Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling physical adsorption on porous and nonporous solids using density functional theory

  • Published:
Journal of Porous Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formalism of (nonlocal) density functional theory provides an attractive way to describe the physical adsorption process at the fluid-solid interface. It provides numerical results of analytic precision in a small fraction of the time required by a simulation technique. In particular, the ability to model adsorption in a pore space of slit-like or cylindrical geometry has led to useful methods for extracting pore size distribution information from experimental adsorption isotherms. However, critical comparisons of experimental isotherms with the isotherms predicted by density functional theory have shown important differences when using the usual prescription for the nonlocal free energy density functional. It is clear that these differences would affect the accuracy of such pore size information. We show in this paper how a small modification to the mean field computation of the intermolecular attractive potential results in excellent agreement with experiment for the systems studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Evans in Fundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids, edited by D. Henderson (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992) pp. 85–175.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N.A. Seaton, Carbon 27, 853 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.P. Olivier and W.B. Conklin, presented at First International Symposium on Effects of Surface Heterogeneity in Adsorption and Catalysis on Solids, Kazimierz Dolny, Poland, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.M. Lastoski, K.E. Gubbins, and N. Quirke, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 4786 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Tarazona, Phys. Rev. A 31, 2672 (1985); Phys. Rev. A 32, 3148 (1985); P. Tarazona, U.M.B. Marconi, and R. Evans, Mol. Phys. 60, 573 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.F. Meister and D.M. Kroll, Physical Review A 31, 4055 (1985); D.M. Kroll and B.B. Laird, Physical Review A 42, 4806 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.A. Curtin and N.W. Ashcroft, Physical Review A 32, 2909 (1985); A.R. Denton and N.W. Ashcroft, Physical Review A 39, 4701 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.D. Groot, Molecular Physics 60, 45 (1987); R.D. Groot and J.P. van der Eerden, Physical Review A 36, 4356 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.M. Lastoskie, K.E. Gubbins, and N. Quirke, Langmuir 9, 2693 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.P. Olivier, W.B. Conklin, and M.v. Szombathely in Characterization of Porous Solids III Proceedings, edited by J. Rouquerol et al., (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994), p. 81. Note: The curves were inadvertently reversed in Fig. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.P. Olivier in Carbon '94 Extended Abstracts, (The Spanish Carbon Group, Granada, Spain, 1994), p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W.A. Steele, Surf. Science 36, 317 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.D. Weeks, D. Chandler, and H.C. Anderson, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 5237 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. N.F. Carnahan and K.E. Starling, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 635 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Ross and J.P. Olivier in On Physical Adsorption, (Interscience, New York, 1964), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olivier, J.P. Modeling physical adsorption on porous and nonporous solids using density functional theory. J Porous Mater 2, 9–17 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486565

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486565

Keywords

Navigation