Skip to main content
Log in

Methylmercury production in flooded soils: A laboratory study

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of soil flooding on methylmercury (MeHg) production was studied by placing humus and peat with water in 40 liter vessels. Total mercury (Tot-Hg), MeHg, nutrients, total organic carbon (TOC) and color were measured in water. Potential mercury methylation and demethylation rates in water and in flooded soils (humus and peat) were measured using radiochemical methods under aerated and non-aerated conditions during a period of 117 days.

In general, the potential methylation in humus and peat were one order of magnitude higher than in the water phase. During the experiment, methylation increased in humus and in peat but decreased in water. Demethylation decreased in all compartments. Anoxis increased methylation in soils but not in the water phase. On the other hand, demethylation was clearly higher in anoxic conditions. Tot-Hg increased more rapidly than MeHg in the water of the vessels, and a more rapid MeHg increase was observed in peat vessels than in humus vessels. Highest concentrations of MeHg (5.42 ng/L peat, 7.98 ng/L humus) were measured in non-aerated vessels.

Water color correlated negatively with methylation in water but positively with MeHg concentrations, indicating that humic substances are the main MeHg carriers but are not active melhylating agents. Methylmercury fluxes to water (3.6–44 ng/m2*d) were of the same order of magnitude as those measured in field experiments in Canada and in a beaver lake in Finland but were notably higher than those fluxes from unflooded catchmets.

The results indicate that increased net methylation in flooded humus and peat soils, especially in anoxic conditions, is the main reason for increased MeHg concentrations in reservoirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, A. and Cumbie, P.: 1977,Bull. Env. Contam. & Tox. 17, 595–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfthan, G., Järvinen, O., Pikkarainen, J. and Verta, M.:1983,Nordic Council Arct. Med. Res. Rep. 35, 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N.: 1989,Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46, 1131–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N. and Fitzgerald, W.: 1988,Anal. Chim. Acta. 208, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N. and Crecelius, E.: 1983,Mar. Chem. 14, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodaly, R. and Hecky, R.: 1979, Post-impoundment increases in fish mercury levels in the Southern Indian Lake Reservoir, Manitoba,Fisheries and Marine Service Manuscript Report 1531, 15 pages.

  • Bodaly, R., Hecky, R. and Fudge, R.: 1984,Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41, 682–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M., Lugo, A. and Brown, S.: 1981,Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furutani, A. and Rudd, J.. 1980,Applied and Environmental Microbiology 40, 770–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecky, R., Bodaly R., Ramsey, D., Ramlal P. and Strange, N.: 1987, Evolution of limnological conditions, microbial methylation of mercury and mercury concentrations in fish in reservoirs of northern Manitoba,Canada-Manitoba Agreement on the Study and Monitoring of Mercury in the Churchill River Diversion, Technical appendices to the summary report 9, 53 pages.

  • Horvat, M., Bloom, N. and Liang, L.: 1993,Anal. Chim. Acta 282: 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T.: 1987, Methylation, demethylation, and bio-accumulation of mercury in lakes and reservoirs of northern Manitoba, with particular reference to effects of environmental changes caused by the Churchill-Nelson River diversion,Canada-Manitoba Agreement on the Study and Monitoring of Mercury in the Churchill River Diversion, Technical appendices to the summary report 8, 58 pages.

  • Lee, Y.-H., Borg, G., Iverfeldt, Å. and Hultberg, H.: 1995. Fluxes and turnover of methylmercury: Mercury pools in forest soils,Trace Substances in the environment, in print.

  • Lodenius, M., Seppänen, A. and Herranen, M.: 1983,Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 19, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskimmin, B., Rudd, J. and Kelly, C.: 1992.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 49, 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilainen, T. and Verta, M. 1994, Mercury methylation and demethylation in aerobic surface waters, submitted toCan. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

  • Matilainen, T., Verta, M., Niemi, M. and Uusi-Rauva, A.: 1991, Specific rates of net methylmercury production in lake sediments,Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 56, 595–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister, J., DiNunzio, J. & Cox, J. 1979, Source and level of mercury in a new impoundment,Journal of American Water Works Association 71, 574–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, K. and Thérien, N.: 1995, Mercury release and transformation from flooded vegetation and soils: experimental evaluation and simulation modelling,Trace Substances in the environment, in print.

  • Mucci, A., Lucotte, M., Montgomery, S., Plourde, Y. and Van Tra, H.: 1994, Mercury remolization from flooded soils in a hydroelectric reservoir of northern Québec, LG-2: results of a soil rsuspension experiment, manuscript.

  • Potter, L., Kidd, D. and Standiford, D.: 1975, Mercury levels in Lake Powell. Bioamplification of mercury in man-made desert reservoir,Environmental Science & Technology 9, 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramlal, P., Rudd, J. and Hecky R.: 1986.Applied and Environmental Microbiology 51, 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, L., Vitt, D. and Bayley, S.: 1990, Growth, production and decomposition dynamics of Sphagnum under natural and experimentally acidified conditions,Ecology 71, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Louis, V., Rudd, J., Kelly, C., Beaty, K., Bloom, N. and Flett, R.: 1994a, Importance of wetlands as sources of methyl mercury to boreal forest ecosystems, submitted toCan. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

  • St. Louis, V., Rudd, J., Kelly, C., Roulet, N., Heyes, A., Beaty, K., Bloom, N. and Flett, R.: 1994b, Mass-Balance budgets of methyl mercury and total mercury in two unperturbed boreal forest wetlands, manuscript.

  • Verta, M., Rekolainen, S. and Kinnunen, K.: 1986, Causes of increased fish mercury levels in Finnish reservoirs,Publications of the Water Research Institute, National Board of Waters, Finland 65, 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verta, M., Matilainen, T., Porvari, P., Niemi, M., Uusi-Rauva, A. and Bloom, N.: 1993, Methylmercury sources in boreal lake ecosystems. Mercury as a global pollutant: Toward intergation and synthesis,Trace Substances in the environment, in print.

  • Webster, J. and Benfield, E.: 1986,Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 567.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porvari, P., Verta, M. Methylmercury production in flooded soils: A laboratory study. Water Air Soil Pollut 80, 765–773 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189728

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189728

Keywords

Navigation