Abstract
Researchers have used attribution theory as a basis for exploring the relationship between consumers' inferences of advertiser motivation (attributions) and advertising response. This study postulated the existence of two new types of attributions which relate to the perceived ethics of the advertiser (advertiser ethical attributions) and the advertising message (message ethical attributions). Research conducted among a nationally representative sample of 273 adults: (1) verified the existence of both advertiser and message ethical attributions, (2) demonstrated the independence of advertiser and message ethical attributions both from each other and from other measures of advertiser and message evaluation, (3) identified the specific advertising characteristics which lead to the formation of each type of ethical attribution and (4) demonstrated a significant relationship between advertiser and message ethical attributions and measures of advertising response.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker, D. and D. Stayman: 1990, ‘Measuring Audience Perceptions of Commercials and Relating Them to Advertising Impact’,Journal of Advertising Research 30, 7–17.
Abratt, R. and D. Sacks: 1988, ‘The Marketing Challenge: Towards Being Profitable and Socially Responsible’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, 497–508.
Bishop, T. R.: 1992, ‘Integrating Business Ethics into an Undergraduate Curriculum’,Journal of Business Ethics 11, 291–299.
Celsi, R. and J. C. Olson: 1988, ‘The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes’,Journal of Consumer Research 15, 210–224.
Davis, J. J.: in press, ‘Environmental Advertising: Norms and Levels of Advertiser Trust’,Journalism Quarterly.
Dunlap, R. E. and R. Scarce: 1991, ‘Environmental Problems and Protection’,Public Opinion Quarterly 55, 651–672.
Eagley, A. H. and S. Chaiken: 1975, ‘An Attribution Analysis of the Effect of Communicator Characteristics on Opinion Change’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, 136–144.
Federal Trade Commission: 1992, ‘Guidelines for the use of Environmental Marketing Claims’,Federal Register 16 CFR Part 260 (August 13), 36363–36369.
Golden, L. L. and M. I. Alpert: 1987, ‘Comparative Analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of One- and Two-Sided Communications for Contrasting Products’,Journal of Advertising 16, 18–25.
Gotleib, J. B. and D. Sarel: 1991, ‘Comparative Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Involvement and Source Credibility’,Journal of Advertising 20, 38–45.
Harvey, J. H. and G. Weary: 1984, ‘Current Issues in Attribution Theory and Research’,Annual Review of Psychology 35, 427–459.
Hastie, R.: 1981, ‘Schematic Principles in Human Memory’, in E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman and M. P. Zanna (eds.),Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Vol 1 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 39–88.
Heider, F.: 1958,The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Wiley and Sons, NY).
Hewstone, M.: 1989,Causal Attribution (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).
Humphrey, H. H.: 1990,The Green Report: Findings and Preliminary Recommendations for Responsible Environmental Advertising (Office of the Attorney General, Minneapolis, MN).
Jones, E. E. and K. E. Davis: 1965, ‘From Facts to Dispositions. The Attribution Process in Person Perception’,Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2, 220–266.
Kangun, N., L. Carlson and S. Grove: 1991, ‘Environmental Advertising Claims: A Preliminary Investigation’,Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 10, 47–58.
Kelley, H. H.: 1973, ‘The Process of Causal Attribution’,American Psychologist 28, 107–128.
Kelley, H. H.: 1967, ‘Attribution Theory in Social Psychology’, in D. Levine (ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NB), 192–240.
Kelley, H. H. and J. L. Michela: 1980, ‘Attribution Theory and Research’,Annual Review of Psychology 31, 457–501.
Lichtenstein, D. R., S. Burton and B. S. O'Hara: 1989, ‘Marketplace Attributions and Consumer Evaluations of Discount Claims’,Psychology and Marketing 6, 163–180.
Medcaf, J. H.: 1990, ‘PEAT: An Integrative Model of Attribution Processes’,Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 23, 111–209.
Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo: 1986,Communication and Persuasion (Springer-Verlag, NY).
Piper, T. R.: 1989,Ethics, Leadership and the Harvard Business School (Harvard Business School, MA).
Sims, R. R.: 1992, ‘The Challenge of Ethical Behavior in Organizations’,Journal of Business Ethics 11, 505–513.
Sims, R. R. and J. J. Sims: 1991, ‘Increasing Applied Business Ethics in Business School Curricula’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 211–220.
Srull, T. K.: 1981, ‘Person Memory: Some Tests of Associative Storage and Retrieval Models’,Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7, 440–462.
Weary, G., J. H. Harvey and M. A. Stanley: 1989,Attribution (Springer-Verlag, NY).
Weiner, B.: 1986,An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion (Springer-Verlag, NY).
Whalen, J. P., R. P. Hsand and J. Wong: 1991, ‘Exploring the Structure of Ethical Attributions as a Component of the Consumer Decision Model: The Vicarious Versus Personal Perspective’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 285–293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr. Joel J. Davis is Assistant Professor of Journalism, School of Communication, at San Diego State University. Dr. Davis' interests include environmental marketing, marketing strategy and marketing ethics. He has published in these areas in theJournal of Business Ethics, Journalism Quarterly andSAM Advanced Management Journal.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, J.J. Good ethics is good for business: Ethical attributions and response to environmental advertising. J Bus Ethics 13, 873–885 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871701
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871701