Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual foraging components of harvester ants: movement patterns and seed patch fidelity

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We investigated individual foraging components of the western harvester ant,Pogonomyrmex occidentalis, in the native seed background of a shrub-steppe environment. Our study identified factors affecting foraging movements and seed selection by individual ants. Some assumptions and predictions of central-place foraging theory and a correlated random walk were evaluated for individual foragers. Results showed that ant size was only weakly correlated with the seed sizes harvested; seed size was a more important constraint than a predictor of seed selection. Individual ants spent more time in localized search behavior than traveling between search areas and nests.P. occidentalis foragers encountered seeds randomly with respect to time, and handled a mean of 1.7 seeds/trip. A correlation of increased search effort with greater travel distances was consistent with central-place foraging theory but, contrary to it, search and travel effort were not associated with energetic reward.

Individual ants exhibited fidelity in both search site and native seed species. Spatial analyses of foraging movements showed a highly oriented travel path while running, and an area-restricted path while searching. Searching ants moved in a manner consistent with a correlated random walk. The deterministic component of patch fidelity and the stochastic component of search may override energetic foraging decisions in individualP. occidentalis ants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batschelet, E., 1981.Circular Statistics in Biology. Academic Press, New York, 370 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. A., 1975. Foraging strategies of ants in response to variable food density.Ecology 56:213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briese, D. T. and B. J. Macauley, 1981. Food collection within an ant community in semi-arid Australia, with special reference to seed harvesters.Aust. J. Ecol 6:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. L., 1989. The analysis of angular data in ecological field studies.Ecology 70:1540–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, T. O., 1990.Granivory in a shrub-steppe ecosystem: interactions of harvester ant foraging and native seeds.PhD thesis. Utah State University, Logan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, T. O. and J. A. MacMahon, 1991. Foraging patterns ofPogonomyrmex occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a shrub-steppe ecosystem: the roles of temperature, trunk trails, and seed resources.Environ. Entomol. 20:265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. W., 1978. Experimental tests of the optimal diet in two social insects.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 4:35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J.-L., S. Aron, S. Goss and J. M. Pasteels, 1990. The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the argentine ant.J. Insect Behav. 3:159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vita, J., 1979. Mechanisms of interference and foraging among colonies of the harvester antPogonomyrmex californiens in the Mojave Desert.Ecology 60:729–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, T. A., 1970.Foraging behavior of the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis, (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Kansas.PhD thesis. Kansas State University, Manhattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewell, J. H., 1988. Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants,Pogonomyrmex occidentalis.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22:401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewell, J. H., 1990. Directional fidelity as a foraging constraint in the western harvester ant,Pogonomyrmex occidentalis.Oecologia 82:45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fresneau, D., 1985. Individual foraging and path fidelity in a ponerine ant.Ins. Soc. 32:109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M., 1984. Species-specific patterns in the social activities of harvester ant colonies (Pogonomyrmex)Ins. Soc. 31:74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, M. and U. Maschwitz, 1985. Foraging strategies and recruitment behaviour in the European harveser antMessor rufitarsis (F.).Oecologia (Berl.) 68:45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, R. D. and N. G. Maroudas, 1985. Central place foraging by an ant (Cataglyphis bicolor Fab.): a model of searching.Anim. Behav. 33:916–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers, J. M., 1981. Reliability theory and foraging by ants.J. theor. Biol. 89:175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. J., 1985. Harvester ant foraging and plant species distribution in annual grassland.Oecologia (Berl.) 67:519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., 1976. Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants,Pogonomyrmex.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1:1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson, 1970. Recruitment trails in the harvester antPogonomyrmex badius.Psyche 77:385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson, 1990.The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 732 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jander, R., 1982. Random and systematic search in foraging insects. In:Biology of Social Insects (M. D. Breed, C. D. Michener and H. E. Evans, Eds.), Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, C. D. and S. D. Porter, 1982. Foraging behavior ofPogonomyrmex owyheei in southeast Idaho.Environ. Entomol.11:381–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. M. and N. Shigesada, 1983. Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk.Oecologia (Berl.) 56:234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelrick, M. I., J. A. MacMahon, R. R. Parmenter and D. V. Sisson, 1986. Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: the relationships of seed attributes and seed use.Oecologia (Berl.) 68:327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon, J. A. and F. H. Wagner, 1985. The Mojave, Sonoran and Chihuahuan Deserts of North America. In:Hot Deserts and Arid Shrublands, Vol. 12A, Ecosystems of the World (M. Evenari and I. Noy-Meir, Eds.), Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 105–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, C. E. and M. L. Cain, 1989. Analyzing discrete movement data as a correlated random walk.Ecology 70:383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onoyama, K. and T. Abe, 1982. Foraging behavior of the harvester antMessor aciculatus in relation to the amount and distribution of food.Jap. J. Ecol. 32:383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G. H. and N. E. Pearson, 1979. On the theory of central place foraging. In:Analysis of Ecological Systems (D. J. Horn, G. R. Stairs and R. D. Mitchells, Eds.), Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp. 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G. F. and E. O. Wilson, 1978.Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 352 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter, R. R. and J. A. MacMahon, 1983. Factors determining the abundance and distribution of rodents in a shrub-steppe ecosystem: the role of shrubs.Oecologia (Berl.) 59:145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels, J. M. and J.-L. Deneubourg, Eds. 1987.From Individual to Collective Behavior in Social Insects. Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel, 433pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. V. and O. J. Reichman, 1987. Distribution of seeds in Sonoran Desert soils: implications for heteromyid rodent foraging.Ecology 68:1797–1811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes Lopez, J. L., 1987. Optimal foraging in seed-harvester ants: computer-aided simulation.Ecology 68:1630–1633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing, S. W., 1981. Foraging specializations of individual seed-harvester ants.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.9:149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing, S. W., 1982. Foraging velocity of seed-harvester antsVeromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Environ. Entomol. 11:905–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing, S. W. and G. B. Pollock, 1984. Worker size variability and foraging efficiency inVeromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15:121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L. E., 1974. Foraging activity of the western harvester ant in the shortgrass plains ecosystem.Environ. Entomol 3:420–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, R., 1971. Route fidelity, visual memory and recruitment behaviour in foraging wood ants of the genusFormica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Acta Zool. Fenn. 133:1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf, 1981.Biometry, 2nd Ed. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, 859pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W. and J. R. Krebs, 1986.Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 247 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F., 1977. Foraging behavior of ants: experiments with two species of myrmecine ants.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2:147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello, J. F. A., 1988. Variation in foraging behavior among workers of the antFormica schaufussi: ecological correlates of search behavior and the modification of search pattern. In:Interindividual Behavioral Variability in Social Insects (R. L. Jeanne, Ed.), Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello, J. F. A., 1989. Foraging strategies of ants.Ann. Rev. Entomol. 34:191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R., 1987. Spatial organization of foraging behavior in individually searching desert ants,Cataglyphis (Sahara Desert) andOcymyrmex (Namib Desert). In:From Individual to Collective Behavior in Social Insects (J. M. Pasteels and J. L. Deneubourg, Eds.), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp. 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R., R. D. Harkness and P. Schmid-Hempel, 1983.Foraging strategies in individually searching ants Cataglyphis bicolor (Hym.: Formicidae). Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 73 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. T. O. Crist

    Present address: Department of Biology, Colorado State University, 80523, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Ecology Center, Utah State University, UT84322-5305, Logan, USA

    T. O. Crist & J. A. MacMahon

Authors
  1. T. O. Crist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. A. MacMahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crist, T.O., MacMahon, J.A. Individual foraging components of harvester ants: movement patterns and seed patch fidelity. Ins. Soc 38, 379–396 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241873

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241873

Key words

Search

Navigation