Skip to main content
Log in

The macroscopic yield behaviour of polymers

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A yield criterion, not previously compared with the actual macroscopic behaviour of polymers, is herein compared with the pressure-modified octahedral shear stress criterion earlier suggested by others. This new relation, which is a version of the von Mises criterion, accommodates differences in tensile and compressive yield strengths and accounts for any dependence of yielding on the hydrostatic component of the applied stress state.

With the use of thin-wall tubes accounting for the majority of experimental points, the yield behaviour of polycarbonate and polyvinylchloride was investigated. Besides these findings, results previously reported by others have also been utilized in this paper. Since these various studies employed quite different polymers, the excellent overall correlation of experiment with prediction should merit the serious attention of persons interested in the macroscopic yield behaviour of polymers.

Comparisons between this new criterion and the modified octahedral shear stress are also made in regard to the effect of pressure on subsequent yield behaviour. Although not fully verified, it is suggested that the predictions which result using this new criterion, seem a little more reasonable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. M. Ward, J. Mater. Sci. 6 (1971) 1397.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Whitney and R. D. Andrews, J. Polymer Sci. C, 16 (1967) 2981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. C. Bauwens, ibid, 8 (1970) 893.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Sternstein and L. Ongchin, A.C.S. Pol. Prep. 10 (1969) 1117.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Brown, Mat. Sci. and Eng. 8 (1971) 69.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Meldahl, Brown Boveri Review 31 (1944) 260.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Schleicher, Z. Agnew. Math. Mech. 6 (1926) 199.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Stassi D'Alia, Meccanica 3 (1967) 178.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. W. Tschoegl, Polymer Sci. Symp. 32 (1971) 239.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Nadai, “Theory of Flow and Fracture of Solids” (McGraw-Hill, 1950) 210, 220.

  11. C. Bauwens-Crowet, J. C. Bauwens, and G. Home, J. Mater. Sci. 7 (1972) 176.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Marin, J. H. Raupel, V. L. Dutton, and M. W. Brossman, NACA Tech. Notes, No. 1536 (1948).

  13. S. B. Ainbinder, M. G. Laka, and I. Yu Maiors, Mekh. Polemerov 1 (1965) 65.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. W. Christiansen, E. Baer, and S. V. Radcliffe, Phil. Mag. 24 (1971) 451.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Sardar, S. V. Radcliffe, and E. Baer, Polymer Eng. and Sci. 8 (1968) 290.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Christiansen, S. V. Radcliffe, and E. Baer, communication to R. Raghava via unpublished work, 1971.

  17. K. D. Pae and D. R. Mears, Polymer Letters 6 (1968) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Biglione, E. Baer, and S. V. Radcliffe, in “Fracture 1969” Proceeding of the second International Conference, Brighton, 1969, ed. P. L. Pratt (Chapman and Hall, London, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. R. Mears, K. D. Pae, and J. A. Sauer, J. Appl. Phys. 40 (1969) 4229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raghava, R., Caddell, R.M. & Yeh, G.S.Y. The macroscopic yield behaviour of polymers. J Mater Sci 8, 225–232 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00550671

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00550671

Keywords

Navigation