Abstract
This study tested one hypothesis concerning the attribution of gender role stereotypes about competitive behavior and three hypotheses concerning differences in attribution of sex between male and female subjects. The study used a Prisoner's Dilemma Game setting to expose subjects to one of three conditions (competitive, cooperative, or tit-for-tat) to measure attribution of sex to an unknown confederate. A chi-square analysis revealed significant differences in the attribution of sex to the anonymous confederate between the competitive and the combined cooperative and tit-for-tat groups. In the competitive condition, subjects were more prone to think that the anonymous confederate was male than were subjects in the cooperative and tit-for-tat condition. This finding is consistent with the gender role stereotype that generally associates competitive behavior with masculinity and not with femininity. Post hoc chi-squares also revealed no difference between male and female subjects in the attribution of sex in any of the three conditions. Implications of these findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
Berndt, T. J., & Heller, K. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes and social inferences: A developmental study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 889–898.
Birnbaum, D. W., & Chemelski, B. E. (1984). Preschoolers' inferences about gender and emotion: The mediation of emotionality stereotypes. Sex Roles, 10, 505–511.
Block, J. H. (1973). Conceptions of sex-role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 28, 512–526.
Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662–669.
Brown, L. S. (1986). Gender-role analysis: A neglected component of psychological assessment. Psychotherapy, 23, 243–248.
Burns, A. L., Mitchell, G., & Obradovich, S. (1989). Of sex roles and strollers: Female and male attention to toddlers at the zoo. Sex Roles, 20, 309–315.
Cann, A., & Siegfried, W. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leader behavior. Sex Roles, 23, 413–419.
Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationship among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.
Dobbins, G. H., Long, W. S., Dedrick, E. J., & Clemons, T. C. (1990). The role of self-monitoring and gender on leader emergence: A laboratory and field study. Journal of Management, 16, 609–618.
Everitt, B. S. (1977). The analysis of contingency tables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Fagenson, E. A. (1990). Perceived masculine and feminine attributes examined as a function of individuals' sex and level in the organizational power hierarchy: A test of four theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 204–211.
Gerber, G. L. (1977). The effect of competition on stereotypes about sex-role and marital satisfaction. Journal of Psychology, 97, 297–308.
Gerber, G. L. (1984). Attribution of feminine and masculine traits to opposite-sex dyads. Psychological Reports, 55, 907–918.
Goktepe, J. R., & Schneier, C. E. (1989). Role of sex, gender roles, and attraction in predicting emergent leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 165–167.
Griesinger, D. W., & Livingston, J. W. (1973). Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behavioral Science, 18, 173–188.
Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., & Konrad, A. M. (1990). Predicting social-sexual behavior at work: A contact hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 560–577.
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., & Simon, M. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935–942.
Hoffman, C. D., Tsuneyoshi, S. E., Ebina, M., & Fite, H. (1984). A comparison of adult males' and females' interactions with girls and boys. Sex Roles, 11, 799–811.
Johnston, W. B., & Packer, A. H. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the twenty-first century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
Kagan, J. (1964). Acquisition and significance of sex-typing and sex role identity. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kapalka, G. M., & Lachenmeyer, J. R. (1989). Sex-role flexibility, locus of control, and occupational status. Sex Roles, 19, 417–427.
Lowenstern, H. (Ed.). (1990). Current labor statistics: Employment data. Monthly Labor Review, 113(4), 62.
Major, B., Bylsma, W. H., & Cozzarelli, C. (1989). Gender differences in distributive justice preferences: The impact of domain. Sex Roles, 21, 487–497.
Noe, R. A. (1988). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 13, 65–78.
Pearson, H. M., & Kahn, S. E. (1989). Women clerical workers: Sex-role socialization, work attitudes, and values. Career Development Quarterly, 37, 249–256.
Powell, G. N. (1990). One more time: Do female and male managers differ? Academy of Management Executive, 4(3), 68–75.
Pritchard, R. D. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 176–211.
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner's Dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Remmer, P., & Ross, E. (1982). The counselors' role in creating a school environment that fosters androgyny. School Counselor, 30, 4–14.
Ruble, D. N., & Ruble, T. N. (1982). Sex stereotypes. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping. pp. 188–252. New Yorker: Praeger.
Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., & Jacobson, C. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles, 20, 103–111.
Schneer, J. A., & Reitman, F. (1990). Effects of employment gaps on the careers on M.B.A.'s: More damaging for men than for women? Academy of Management Journal, 33, 391–406.
Spence, J. T., & Helmrich, R. L. (1975). Rating of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimension, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: Texas University Press.
Srivastava, A. K., (1985). Cooperation and competition in prisoner's dilemma game. Psychological Studies, 30, 116–120.
Sutton, C. D., & Woodman, R. W. (1989). Pygmalion goes to work: The effects of supervisor expectations in a retail setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 943–950.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1989). Statistical Abstract of the United States 1989 (109 ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Williams, K., Goodman, M., & Green, R. (1985). Parent-child factors in gender role socialization in girls. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 26, 720–731.
Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organizations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, W.C., Miles, E.W. & Kniska, J. Boys will be boys (and girls will be girls): The attribution of gender role stereotypes in a gaming situation. Sex Roles 25, 607–623 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289567
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289567