Skip to main content
Log in

Firm growth during infancy

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the post-entry patterns of survival and growth of firms established in Portuguese manufacturing in 1983. Our data suggest the existence of a highly turbulent economy, with a very large number of small firms being created, but a great proportion of new firms disappearing in the first years subsequent to their birth. Survivors, however, grow quite fast and we found that small firms grow faster than their larger counterparts. Moreover, we found that the growth decision of firms is affected by a firm specific component, which is also correlated with firm size. These two effects are oppositely signed and, therefore, estimates that fail to take this firm specific effect into account are likely to be strongly biased towards zero.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. and D. Audretsch, 1989,Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., 1991, ‘New Firm Survival and the Technological Regime’,Review of Economics and Statistics 60(3), 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D. B. and T. Mahmood, 1992, ‘Firm Selection and Industry Evolution: The Post-Entry Performance of New Firms’, Discussion Paper FS IV 92–7, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.

  • Amemiya, T., 1984, ‘Tobit Models: A Survey’,Journal of Econometrics 24, 3–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., 1958, ‘On the Theory of Oligopoly’,Economica 25, August, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., 1959,Business Behavior, Value and Growth, New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., 1962, ‘On the Theory of Expansion of the Firms’,American Economic Review 52, 1078–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M. and R. Hamilton, 1984, ‘Small firms' Seedbed Role and the Concept of Turbulence’,Journal of Industrial Economics 33, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourlakis, C., 1990, ‘Probability of Survival and Firm Growth in Greek Manufacturing Industries’,Paper presented at the 17th EARIE Conference, Lisbon.

  • Contini, B. and R. Revelli, 1989, ‘The Relationship between Firm Growth and Labor Demand’,Small Business Economics 1(4), 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, P. and A. Hughes, 1990, ‘Small Firms, Age, Growth and Survival in the, 1990's’,Paper presented at the 17th EARIE Conference, Lisbon.

  • Dunne, T., M. Roberts and L. Samuelson, 1989, ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 104(4), 671–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., 1987a, ‘Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 95(4), 657–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., 1987b, ‘The Relationship Between Firm Growth, Size, and Age — Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries’,Journal of Industrial Economics 35(4), 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P., 1991,Market Dynamics and Entry, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. and J. Schwalbach (eds.), 1991,Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., 1987, ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the United-States Manufacturing Sector’,Journal of Industrial Economics 35(4), 583–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A., 1978, ‘Specification Tests in Econometrics’,Econometrica 46(6), 1251–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. and D. Morris, 1991,Industrial Economics and Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huighen, R., A. Kleijweg and G. van Leeuwen, 1991, ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in Dutch Manufacturing Estimated on Panel Data’,Research Paper 9105, Research Institute for Small and Medium Sizes Business in the Netherlands.

  • Jovanovic, B., 1982, ‘Selection and Evolution of Industry’,Econometrica 50(2), 649–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M., 1985, ‘Growth, Acquisition Activity and Firm Size — Evidence from the United Kingdom’,Journal of Industrial Economics 33(3), 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loverman, G. and W. Sengenberger, 1991, ‘The Re-emergence of Small-Scale Production: An International Comparison’,Small Business Economics 3(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., 1978, ‘On the Size Distribution of Business Firms’,Bell Journal of Economics 9(3), 508–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G., 1988, ‘Limited Dependent Variable Models Using Panel Data’,Journal of Human Resources 23(3), 307–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, T., 1992, ‘Does the Hazard Rate for New Plants Vary Between Low-and High-Tech Industries?’Small Business Economics 4(3), 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1962, ‘Entry, Gibrat's Law, and the Growth of Firms’,American Economic Review 52(5), 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R., 1963, ‘A Model of the Managerial Enterprise’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 77(2), 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. and P. Portugal, 1993, ‘The Effect of Demand and Technological Conditions on the Life Expectancy of New Firms’, in G. Mussati, A. Fumagalli and M. Vivarelli (eds.),Births and Start-Up of Small Firms, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E., 1959,The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. and B. Kirchhoff, 1989, ‘Formation, Growth and Survival: Small Firm Dynamics in the U.S. Economy’,Small Business Economics 1(1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S., 1974, ‘A New Look at the Growth of Industrial Concentration’,Oxford Economic Papers 26(2), 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. and P. Pashighian, 1962, ‘Firms Size and Rate of Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 70(6), 556–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. and A. Spivak, 1989, ‘Firm Size and Optimal Growth Rates’,European Economic Review 33(1), 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. and G. Wittington, 1975, ‘The Size and Growth of Firms’,Review of Economic Studies 42(1), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. et al., 1987,The Performance of Small Firms: Profits, Jobs and Failures, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., 1992, ‘Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Persistence of Chance: Testing Gibrat's Law with Establishment Data From Lower Saxony, 1978–1989’,Small Business Economics 4(3), 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., 1980, ‘A Heteroskedastic-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity’,Econometrica 48, 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., 1982, ‘Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models’,Econometrica 50(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mata, J. Firm growth during infancy. Small Bus Econ 6, 27–39 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066110

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066110

Keywords

Navigation