Abstract
The visual system of the fly is able to extract different types of global retinal motion patterns as may be induced on the eyes during different flight maneuvers and to use this information to control visual orientation. The mechanisms underlying these tasks were analyzed by a combination of quantitative behavioral experiments on tethered flying flies (Musca domestica) and model simulations using different conditions of oscillatory large-field motion and relative motion of different segments of the stimulus pattern. Only torque responses about the vertical axis of the animal were determined. The stimulus patterns consisted of random dot textures (“Julesz patterns”) which could be moved either horizontally or vertically. Horizontal rotatory large-field motion leads to compensatory optomotor turning responses, which under natural conditions would tend to stabilize the retinal image. The response amplitude depends on the oscillation frequency: It is much larger at low oscillation frequencies than at high ones. When an object and its background move relative to each other, the object may, in principle, be discriminated and then induce turning responses of the fly towards the object. However, whether the object is distinguished by the fly depends not only on the phase relationship between object and background motion but also on the oscillation frequency. At all phase relations tested, the object is detected only at high oscillation frequencies. For the patterns used here, the turning responses are only affected by motion along the horizontal axis of the eye. No influences caused by vertical motion could be detected. The experimental data can be explained best by assuming two parallel control systems with different temporal and spatial integration properties: TheLF-system which is most sensitive to coherent rotatory large-field motion and mediates compensatory optomotor responses mainly at low oscillation frequencies. In contrast, theSF-system is tuned to small-field and relative motion and thus specialized to discriminate a moving object from its background; it mediates turning responses towards objects mainly at high oscillation frequencies. The principal organization of the neural networks underlying these control systems could be derived from the characteristic features of the responses to the different stimulus conditions. The input to the model circuits responsible for the characteristic sensitivity of the SF-system to small-field and relative motion is provided by retinotopic arrays of local movement detectors. The movement detectors are integrated by a large-field element, the output cell of the network. The synapses between the detectors and the output cells have nonlinear transmission characteristics. Another type of large-field elements (“pool cells”) which respond to motion in front of both eyes and have characteristic direction selectivities are assumed to interact with the local movement detector channels by inhibitory synapses of the shunting type, before the movement detectors are integrated by the output cells. The properties of the LF-system can be accounted for by similar model circuits which, however, differ with respect to the transmission characteristic of the synapses between the movement detectors and the output cell; moreover, their pool cells are only monocular. This type of network, however, is not necessary to account for the functional properties of the LF-system. Instead, intrinsic properties of single neurons may be sufficient. Computer simulations of the postulated mechanisms of the SF-and LF-system reveal that these can account for the specific features of the behavioral responses under quite different conditions of coherent large-field motion and relative motion of different pattern segments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E (1985) Direction-and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Perception 14:105–126
Baker CL Jr, Braddick OJ (1985) Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion. Perception 14:181–192
Baker CL Jr, Cynader MS (1988) Space-time separability of direction selectivity in cat striate cortex neurons. Vision Res 28:239–246
Bausenwein B, Wolf R, Heisenberg M (1986) Genetic dissection of optomotor behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. Studies on wild-type and the mutant optomotor-blind H31. J Neurogenet 3:87–109
Bishop LG, Keehn DG, McCann GD (1968) Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the fliesCalliphora phaenicia andMusca domestica. J Neurophysiol 31:509–525
Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1989) Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci (in press)
Buchner E (1976) Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol Cybern 24:85–101
Buchner E (1984) Behavioural analysis of spatial vision in insects. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 561–621
Bülthoff H (1981) Figure-ground discrimination in the visual system ofDrosophila melanogaster. Biol Cybern 41:139–145
Collett TS (1971) Visual neurones for tracking moving targets. Nature 232:127–130
Collett TS, King AJ (1975) Vision during flight. In: Horridge GA (ed) The compound eye and vision of insects. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 437–466
DeVoe RD (1980) Movement sensitivities of cells in the fly's medulla. J Comp Physiol 138:93–119
DeVoe RD, Ockleford EM (1976) Intracellular responses from cells of the medulla of the fly,Calliphora erythrocephala. Biol Cybern 23:13–24
Doorn AJ van, Koenderink JJ (1982a) Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Exp Brain Res 45:179–188
Doom AJ van, Koenderink JJ (1982b) Spatial properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Exp Brain Res 45:189–195
Eckert H (1973) Optomotorische Untersuchungen am visuellen System der StubenfliegeMusca domestica L. Kybernetik 14:1–23
Eckert H, Dvorak DR (1983) The centrifugal horizontal cells in the lobula plate of the blowfly,Phoenicia sericata. J Insect Physiol 29:547–560
Egelhaaf M (1985a) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. I. Behavioural constraints imposed on the neuronal network and the role of the optomotor system. Biol Cybern 52:123–140
Egelhaaf M (1985b) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. II. Figure-detection cells, a new class of visual interneurones. Biol Cybern 52:195–209
Egelhaaf M (1985c) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. III. Possible input circuitries and behavioural significance of the FD-cells. Biol Cybern 52:267–280
Egelhaaf M (1987) Dynamic properties of two control systems underlying visually guided turning in house-flies. J Comp Physiol A 161:777–783
Egelhaaf M (1989) Visual afferences to flight steering muscles controlling optomotor responses of the fly. J Comp Physiol A (in press)
Egelhaaf M, Borst A (1989) On the role of GABAergic inhibitory synapses in motion detection of the fly. In: Elsner N, Singer W (eds) Dynamics and plasticity in neuronal systems. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 106
Egelhaaf M, Hausen K, Reichardt W, Wehrhahn C (1988) Visual course control in flies relies on neuronal computation of object and background motion. Trends Neurosci 11:351–358
Egelhaaf M, Borst A, Reichardt W (1989a) The nonlinear mechanism of direction selectivity in the fly motion detection system. Naturwissenschaften 76:32–35
Egelhaaf M, Borst A, Reichardt W (1989b) Computational structure of a biological motion detection system as revealed by local detector analysis. J Opt Soc Am A (in press)
Emerson RC, Citron MC, Vaughn WJ, Klein SA (1987) Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58:33–65
Fermi G, Reichardt W (1963) Optomotorische Reaktionen der FliegeMusca domestica. Abhängigkeit der Reaktion von der Wellenlänge, der Geschwindigkeit, dem Kontrast und der mittleren Leuchtdichte bewegter periodischer Muster. Kybernetik 2:15–28
Frost BJ, Nakayama K (1983) Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. Science 220:744–745
Frost BJ, Scilley PL, Wong SCP (1981) Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons. Exp Brain Res 43:173–185
Geiger G, Nässel DR (1982) Visual processing of moving single objects and wide-field patterns in flies: Behavioural analysis after laser-surgical removal of interneurons. Biol Cybern 44:141–149
Götz KG (1964) Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der FruchtfliegeDrosophila. Kybernetik 2:77–92
Götz KG (1968) Flight control inDrosophila by visual perception of motion. Kybernetik 4:199–208
Götz KG (1972) Principles of optomotor reactions in insects. Bibl Ophthalmol 82:251–259
Götz KG (1983) Bewegungssehen und Flugsteuerung bei der FliegeDrosophila. In: Nachtigall W (ed) BIONA report. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur zu Mainz and Fischer, Mainz Stuttgart New York, 21–34
Götz KG, Buchner E (1978) Evidence for one-way movement detection in the visual system ofDrosophila. Biol Cybern 31:243–248
Götz KG, Hengstenberg B, Biesinger R (1979) Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture inDrosophila. Biol Cybern 35:101–112
Grünau M von, Frost BJ (1983) Double-opponent-process mechanism underlying RF-structure of directionally specific cells of cat lateral suprasylvian visual area. Exp Brain Res 49:84–92
Grüsser O-J (1971) A quantitative analysis of spatial summation of excitation and inhibition within the receptive field of retinal ganglion cells of cats. Vision Res [Suppl] 3:103–127
Hausen K (1981) Monocular and binocular computation of motion in the lobula plate of the fly. Verb Dtsch Zool Ges 74:49–70
Hausen K (1982a) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. I. The horizontal cells: structure and signals. Biol Cybern 45:143–156
Hausen K (1982b) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. II. The horizontal cells: receptive field organization and response characteristics. Biol Cybern 46:67–79
Hausen K (1984) The lobula-complex of the fly: Structure, function and significance in visual behaviour. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 523–559
Hausen K, Egelhaaf M (1989) Neural mechanisms of visual course control in insects. In: Stavenga D, Hardie R (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 391–424
Hausen K, Wehrhahn C (1983) Microsurgical lesion of horizontal cells changes optomotor yaw responses in the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala. Proc R Soc London B 219:211–216
Hausen K, Wehrhahn C (1989) Neural circuits mediating visual flight in flies. II. Separation of two control systems. Biol Cybern (submitted for publication)
Heisenberg M, Wolf R (1984) Vision inDrosophila. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Hengstenberg R (1982) Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora. J Comp Physiol 149:179–193
Henn V, Grüsser O-J (1969) The summation of excitation in the receptive fields of movement-sensitive neurons of the frog's retina. Vision Res 9:57–69
Kirschfeld K (1972) The visual system ofMusca: studies on optics, structure and function. In: Wehner R (ed) Information processing in the visual system of Arthropods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 61–74
McCann GD, Dill JC (1969) Fundamental properties of intensity, form, and motion perception in the visual system ofCalliphora phaenicia andMusca domestica. J Gen Physiol 53:385–413
McCann GD, MacGinitie GF (1965) Optomotor response studies of insect vision. Proc R Soc Lond B 163:369–401
Mimura K (1971) Movement discrimination by the visual system of flies. Z Vergl Physiol 73:105–138
Mimura K (1972) Neural mechanisms, subserving directional selectivity of movement in the optic lobe of the fly. J Comp Physiol 80:409–437
Newsome WT, Wurtz RH (1988) Probing visual cortical function with discrete chemical lesions. Trends Neurosci 11:394–400
Newsome WT, Wurtz RH, Dürsteler MR, Mikami A (1985) Deficits in visual motion processing following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 5:825–840
Olberg RM (1981) Objectand self-movement detectors in the ventral nerve cord of the dragonfly. J Comp Physiol 141:327–334
Olberg RM (1986) Identified target-selective visual interneurons descending from the dragonfly brain. J Comp Physiol 159:827–840
Palka J (1972) Moving movement detectors. Am Zoologist 12:497–505
Poggio T, Reichardt W, Hausen K (1981) A neuronal circuitry for relative movement discrimination by the visual system of the fly. Naturwissenschaften 68:443–446
Reichardt W (1961) Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In: Rosenblith WA (ed) Sensory communication. M.I.T. Press/Wiley, New York London, pp 303–317
Reichardt W (1987) Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors. J Comp Physiol A 161:533–547
Reichardt W, Egelhaaf M (1988) Properties of individual movement detectors as derived from behavioural experiments on the visual system of the fly. Biol Cybern 58:287–294
Reichardt W, Guo A (1986) Elementary pattern discrimination (behavioural experiments with the flyMusca domestica). Biol Cybern 53:285–306
Reichardt W, Poggio T (1979) Figure-ground discrimination by relative movement in the visual system of the fly. Part I: Experimental results. Biol Cybern 35:81–100
Reichardt W, Poggio T, Hausen K (1983) Figure-ground discrimination by relative movement in the visual system of the fly. Part II: Towards the neural circuitry. Biol Cybern 46 [Suppl]:1–30
Riehle A, Franceschini N (1984) Motion detection in flies: parametric control over ON-OFF pathways. Exp Brain Res 54:390–394
Rowell CHF, O'Shea M, Williams JLD (1977) The neuronal basis of a sensory analyzer, the acridid movement detector system. IV. The preference for small field stimuli. J Exp Biol 68:157–185
Santen JPH van, Sperling G (1984) Temporal covariance model in human motion perception. J Opt Soc Am A 1:451–473
Schuling FH (1988) Processing of moving images in natural and artificial visual systems. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Groningen
Simpson JI (1984) The accessory optic system. Ann Rev Neurosci 7:13–41
Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Saito H, Yukie M, Fukada Y, Iwai E (1986) Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 6:134–144
Virsik R, Reichardt W (1974) Tracking of moving objects by the flyMusca domestica. Naturwissenschaften 61:132–133
Virsik R, Reichardt W (1976) Detection and tracking of moving objects by the flyMusca domestica. Biol Cybern 23:83–98
Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in insects. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6C: Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–616
Wehrhahn C (1985) Visual guidance of flies during flight. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York Toronto, pp 673–684
Wehrhahn C (1986) Motion sensitive yaw torque responses of the houseflyMusca: A quantitative study. Biol Cybern 55:275–280
Wehrhahn C, Hausen K (1980) How is tracking and fixation accomplished in the nervous system of the fly? A behavioural analysis based on short tim stimulation. Biol Cybern 38:179–186
Wilson H (1985) A model for direction selectivity in threshold motion perception. Biol Cybern 51:213–222
Zaagman, WH, Mastebroek HAK, Buyse T, Kuiper JW (1977) Receptive field characteristics of a directionally selective movement detector in the visual system of the blowfly. J Comp Physiol 116:39–50
Zanker JM (1988) How does lateral abdomen deflection contribute to flight control ofDrosophila melanogaster? J Comp Physiol A 162:581–588
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reichardt, W., Egelhaaf, M. & Guo, Ak. Processing of figure and background motion in the visual system of the fly. Biol. Cybern. 61, 327–345 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200799
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200799