Abstract
The regret theory of choice under uncertainty proposed by Loomes and Sugden has performed well in explaining and predicting violations of Expected Utility theory. The original version of the model was confined to pairwise choices, which limited its usefulness as an economic theory of choice. Axioms for a more general form of regret theory have been proposed by Loomes and Sugden. In this article, it is shown that a simple nonmanipulability requirement is sufficient to characterize the functional form for regret theory with general choice sets. The stochastic dominance and comparative static properties of the model are outlined. A number of special cases are derived in which regret theory is equivalent to other well-known theories of choice under uncertainty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allais, Maurice. (1953). “Le comportement de l'homme rationel devant le risque: critique des axioms et postulates de l'école americaine,”Econometrica 21, 503–546.
Bell, D. (1982). “Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty,”Operations Research 20, 961–981.
Camerer, Colin. (1989). “An Experimental Test of Several Generalized Utility Theories,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2, 61–104.
Diamond, Peter and Joseph Stiglitz. (1974). “Increases in Risk and in Risk Aversion,”Journal of Economic Theory 8, 337–360.
Fishburn, Peter. (1983). “Nontransitive Measurable Utility,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 26, 31–67.
Loomes, Graham, and Robert Sugden. (1982). “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty,”Economic Journal 92, 805–824.
Loomes, Graham, and Robert Sugden. (1983). “Regret Theory and Measurable Utility Theory,”Economics Letters 12, 19–22.
Loomes, Graham, and Robert Sugden. (1986). “Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty,”Review of Economic Studies 53, 271–282.
Loomes, Graham, and Robert Sugden. (1987). “Some Implications of a More General Form of Regret Theory,”Journal of Economic Theory 41, 270–287.
Loomes, Graham and Robert Sugden. (1987). “Testing for regret and disappointment in choice under uncertainty,”Economic Journal 97, 118–129.
Machina, Mark. (1983). “The Economic Theory of Individual Behavior Toward Risk: Theory, Evidence and New Directions,” Technical Report No. 433, Centre for Research on Organisational Efficiency, Stanford.
Quiggin, John. (1982). “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation 3, 323–343.
Quiggin, John. (1989). “Stochastic Dominance in Regret Theory,”Review of Economic Studies 57, 503–511.
Quiggin, John. (1991). “Comparative Statics for Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Theory,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4, 339–350.
Savage, L.J. (1954).Foundations of statistics. N.Y.: Wiley.
Sugden, Robert. (1993). “An axiomatic foundation for regret theory,”Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming.
von Neumann, John, and O. Morgenstern. (1944).Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.
Yaari, Menahem. (1987). “The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk,”Econometrica 55, 95–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden, Peter Wakker, and Nancy Wallace for helpful comments and criticism.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quiggin, J. Regret theory with general choice sets. J Risk Uncertainty 8, 153–165 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065370
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065370