Skip to main content
Log in

The adverse impacts of local historic designation: The case of small apartment buildings in Philadelphia

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the sales effects of local historic preservation. Using the hedonic framework our study shows that small historic apartment buildings experienced a 24% reduction in price compared to nonlocally certified properties. Our variable for federal historic districts, however, produced statistically insignificant results. The results suggest that historic control (as practiced in Philadelphia) is confiscatory. The study illustrates an outcome of public regulation that impinges on private property rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asabere, P.K., G. Hachey, and S. Grubaugh. (1989). “Architecture, Historic Zoning, and the Value of Homes,”Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2, 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asabere, P.K., and F.E. Huffman. (1991). “Historic Districts and Land Values,”The Journal of Real Estate Research 6:1 (Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, V.O., and R. Klein. (1988). “The Impact of Historic Districting on Property Values,”Appraisal Journal (April), 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, K.N. (1977). “Tolerance and Condition in Regression Computations,”Journal of American Statistical Association 72, 863–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G., and D. Cox. (1964). “An Analysis of Transformations,”Journal of the American Statistical Association Series B, 26, 211–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G., and P.W. Tidwell. (1962). “Transformations of the Independent Variables,”Technometrics 531–550.

  • Ford, D.A. (1989). “The Effect of Historic District Designation on Single-Family Home Prices,”AREUEA Journal 17:3 (Fall), 353–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P.E. (1984). “Estimation with Correctly Interpreted Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations,”American Economic Review.

  • White, H. (1980). “A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity,”Econometrica 48, 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockard, W.E., and S.D. Hines. (1983). “Historic Zoning Considerations in Neighborhood and District Analysis,”Appraisal Journal (October), 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Trust for Historic Preservation. (1983). Information Sheet No. 35. Washington, D.C.: National Trust for Historical Preservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service. (1991). U.S. Department of Interior, Washington, D.C.,Tax Incentives for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings: Fiscal Year 1990 Analysis February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philadelphia City Planning Commission. (1986).Analysis of Preservation Techniques for Center City Philadelphia October 30.

  • Pindyck, R.S., and D.L. Rubinfeld. (1981).Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, P.V., and C.P. Ahem. (1988). “The Impact of Historic District Designation on Property Values: An Empirical Study,” Unpublished paper, University of Colorado at Denver, December.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asabere, P.K., Huffman, F.E. & Mehdian, S. The adverse impacts of local historic designation: The case of small apartment buildings in Philadelphia. J Real Estate Finan Econ 8, 225–234 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096993

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096993

Key words

Navigation