JJ (1982b) Spatial properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Exp Brain Res 45:189–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert H (1973) Optomotorische Untersuchungen am visuellen System der StubenfliegeMusca domestica L. Kybernetik 14:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert H, Dvorak DR (1983) The centrifugal horizontal cells in the lobula plate of the blowfly,Phoenicia sericata. J Insect Physiol 29:547–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M (1985a) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. I. Behavioural constraints imposed on the neuronal network and the role of the optomotor system. Biol Cybern 52:123–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M (1985b) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. II. Figure-detection cells, a new class of visual interneurones. Biol Cybern 52:195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M (1985c) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. III. Possible input circuitries and behavioural significance of the FD-cells. Biol Cybern 52:267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M (1987) Dynamic properties of two control systems underlying visually guided turning in house-flies. J Comp Physiol A 161:777–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M (1989) Visual afferences to flight steering muscles controlling optomotor responses of the fly. J Comp Physiol A (in press)

  • Egelhaaf M, Borst A (1989) On the role of GABAergic inhibitory synapses in motion detection of the fly. In: Elsner N, Singer W (eds) Dynamics and plasticity in neuronal systems. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 106

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M, Hausen K, Reichardt W, Wehrhahn C (1988) Visual course control in flies relies on neuronal computation of object and background motion. Trends Neurosci 11:351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M, Borst A, Reichardt W (1989a) The nonlinear mechanism of direction selectivity in the fly motion detection system. Naturwissenschaften 76:32–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M, Borst A, Reichardt W (1989b) Computational structure of a biological motion detection system as revealed by local detector analysis. J Opt Soc Am A (in press)

  • Emerson RC, Citron MC, Vaughn WJ, Klein SA (1987) Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58:33–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermi G, Reichardt W (1963) Optomotorische Reaktionen der FliegeMusca domestica. Abhängigkeit der Reaktion von der Wellenlänge, der Geschwindigkeit, dem Kontrast und der mittleren Leuchtdichte bewegter periodischer Muster. Kybernetik 2:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost BJ, Nakayama K (1983) Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. Science 220:744–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost BJ, Scilley PL, Wong SCP (1981) Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons. Exp Brain Res 43:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger G, Nässel DR (1982) Visual processing of moving single objects and wide-field patterns in flies: Behavioural analysis after laser-surgical removal of interneurons. Biol Cybern 44:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG (1964) Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der FruchtfliegeDrosophila. Kybernetik 2:77–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG (1968) Flight control inDrosophila by visual perception of motion. Kybernetik 4:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG (1972) Principles of optomotor reactions in insects. Bibl Ophthalmol 82:251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG (1983) Bewegungssehen und Flugsteuerung bei der FliegeDrosophila. In: Nachtigall W (ed) BIONA report. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur zu Mainz and Fischer, Mainz Stuttgart New York, 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG, Buchner E (1978) Evidence for one-way movement detection in the visual system ofDrosophila. Biol Cybern 31:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG, Hengstenberg B, Biesinger R (1979) Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture inDrosophila. Biol Cybern 35:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünau M von, Frost BJ (1983) Double-opponent-process mechanism underlying RF-structure of directionally specific cells of cat lateral suprasylvian visual area. Exp Brain Res 49:84–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüsser O-J (1971) A quantitative analysis of spatial summation of excitation and inhibition within the receptive field of retinal ganglion cells of cats. Vision Res [Suppl] 3:103–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1981) Monocular and binocular computation of motion in the lobula plate of the fly. Verb Dtsch Zool Ges 74:49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1982a) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. I. The horizontal cells: structure and signals. Biol Cybern 45:143–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1982b) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. II. The horizontal cells: receptive field organization and response characteristics. Biol Cybern 46:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1984) The lobula-complex of the fly: Structure, function and significance in visual behaviour. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 523–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K, Egelhaaf M (1989) Neural mechanisms of visual course control in insects. In: Stavenga D, Hardie R (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 391–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K, Wehrhahn C (1983) Microsurgical lesion of horizontal cells changes optomotor yaw responses in the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala. Proc R Soc London B 219:211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K, Wehrhahn C (1989) Neural circuits mediating visual flight in flies. II. Separation of two control systems. Biol Cybern (submitted for publication)

  • Heisenberg M, Wolf R (1984) Vision inDrosophila. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengstenberg R (1982) Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora. J Comp Physiol 149:179–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Henn V, Grüsser O-J (1969) The summation of excitation in the receptive fields of movement-sensitive neurons of the frog's retina. Vision Res 9:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld K (1972) The visual system ofMusca: studies on optics, structure and function. In: Wehner R (ed) Information processing in the visual system of Arthropods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann GD, Dill JC (1969) Fundamental properties of intensity, form, and motion perception in the visual system ofCalliphora phaenicia andMusca domestica. J Gen Physiol 53:385–413

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann GD, MacGinitie GF (1965) Optomotor response studies of insect vision. Proc R Soc Lond B 163:369–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimura K (1971) Movement discrimination by the visual system of flies. Z Vergl Physiol 73:105–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimura K (1972) Neural mechanisms, subserving directional selectivity of movement in the optic lobe of the fly. J Comp Physiol 80:409–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome WT, Wurtz RH (1988) Probing visual cortical function with discrete chemical lesions. Trends Neurosci 11:394–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome WT, Wurtz RH, Dürsteler MR, Mikami A (1985) Deficits in visual motion processing following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 5:825–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Olberg RM (1981) Objectand self-movement detectors in the ventral nerve cord of the dragonfly. J Comp Physiol 141:327–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Olberg RM (1986) Identified target-selective visual interneurons descending from the dragonfly brain. J Comp Physiol 159:827–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Palka J (1972) Moving movement detectors. Am Zoologist 12:497–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio T, Reichardt W, Hausen K (1981) A neuronal circuitry for relative movement discrimination by the visual system of the fly. Naturwissenschaften 68:443–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt W (1961) Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In: Rosenblith WA (ed) Sensory communication. M.I.T. Press/Wiley, New York London, pp 303–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt W (1987) Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors. J Comp Physiol A 161:533–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt W, Egelhaaf M (1988) Properties of individual movement detectors as derived from behavioural experiments on the visual system of the fly. Biol Cybern 58:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt W, Guo A (1986) Elementary pattern discrimination (behavioural experiments with the flyMusca domestica). Biol Cybern 53:285–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt W, Poggio T (1979) Figure-ground discrimination by relative movement in the visual system of the fly. Part I: Experimental results. Biol Cybern 35:81–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt W, Poggio T, Hausen K (1983) Figure-ground discrimination by relative movement in the visual system of the fly. Part II: Towards the neural circuitry. Biol Cybern 46 [Suppl]:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Riehle A, Franceschini N (1984) Motion detection in flies: parametric control over ON-OFF pathways. Exp Brain Res 54:390–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell CHF, O'Shea M, Williams JLD (1977) The neuronal basis of a sensory analyzer, the acridid movement detector system. IV. The preference for small field stimuli. J Exp Biol 68:157–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Santen JPH van, Sperling G (1984) Temporal covariance model in human motion perception. J Opt Soc Am A 1:451–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuling FH (1988) Processing of moving images in natural and artificial visual systems. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Groningen

  • Simpson JI (1984) The accessory optic system. Ann Rev Neurosci 7:13–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Saito H, Yukie M, Fukada Y, Iwai E (1986) Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 6:134–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Virsik R, Reichardt W (1974) Tracking of moving objects by the flyMusca domestica. Naturwissenschaften 61:132–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Virsik R, Reichardt W (1976) Detection and tracking of moving objects by the flyMusca domestica. Biol Cybern 23:83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in insects. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6C: Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrhahn C (1985) Visual guidance of flies during flight. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York Toronto, pp 673–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrhahn C (1986) Motion sensitive yaw torque responses of the houseflyMusca: A quantitative study. Biol Cybern 55:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrhahn C, Hausen K (1980) How is tracking and fixation accomplished in the nervous system of the fly? A behavioural analysis based on short tim stimulation. Biol Cybern 38:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson H (1985) A model for direction selectivity in threshold motion perception. Biol Cybern 51:213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaagman, WH, Mastebroek HAK, Buyse T, Kuiper JW (1977) Receptive field characteristics of a directionally selective movement detector in the visual system of the blowfly. J Comp Physiol 116:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanker JM (1988) How does lateral abdomen deflection contribute to flight control ofDrosophila melanogaster? J Comp Physiol A 162:581–588

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reichardt, W., Egelhaaf, M. & Guo, Ak. Processing of figure and background motion in the visual system of the fly. Biol. Cybern. 61, 327–345 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200799

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200799

Keywords

Navigation