Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for the study of hypertext

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for the study of hypertext. First, an historical perspective on the evolution of hypertext is provided. Next, hypertext system components are presented and relevant psychological and pedagogical issues are analyzed. Finally a framework for the study of hypertext, with implications for theory, research, and development, is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessandrini, K. (1984). Pictures and adult learning.Instructional Science 13(1): 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1980).Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (1991). Implications of connectionism for thinking about rules.Educational Researcher 20(3): 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, G. (1984).Notes on Graphic Design and Visual Communication. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C. (1989). Hypertext design issues.Performance Improvement Quarterly 2(3): 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945). As we may think.Atlantic Monthly 176(1): 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.M. & Rosson, M.B. (1987). Paradox of the active user, in J.M. Carroll, ed.,Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cates, W.M. (1992). Fifteen principles for designing more effective instructional hypermedia/ multimedia products.Educational Technology 32(12): 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. & Reigeluth, C. (1992). Instructional prescriptions for learner control.Educational Technology 32(10); 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey.Computer 20(9): 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, G. & Mylonas, E. (1988). The Perseus Project: An interactive curriculum on Classical Greek civilization.Educational Technology 28(11): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Young, M.J. (1991).Background and Analysis of Dr. King's ‘Letter.’ Unpublished manuscript.

  • Dillon, A. (1991). Readers' models of text structures: The case of academic articles.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 913–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchastel, P. (1990). Examining cognitive processing in hypermedia usage.Hypermedia 2(3): 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. & Hardman, L. (1989). ‘Lost in hyperspace’: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext environment, in R. McAleese, ed.,Hypertext: Theory into Practice (pp. 105–125). London: BSP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbart, D.C. (1963). A conceptual framework for the augmentation of man's intellect, inVistas in Information Handling, Vol. 1. London: Spartan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G., Trumbull, D. & Mazur, J. (1991). Designing and testing navigational strategies and guidance tools for a hypermedia program.Journal of Educational Computing Research 7: 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M.J. (in press). Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, assumptions, and implications for automated design, in R. Tennyson, ed.,Perspectives on Automating Instructional Design. New York: Springer-Verlag

  • Hannafin, M.J. (1993).The Cognitive Implications of Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework. Report to the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, AL/HRTC, Brooks AFB, TX.

  • Heller, R. (1990). The role of hypermedia in education: A look at the research issues.Journal of Research on Computing in Education 22(4): 431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. (1988). Designating structured hypertext and structuring access to hypertext.Educational Technology 28(11): 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. (1986). Hypertext principles for text and courseware design.Educational Psychologist 21(4): 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. & Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 20(1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. (1988). Authoring considerations for hypertext.Educational Technology 28(11): 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M. & Berdel, R. (1990). Design and use of hypermedia systems.Educational Technology Research and Development 38(3): 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, A. (1991). Some guidelines for the design of effective hypercourses.Educational Technology 31(10): 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, A. & Roselli, T. (1991). Effect of hypertextual approach versus the structured approach on students’ achievement.Journal ofComputer Based Instruction 18(2): 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C, Letourneau, G. & Banvard, R. (1989). Hypermedia and instruction.Educational Technology Research and Design 37(4): 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchionini, G. (1988). Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos.Educational Technology 28(11): 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchionini, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1988). Finding facts vs. browsing knowledge in hypertext systems.Computer 21(1): 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlin, M. (1983).Cognition. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misanchuk, E. & Schwier, R. (1992). Representing interactive multimedia and hypermedia audit trails.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 1: 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. (1987). New technologies in education.Education and Computing 3: 239–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T.H. (1988). Managing immense storage.Byte 13(1): 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, W. & Palumbo, D. (1992). Learning, instruction, and hypermedia.Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 1: 287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1990). The art of navigating through hypertext.Communications of the ACM 33: 296–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1982).Learning and Memory. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1988). Infuriating by design.Psychology Today 22(3): 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, I. & Hannafin, M.J. (1993). Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia.Educational Technology Research and Development 41(3): 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?Educational Technology 31(5): 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poison, P. & Lewis, C. (1990). Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces.Human-Computer Interaction 5: 191–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, U. & Turoff, M. (1990). Hypertext functionality: A theoretical framework.International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2(4): 333–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, D. & Tompa, F. (1988). Hypertext and the Oxford English Dictionary.Communications of the ACM 31(7): 871–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of learner control.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 20(2).

  • Reynolds, S.B. & Dansereau, D.F. (1990). The knowledge hypermap: An alternative to hypertext.Computers and Education 14(5): 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J. & Coulson, R.L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.Educational Technology 31(5): 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. & Jengh, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter, in D. Nix & R. Spiro, eds.,Cognition, Education and Multimedia: Explorations in High Technology (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, E. (1977). Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 3: 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, E. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977–1988.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16:117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. & Dawson, G. (1992). Constraints to curriculum reform: Teachers and the myths of schooling.Educational Technology Research and Development 40: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, S.D. & Roby, W. (1990). Orientation and disorientation in a hypertext lexicon.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 17(4): 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. (1988). Hypertext: Technology, application, and research issues.Journal of Educational Technology Systems 17(1): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J.V. (1984).Using Charts and Graphs: 1000 Ideas for Visual Persuasion. New York: R.R. Bowker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B.G. & Jonassen, D.H. (1989). Hypertext and instructional design: Some preliminary guidelines.Performance Improvement Quarterly 2(3): 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, N., Haan, B. Meyrowitz, N. & Drucker, S. (1988). Intermedia: The concept and construction of a seamless information environment.Computer 21(1): 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, N., Smith, K.E., Garret, N. & Meyrowitz, N. (1988). Issues in designing a hypermedia document system, in S. Ambron & K. Hooper, eds.,Interactive Multimedia (pp. 34–85). Microsoft: Redmond, WA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gall, J.E., Hannafin, M.J. A framework for the study of hypertext. Instr Sci 22, 207–232 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892243

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892243

Keywords

Navigation