Abstract
It is argued that because the tetragonal (t) to monoclinic (m) transformation in zirconia is exothermic, this guarantees that the surface free energy of the former is less than that of the latter structure. It is argued further that for pristine, unconstrained, single crystals,A s ∼M s ∼ 1447 K. It follows then, from a thermodynamic analysis that the reciprocal crystallite size is a linear function of the transformation temperature. Quantitative agreement was obtained between calculated and experimental crystallite size-temperature data which ranged over three orders of magnitude.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. C. Garvie,J. Phys. Chem. 69 (1965) 1238.
Idem, ibid. 82 (1978) 218.
A. Ono,Miner. J. 6 (1972) 442.
T. Mitsuhashi andY. Fujiki,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 56 (1973) 493.
T. Mitsuhashi, M. Ichihara andU. Taksuke,ibid. 57 (1974) 97.
J. Bailey, D. Lewis, E. Librant andL. Porter,Trans. J. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 71 (1972) 25.
E. G. King andJ. P. Coughlin,J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 72 (1950) 2262.
H. Holmes, E. Fuller Jr andR. Gammage,J. Phys. Chem. 76 (1972) 1497.
R. C. Garvie,J. Mater. Sci. 20 (1985) 3499.
C. F. Grain andR. C. Garvie, US Bureau of Mines Report of Investigation RI6619 (1965).
R. C. Garvie,J. Mater. Sci. submitted.
M. Parish andH. K. Bowen,Ceram. Int. 10 (1984) 75.
N. Claussen andM. Ruhle,Adv. Ceram. 3 (1981) 137.
P. E. D. Morgan,Comm. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 67 (1984) C-204.
I. W. Chen andY. H. Chiao,Acta. Metall. 31 (1983) 1627.
Idem, Adv. Ceram. 12 (1984) 33.
A. H. Heuer, N. Claussen, W. Kriven, andM. Ruhle,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 65 (1982) 642.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garvie, R.C., Goss, M.F. Intrinsic size dependence of the phase transformation temperature in zirconia microcrystals. J Mater Sci 21, 1253–1257 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553259
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553259